Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / November 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

AMA EC Action on Turbine Operating rules

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Red Scholefield - 17 Nov 2003 02:22 GMT
FYI

> -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fw: EC Conference Call Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 8:56:19 -0600 From:
"sfrank69" Original sender's name:    Richard Hanson Original sender's
address: richh@ama10.org

To All Interested Parties,

The AMA Executive Council has just completed its emergency Council meeting
(Conference Call) regarding the new Turbine Operating rules.

After much discussion it was decided to suspend implementation of the new
rules pending further input on the engine and airframe requirements for
turbine powered aircraft. For risk management purposes, the EC's primary
focus is on limiting the maximum speed of these aircraft to no more than 200
mph. The AMA Safety Committee and the turbine community will be asked for
input and suggestions on methodologies that ensure definitive compliance
with the speed limitation. Input will also be solicited regarding the
guidelines for fuel quantity and engine thrust limitations.

The specific content of the motion and commentary should be posted to the
AMA Web page by close of business Monday, 11/17.

For clarification... The Executive Council motion passed 11/01/2003 set the
implementation date for the new Turbine Operating rules at January 1, 2004.
The effect of the EC motion this evening leaves the current (old) turbine
rules in place until further action by the EC.

I wish to thank those of you who have express your interest and concern, and
I would also like to express my sincere appreciation for your patience in
this matter. Any questions or input regarding these issues should be
forwarded to AMA HQs Attn: the AMA Safety Committee.

Rich Hanson, VP AMA District X

*********
--
Red Scholefield
AMA 951 Dist. V
Leader Member/CD
Icrashrc - 17 Nov 2003 09:30 GMT
So....at 200mph no one will get hurt. But at 201mph.............
Makes sense to me!
-------------------------------------------------------------

> For risk management purposes, the EC's primary
>focus is on limiting the maximum speed of these aircraft to no more than 200
>mph. The AMA Safety Committee and the turbine community will be asked for
>input and suggestions on methodologies that ensure definitive compliance
>with the speed limitation.
remove my-wife to reply   :-)
Normen Strobel - 17 Nov 2003 13:40 GMT
Nobody follows the rules anyways.  When going to a jet rally the announcer
was reading off the radar gun display as 199.999 miles per hour.

Signature

Normen Strobel
nstrobel@zoominternet.nospam.net

> So....at 200mph no one will get hurt. But at 201mph.............
> Makes sense to me!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >with the speed limitation.
> remove my-wife to reply   :-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.