Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / February 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tower 46

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CG - 19 Feb 2004 17:57 GMT
I know this has been discussed already, but there's something not right
here.

I got no 418 Tower 46 engine off the line, problems and all. I threw it in a
box after I just couldn't get it tuned and it crashed a plane of mine. Then
I saw the posts on how to fix the stupid thing, so I dug it up, cleaned it
out, sealed every single place with gasket sealer, and guess what - the
STUPID thing idles with the throttle fully closed!!!!!!!

Damn it.  Do I throw this thing away for good or is there something I'm
missing??

OS rules.

Cornelis
Dr1Driver - 19 Feb 2004 18:08 GMT
> the
>STUPID thing idles with the throttle fully closed!!!!!!!

I got a Webra Speed .40 that does that.  It it idles well, transitions well,
and runs at full throttle well; don't worry about it.  Put your finger over the
exhaust to stop it.
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
Dan Thompson - 19 Feb 2004 18:26 GMT
>I got no 418 Tower 46 engine off the line, problems and all. I threw it in a
>box after I just couldn't get it tuned and it crashed a plane of mine. Then
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>OS rules.

Yep, what you missed was all those engines in the past that we were lucky to
get to idle. Now when one can't cut it off, they get iritated. I have three
Tower 75's and two 46's and I am tickled how well they idle. I'll give up that
cutting off for a reliable and slow idle. A rag in the prob at 2K stops it very
reliably.

Dan  Thompson  (AMA 32873,  EAA 60974, WB4GUK, GROL)
remove POST in address for email
Ted Campanelli - 19 Feb 2004 18:40 GMT
On 2/19/2004 12:57 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:

DO NOT, I REPEAT, DO NOT THROW ANYTHING IN THE PROP OF A RUNNING
ENGINE!!!  This is hazardous to EVERYONE in the immediate area.

Tower engines are well known for their inability to not shut off with
the transmitter.  Your best bet is to either:  1st choice,  pinch the
fuel line closed (if accessible); 2nd choice, put your finger over the
exhaust (wear a glove or use a cloth to avoid a burn); 3rd choice, shut
the high speed needle valve, 4th choice, replace the front bearing with
a sealed bearing.

The Tower engines are a decent engine - plenty of power for their size.
 They do have some "idiosyncrasies", as you have found out.

> I know this has been discussed already, but there's something not right
> here.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Cornelis
Paul McIntosh - 19 Feb 2004 19:28 GMT
I am not even sure a sealed bearing wil work.  This is the same crankcase
and crankshaft used on the Raptor and that engine never seemed to have the
same problem.  I would look at the spiral slot on the barrel to see if it is
still slightly exposed when the carb is completely shut.

> On 2/19/2004 12:57 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
> great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> >
> > Cornelis
Dr1Driver - 19 Feb 2004 19:39 GMT
>DO NOT, I REPEAT, DO NOT THROW ANYTHING IN THE PROP OF A RUNNING
>ENGINE!!!

Thank you, Ted!  This act is almost as stupid as stopping it with the sole of
your shoe.  

Not even considering the danger to yourself and onlookers, the OOB prop might
literally tear the engine off the mount, or shake the plane apart.  

Yes, I know there will be many of you who "have done this for ??? years without
an accident."  To you I say...IT'S STILL STUPID!
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
C.O.Jones - 20 Feb 2004 15:28 GMT
> >DO NOT, I REPEAT, DO NOT THROW ANYTHING IN THE PROP OF A RUNNING
> >ENGINE!!!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"

Yep Dr.  You're right.  The rag ranks right up there with placing a finger
extremely close to the back side of that spinning prop.  Relying of course
on the prop to knock away the finger should it get too close.  But you still
tempt fate anyway.  And I've know people who have been bit good by such a
stunt.

Stupid is as Stupid does!

Chuck
Paul McIntosh - 19 Feb 2004 19:29 GMT
If you want to try a sealed front bearing, give me your address and I'll
send you one free.  Then report back if it helps.

> I know this has been discussed already, but there's something not right
> here.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Cornelis
jeffm - 19 Feb 2004 21:49 GMT
I have a TH .75 and it does the same thing, can not get it to cut off with
barrell completely closed. But it runs very well. I just pinch the fuel line,
throttle it up a tad then shuts right off. I lkke the engine, the only other
engine i have other then the TH is a OS .40 LA and I was constantly tinkering
with it to keep it running well, the TH i never have to fool with it at all,
starts right up and runs all day long without a hiccup!....

