Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / April 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Li Poly, 2 packs, differing voltages

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Wan - 21 Apr 2004 12:22 GMT
Hi,

I have 2 packs of 3S3P 11.1 V, 1500 mAh Kokam Li Poly batteries.

My first pack has the individual cells discharged with a Triton
charger before initial charge. This pack reads at 12.44 Volts after
charging.

The second pack  was not discharged before charging. The cells were
charged individually, and subsequently, the cells read; 11.9 V, 11.55
V and 11.55 V. After they were connected in parallel, the pack read
11.1 V.

As you can see, for the second pack, there was a drop in voltage after
sitting overnight in parallel. And the difference between the first
pack and second pack is about 1.34 V.

Would anyone tell me why the difference? Also would discharging in
flight allow a better charge to a higher voltage?

Thanking you first,
Wan
MK - 21 Apr 2004 19:08 GMT
Why would you discghare LiPoly cells?  I thought you shouldn't.
(left mine plugged in and it's trash now)
mk
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Thanking you first,
> Wan
Wan - 22 Apr 2004 00:02 GMT
> Why would you discghare LiPoly cells?  I thought you shouldn't.
> (left mine plugged in and it's trash now)
> mk

A friend of mine discharged the first 2 batteries for me before
charging them, though I was told in other posts by many persons I need
not do so.

However, it was done. Still, why is the difference between the first
pack and the second pack?

Wan
Abel Pranger - 22 Apr 2004 17:22 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Would anyone tell me why the difference? Also would discharging in
> flight allow a better charge to a higher voltage?

Wan-
From your description, you didn't charge the cells individually, but
rather charged series packs of three.   You aren't really going to get
an answer to your question until you measure the voltage across each
cell.  Cell voltage should be very close between cells, say within a
couple of hundredths of a volt.  If not, the pack is unbalanced.
Charge the cells individually to balance the pack (dunno if Kokam
provides taps between cells to facilitate this - if not you'll have to
provide them).

Abel
Wan - 23 Apr 2004 02:22 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Abel

Abel,

Unfortunately, these Kokam batteries came fully assembled in series
without any tabs for the individual cell. You are correct in that I
charged them in series of three. But that's the way my friends do it.

I hate  thinking about taking them apart to provide tabs. They were so
well crafted from the factory.

After resting for several days, the difference in voltage is now about
.7 V between the two packs. How does the .7 V difference reconcile
with the need to get the cells balanced to within a couple of
hundredths of a volt per cell?

Thanks,
Wan
Abel Pranger - 23 Apr 2004 18:20 GMT
> Unfortunately, these Kokam batteries came fully assembled in series
> without any tabs for the individual cell. You are correct in that I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> with the need to get the cells balanced to within a couple of
> hundredths of a volt per cell?

Wan-
I'm a little surprised that your Kokam packs don't provide access to
individual cells, as I presume Fred Marks was the dealer.  Here's a
quote attributed to him re LiPo safety:

"Before you charge a new Lithium pack, check the voltage of each cell
individually. I do this after every tenth cycle there after. This is
absolutely critical in that an unbalanced pack can explode while
charging even if the correct cell count is chosen. If the cells are
not within 0.1 volts of each other then charge each cell individually
to 4.2 volts so that they are all equal. If after every discharge the
pack is unbalanced you have a faulty cell and that pack must be
replaced."

See the complete discussion at
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=209187

Much more authoritative info there than I can provide - my personal
LiPo experience is limited to a 2-cell pack in a 6 oz foamie, and a
digital camera.

Abel
Wan - 24 Apr 2004 00:43 GMT
> > Unfortunately, these Kokam batteries came fully assembled in series
> > without any tabs for the individual cell. You are correct in that I
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Abel

Abel,

This is the web site of FMA Direct where I purchased my Kokam
batteries. As I said, the packs didn't come with tabs for individual
cells. See if you could tell from this web site.

https://www.fmadirect.com/site/home.htm

I hope it can come through. Is Jim Mcpherson associated with FMA
Direct?

Thanks for sending the discussion site, After reading and seeing how
Li Poly batteries could cause damage, I wondered how modelers
survived?

Anyway, out of curiosity, I charged the same 3S3P Kokam battery pack
again and it came up with a new reading of 12.64 V.

I can't explain it, since it was quite different the first time.

