Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / March 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Anyone ever put a gas engine in a 25% Hangar9 CAP 232?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pat Fruth - 05 Mar 2004 15:21 GMT
I've got a 25% Hangar9 CAP 232 with a Moki 1.20 in it.
This is the 73" wingspan, 11.5 Lbs. ,blue/aqua/white, CAP 232 that Hanagar9
doesn't sell anymore.
Bought it used a couple years ago.
It's a great flying plane, but slightly under powered for my altitude (I'm
in Denver, CO).
So, I'm thinking about replacing the Moki 1.20 with something bigger.
If I'm gonna do this, I'd really like to go with a gas engine.

Got my eye on the MVVS 1.60 and RCS 1.80 gassers.
All reports I've seen indicate these are great gas engines.

Has anyone out there put either of these gassers in Hanagar9 CAP 232?
Anyone have any other suggestions for a gas engine in this plane?
Pe Reivers - 05 Mar 2004 20:00 GMT
Check out the MVVS 1.60 in RCuniverse.
I have flown both engines, and liked the MVVS a lot more.
The Moki gasser (RCS) is left to gather dust on my shelf.
If you go to a bigger engine, weight will go up as well. Also there is the
added ignition, switch and battery.
I figure your final weight will be around 12 lbs. That is just a bit too
heavy, If you plan to fly 3D. If aerobatics is your goal, the MVVS will make
a great combo.
Bob Pastorello has flown it and was quite satisfied. He abandoned the
project however, because in down figures the added weight made speed
increase too much for his liking

--

With Kind Regards,

http://mvvs-nl.com
http://home.wanadoo.nl/pereivers/
___________

> I've got a 25% Hangar9 CAP 232 with a Moki 1.20 in it.
> This is the 73" wingspan, 11.5 Lbs. ,blue/aqua/white, CAP 232 that Hanagar9
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Has anyone out there put either of these gassers in Hanagar9 CAP 232?
> Anyone have any other suggestions for a gas engine in this plane?
Six_O'Clock_High - 05 Mar 2004 22:09 GMT
> Check out the MVVS 1.60 in RCuniverse.
> I have flown both engines, and liked the MVVS a lot more.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> http://mvvs-nl.com
> http://home.wanadoo.nl/pereivers/

Hello Pe`!

Talk about a SMALL world!  His old airframe is the one *I* have a BME 44
mounted on and been flying for at least 2 years.
Pe Reivers - 06 Mar 2004 23:06 GMT
Yep, sure is Jim.

I see Charley  also chimed in.

The BME must be some overkill. How are your snap corners with this engine :)
I suppose interesting. Bur hey, then there's the power that pulls the plane
through.

--

With Kind Regards,

http://mvvs-nl.com
http://home.wanadoo.nl/pereivers/
___________

> > Check out the MVVS 1.60 in RCuniverse.
> > I have flown both engines, and liked the MVVS a lot more.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Talk about a SMALL world!  His old airframe is the one *I* have a BME 44
> mounted on and been flying for at least 2 years.
Charles & Peggy Robinson - 06 Mar 2004 05:33 GMT
  Bob put one together with a ZDZ 40 too.  He had the pics on his web site.
He didn't keep that one long either.  I wonder who has it now.

 I think the newer version 1.6 with the tuned pipe might fly pretty well
but a scale purist would detest the pipe hanging on it.  What we need is a
wrap around tuned can for the 1.6.

 Cheers,

  CR

> Check out the MVVS 1.60 in RCuniverse.
> I have flown both engines, and liked the MVVS a lot more.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > Has anyone out there put either of these gassers in Hanagar9 CAP 232?
> > Anyone have any other suggestions for a gas engine in this plane?
Six_O'Clock_High - 06 Mar 2004 06:18 GMT
Only one plane.  He used several different engines before unloading the
plane.  Firewall has several holes.

>    Bob put one together with a ZDZ 40 too.  He had the pics on his web site.
> He didn't keep that one long either.  I wonder who has it now.
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> > > Has anyone out there put either of these gassers in Hanagar9 CAP 232?
> > > Anyone have any other suggestions for a gas engine in this plane?
Boo - 06 Mar 2004 20:20 GMT
> Check out the MVVS 1.60 in RCuniverse.
> I have flown both engines, and liked the MVVS a lot more.
> The Moki gasser (RCS) is left to gather dust on my shelf.

