From the Land of Mickey Mouse.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Red Scholefield - 27 May 2004 01:14 GMT Confirmed. Judi Dunlap appointed as interim District V VP.
Her qualifications are:
Appointed as Contest Coordinator for the State of Florida (2001) and made an AMA member and elevated to Leader Member at the same time by District VP Jim McNeill. Was named VP sometime in the summer of 2003. Judi's husband is a member of the Ocala Flying Model Club, one of the largest in the District, and Judi did the promotion work for the club. Her actual modeling experience is only slightly better than Jim McNeill's over the past 15 or 20 years. (Zero vs. being married to an active modeler). According to Dave Brown she was one of two AVP nominees by McNeill to replace him should he become unable to serve.
District V has 18 AVPs, One, Manny Sousa, has already been nominated to run in this year's election. If this election turns into a 3 way race will Dunlap be able to take advantage of being the incumbent against those already nominated, Sousa and Stillman?
Do we send another non-modeler to Muncie to represent us? She has stated that she does not plan on changing anything!
Red Scholefield AMA 951 Dist. V Leader Member/CD
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joyce Hager" <jhager@modelaircraft.org> To: "Red Scholefield" <redscho@bellsouth.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 7:22 PM Subject: RE: Dunlap appointed to succeed McNeill
> Yes, she was named the first of the year, I have not had a chance to talk > with her yet > > -----Original Message----- > From: Red Scholefield [mailto:redscho@bellsouth.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:00 AM > To: Joyce Hager > Subject: Dunlap appointed to succeed McNeill > > Is this true? > > Red S. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Norm Deputy" <ndeputy@bellsouth.net> > To: <amadist5@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:47 PM > Subject: RE: [AMA Dist V] McNeill Obituary > > > I heard from a reliable source that Judi Dunlap was appointed the VP > > position for the remainder of the term vacated by Jim McNeill. My > > source > was > > an AVP in our district that was called by Judi to let him know of the > > decision and solicited help because of schedule problems. > > > > Norm Deputy Fred McClellan - 27 May 2004 04:10 GMT >Confirmed. Judi Dunlap appointed as interim District V VP. <SNIP>
If gas didn't cost so much I'd drive to Birmingham and piss on his headstone.
The bastard is yanking District V around one last time, from the grave.
Efulmer - 27 May 2004 04:29 GMT Fred, I've read a lot of your posts but this one really takes the cake. That lick was lower than a snakes belly. Eddie Fulmer
Fred McClellan - 27 May 2004 23:39 GMT >Fred, > I've read a lot of your posts but this one really takes the cake. That lick >was lower than a snakes belly. Eddie Fulmer Dunno what your panties are in a wad about.
I wrote nothing in that post I have not been saying for _decades_, and you know that much quite well having participated in those threads over the years.
Jim McNeill is dead. That really is an unfortunate thing for his wife of five decades and for his children and grand children. Really, really, too bad.
I have never said I wished him dead, just out of AMA office.
I detested Jim McNeill for what he did to AMA and to District V.
I also made sure he knew it, up close and personal, more than ten years ago.
I confronted McNeill several times when he was alive.
I wonder if you can say the same.
C.O.Jones - 28 May 2004 10:08 GMT But to continue your childish rant at this point in time demonstrates your total lack of basic human consideration. You sir are despicable! I look forward to the day I can tell you to your face!
> >Fred, > > I've read a lot of your posts but this one really takes the cake. That lick [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > I wonder if you can say the same. Red Scholefield - 28 May 2004 13:23 GMT If you quit hiding behind a bogus e-mail address maybe it could be arranged. Do you still live at Brainerd Ct in Springfield VA?
Red S.
RE: Fred McClellan
> But to continue your childish rant at this point in time demonstrates your > total lack of basic human consideration. You sir are despicable! I look > forward to the day I can tell you to your face! C.O.Jones - 29 May 2004 12:44 GMT I don't have the first clue what you're talking about. But if that's what you want to think, knock yourself out! However you do seem rather obsessed about something. Maybe you're simply mourning the loss of your old nemesis, McNeil?
> If you quit hiding behind a bogus e-mail address maybe it could be arranged. > Do you still live at [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > total lack of basic human consideration. You sir are despicable! I look > > forward to the day I can tell you to your face! Red Scholefield - 29 May 2004 22:03 GMT How about the e-mail address g8tr8@aol.com? Or is this another C. O. Jones? I guess Kevin is owed an apology for thinking you were both the same person.
