So Red, what do 'ya think; will existing radios be able to be converted to
spread spectrum or are all those high-dollar radios in use going to become
obselete overnight when SS happens?
MJC
> >It is simply, finally
> >being implemented in R/C. About time too!
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Fred
Paul McIntosh - 23 Feb 2004 19:30 GMT
My guess is that the modules will be replaceable. Everyone with "standard"
radios will be out of luck. I also suspect a rather long phase in-out
period to allow the older sets to be either converted or used long enough
that the sting of replacement won't be so bad.
> So Red, what do 'ya think; will existing radios be able to be converted to
> spread spectrum or are all those high-dollar radios in use going to become
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> > Fred
RedFred1 - 23 Feb 2004 19:51 GMT
>My guess is that the modules will be replaceable. Everyone with "standard"
>radios will be out of luck. I also suspect a rather long phase in-out
>period to allow the older sets to be either converted or used long enough
>that the sting of replacement won't be so bad.
That is always the issue with introducing new technology. IMHO - I do believe
that when this issue comes to the forefront, that the FCC will be happy to help
us! I think there is enough demand for our current frequency allotment by other
interested parties that converting into the 900mhz or other currently used
spread spectrum bands will look like a win/win solution to them. They have
already allowed the Hams to experiment with spread spectrum data transmission
on certain bands.
All I can say is that it will get interesting!
Fred
Doug McLaren - 23 Feb 2004 23:15 GMT
| So Red, what do 'ya think; will existing radios be able to be converted to
| spread spectrum or are all those high-dollar radios in use going to become
| obselete overnight when SS happens?
As mentioned by another poster, radios with modules will probably be
changable by just replacing the module.
As for other radios being obsolete, no. We can't just start using
spread spectrum on 72 mhz -- if people do start switching to spread
spectrum, they'll need to use another frequency range. So radios on
72 mhz will keep working and will be just as good as they are today
... as long as the spectrum isn't sold to the highest bidder. Spread
spectrum does play reasonably nice with other types of radio
emissions, but even the perception of causing problems would be bad.
I'm not sure if 900, 2400 or 5800 mhz is the answer, however. The
power limits on these bands will severely limit the range usable by a
spread-spectrum system. That, and these bands are full of junk.
Spread spectrum does tend to ignore noise, even if the noise isn't
spread spectrum itself, but the noise will reduce performance. Your
plane won't crash (unless the whole band is saturated) but response
speed could drop. Your microwave can easily kill your WiFi network,
as can your 2.4 ghz cordless phone.
Ideally, another band would be allocated just for R/C, just for spread
sprectrum. No need for an air/ground split. The power limits would
be high enough to allow the same range we enjoy. Of course, spectrum
is money, so I'm not holding my breath. :)

Signature
Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL! SEND $9.95 FOR MORE DETAILS!
C.O.Jones - 24 Feb 2004 01:25 GMT
> So Red, what do 'ya think; will existing radios be able to be converted to
> spread spectrum or are all those high-dollar radios in use going to become
> obselete overnight when SS happens?
I suspect any current radios with Freq Modules will be easily converted.
Those with built in RF decks may prove to be more trouble than they're
worth. But this will probably be on a case by case basis as I'm sure some
designs may lend themselves to easy conversion.
Chuck