Can you expand on this a bit Pe ?  Why do you prefer the MVVS to the
RCS/Moki,  is is just a power thing,  or does it handle and throttle
better or what ?

Signature

Boo

Bob B - 06 Mar 2004 17:16 GMT
> I've got a 25% Hangar9 CAP 232 with a Moki 1.20 in it.
> This is the 73" wingspan, 11.5 Lbs. ,blue/aqua/white, CAP 232 that Hanagar9
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Has anyone out there put either of these gassers in Hanagar9 CAP 232?
> Anyone have any other suggestions for a gas engine in this plane?

I have read all the responses and see that a lot of guy's know how to
screw up the flying characteristics of a really nice flying plane. For
one thing the power to weight gain is not worth all the trouble of
going gas it's real simple the plane is to small. I have two of these
caps, one I fly with an O.S. 1.60 and the other with a Moki 1.80 and
both will fly any way your heart desires 3-D Imac what ever your into
and I don't have to worry about adding to the tip stall problem with
extra weight that adding gas causes. Either one of them will hover at
half throttle and pull out like a rocket. If you want to go gas get a
bigger plane and enjoy it but don't waist your time with gas on the
Mat Chapman cap or any other version of the 1/4 scale. Also you will
never bring that plane in at 11 pounds with a gas engine on it so who
ever said that is blowing smoke up your hind side by saying it. By the
way I have had these two H-9 caps for at least three years so I know
the plane pretty well and it bugs me everytime I see someone suggest a
gasser for this plane it is a waist of a good flying air frame to load
it down with a gasser. If you do it you'll be in hear screaming about
the plane being a tip stalling monster because you weighted it down,
they come in heavy enough with a good size glow on them.
Six_O'Clock_High - 06 Mar 2004 23:54 GMT
> > I've got a 25% Hangar9 CAP 232 with a Moki 1.20 in it.
> > This is the 73" wingspan, 11.5 Lbs. ,blue/aqua/white, CAP 232 that Hanagar9
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> the plane being a tip stalling monster because you weighted it down,
> they come in heavy enough with a good size glow on them.

That is one opinion.  Mine weighs in at 13 pounds 8 ounces and I don't have
too much in the way of problems with it.  But then a long time ago I learned
NOT to haul back on the elevator whenever things are not right.  To each his
own. .  .
Pat Fruth - 07 Mar 2004 01:32 GMT
> I have read all the responses and see that a lot of guy's know how to
> screw up the flying characteristics of a really nice flying plane. For
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> the plane being a tip stalling monster because you weighted it down,
> they come in heavy enough with a good size glow on them.

Hey Bob, in the final analysis, I have to agree.  After looking at all the
engine possibilities (gassers that is), I'd have to say the lightest, best
overall power-to-weight ratio is the ZDZ 40... but at roughly 51 ounces (and
that's without a muffler), it's just TOO much weight for the CAP.

The CAP is a tip stalling monster.  That's for sure.  I have the scuffed up
wing tips to prove it.  I'm still trying to get used to power-on landings at
this altitude.  I moved from Minneapolis to Denver a couple years ago and
I'm still not used to it).  Adding an additional 32 - 40 ounces would just
be too much.

Anyhow, I actually thought about moving up from the Moki 1.20 to the Moki
1.80 (it's only 10 ounces heavier than the Moki 1.20), but I dismissed the
idea cuz I figured the fuel consumption rate would make the flight time too
short on my current 18 oz fuel tank.  Heck, as it is, right now. I have to
add 8 - 10 ounces to the nose just to get it to balance... so the Moki 1.80
would fix my balance problem too.

So, I was really glad to hear that your actually using the Moki 1.80 in this
plane.

What altitude do you fly at?
What is your full throttle fuel consumption rate?
What size fuel tank are you using?
What kind of flight times are you getting?
Are you balanced on the Hangar9 recommended CG?
Did you have to add any weight to the tail on your setup?