RS
> I don't have the first clue what you're talking about. But if that's what > you want to think, knock yourself out! Herb Winston - 30 May 2004 01:37 GMT C.O. Still sounds, looks, appears to be Kevie Kline Incaranate.
 Signature Herb Winston AMA 50438 Bonita Springs, FL
Remove NO SPAM to reply
He may look like an idiot, and he may sound like an idiot, but don't let him fool you. He really is an idiot.
Mark Twain
> How about the e-mail address g8tr8@aol.com? Or is this another C. O. Jones? > I guess Kevin is owed an apology for thinking you were both the same person. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I don't have the first clue what you're talking about. But if that's what > > you want to think, knock yourself out! C.O.Jones - 30 May 2004 17:25 GMT Like I said, believe what you want! Your obsession is often quite amusing. If you think that's my address, why don't you try it? Or would that spoil your fantasy?
> How about the e-mail address g8tr8@aol.com? Or is this another C. O. Jones? > I guess Kevin is owed an apology for thinking you were both the same person. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I don't have the first clue what you're talking about. But if that's what > > you want to think, knock yourself out! Fred McClellan - 29 May 2004 20:45 GMT >But to continue your childish rant at this point in time demonstrates your >total lack of basic human consideration. You sir are despicable! I look >forward to the day I can tell you to your face! Sure thing, bub.
Your kind is just full of threats as long as they can hide behind nom de plumes.
Coward, some might say.
You call me a "real slime", and expect me to reply with kind words ?
Grow up.
I'm not on a rant.
Eddie thought my post beneath his dignity.
I thought my post reflected the position I've held with regard to Jim McNeill for almost twenty years, a position I still hold based on having met him on numerous occasions, on having been an eyeball witness to his shenanigans, and on having lived in this District for the same amount of time.
I have nothing to apologize for because I made my personal opinion of Jim known to him more than once, and I see no reason to elevate him to sainthood (as someone else wrote) just because he's met the same ultimate fate we will all meet.
You on the other hand precipitated the rant with your "real slime" comment.
You who are not a member of AMA, you who never met Jim McNeill, you who have not been witness to the political dirty tricks and machinations of the man.
Who the hell are you to tell anyone how to speak about their experiences with Jim McNeill ?
Come to think of it, who the hell _are_ you ?
Kevin, some people think, reincarnated.
In any event, your expertise in this subject is nil.
Now go 'way and bother someone who is not likely to reply in kind to your snottygrams and personal insults.
C.O.Jones - 30 May 2004 17:28 GMT Coward is as a coward does! It's easy to speak ill of the dead! Shows their true character! Regardless of ones association with them when alive.
Now why don't you grow up? Maybe someday you'll be worthy of cleaning my boots!
> >But to continue your childish rant at this point in time demonstrates your > >total lack of basic human consideration. You sir are despicable! I look [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > Now go 'way and bother someone who is not likely to reply in kind to > your snottygrams and personal insults. Fred McClellan - 30 May 2004 17:48 GMT >Coward is as a coward does! It's easy to speak ill of the dead! Shows >their true character! Regardless of ones association with them when alive. > >Now why don't you grow up? Maybe someday you'll be worthy of cleaning my >boots! I'm convinced you're just a pimply-faced brat teenager who steals time on daddy's computer.
"Coward is as a coward does" ?
What the f.ck is that ?
You're the one making "challenges".
"Want to make something of it ?"
I figger 7th, maybe 8th grade at most.
Or is that your education level ?
Go play with the horsies and let the big boys alone before they pinch your head, bozo.
C.O.Jones - 31 May 2004 12:48 GMT Like the man said Fred. From the land of Mickey Mouse! And you epitomize it to the max!
> >Coward is as a coward does! It's easy to speak ill of the dead! Shows > >their true character! Regardless of ones association with them when alive. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Go play with the horsies and let the big boys alone before they pinch > your head, bozo. Fred McClellan - 31 May 2004 17:55 GMT >Like the man said Fred. From the land of Mickey Mouse! And you epitomize >it to the max! I have no doubt you are a certified expert in Mickey Mouse.
You demonstrated that proficiency when you claimed to have advised four Presidents.
Shut the f.ck up, blow hard.
C.O.Jones - 01 Jun 2004 02:25 GMT The problem is Fred, you know I'm right! That's why you get so worked up! I yank your chain and you can't stand it!