Wan
Wan - 24 Apr 2004 08:54 GMT
> > > Unfortunately, these Kokam batteries came fully assembled in series
> > > without any tabs for the individual cell. You are correct in that I
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> Wan

Sorry for coming back right after my last post, but here is another
site that offers Kokam batteries with tabs for testing individual
cells;

http://www.lightflightrc.com/indexHTML.htm

I could've kicked myself for not doing more research. For a few
dollars more I can have the better battery! "Too late for crying over
spilt milk"

Fred Marks is the one I should've asked if he was associated with FMA
Direct or with LightFlightRC?

Wan
Abel Pranger - 25 Apr 2004 19:41 GMT
<quoted text snipped>

>Sorry for coming back right after my last post, but here is another
>site that offers Kokam batteries with tabs for testing individual
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Fred Marks is the one I should've asked if he was associated with FMA
>Direct or with LightFlightRC?

Wan-

Don't kick yourself, just fix it.  I know you can, as I have had a
first hand look at your workmanship.

Fred Marks is the 'FM' in FMA Direct.

Abel
Wan - 26 Apr 2004 03:33 GMT
>  <quoted text snipped>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Abel

Thanks for the compliment, Abel.

I didn't know FM means Fred Marks. In that case, since he is a
proponent for testing each cell once in a while, why did the batteries
I purchased from FMA Direct come with tabs for the indivdual cells, as
I found in the other web site (LightFlight RC)?

I didn't mean anything by it, just being curious.

Anyway, I replaced my ESC's with the new programmable ones that senses
the cut off point for batteries and allow time to come down before
harm to the batteries.

Progress! Isn't it great?

Wan
The Natural Philosopher - 24 Apr 2004 10:35 GMT
>>>Unfortunately, these Kokam batteries came fully assembled in series
>>>without any tabs for the individual cell. You are correct in that I
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> Wan

The cahrger should finish charging at somethwere near 12.60v.

Thats the resting voltage of a fully charged 3s pack.

When fully discharged the pack should still show at LEAST 9v, prpbably
nearer ten.

Packs are normally shipped half charged - somehing like 11v -11.5 volts
or so for 3S.
Wan - 25 Apr 2004 02:26 GMT
> >>>Unfortunately, these Kokam batteries came fully assembled in series
> >>>without any tabs for the individual cell. You are correct in that I
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> Packs are normally shipped half charged - somehing like 11v -11.5 volts
> or so for 3S.

Thank you TNP, that helps a lot.

However I don't know why my post has not appeared after more than 12
hours. I will copy and paste it here again;

Abel,

Sorry for coming back right after my last post, but here is another
site that offers Kokam batteries with tabs for testing individual
cells;

http://www.lightflightrc.com/indexHTML.htm

I could've kicked myself for not doing more research. For a few
dollars more I can have the better battery! "Too late for crying over
spilt milk"

Fred Marks is the one I should've asked if he was associated with FMA
Direct or with LightFlightRC?

Wan
Jim Lilly - 25 Apr 2004 04:54 GMT
Wan,

> However I don't know why my post has not appeared after more than 12
> hours.

Probably due to some glitch between your ISP's servers & your PC.

It _DID_ appear on.....

> Subject: Re: Li Poly, 2 packs, differing voltages
> Date: 24 Apr 2004 00:54:32 -0700

--

    Jim L.
    https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
    Using - Virtual Access(OLR), ZAP 4.5, & WinXP Pro w/SP1
Wan - 25 Apr 2004 13:50 GMT
> Wan,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>      https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
>      Using - Virtual Access(OLR), ZAP 4.5, & WinXP Pro w/SP1

Jim,

The post that was on,  Date: 24 Apr 2004 00:54:32 -0700, refers to the
FMA Direct  web site. Whereas my  recent post on, Date; 24 Apr 2004
18:26:08, refers to the LightFlight web site.

Thanks for your commentary, but I am confused. Perhaps it WAS my ISP
that caused the problem?

I know we're getting off topic. Still, I'm trying to deal with  the
delay, 3 to 9 hours is long enough already.

Wan
Todd Klondike - 25 Apr 2004 15:54 GMT
wanjung@toast.net (Wan) posted message
ID<7387603e.0404250450.62506d31@posting.google.com>on 25 Apr 2004
05:50:55 -0700
>> Wan,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>Wan

It's simple.  You're posting through Google.  12 hour delays are
normal.  If you want real-time, you need to post through your ISP or
an independant news service.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.