Thanks for your input.

BTW. I did go bigger, I've also got the H9 1/3 scale CAP 232 powered by a
ZDZ 80 gasser.... fun stuff ;-)
Pat Fruth - 07 Mar 2004 01:55 GMT
> What altitude do you fly at?
> What is your full throttle fuel consumption rate?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks for your input.

Bob,
Shoot... forgot... one more question.
How did you mount the Moki 1.80?  Inverted? or Sideways?
Bob B - 07 Mar 2004 13:28 GMT
> > What altitude do you fly at?
> > What is your full throttle fuel consumption rate?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Shoot... forgot... one more question.
> How did you mount the Moki 1.80?  Inverted? or Sideways?

Hi Pat our field is at the highest point in the state of Wisconsin and
that's about all I can tell you on that, I'll have to find out the
altitude. Full throttle fuel consumption is around 1 1/2 oz's per
minute but you rarely need full power with the 1.80 and I run a 20.oz
tank so it's no problem getting an 8 to 10 minute flight. I mounted
the Moki on the aluminium mount that came with the cap and have had no
problems with that. As far as tail heavy I didn't have a problem with
that on my Chapman cap because of the moki being a bit on the heavy
side, that and I mounted my battery right on top of the tank and I
actualy came out in the middle of the c.g. range. I ran dual elevator
servo's mounted in the fuse where they belong and used D.B. pushrods
and of course the pull-pull on rudder. On my other H-9 cap,it was one
of their white versions, I run an O.S. 1.60 and I have to say other
than using a little more throttle to pull out of a hover there isn't
that much difference between it and the Moki power wise but it seems a
bit better on fuel and is a bit lighter than the moki so I had to
mount my throttle servo up on the back of the firewall and also
mounted the battery on top of the tank like I did in the Chapman cap.
The trick with these caps is to keep them as light as possible
12-121/2 pounds and make sure to latteraly balance them, don't get the
cg to far back and be easy on the elevator and they will fly as slow
as you want without any worry about tip stalling. I can float either
one of them in so slow it's almost scary hehe. I read so much about
tip stalling on these caps and just kinda shake my head because it
doesn't have to be. The biggest problem guy's have is they try to
stuff a gasser in them and wind up getting them way to heavy, that and
they feel they need to have the cg back in the tail feathers some
place for 3-D and it doesn't need that either and then they try to see
how much elevator they can get and then come into here and other
forums and cry about how bad their caps snap. Sorry about that rant
but do a search and you'll see what I mean, I was amazed at how slow
these bigger caps can really fly with no problems,a lot different than
my 40 size Kyosho cap, now that's a snap monster. What a bag of wind I
am hey? So there it is my friend and if you have any other questions
just hollar and remember to latteraly balance it, my wing tips are not
scuffed up.
Pat Fruth - 07 Mar 2004 14:57 GMT
> Hi Pat our field is at the highest point in the state of Wisconsin

Ok, so your probably somewhere between 800 - 1300 ft.

> I can float either one of them in so slow it's almost scary hehe.

Come visit me this summer.  Flying the CAP at 6000 ft on a 90 degree summer
day gave me a whole new perspective on things ;-)
Bob B - 07 Mar 2004 13:30 GMT
> > What altitude do you fly at?
> > What is your full throttle fuel consumption rate?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Shoot... forgot... one more question.
> How did you mount the Moki 1.80?  Inverted? or Sideways?

Darn I almost forgot to tell ya, I mounted the 1.80 sideways.
Matthew P. Cummings - 07 Mar 2004 17:40 GMT
> Hey Bob, in the final analysis, I have to agree.  After looking at all the
> engine possibilities (gassers that is), I'd have to say the lightest, best
> overall power-to-weight ratio is the ZDZ 40... but at roughly 51 ounces (and
> that's without a muffler), it's just TOO much weight for the CAP.

Not that my CAP is the one being discussed here, mine's a Genesis CAP 232
and with the ZDZ 40 and it's muffler and batteries, my plane weighs 11 lbs
4 oz.  It flies like a dream.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.