> >Like the man said Fred. From the land of Mickey Mouse! And you epitomize > >it to the max! [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Shut the f.ck up, blow hard. Fred McClellan - 01 Jun 2004 04:11 GMT >The problem is Fred, you know I'm right! That's why you get so worked up! >I yank your chain and you can't stand it! Wrong again on several accounts as usual, nitwit.
You seem to think you have carte blanche to slander and insult all and sundry.
You seem to think you can do so without being taken to task.
You think you can make outrageous claims, like "I advised four presidents", and everyone here is too inept to realize you've told an impossible whopper just to puff up your own self-importance.
You can't even keep your lies straight.
You're not "right" by any stretch of the imagination, fool.
The only thing being "yanked" around here is your own pud, needledick.
C.O.Jones - 01 Jun 2004 21:07 GMT Then why do you keep responding and allowing such short posts from me to cause you to wax verbose?
> >The problem is Fred, you know I'm right! That's why you get so worked up! > >I yank your chain and you can't stand it! [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > The only thing being "yanked" around here is your own pud, needledick. Paul McIntosh - 01 Jun 2004 21:47 GMT Fred,
Remember the pledge? Seems like a good time to resurrect it.
-- Paul McIntosh http://www.rc-bearings.com
> Then why do you keep responding and allowing such short posts from me to > cause you to wax verbose? [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > > > The only thing being "yanked" around here is your own pud, needledick. Fred McClellan - 02 Jun 2004 02:07 GMT >Fred, > >Remember the pledge? Seems like a good time to resurrect it. Won't work on this a.shole.
Honor eludes him.
Paul McIntosh - 02 Jun 2004 07:42 GMT No, WE take the pledge. Don't feed him and he will look for other pastures.
-- Paul McIntosh http://www.rc-bearings.com
> >Fred, > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Honor eludes him. C.O.Jones - 03 Jun 2004 10:52 GMT > >Fred, > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Honor eludes him. Look who talks about honor!
Fred McClellan - 04 Jun 2004 06:50 GMT >Look who talks about honor! Damn straight.
It's quite honorable to tell you to shut the f.ck up and mean it.
Now go back to jerking off in the closet, pimpleface.
C.O.Jones - 04 Jun 2004 11:14 GMT > >Look who talks about honor! > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Now go back to jerking off in the closet, pimpleface. Not hardly Fred! I want to bait you some more so everyone can see what total foul mouthed turd you are! You're the best joke since Clinton was in office.
James D Jones - 04 Jun 2004 20:37 GMT >>> Look who talks about honor! >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > what total foul mouthed turd you are! You're the best joke since > Clinton was in office. If you two must trade insults, why not do it off-line. All you are doing by posting here is letting others know how stupid you both are. If what you are doing is trying to offend as many people as possible, You are close to success.
Jim - AMA 501383
Fred McClellan - 05 Jun 2004 00:33 GMT >If you two must trade insults, why not do it off-line. All you are >doing by posting here is letting others know how stupid you both are. >If what you are doing is trying to offend as many people as possible, >You are close to success. You don't like the tone of the thread, and you don't have the sense to avoid it, but I'm stupid ?
Yeah, right.
C.O.Jones - 05 Jun 2004 01:30 GMT > On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:37:15 GMT, James D Jones > but I'm stupid ? > > Yeah, right. Ah! Finally something we can both agree on!
James D Jones - 05 Jun 2004 17:37 GMT Right, I'm dumb enough to post something that you can use out of context. But, I guess that we are all stupid if your name isn't in our kill list. But, that wouldn't help much. You'll just change it again.
>>On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:37:15 GMT, James D Jones >>but I'm stupid ? >> >>Yeah, right. > > Ah! Finally something we can both agree on! James D Jones - 05 Jun 2004 17:34 GMT I'm sorry, but the title of the thread left no clue that children were trading insults. Not posting garbage in public places avoids the problem. Your response makes as much sense as a flashers when he claims that the lady didn't need to look. Not quite as offensive, but getting there.
Jim - AMA 501383
>>If you two must trade insults, why not do it off-line. All you are >>doing by posting here is letting others know how stupid you both are. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Yeah, right. C.O.Jones - 05 Jun 2004 01:36 GMT > If you two must trade insults, why not do it off-line. All you are > doing by posting here is letting others know how stupid you both are. > If what you are doing is trying to offend as many people as possible, > You are close to success. > > Jim - AMA 501383 Just for the record, I'm more concerned about being connected in some way to someone named "Jim Jones"!
http://www.conncoll.edu/academics/departments/relstudies/290/newage/jimjones.html
http://www.religioustolerance.org/dc_jones.htm
James D Jones - 05 Jun 2004 17:45 GMT >> If you two must trade insults, why not do it off-line. All you are >> doing by posting here is letting others know how stupid you both [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http://www./dc_jones.htm I came by my name honestly. There have been many of us with that name. Some famous, and some infamous. I note that one of the organizations you quote is religioustolerance.org. It's too bad that tolerance of others isn't your game plan. I would appreciate it if you used an alias other tha Jones. I also do not wish to be associated with anyone with the venom you often express.
