Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / April 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Right - Left - Your OTHER Right!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill - 06 Apr 2004 19:19 GMT
I was asked to help a guy out with his plane, a Four Star 60 with a new
Saito 100. The plane had flown before, he swapped engines and radios. I
dialed in the engine and did a pre-flight, Up elevator, right rudder, Right
aileron. Everything fine, so he taxied out and flew the plane. Immediately
after take off, he started shouting about reversed aileron. ??? Amazingly,
he managed to get the plane back intact. First time I have seen this happen
without destroying the plane.

Since I had helped him, and the controls had all moved to their proper
places, I was quite upset. Before he even touched the plane on the ground, I
said "Give me RIGHT aileron." Sure enough, the right aileron moved up. Still
puzzled, I had him do it again, this time I had him hold it and looked at
his transmitter. He was holding the stick FULL LEFT aileron. One week later,
he was again getting ready to fly, I walked by and said "Give me right
aileron" this time the right aileron moved down. He was still holding full
left. I now call him "Lefty" In the future, when asked to do a pre-flight, I
will now hold the transmitter myself.
Six_O'Clock_High - 06 Apr 2004 22:33 GMT
> I was asked to help a guy out with his plane, a Four Star 60 with a new
> Saito 100. The plane had flown before, he swapped engines and radios. I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> left. I now call him "Lefty" In the future, when asked to do a pre-flight, I
> will now hold the transmitter myself.

I had a student (I have dropped him because he does not follow my safety
rules) who had a similar problem.  I would ask for a right turn and he would
go left.  When I called for a correction he would swear he went right.  The
other thing he would do was  'lean' on the stick and swear he was not
touching it and there was something wrong because the plane was turning or
climbing or diving.  It became clear that he has some medical problems that
were causing most of the problems.  Until he began doing the exact things I
told him not to for safety reasons, I was committed to fly with him  until
he worked it all out.
Doug McLaren - 07 Apr 2004 09:23 GMT
| Immediately after take off, he started shouting about reversed
| aileron. ??? Amazingly, he managed to get the plane back
| intact. First time I have seen this happen without destroying the
| plane.

To be fair, you can certainly fly with reversed ailerons.  It's mostly
just a matter of realizing that that is the problem *before* you make
a lawn dart of the plane (which usually happens pretty quick, because
people start correcting more and more when the planes goes the wrong
way.)  But once you realize that's the problem, and make the mental
adjustment (some can do that in a few seconds, some can't), you're
usually fine.  Of course, it's probably a lot easier on a plane with
generous dihedral, where letting go of the sticks will make it all
better, at least until you have to turn.  And if you have a rudder,
you can try that.

It's kind of funny -- flying at the local park, people will come out
with their new Firebird or similar airplane and take off and fly just
fine -- but if you look more carefully, I'd say there's a 50/50 chance
that at least one of their sticks are completely reversed.  But since
they're used to it that way, they fly that way just fine.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
`Some guy hit my fender the other day, and I said unto him "Be fruitful
and multiply". But not in those words ...' -Woody Allen

Morris Lee - 07 Apr 2004 15:35 GMT
> It's kind of funny -- flying at the local park, people will come out
> with their new Firebird or similar airplane and take off and fly just
> fine -- but if you look more carefully, I'd say there's a 50/50 chance
> that at least one of their sticks are completely reversed.  But since
> they're used to it that way, they fly that way just fine.

Been there, done that.  I had one of the Bill Evans Simitar designs I
mis-programmed.  The aileron part of the elevons was reversed.  Left stick -
went right! I think "OK, steer backwards!" I managed to get it down intact.

Morris
Dr1Driver - 07 Apr 2004 16:21 GMT
> The aileron part of the elevons was reversed.  Left stick -
>went right! I think "OK, steer backwards!"

