Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / May 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

No Big Deal??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill - 05 May 2004 18:57 GMT
Last week, we had our Spring Big Bird event that drew 50 entrants, and a
couple of hundred spectators. Every year, it seems that we have one or two
guys who always bring out brand new planes and fly them for the first time
at these events. This year, one guy flew a  new GeeBee Arf. When he took
off, the plane made an immediate left turn and flew OVER the pits and
spectators. The pilot, who was quite competent, guided it back, properly
trimmed it. The rest of the flight was uneventful.
There was another pilot, along with myself, who was quite disturbed by this.
At last night's meeting, I pointed out that this practice was in direct
violation of the very first item of the AMA safety code.
I really was not prepared for the reaction. They don't think it's a big
deal. What do you think?
Dr1Driver - 05 May 2004 21:32 GMT
> They don't think it's a big
>deal. What do you think?

A plane should NEVER be flown for the first time at a public event.  Common
sense dictates that.  However, the AMA doesn't address it.  The IMAA, which
governs their own big bird events, does, however.  The plane must be flown at
least 5 times before being flown at an IMAA sanctioned event.

I am glad the pilot was competent enough to recover control and guide the plane
away from the crowd.  However, it IS serious, and a tragic event could have
happened.  In the future, possibly the governing body of the event should
mandate that all entries be previously flown.
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
Six_O'Clock_High - 05 May 2004 21:50 GMT
> > They don't think it's a big
> >deal. What do you think?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> governs their own big bird events, does, however.  The plane must be flown at
> least 5 times before being flown at an IMAA sanctioned event.

Sorry Gary, but you are WRONG.  Pull out your AMA Safety Code for R/C and
read RULE #1!
CainHD - 06 May 2004 03:12 GMT
>Sorry Gary, but you are WRONG.  Pull out your AMA Safety Code for R/C and
>read RULE #1!

Sorry JB but as usual you're only half- informed. OTOH that's better than usual
for you!! (;-))

DR said IMAA SANCTIONED even which also carries an AMA sanction. IMAA is more
restrictive than IMAA.

IMAA Safety Code: >>
3.4 Flight Testing: All aircraft are to have been flight tested and flight
trimmed with a minimum of six (6) flights before the model is allowed to fly at
an IMAA Sanctioned event.
<<
Fred McClellan - 06 May 2004 03:37 GMT
>>Sorry Gary, but you are WRONG.  Pull out your AMA Safety Code for R/C and
>>read RULE #1!
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>an IMAA Sanctioned event.
><<

DR got it wrong when he wrote
"A plane should NEVER be flown for the first time at a public event.
Common sense dictates that.  However, the AMA doesn't address it."

James pointed out that indeed AMA does address "it" in rule 1 of the
Safety Code.

Put-downs don't count when you're wrong, butthead.
Cheers,
Fred McClellan
The House Of Balsa Dust
home.mindspring.com/~the-plumber
C.O.Jones - 06 May 2004 10:38 GMT
> IMAA is more restrictive than IMAA.

What's that again?  IMAA is more restrictive than IMAA?

I know what you meant but, someone being as nit picky an anal as you should
be more careful!
CainHD - 06 May 2004 15:21 GMT
>What's that again?  IMAA is more restrictive than IMAA?
>
>I know what you meant but, someone being as nit picky an anal as you should
>be more careful!

TOUCHE'

IMAA is more restrictive than AMA is what it should be.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.