>>I have somehow managed to glue
>>it 3 mm off centre
>
>3mm is less than 1/8". As long as the tail is square with the wing, I think
>you'll be ok.
I think Dr.1 is right.
Leave it for now, finish everything else, test fly it. THEN if you
don't like how it handles, start in with the cut and paste stuff.
Don't let anybody get near your empennage with a micrometer.
Anybody tries, give 'em a good swift kick in their own
tail feathers.
Marty
Jonnie Chapman - 08 Oct 2003 20:08 GMT
This is good news!!! I will leave it... but just one more query, how
will it handle? if it is not correct, My flying skills are not the
best and might find it hard to differentiate between a broken plane or
a bad pilot..
Thanks for your help though
Cheers JOnnie
MJC - 08 Oct 2003 21:32 GMT
Some of the SPAD designs call for the vertical stab to be bolted onto
one side of the square "fuse" which means that the stab is about 5/8" off of
center from the get-to. And they fly fine.
Quit 'yer frettin'. Go fly.
MJC
> This is good news!!! I will leave it... but just one more query, how
> will it handle? if it is not correct, My flying skills are not the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Cheers JOnnie
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 08 Oct 2003 22:03 GMT
>This is good news!!! I will leave it... but just one more query, how
>will it handle? if it is not correct, My flying skills are not the
>best and might find it hard to differentiate between a broken plane or
>a bad pilot..
I can't predict handling from reading specs.
I haven't flown the plane in question.
If you find it twisting toward the longer stab, that might be
a reason to cut and re-glue.
If it flies about like other things you've flown, then it's
a reason not to bother fixing it.
I've flown a lot of crooked planes, my own and others.
Of course they're not suitable for pattern competition,
but it's amazing how well they fly in spite of the
visible kinks in construction.
Marty
John R. Agnew - 08 Oct 2003 20:22 GMT
> >>I have somehow managed to glue
> >>it 3 mm off centre
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Marty
If I did that I would be pretty pleased with myself. Gee, only 3 mm off!
> 3mm is less than 1/8". As long as the tail is square with the wing, I think
> you'll be ok.
Heck, even if the surface ISN'T perfectly square with the wing, you'll
be okay. I have a plane with the tail surfaces canted a good 5 degrees
off to the right, and it flies perfectly. It's a coroplast fuselage
that decided it wanted to have a twist in it from front to back...
Didn't seem to matter much.
The Natural Philosopher - 08 Oct 2003 22:39 GMT
>>3mm is less than 1/8". As long as the tail is square with the wing, I think
>>you'll be ok.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> that decided it wanted to have a twist in it from front to back...
> Didn't seem to matter much.
They do tend to screw out of loops a bit tho.
But if you are a crap pliot, you won't notice anyway.
dgamblin@nbnet.nb.ca - 09 Oct 2003 01:29 GMT
Hmmmm...
Ah... if not covered yet... add 3 mm to the short side? (or
sand 3 mm of the long side?) :)
If not in a scale contest...grin a lot and fly it.. :(
Dave
>>>3mm is less than 1/8". As long as the tail is square with the wing, I think
>>>you'll be ok.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>But if you are a crap pliot, you won't notice anyway.