Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hobbico Nexstar

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TGW - 10 May 2004 01:16 GMT
I am a newbie to R/C flying.  I have seen some postings, positive and
negative, about the hobbico nexstar and thought I would post my experience
for anyone that may be interested.  I will try to keep this short.  I
purchased the Hobbico from a local hobby shop on the recommendation from the
owner.  Not knowing much and seeing the kit was complete from transmitter to
flight simulator it sounded like a good buy.  The hobbyshop owner, in his
role as educator to a newbie, prescribed some tasks for me to complete prior
to learning how to start the engine and subsequently flying.  He had me
remove the engine and apply additional epoxy to the firewall, then he had me
apply locktight to all screws on the engine, from the mounting bracket to
the muffler.  He also had me apply copper sealant to the exhaust manifold.
I was glad I did this, not only for the learning experience, but the screws
were not all tight, so much for flying out of the box.  The owner also had
me apply some clear coat silicon around the landing gear to keep the exhaust
from entering the fuselage and to epoxy the tail to the plane.  The engine
is stated to be broken in at the factory, the hobbyshop owner had me run it
as if I were breaking it in myself, just for the learning experience.  All
this done and with some time on the simulator, it was time for the first
lesson.  The owner trimmed the plane, the elevator had to be moved a notch
from the recommended setting but not much else in the way of trim. The plane
appeared to handle well with my limited knowledge.  The owner indicated that
he was impressed with the way the plane handled.  I managed to finish the
lesson and the plane went home in one piece.  I don't believe the plane is
as 'out of the box' as the company indicates.  I do however believe it to be
a great training plane, very forgiving with the AFS turned to about 30%.
The wind was kicking up to about 20-30mph and the plane handled well, didn't
crash.  The simulator software if very helpful for learning the use of the
transmitter and reactions but not with depth perception.  It is like hitting
golf balls at a driving range then actually playing on a golf course, two
entirely different experiences.  I would recommend to any newbie that he/she
get sound lessons in a structured manner.  I learned to ski by myself and
have since mastered all the wrong ways to do things.
res0m2r9 - 10 May 2004 03:26 GMT
I have a Nexstar and it only took 1 hour to get it flight ready. There was
no need to take the steps outlined below. I put the plane together,
practiced on the sim for a week, then went to a dry lake bed and flew the
plane. I have made about 60 or so flights with the Nexstar and no problems
with loose screws or anything. If you were flying this plane in 20 to 30 mph
wind it would have been turned in scrap. In 8 to 10 mph wind the plane
handles good but will not turn with ease and in some cases the plane will
not turn at all due to the shape of the wing.

> I am a newbie to R/C flying.  I have seen some postings, positive and
> negative, about the hobbico nexstar and thought I would post my experience
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> get sound lessons in a structured manner.  I learned to ski by myself and
> have since mastered all the wrong ways to do things.
Ted Campanelli - 10 May 2004 13:21 GMT
On 5/9/2004 10:26 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:

The problem in turning is not with the shape of the wing.  The problem
is the AFS.

MANY EXPERIENCED PEOPLE have reported that when using the AFS, they are
fighting the plane.  Go to  http://www.rcuniverse.com/  and do a search
on NexStar.  The general consensus from the majority of people (many of
whom I respect for their knowledge) is that the AFS is more trouble than
it is worth and should be turned off.

Several instructors have almost crashed the Nexstar because of the AFS.

If the AFS works for you, great.  In can not recommend it.  I feel you
should have an instructor and preferably with a buddy box.

> I have a Nexstar and it only took 1 hour to get it flight ready. There was
> no need to take the steps outlined below. I put the plane together,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> handles good but will not turn with ease and in some cases the plane will
> not turn at all due to the shape of the wing.
Dr1Driver - 10 May 2004 14:13 GMT
>The problem in turning is not with the shape of the wing.  The problem
>is the AFS.

I just read the review, and I agree.  

