Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / May 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Engine size for Goldberg Eagle

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ann - 03 May 2004 21:54 GMT
I'm ready to buy my first trainer, and have narrowed choices down to a
Goldberg Eagle or Sig Kadet LT-40.  During my research, I have noticed
that some recommend outfitting the plane with a midsize engine while
others recommend opting for the largest engine available for your
particular plane.  The Eagle (if I remember correctly) recommends a
.29 to .45 2 stroke.  I have been considering either a .40 or .46
size.  Any pros and cons either way?  Is this small difference in
displacement going to make much of a difference in the air? I've been
looking mainly at OS engines but am open to suggestions.
Thanks.
Dr1Driver - 03 May 2004 22:18 GMT
>I have been considering either a .40 or .46
>size.  Any pros and cons either way?  

Provided the engine is a good one, either will be plenty of power for the Eagle
or Kadet.

There are pros and cons in getting a less expensive engine, like the OS LA, vs
a FX. The LA is plenty of power for a trainer, but you might want more power in
a sport plane later.  Buying, let's say, an FX will enable you to use it in
subsequent planes.

I'd also look at the Thunder Tiger Pro engines.  They are good, reliable,
powerful, and not too expensive.
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
Anthony - 03 May 2004 23:04 GMT
I suggest a moki 210 that way you can grow into it later..................
just kidding
Get the better motor like a 46 ax the new version of the fx in the  46 size
A quality motor will keep you in the sky while  learning  and not repairing
damaged planes from DEAD sticks
os motor are user friendly an good quality ..............  nobody ever
complains about quality   la is a non ball bearing motor and is very
reliable also ,  but  just don't have the peak performance of a ball bearing
motor

> I'm ready to buy my first trainer, and have narrowed choices down to a
> Goldberg Eagle or Sig Kadet LT-40.  During my research, I have noticed
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> looking mainly at OS engines but am open to suggestions.
> Thanks.
Fred McClellan - 03 May 2004 23:26 GMT
>I'm ready to buy my first trainer, and have narrowed choices down to a
>Goldberg Eagle or Sig Kadet LT-40.  During my research, I have noticed
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>looking mainly at OS engines but am open to suggestions.
>Thanks.

Don't forget the K&B .40 - stock number 4011, ringed version.

Runs forever, hauls an Eagle around with all the pizaz . . . . pizzaz
. . . . gusto you'll ever need.

Methinks the Eaglet and later Eagle .40 were designed for the K&B.

Price is within a buck of the O.S. engine.
Cheers,
Fred McClellan
The House Of Balsa Dust
home.mindspring.com/~the-plumber
DANNYSPEED - 04 May 2004 00:24 GMT
Hi, we went a different way with ours. Our thinking was: If flying from grass,
a larger engine will over come the the drag of the grass better and you will
get better takeoff speed quicker. Less time on the ground. I would recommend
any of the .46 to .51 engins out there.
   We powered our first with an OS LA 40 and I was able to horse it off the
ground but a begginer would have trouble. We then switched to an OS LA .46 and
it was much better. My brother had a Supertigre .51 on his and it was better
yet. Go to the bigger engines and you can use it on your next plane also. My
.02 cents worth, Dan.
jeboba - 04 May 2004 03:01 GMT
Don't worry about overpowering....remember, you can always throttle back but
if you don't have enough power, no amount of throttle will help.

> Hi, we went a different way with ours. Our thinking was: If flying from grass,
> a larger engine will over come the the drag of the grass better and you will
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> yet. Go to the bigger engines and you can use it on your next plane also. My
> .02 cents worth, Dan.
Dr1Driver - 04 May 2004 04:17 GMT
>We powered our first with an OS LA 40 and I was able to horse it off the
>ground but a begginer would have trouble.

I recommend larger wheels than the manual specifies if flying off grass.  Go
with 3".  If weight is a problem, use the Dave Brown or GP foam type.

Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
PCPhill - 04 May 2004 20:27 GMT
> >We powered our first with an OS LA 40 and I was able to horse it off the
> >ground but a begginer would have trouble.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Dr.1 Driver
> "There's a Hun in the sun!"

Ditto...

I had a MDS .40 engine on mine and it took darn near the whole runway to get
off the ground. It had adequate power when airborne though.  Trying to keep
a MDS running through a whole flight is another story.  Had to put larger
wheels on because the prop would hit the grass with regularity.

PCPhill
Paul McIntosh - 04 May 2004 07:31 GMT
I would stick with the upper half of the recommended range simply because
these planes are fairly large and always seem to end up heavier than
expected.  Remember, you don't always have to use full throttle.

--
Paul McIntosh
http://www.rc-bearings.com
> I'm ready to buy my first trainer, and have narrowed choices down to a
> Goldberg Eagle or Sig Kadet LT-40.  During my research, I have noticed
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> looking mainly at OS engines but am open to suggestions.
> Thanks.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.