Jim - AMA 501383
C.O.Jones - 06 Jun 2004 15:00 GMT > I came by my name honestly. There have been many of us with that name. > Some famous, and some infamous. I note that one of the organizations [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Jim - AMA 501383 That's right! It's all my fault! No one here has any vices what so ever! Why what a wonderfully myopic little world we live in!
Herb Winston - 07 Jun 2004 05:48 GMT C! O! Jones!: A! Kevie! Kline! Clone!
 Signature Herb Winston AMA 50438 Bonita Springs, FL
Remove NO SPAM to reply
He may look like an idiot, and he may sound like an idiot, but don't let him fool you. He really is an idiot.
Mark Twain
> > > I came by my name honestly. There have been many of us with that name. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > That's right! It's all my fault! No one here has any vices what so ever! > Why what a wonderfully myopic little world we live in! Fred McClellan - 05 Jun 2004 00:30 GMT >Not hardly Fred! I want to bait you some more so everyone can see what >total foul mouthed turd you are! You're the best joke since Clinton was in >office. I'm the joke ?
Why then is it that you quote me when you want to tell someone off but lack the gonads to do so ?
f.cking wimp.
Fred McClellan - 05 Jun 2004 00:46 GMT >Not hardly Fred! I want to bait you some more so everyone can see what >total foul mouthed turd you are! You're the best joke since Clinton was in >office. Now that you mention it "C.O", that's been your intended purpose ever since you joined the group back in November.
Been around every bit of seven months, and your major contributions have been to deride AMA and AMA members, and to bait individuals and pontificate about your self-righteous moralistic nonsense.
You are quite correct.
Bait away.
With enough practice you will become a master.
I'm done with you and the news group.
Piss off.
C.O.Jones - 05 Jun 2004 01:32 GMT > On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:14:21 -0400, "C.O.Jones" > > I'm done with you and the news group. Promises! Promises!
Robert A. Booey - 05 Jun 2004 04:43 GMT > I'm done with you and the news group. Kewl. Now, if it were only true.
Dr1Driver - 01 Jun 2004 22:24 GMT >Then why do you keep responding and allowing such short posts from me to >cause you to wax verbose? Oh gawd, he's got the thesaurus out again! Dr.1 Driver "There's a Hun in the sun!"
Fred McClellan - 02 Jun 2004 02:06 GMT >Then why do you keep responding and allowing such short posts from me to >cause you to wax verbose? Because I never will have been a practiced master of the lie, insinuated slander, and implied insult the way you are.
Todd Klondike - 02 Jun 2004 04:15 GMT Fred McClellan <notthe-plumber@mindsprang.com> posted message ID<5q9qb0pmlbij2g1avvklu3622l9a5gckc5@4ax.com>on Wed, 02 Jun 2004 01:06:30 GMT
>>Then why do you keep responding and allowing such short posts from me to >>cause you to wax verbose? > >Because I never will have been a practiced master of the lie, >insinuated slander, and implied insult the way you are. And, apparently, you never will have been a practiced master of the syntax, either.
Jack Goff - 02 Jun 2004 12:53 GMT > And, apparently, you never will have been a practiced master of the > syntax, either. "And, apparently, you never will have been..." ?!? Want to try that again, but this time in English?
Jack
Todd Klondike - 02 Jun 2004 13:15 GMT "Jack Goff" <cgoff@sc.com> posted message ID<Tcjvc.1409$wH4.70830@twister.southeast.rr.com>on Wed, 02 Jun 2004 11:53:23 GMT
>> And, apparently, you never will have been a practiced master of the >> syntax, either. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Jack I was spoofing Mr. McClellan's post where he originally said the "never will have been a practiced master" bit. I used his tortured syntax to point out, well, his tortured syntax. It takes away from the jokes, Jack, when one is compelled to explain them.
 Signature Martyr 'em all and let Allah sort 'em out.
