>>The Right thrust acts in relation to the propeller thrust, regardless of
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> That's what I thought!
I didn't, because frankly that statement makes no sense anyway.
IF you have dihedral, then anything that introduces a yaw, will end up
rolling the model.
Right thrust works to counteract power dependent rolloing moments via
dihedral. Right thrust works upise down - as does rudder, because when
upside dwon teh wings have ANHEDRAL if you like. To get an invrted
rudder only model to turn left, you do indeed use LEFT rudder, which
doesn't turn the plane INTO the desired bank, it turns it OUT, but the
(anhedral) rolls the plane in the OPPOSITE direction to the yaw, and if
you then take the rudder off, and apply some 'down' elevator, you can
turn your plane to the left...a most unnatural looking manouver to be
sure, but thtas how it works..
If you have no dihedral, then right thrust is going to simply make your
model yaw, and not actually turn it right.
IF you have sweepback, and no dihedral, then the effect is to always
roll in the direction of the yaw. So under these circumstances the right
thrust will roll the model to the right , right way up, and to the left,
when inverted. Its no surprise then that pattern models have no right
thrust and slightly sweptback wings, typically. This makes them behave
the same way either way up, and any propwash/torque effects are taken
care of by aileron trim, and, with teh ailerons inboard near the
propwash, the work under low airspeed conditions as well.
Sidethrust IMHO is an ugly way to get a scale model or trainer to track
straight when you haven't got a computer mixer. On a neutrally stable
aerobatoic model it shouldn't be necessary.
Dan Thomas - 05 Nov 2003 01:46 GMT
> >>The Right thrust acts in relation to the propeller thrust, regardless of
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> If you have no dihedral, then right thrust is going to simply make your
> model yaw, and not actually turn it right.
Now, there is an aerobatic low-wing homebuilt aircraft known
as the Jurca Scirocco that has NO dihedral. The designer felt that
dihedral was not always necessary for stability. This airplane will
roll in the proper direction when rudder is applied, even without
dihedral, partly because the fuselage blanks a bit of the inside wing
as a skid begins. Many high-wing airplanes have no dihedral either,
and behave perfectly normally, banking when yaw is introduced. The
Bede BD-4 is one. All of the Cessna high-wingers have only a degree or
so, and still bank with yaw.
There are other factors that will make a wingtip rise if the wing
is yawed a bit. I believe a minimizing of the tip vortex on the
leading tip has something to do with it.
Our first RC was a powered two-axis sailplane, with plenty of
dihedral. It banked normally using rudder whether right side up or
upside down, though it was difficult to keep it inverted.
In full-scale training, you will learn that the turn is
accomplished using bank angle, to change the lift vector from vertical
to toward the centre of the turn. The rudder is used ONLY to eliminate
the adverse yaw created in most airplanes as the downgoing aileron on
the outside wing creates more drag than the upgoing aileron and pulls
the nose a bit away from the desired turn direction. Rudder is a
coordinating device, not a turning device. Using rudder to turn
creates a skid, which at low speeds can result in an uncoordinated
stall and a spin.
Dan