>If you want to try a sealed front bearing, give me your address and I'll
>send you one free.  Then report back if it helps.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> Cornelis
GaijinGig - 19 Feb 2004 23:03 GMT
Hello all,
 I don't understand  with ALL  the reliable  engines  out there  and
for only a few dollars more..  why go the tower routine?  I'm still
new to this hobby  and have been lurking around here for a little
while   even i know to stay away  from tower anything......   guys at
my field AND here -most of the people i know  don't mess with that
stuff...  now for all i know  OS(what i use)  is a OS with the tower
name  slapped on it....and naturally  some of you  will say that  they
have never had a problem  with a tower engine  - well to  you  I say
your lucky..  I know of too many folks who say they are  not worth the
money
I'm not taking  chances...
gig

>I know this has been discussed already, but there's something not right
>here.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Cornelis
Ted Campanelli - 20 Feb 2004 00:51 GMT
On 2/19/2004 6:03 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:

The last I heard, Tower engines were made by GMS, but used a different
carb.  I don't know if the GMS has the shutdown problem or not.  Perhaps
Paul McIntosh can let us know - he is very familiar with the GMS line.

For a GOOD, RELIABLE, INEXPENSIVE engine, take a look at the Thunder
Tiger.  I have a Pro 46 and a Pro 1.20.  Once you break them in they are
great.  They do take a little longer to break in than an OS though.

>  Hello all,
>   I don't understand  with ALL  the reliable  engines  out there  and
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>
>>Cornelis
Paul McIntosh - 20 Feb 2004 07:22 GMT
The Tower ball bearing engines are indeed made by GMS.  It also appears that
the newer, larger Tower engines may be Supertigres.  They are using
different castings than the GMS line.

I have heard reports that some GMS engines will not shut off but I have not
experienced it myself.  I have run a couple dozen GMS engines of various
sizes.

> On 2/19/2004 6:03 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
> great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> >>
> >>Cornelis
Morris Lee - 20 Feb 2004 13:34 GMT
I have a TT Pro 46 and haven't had any problems with it.  I bought a GMS 47,
and although it hasn't been in the air yet, it kept idling with the throttle
shut off until I richened the idle needle a touch.  It now dies about 15
seconds after the throttle is closed.

Morris

> I have heard reports that some GMS engines will not shut off but I have not
> experienced it myself.  I have run a couple dozen GMS engines of various
> sizes.
>
> > On 2/19/2004 6:03 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
> > great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:

> > For a GOOD, RELIABLE, INEXPENSIVE engine, take a look at the Thunder
> > Tiger.
Pete Kerezman - 20 Feb 2004 16:06 GMT
>I have heard reports that some GMS engines will not shut off but I have not
>experienced it myself.  I have run a couple dozen GMS engines of various
>sizes.

 My .47 didn't shut down at idle until I tightened the hex nut on the
needle assembly.  No big deal.

Texas Pete
AMA 59376
Fubar of The HillPeople - 20 Feb 2004 16:36 GMT
One of the best running engines I own is a GMS .76 ringed. It does seem to
react a bit to changing humidity/temp (did one day at least), but it screams
when I want it to, purrs in the mid range, will idle forever, transitions
instantly, and, importantly for this thread, shuts off instantly with a flip
of the tx switch.
Will probably put it on my Killer Kaos whenever I finally get around to
building it.

Signature

Dan
KE6ERB
AMA605992
I've heard the screams of the vegetables...
http://fubar1.freeservers.com

> The Tower ball bearing engines are indeed made by GMS.  It also appears that
> the newer, larger Tower engines may be Supertigres.  They are using
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> > >>
> > >>Cornelis
Paul McIntosh - 20 Feb 2004 18:24 GMT
The GMS ringed engines are some of the best around.  They are the first I
ever owned that would idle reliably under 2K right out of the box.

> One of the best running engines I own is a GMS .76 ringed. It does seem to
> react a bit to changing humidity/temp (did one day at least), but it screams
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> > > >>
> > > >>Cornelis
Fubar of The HillPeople - 20 Feb 2004 18:57 GMT
Ya got THAT right!
Speaking of GMS engines, you sell bearing sets for them if I recall? I have
a .32 that I need to replace the bearings in due to faulty installation.
Mine.

Signature

Dan
KE6ERB
AMA605992
I've heard the screams of the vegetables...
http://fubar1.freeservers.com

> The GMS ringed engines are some of the best around.  They are the first I
> ever owned that would idle reliably under 2K right out of the box.
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Cornelis
Paul McIntosh - 21 Feb 2004 10:16 GMT
Fubar,

I have the steel bearings in stock.  I am waiting for more 6901 ceramic rear
bearings to arrive.

> Ya got THAT right!
> Speaking of GMS engines, you sell bearing sets for them if I recall? I have
[quoted text clipped - 104 lines]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Cornelis
Fubar of The HillPeople - 21 Feb 2004 22:52 GMT
Good deal.
Will get in touch with you soon. I think the steel bearings will be fine for
my needs.
Thanks!