Jack Goff - 03 Jun 2004 02:43 GMT > I was spoofing Mr. McClellan's post where he originally said the > "never will have been a practiced master" bit. I used his tortured > syntax to point out, well, his tortured syntax. It takes away from > the jokes, Jack, when one is compelled to explain them. Ahh... being a text only venue, the normal way to point out a joke such as this is with a :-), or a ;-). We couldn't see your grin as you typed.
Also, as a rule, *good* jokes don't need explaining. ;-)
Jack
Todd Klondike - 03 Jun 2004 03:40 GMT "Jack Goff" <cgoff@sc.com> posted message ID<anvvc.2436$wH4.142820@twister.southeast.rr.com>on Thu, 03 Jun 2004 01:43:34 GMT
>> I was spoofing Mr. McClellan's post where he originally said the >> "never will have been a practiced master" bit. I used his tortured [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Jack Subtlety is everything. I supposed that the jest would be obvious to anyone familiar with the English language. Also, I am no fan of emoticons.
Jack Goff - 03 Jun 2004 13:13 GMT > Subtlety is everything. I supposed that the jest would be obvious to > anyone familiar with the English language. Therein lies the fault. One would need to posess this familiarity *and* must have paid close attention to the previous post. I failed in the latter.
Also, I am no fan of
> emoticons. Too bad. It would have save us both a bit of typing.
Now where did I put that glue?
Jack
Fred McClellan - 02 Jun 2004 23:29 GMT >Fred McClellan <notthe-plumber@mindsprang.com> posted message >ID<5q9qb0pmlbij2g1avvklu3622l9a5gckc5@4ax.com>on Wed, 02 Jun 2004 [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >And, apparently, you never will have been a practiced master of the >syntax, either. While it may be true that you never will have been conversant in future perfect tense, I are.
C.O.Jones - 27 May 2004 10:48 GMT I was wondering how long it would take before the real slime stepped in on this! Congratulations Fred for not disappointing me! You've just lived up to everything I know you are!
Chuck
> >Confirmed. Judi Dunlap appointed as interim District V VP. > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > The bastard is yanking District V around one last time, from the > grave. IFLYJ3 - 27 May 2004 17:45 GMT Why is it that when a person dies, he becomes a saint regardless of how he was here? I think Fred just had the gonads to say what a lot of people think.
> I was wondering how long it would take before the real slime stepped in on > this! Congratulations Fred for not disappointing me! You've just lived up [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > The bastard is yanking District V around one last time, from the > > grave. C.O.Jones - 27 May 2004 23:53 GMT > Why is it that when a person dies, he becomes a saint regardless of > how he was here? I think Fred just had the gonads to say what a lot of > people think. Not a saint by any means. But the man is dead! Can't you McNeil haters let go of it and allow the man to rest in peace? Obviously not! I do hope all of you experience the same level of respect when you go!
And for the record, McNeil only SUGGESTED who his replacement should be. It was up to Dave Brown and/or the EC to make the decision who to appoint. Maybe you should take your gripes up with them?
Red Scholefield - 28 May 2004 04:21 GMT > And for the record, McNeil only SUGGESTED who his replacement should be. It > was up to Dave Brown and/or the EC to make the decision who to appoint. > Maybe you should take your gripes up with them? Somebody is blowing in our ear!
From: "Bill Oberdieck" <sgaeroinc@comcast.net> AMA VP District VII To: "Red Scholefield" <redscho@bellsouth.net> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Something strange.
> FWIW, it was Jim's choice, no one elses. So according to the Bylaws ArtX > Sect 2 and the Standing Rules first paragraph the issue is settled as long > as the selected person meets any additional criteria. In response to:
From: "Red Scholefield" <redscho@bellsouth.net> To: "ama5" <amadist5@yahoogroups.com> Cc: "AMA EC" <5-ExecutiveCouncil@modelaircraft.org> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:54 PM Subject: Something strange.
> I am puzzled. Two people were nominated by McNeill to be his replacement. > One, an active modeler, and the other with hardly any real modeling > background. Why was the one with the limited experience picked over the > experienced one? > > Red S. C.O.Jones - 28 May 2004 10:11 GMT And when has the EC allowed something like a silly rule to get in their way? They allowed it! They could have changed it but they allowed it for whatever reason. However, it is just interim so maybe there will be out of cycle elections soon. Or, maybe the selected just might prove to be worthy after all. Time will tell. Glad my enjoyment of the hobby isn't dependant on any of that.