The AFS will attempt to correct ANY deviation from straight and level flight,
including a planned altitude change or banked turn.  This means control input
will partially be used to overcome the AFS.  The wing leading edge extensions
will not cause turning difficulty, and are not a new idea, by any means.  The
speed brakes may actually slow the plane so far below the envelope that
recovery is not possible by any means.  Ah...if you want the plane so slow
down, reduce the throttle.  It's worked for years on such venerable trainers as
the Eagle, PT series, and many others.

I tried a gyro (which the AFS essentially is) on the rudder of my first Dr.1.
I flew it about a week and promptly removed it and LEARNED TO FLY THE PLANE.  I
agree with you, pull out the AFS, get an instructor, and simply learn to fly.

The AFS may actually hinder the flight learning curve.  It will allow the
novice to rely too much on electronics to correct the plane, and he will not
have the needed skills when he flys anything without the AFS.  

All of the pre-building/installing means the novice will know even less than
most about his plane's construction and the principles of properly setting up
engines, radios, and applying aerodynamics to his flying.

The other "innovations" are not really innovations, but simply a manufacturer's
new hype for old ideas.  Everything on this plane has been done many years ago,
including speed brakes, a steel rod wing joiner, bolt on stabilizers,
detachable landing gear, vibration isolating engine mount, and a pivoting/
breakaway bolt on wing mount.  Hobbico simply packaged them and attached a
pricey tag.

Even the ad hype suggests you should have an instructor and buddy box.  

It ain't worth the money, people.
Dr.1 Driver
"There's a Hun in the sun!"
jeboba - 10 May 2004 19:39 GMT
Take that AFS system out or turn it off! It'll turn great!

> On 5/9/2004 10:26 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
> great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> > handles good but will not turn with ease and in some cases the plane will
> > not turn at all due to the shape of the wing.
Doug McLaren - 10 May 2004 15:41 GMT
| If you were flying this plane in 20 to 30 mph wind it would have
| been turned in scrap. In 8 to 10 mph wind the plane handles good but
| will not turn with ease and in some cases the plane will not turn at
| all due to the shape of the wing.

Note that a steady wind does not change the way a plane flies.  It
only changes the way it *appears* to fly to somebody on the ground.

The plane does not `know' how fast the wind is blowing.  All it knows
is the direction and how fast it's going (air speed, not ground
speed.)  It doesn't care if it's going upwind, downwind or in a
crosswind.  It turns at exactly the same rate as it does in no wind.
All that differs is how it appears to fly to one on the ground.

However, there are a few things that I should mention --

- Wind tends to create turbulence, which bounces your plane around.  This
  is certainly a real effect.

- As you get closer to the ground, the speed of the wind tends to drop,
  due to the drag of the ground slowing down the wind near it.

  What this means is that if you're landing upstream, your air speed
  drops as you get closer to the ground.  This can stall your plane if
  you're not careful, but it also helps you land in a small area.

  If you're landing downwind, it will tend to make your plane baloon up
  and can make you take lots of space to land -- or take you smack into
  the fence at the end of the runway.

- Wind is rarely steady.  If you're flying upwind in a 20 mph wind,
  and it gusts to 25 mph, your plane just gained 5 mph of airspeed.
  Conversely, if it slows down to 15 mph, your plane just lost 5 mph
  of airspeed.  If you were really close to a stall, that may send your
  plane crashing into the ground.

  What this usually means is that you want to fly a bit faster when you're
  close to the ground on a windy day than you would with no wind.

Of course, when flying in a wind, the plane *appears* to fly
differently depending on what direction it's going.  But this is
mostly just a matter of perception, only really important when your
plane is on the ground or about to be on the ground (take-off and
landing.)  (Or if you're trying to do precision aerobatics, which are
typically done to look right to somebody on the ground.)

Of course, for the Nextstar, apparantly the problem is the AFS rather
than anything else, but I've never flown one, so I don't know ...