Has anyone thought of the most simple solution???  Steer with the rudder until
you get it down!  Let's learn to use that LEFT stick, people.  Even a wing with
no dihedral will respond to the rudder enough to steer and land safely.  :)  Of
course, this wouldn't work on a Scimitar, since I believe it doesn't have a
rudder.
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
Bill - 07 Apr 2004 17:45 GMT
When this happened, one of the club instructors, who was standing close to
him, told him to use the rudder. He ignored him completely. After he landed,
the instructor asked "Didn't you hear me about the rudder?" The guy said he
heard him, but it didn't register.
A couple of years ago, a guy was flying a way over powered stick. He was ALL
over the sky going real fast. After a few minutes, he stated that his
ailerons were reversed. Watching the plane, I said "Gee, first thing I would
do is pull back on the throttle" just as the plane hit the ground.
The only time this happened to me, I had a Goldberg Cub. I had two radios, a
4 channel and a 6 channel for a different plane, both on the same frequency.
I took off the cub with the wrong radio. (Only difference was the ailerons)
and managed to turn it so it was going away from me. I saw that the land in
front of it was clear, so I killed the engine and let it glide in. Seemed to
take about an hour for it to finally land, but I managed not to hurt the
plane. I do the Left, Right, Up, Down stick mixing now before EVERY flight.

> > The aileron part of the elevons was reversed.  Left stick -
> >went right! I think "OK, steer backwards!"
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"
Dr1Driver - 07 Apr 2004 18:10 GMT
>When this happened, one of the club instructors, who was standing close to
>him, told him to use the rudder. He ignored him completely. After he landed,
>the instructor asked "Didn't you hear me about the rudder?" The guy said he
>heard him, but it didn't register.

Yea, I've seen many students go brain dead.  They don't have the experience to
think fast.  That's when a competent pilot or instructor should TAKE the TX out
of the novice's hands and land the plane himself.  Better a P.O.ed novice than
a hurt bystander, damaged property, or crashed airplane.

> I do the Left, Right, Up, Down stick mixing now before EVERY flight.

Even though no one but me handles my TX, I also do this simple check.  I was at
a fly in several years ago and the impound guy (a rank novice) ws "helping"
everyone by re-centering the trims!!!  

Have a routine: Right aileron, left aileron, up elevator, down elevator, right
rudder, left rudder.  Say it aloud while you move the sticks: "Right aileron
UP, left aileron UP, elevator UP, elevator DOWN, rudder RIGHT, rudder LEFT."
Even if something isn't reversed, linkages break and servos fail.
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
Bill - 07 Apr 2004 19:19 GMT
Speaking of Impound reminds me. A couple of years ago, a new member
volunteered to run transmitter impound. You would have had to know this guy
to really appreciate the story, he was the kind of guy who did not listen to
anyone. Anyway, I took my new 9ZWC-2 transmitter, in the case and gave it to
him without thought. Later I happened to be by the impound and was looking
at the variety of transmitters when one particular one caught my eye,
another 9ZWC-2. Since these transmitters had just been released, and I
happened to luck out and get one, I was surprised to see another one, but it
was a big meet and it was possible. I stared at it for a good minute when
the light bulb came on. I was looking at MY transmitter! The guy had opened
the case, removed my transmitter and set it on the shelf. The club president
happened to be standing right next to me and took in the whole thing. I
didn't say anything, I just walked away. The president had him put the
transmitter back into the case. I told the pres it wasn't a big deal, but if
I hadn't wanted it to stay in the case, I wouldn't have brought it over to
him IN the case.

> >When this happened, one of the club instructors, who was standing close to
> >him, told him to use the rudder. He ignored him completely. After he landed,
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"
Efulmer - 08 Apr 2004 03:11 GMT
I hate CATS!!    C=controls  A=antenna  T=trims  S=switches.   I hate cats!!  
But I always do one when I fly.  Everytime.  Not just the first flight of the
day.  Saved my top flight P-51 last time I took it out.  I teach it too.  If
you don't do your cats you don't get any instruction.  Eddie Fulmer
Six_O'Clock_High - 07 Apr 2004 19:30 GMT
> > The aileron part of the elevons was reversed.  Left stick -
> >went right! I think "OK, steer backwards!"
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"

That even works on high wing loaded birds with low wings, IF you slow down.
Part of the reason to do a complete test during the initial flight is to
find out exactly what the response to rudder only is at various speeds (full
and slow).
QuietDavid - 08 Apr 2004 01:56 GMT
This issue can be quite confusing at times - a while ago I volunteered to
be a student on an instructors training day (ie guys were learning to be
instructors, and the would-be intructor was being taught how to teach me)

While as a very raw and hopeless-flyer I appreciated the opportunity to
gain extra tuition, it was quite interesting to see the way in which
people interpreted the right and left commands.