Signature

Dan
KE6ERB
AMA605992
I've heard the screams of the vegetables...
http://fubar1.freeservers.com

> Fubar,
>
[quoted text clipped - 123 lines]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>Cornelis
Jim Lilly - 20 Feb 2004 22:15 GMT
Paul,

> GMS engines

Any background info on GMS the company?

Who ~is~ 'GMS', where are they made, how long they been around, etc???
Their web site says little....  
http://www.mecoa.com/gms/
http://www.bestrc.com/gms/index.html
http://www.gmsengines.com/

I got a used GMS 2000 - .47 off e-bay. Runs fair, has LOADS of power (
far more than a TH .46 I have), but cuts out/dies/runs hot even set
rich. Former owner had put JB Weld around base of carb:-(   Air leaks?
Crappy carb?
--

    Jim L.
    https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
    Using - Virtual Access(OLR), ZAP 4.5, & WinXP Pro w/SP1
Paul McIntosh - 20 Feb 2004 23:08 GMT
GMS has been around for well over 15 years that I am aware of.  They
originally just rebadged ASPs but then Jim Goad (Indy RC) got together with
a couple others over there and designed the next generation.  Those were
really good engined at the time but never really sold well.  Kinda like
early Magnums.

The newest of the GMS line are VERY good engines and well worth the money.
People who bought the Raptor found out just how good they could be.
Unfortunately, Tower made it part of their contract with GMS to not sell
that engine to anyone.  At least, this is what I was told when I attempted
to import lots of them.

Although I am no longer selling engines, I still have several GMS sizes on
my shelf waiting for suitable airframes.

> Paul,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>      https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
>      Using - Virtual Access(OLR), ZAP 4.5, & WinXP Pro w/SP1
Jim Lilly - 20 Feb 2004 23:38 GMT
Paul,

> The newest of the GMS line are VERY good engines and well worth the money.

Hmm, hopefully the brand new one I just ordered for my Ultra Stik 40, will
be better than the used one I described above/below.

> I got a used GMS 2000 - .47 off e-bay. Runs fair, has LOADS of power (
> far more than a TH .46 I have), but cuts out/dies/runs hot even set
> rich. Former owner had put JB Weld around base of carb:-(   Air leaks?
> Crappy carb?

I might try fixes on the used GMS .47 described at
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/TipsTricksLinks/tip_gms.htm
--

    Jim L.
    https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
    Using - Virtual Access(OLR), ZAP 4.5, & WinXP Pro w/SP1
Paul McIntosh - 21 Feb 2004 10:31 GMT
One thing to note about GMS engines is that they run just as well on 5%
nitro as 10%.  If you want to run 10-15% nitro, add one more head shim.
Also, this engine is very happy with a 10X6 but easily pulls an 11X6 0r
12X5.

> Paul,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>      https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
>      Using - Virtual Access(OLR), ZAP 4.5, & WinXP Pro w/SP1
MK - 21 Feb 2004 14:47 GMT
air leaks, maybe back plate or head
mk
> Paul,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>      https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
>      Using - Virtual Access(OLR), ZAP 4.5, & WinXP Pro w/SP1
Dr1Driver - 20 Feb 2004 02:33 GMT
> I don't understand  with ALL  the reliable  engines  out there  and
>for only a few dollars more..  why go the tower routine?

That's a legitimate question.  Over the years I've seen countless modelers
buying low-priced stuff, only to have to replace it when it wears out or cannot
be made to perform.  Let's not be penny-wise and pound-foolish.  Buy PROVEN,
GOOD equipment that will last you many years, and give you many hours of
pleasure, rather than tinkering and frustration.
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
CG - 20 Feb 2004 09:01 GMT
Amen to that. As I said, OS rules.

And it really does. I've had a LOT of OS engines over the years, and I've
never had problems with a single one. The extra $$'s are well worth it.

> > I don't understand  with ALL  the reliable  engines  out there  and
> >for only a few dollars more..  why go the tower routine?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"
MK - 21 Feb 2004 14:50 GMT
if money is no object, Webra kicks OS's tail.
Well, my speed 50 is great anyway.
mk
> > I don't understand  with ALL  the reliable  engines  out there  and
> >for only a few dollars more..  why go the tower routine?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"
Paul McIntosh - 25 Feb 2004 07:59 GMT
So, when a new product comes out you just ignore it?  When does it become
"proven" if it is not used?

> > I don't understand  with ALL  the reliable  engines  out there  and
> >for only a few dollars more..  why go the tower routine?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.