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
"The lesser of two evils -- is evil." -- Seymour (Sy) Leon

res0m2r9 - 13 May 2004 05:41 GMT
I do not use the afs. I used it my first time on a dry lake bed and the
color of the lake bed confused the AFS. I will not use the AFS agian.
> I have a Nexstar and it only took 1 hour to get it flight ready. There was
> no need to take the steps outlined below. I put the plane together,
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> > get sound lessons in a structured manner.  I learned to ski by myself and
> > have since mastered all the wrong ways to do things.
Fubar - 10 May 2004 04:07 GMT
Sounds like you have a great LHS owner there. Too many of them will talk you
into something you are not ready for, or wont need and are no help at all.
Obviously this wasnt a Hobby People or Hobby Town USA type of store although
once in a great while there will be somebody there that knows more than how
to ring up a purchase.
All the things he had you do are good ideas, especially teaching you to
break in the engine. That will come in very handy later when you buy your
next engine. (and you will!)
I recommend you try to give that owner all the business you can if you can.
The small hobby shops are a disappearing breed, unfortunately. I have a
great one in Glendale, Calif. called Robin's Hobby. I try to do all my
business with him whenever possible. He knows the hobby (second generation
owner) and has a lot of good advice.

Congrats on your first flight! I pretty much learned how to ski the same way
along with learning to fly RC and went thru a LOT of planes before getting
the hang of it. There is a lot to be said for getting an instructor. I also
wish I had had a decent simulator but didnt have the puter for one at the
time.
There isnt as much of a nervous factor when flying a simulator as there is
when flying something that will break, right? ;-)
Welcome to the hobby. You are now doomed. There is no escape. You have been
assimilated.

Practice, practice, practice, and, once again, welcome to the hobby!

Signature

Fubar of The HillPeople
AMA605992
KE6ERB
http://www.fubar1.net
"I've heard the screams of the vegetables."

> I am a newbie to R/C flying.  I have seen some postings, positive and
> negative, about the hobbico nexstar and thought I would post my experience
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> get sound lessons in a structured manner.  I learned to ski by myself and
> have since mastered all the wrong ways to do things.
Steven York - 10 May 2004 05:02 GMT
I, too, am a newbie and the flight simulator is great except for fact that
you can't see how far above the ground you are (most of the time). Also it's
tougher in reality to tell from a great distance if the plane is approaching
or departing (coming or going); whereas on the simulator, it usually appears
close-up that you can tell.

I have the Cessna 180 from Wattage that I bought at the RC/Expo a few weeks
ago. I have never flown before, and this plane is a nice trainer. The staff
worker from Hobby People was very helpful. I was going to buy another
beginner plane, but he recommended against it because the radio was only
good in that plane. Although it's 27Mhz, with my Cessna at least I can take
out the radio and use it in another plane when I'm ready.

As a beginner (self-taught, no buddy box), I basically read a lot, did some
simulation, and watched others. This is my third weekend with it and I can
do laps around a school yard and actually land it really smoothly a few
times. Of course, I've only gone out when it was absolutely calm out. My
only mishap was it got too far away and I misjudged the direction and ended
up losing altitude and went into a tree. The next day I had to fish it
out--but no damage what-so-ever!

I've also gone through a few props trying to land the thing (which are
inexpensive to replace). The Cessna is a very durable plane.

Cessna review:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/magazine/article_display.cfm?article_id=318

--S

> I am a newbie to R/C flying.  I have seen some postings, positive and
> negative, about the hobbico nexstar and thought I would post my experience
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> get sound lessons in a structured manner.  I learned to ski by myself and
> have since mastered all the wrong ways to do things.
Morris Lee - 10 May 2004 13:30 GMT
Your LHS owner is fantastic!  He showed you a lot of things learned by lots
of us by trial and error.