When the Master Instructor said 'left' he meant stick left.  When the
trainee instructor said 'left' he meant turn the plane to ITS left.  It
took them a while to work out why I seemingly didn't follow instructions,
and resulted in some seemingly strange manouveres.

Incidently, while both these guys were good at flying, their teaching
skills (especially the Master Instructor) were woefull.  One telling me
this, and the other telling me that, made it very difficult at times.  But
still, I do appreciate their giving of their time and effort on behalf of
beginners like me.

David

> | Immediately after take off, he started shouting about reversed
> | aileron. ??? Amazingly, he managed to get the plane back
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> `Some guy hit my fender the other day, and I said unto him "Be fruitful
>  and multiply". But not in those words ...' -Woody Allen
Six_O'Clock_High - 09 Apr 2004 06:14 GMT
> This issue can be quite confusing at times - a while ago I volunteered to
> be a student on an instructors training day (ie guys were learning to be
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> David

David,
It seems that many of us fail to put our flying experiences in words when we
are teaching students.  Very few of our 'instructors' have ever had a course
in education which would correct some of their deficiencies.  The better
instructors figure out they are weak and change.  When they find, hear of,
or see better methods they adapt.  Only problem is that it takes one willing
to put his/her ego away and admit they don't know it all.  In this hobby,
that is a rare breed.
QuietDavid - 09 Apr 2004 23:32 GMT
My comment "their teaching skills (especially the Master Instructor) were
woefull" was more about the process of instruction these guys employed, not so
much about the content.  Perhaps I should also mention that in a previous life
I taught training proceddures and techniques at a University.

The sort of things where they could have done better were related to giving me
a 'big picture' of what I would be required to do, of getting together and
working out how they would teach before the teaching me session, of deciding
which of them would give ME directions, working out a set of terms common to
them both, of determining and FOLLOWING a protacol - eg Master Instructor tells
learner instructor, and learner instructor tells me.

Also, doing an assessment of my current abilities, then working with me to
develop a set of learning goals for each session would have been very helpful,
as would have been the two instructors setting out clear session goals for the
trainee instructor.

However, note that despite these critical comments, I do appreciate the time
and effort these guys devote to helping out us beginners.

David

> "QuietDavid" <davidxxx@REMOVE-ME-TO-REPLYtpg.com.au> wrote in message
> ....
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> to put his/her ego away and admit they don't know it all.  In this hobby,
> that is a rare breed.
Six_O'Clock_High - 10 Apr 2004 01:30 GMT
David,
It is called pre and post flight instruction. . .  Many are incapable of it
but some just never heard of the concept.  I got my 'skills' from college
courses and some specific aviation knowledge I share from G.A..

> My comment "their teaching skills (especially the Master Instructor) were
> woefull" was more about the process of instruction these guys employed, not so
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> > to put his/her ego away and admit they don't know it all.  In this hobby,
> > that is a rare breed.
MikeF - 10 Apr 2004 11:46 GMT
There are few things as difficult as teaching something that has been second-nature to you
for a long time.
Example, a few years ago i tried to teach my wife to ski. I had learned when i was 3 years
old, so i didnt even have a clue what it was like NOT to know how - and more importantly,
what a newbie needs to know.

> David,
> It is called pre and post flight instruction. . .  Many are incapable of it
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> hobby,
> > > that is a rare breed.
QuietDavid - 11 Apr 2004 00:40 GMT
HI MIKE

The most glaring example of this I have found is computer nerds trying to explain/show stuff
to learners - click click, screen sceen mouse mouse - all faster than a learners eye can
follow.  Many learners just give up and say "yeh, OK" and go away confused, and sure that
computers are too hard.

David

> There are few things as difficult as teaching something that has been second-nature to you
> for a long time.
> Example, a few years ago i tried to teach my wife to ski. I had learned when i was 3 years
> old, so i didnt even have a clue what it was like NOT to know how - and more importantly,
> what a newbie needs to know.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.