My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from the
crappy foam type you get in the box to some rubber 3 1/4" tires. The plane
was never very nose heavy. The wheels were enough to shift the cg aft and
make the plane unflyable. Unfortunately I didn't realize this until I was in
the air... So remember:::: After making alterations to your plane, always
recheck your cg... I learned the hard way... For reference sake the plane
was a high wing trainer 40, tricycle gear.
Stefan Pettersen - 23 Nov 2003 22:40 GMT
That's pretty big tires for a 40 size isn't it?
I have a 40-size Zero with 2" tires. Maybe smaller would be better, but your
CG must have been pretty close to catastrophe anyway I wold think.
Maybe I'm wrong... Lesson learned anyway
Stefan
| My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from the
| crappy foam type you get in the box to some rubber 3 1/4" tires. The plane
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
| recheck your cg... I learned the hard way... For reference sake the plane
| was a high wing trainer 40, tricycle gear.
daytripper - 24 Nov 2003 00:29 GMT
>| My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from
>the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>| recheck your cg... I learned the hard way... For reference sake the plane
>| was a high wing trainer 40, tricycle gear.
>That's pretty big tires for a 40 size isn't it?
>I have a 40-size Zero with 2" tires. Maybe smaller would be better, but your
>CG must have been pretty close to catastrophe anyway I wold think.
>Maybe I'm wrong... Lesson learned anyway
If you're flying off the typical grass field it almost demands 3" or larger
tires for a 40-size model...
/daytripper
daytripper - 24 Nov 2003 00:28 GMT
>My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from the
>crappy foam type you get in the box to some rubber 3 1/4" tires. The plane
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>recheck your cg... I learned the hard way... For reference sake the plane
>was a high wing trainer 40, tricycle gear.
Hmm...I'd have thought the wheels should be located *very* near the CG so
there wouldn't be a profound effect when changing from foam to rubber...
/daytripper
Jet Red - 24 Nov 2003 01:13 GMT
So I thought also... but after I thought about it... overall I had added
about 3-4 oz worth of tire 8 inches aft of the cg (wing chord about 11
inches.) The plane was weighted with a slightly light nose (aft cg but
within spec) before the wheel changeout... the wheels were enough to cause a
cg problem... and they don't flight well that way... believe you me...
> >My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from the
> >crappy foam type you get in the box to some rubber 3 1/4" tires. The plane
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> /daytripper
dgamblin@nbnet.nb.ca - 24 Nov 2003 01:39 GMT
8 Inches _ AFT_ OF THE CG????
How in the world do you rotate this sucker on take off???
Dave
>So I thought also... but after I thought about it... overall I had added
>about 3-4 oz worth of tire 8 inches aft of the cg (wing chord about 11
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
>> /daytripper
Six_O'Clock_High - 24 Nov 2003 05:19 GMT
With a BIG elevator and lots of throw! Oh, yeah and a healty elevator
servo!
> 8 Inches _ AFT_ OF THE CG????
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> >>
> >> /daytripper
jflongworth - 24 Nov 2003 11:51 GMT
I would think that if you also replaced the nose wheel (which you didn't
mention), the difference wouldn't be that great since its well ahead of the
CG. Why would you fly a trainer that "was never slightly nose heavy".
Rearward CG's increase pitch sensitivity but you should still be able to
bring the plane back unless it snapped on take-off. If so, this is likely a
result of the rearward CG. Tail heavy planes are also difficult to flare on
landing. I'm curious since like other posters, I have difficulty believing
the effect of the tires. Why worry about foam tires with a trainer? You are
right though that bigger tires are preferable off grass but not essential if
you have sufficient power.
> My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from the
> crappy foam type you get in the box to some rubber 3 1/4" tires. The plane
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> recheck your cg... I learned the hard way... For reference sake the plane
> was a high wing trainer 40, tricycle gear.
Bob Adkins - 24 Nov 2003 15:32 GMT
>My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from the
>crappy foam type you get in the box to some rubber 3 1/4" tires. The plane
Heh heh heh. I throw away the rubber boat anchors and buy light foam wheels.
Sorry for your crash.
Bob
arnereil - 24 Nov 2003 16:08 GMT
On a similar topic, i was flying my venture 60, and decided to clip my
neckstrap to the trx..... the off/on switch in right below the peg on the
trx, and when i clipped in (by feel, not looking), i accidentally flipped
the trx switch to off... the plane went in with extensive damage. It is now
on the building board (or rebuilding board in this case). A very annoying
lesson learned. The ground was soft, and the engine completely buried in
mud. the fuse has multiple cracks in the ply..... engine disassembled after
washing off with water.... completely blown out with compressed air after
gas wash, and oiled..... fuse stripped back to the tail, and working on one
crack at a time. Going to take a week or so to get it back in shape.... It
wasn't part of my weekly plan... and it was my best flyer, having evolved
from a hobbico 60 trainer....
.
Arne, CT, USA
.
> >My lesson learned for others not to follow: I changed out my tires from the
> >crappy foam type you get in the box to some rubber 3 1/4" tires. The plane
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Bob
Stefan Pettersen - 24 Nov 2003 19:43 GMT
Remotes should have a windows-style box come up.
"Are you sure you wan't to shut down?"
Hehe...
| On a similar topic, i was flying my venture 60, and decided to clip my
| neckstrap to the trx..... the off/on switch in right below the peg on the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
| >
| > Bob
Elmshoot - 24 Nov 2003 19:59 GMT
Arne,
I did the same thing in 1977 at a glider contest when I had my assistant hook
my neck strap onto the TX following launch.
he turned the TX off and I crashed a perfectly good glider it was neutraly
stable so it just dove straight in.
An old lesson learned when your plane quits responding is to look down then
reach down and turn the TX Off then on.
I have saved at least 3 planes in my 35 years of flying by doing that. 2 times
it was with computer radios that had got a "hair ball stuck in its CPU."
Sparky
>On a similar topic, i was flying my venture 60, and decided to clip my
>neckstrap to the trx..... the off/on switch in right below the peg on the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>
>> Bob
Matthew P. Cummings - 25 Nov 2003 03:25 GMT
> the air... So remember:::: After making alterations to your plane, always
> recheck your cg... I learned the hard way... For reference sake the plane
> was a high wing trainer 40, tricycle gear.
I agree that it's a good idea to recheck CG on changes. I have a hard
time believing the tires did this however. The mains are close to the CG,
certainly closer than the 8 inches you thought it was behind. My best
guess is that your CG was way off to begin with. How did it go in?
In any event, there's the old theory that a tailheavy plane flies once.
That's true to an extent, it depends on the skill level of the pilot
flying it.
I once flew a trainer for somebody else who hollered for help and his
plane was so far to the rear that once you pulled power the nose jumped
up, landing was done under power and much down elevator. You could not
pull power or the plane would nose up and you couldn't push it down with
elevator, it took both. The lesson I'm imparting to you is that if this
happens again remember throttle and down elevator, and also consider a
steep turn if necessary. Don't stall it, I flew my Duraplane once with a
CG well back and stalled it, first time I ever seen a perfectly flat spin,
I mean level, you could put a bubble level on it. It took about a hundred
feet to recover, but then I was doing it for fun since I was done using it
for the students that day and felt like a challenge.
By the way, it's funny in a way but the reason the CG on that guys plane
was so far to the rear wasn't his fault. His fuel tank leaked big time
and during a climb the fuel sloshed to the rear, the bulkheads held it
there in normal flight. I didn't figure it out until I picked up the
plane and noticed the fuel dripping out from the tail. It was one of the
GP tanks famous for busting up and leaking back several years ago.