Morris

> I am a newbie to R/C flying.  I have seen some postings, positive and
> negative, about the hobbico nexstar and thought I would post my experience
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> get sound lessons in a structured manner.  I learned to ski by myself and
> have since mastered all the wrong ways to do things.
Litehousehobby - 11 May 2004 11:49 GMT
Customer service is number one here:
http://www.lighthousehobby.com
winghawg1 - 28 May 2004 01:05 GMT
I used the AFS to learn flying in the wind, worked great for me,
wouldn't fly in anything higher than 15 to 20 tho. I thinks the Si
works great, I have only had one minor crash out of 15 flights but I d
break props, plan to get larger wheels to sovle that problem, I now fl
without the AFS or speed brakes but both of those are great tools
problem really is that ole timers don't want to learn new things
shame. That plane has helped many people learn to fly from scatch wh
don't have clubs close enough to attend such as myself, anyone wh
knows the basics can fly the Nexstar. Also I have read stories abou
holes in the plane or everything loose, huhm, mine had hole in it too
mount the speed brakes and no more screw holes. All engine screws ar
still tight. I can't believe people tell someone who just paid 400.0
for a great plane to throw away half of it, just can't believe it.

My Two Cents

Kelly D. Co

--
winghawg
wego birddog - 06 Feb 2005 16:22 GMT
Wazzz, new flyer here. I have more time in ground school than flyin
this A/C.

Learn the A/C on the ground first from all points. it will help you s
much.

I hear good stuff about this A/C and the engine is on hot one, OS 4
FXI is hot.

stand by for air-time....................................

--
wego birddo
wego birddog - 19 Feb 2005 16:48 GMT
well, I did take this NEXSTAR out to fly for the first time with th
flaps on and the AFS on at 35% on a overcast day and it did help me fl
the A/C very well.

after a while my trainer took off the AFS and flaps and it was harde
to fly for me.

I'm requesting to fly the A/C with everything hooked up again for
couple of more flight until I get the basics out of the way. A MUST!!

The A/C must be flown on an a overcast day or the sun at 12 high fo
AFS to work right..

overall I like the A/C from somebody that has never flown an RC

--
wego birddo
pcoopy - 19 Feb 2005 22:42 GMT
The reason that it was easier to fly is because without the AFS and
speed brakes installed, compared to other trainers like the Avistar for
example, it flies like a dog.

Phil AMA609
TX_QBALL@webtv.net - 20 Feb 2005 15:46 GMT
the Nexstar has to be the sorriest trainer plane out there. Seen a bunch
of em at the field and it's an overpriced junker..
Darren Earle - 20 Feb 2005 17:43 GMT
I would have to disagree.  Yes, I agree it's overpriced, but it does have
qualities to help a newbie learn to fly.  I became interested in RC flight
July '03.  I purchased an AB and practised with that for awhile, so last
March I purchased a NexStar package.  I live in an area where there are NO
clubs and NO instructors, so learning was up to me.  I also learned to fly
the NS on skis flying off of snow.  I did deactivate the AFS, not because it
wouldn't help, but simply because I live in a place where the sun never
reaches directly overhead.  The plane was flawless,  I been flying it ever
since with no mishaps.  I now use it for float flying and it's just great.
It's helped me to advance my skills and I now am flying a Twist 3-D and an
Extra 300S with a 75 Supertigre up front.

Don't be so absolute in your thinking...there are those of us who do enjoy
this plane.  Also, it does come with a guarentee from Hobbico providing you
learn at a AMA or MAC club.  I like the plane, but that's just my 2cents
worth.
> the Nexstar has to be the sorriest trainer plane out there. Seen a bunch
> of em at the field and it's an overpriced junker..
wego birddog - 21 Feb 2005 06:52 GMT
A dog for a A/C trainer ????? for somebody starting off on the Nexsta
as a R/C trainer
is GOOD, you get to see the plane fly slow and see the forces affectin
the A/C as it flys and for a R/C student that is so important "slow as
dog, ooooooo yes we need it".

one day we fly fast!!!!!!!

--
wego birddo
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.