> > And for the record, McNeil only SUGGESTED who his replacement should be. > It [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > > > Red S. Fred McClellan - 29 May 2004 20:46 GMT >And when has the EC allowed something like a silly rule to get in their way? >They allowed it! They could have changed it but they allowed it for >whatever reason. However, it is just interim so maybe there will be out of >cycle elections soon. Or, maybe the selected just might prove to be worthy >after all. Time will tell. Glad my enjoyment of the hobby isn't dependant >on any of that. More AMA 'expertise' from an outsider.
Fred McClellan - 28 May 2004 05:11 GMT >> Why is it that when a person dies, he becomes a saint regardless of >> how he was here? I think Fred just had the gonads to say what a lot of [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >was up to Dave Brown and/or the EC to make the decision who to appoint. >Maybe you should take your gripes up with them? Maybe you should learn about that which you would profess expertise.
Dave Brown and/or the EC don't get to appoint anyone.
AMA By-Laws say that when the death occurs within three months of the normal end of term, appointments can be made. Otherwise, an election by the Open Members _will be conducted_.
Ms. Dunlap doesn't hold the office, can't hold the office, and if the membership of District V is disenfranchised by political wannabes, Mr. Brown and the surviving Executive Council will find themselves in a court room answering some really pointed questions about violating the By-Laws of a 501C(3) organization.
But of course you wouldn't know that because as far as AMA is concerned you're a complete a.s and utter ignoramus.
C.O.Jones - 28 May 2004 10:17 GMT > Maybe you should learn about that which you would profess expertise. > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > But of course you wouldn't know that because as far as AMA is > concerned you're a complete a.s and utter ignoramus. See! That's what I like about you Fred! Right to the point! Took you five paragraphs/lines to get there. But right to it. You wanted nothing more than to do some more of your name calling. Just can't help it can you?
And for the record, one of the reasons I came to this group in the first place was to gain some impressions about the AMA. And this group and prima donnas like Fred are a couple of the reasons why I do not belong to the AMA!
But you know what Fred? The appointment is identified as an interim appointment. Know what that means Fred? Not permanent! Temporary until a permanent selection can be made!
Get a clue you pathetic lump of animal waste.
Fred McClellan - 29 May 2004 21:02 GMT >See! That's what I like about you Fred! Right to the point! Took you five >paragraphs/lines to get there. But right to it. You wanted nothing more >than to do some more of your name calling. Just can't help it can you? Absolutely. I _always_ reply in kind, as you well know.
Do recall you used the term "real slime".
>And for the record, one of the reasons I came to this group in the first >place was to gain some impressions about the AMA. And this group and prima >donnas like Fred are a couple of the reasons why I do not belong to the AMA! Close, real close.
Your first missive in this news group, in November of last year, had to do with why you should bless AMA with your presence.
I replied, citing a number of reasons.
Your retort was to call me "paranoid".
You've been at it ever since, and have antagonized a goodly number of long-time participants in the news group in so doing.
Have you read the posts asking why participation in the news group is at an all time low ?
I think it is because of your antagonistic tendencies to engage in personal belittlement and insults that is the direct cause of the demise of the group.
What's wrong with the group is YOU.
>But you know what Fred? The appointment is identified as an interim >appointment. Know what that means Fred? Not permanent! Temporary until a >permanent selection can be made! > >Get a clue you pathetic lump of animal waste. More insults, more antagonism.
You don't know what you're talking about, aren't an AMA member, don't have recourse to make your opinion known to the AMA leadership, and do _you_ know what ? Your opinion as to whether the special election must be held or an appointment can be made is moot because you don't get a ballot and you don't get to tell anyone in AMA how _we_ should go about our business.
According to the AMA By-Laws, the option to appoint an interim replacement only exists when the death of the DVP occurs within three months of the normal end of term.
That's what the rules say, and that's what is supposed to happen.
That some of us detested Jim McNeill ought to be proof even to you that he and other members of the EC have been flouting the By-Laws for decades, and the appointment of one of his cronies is just more flouting of the By-Laws by the remaining members of the EC who think they can still get away with such antics.
Well, bub, Dave Brown's Yes-Man is dead and buried, so the automajik seconding of his agenda items just came to a screaming halt, and that cannot bode but well for AMA as a whole.
The death of Jim McNeill allows for the possibility that we just might be able to do business the way the By-Laws say we're supposed to do business.
All the reasons for joining AMA are all still there and all still valid.
Opting to remain outside an organization because one individual is already in that organization is hardly a sound reason.
Who don't you like ?
I'd bet you can find any number of folk you don't like, and can find reason not to join whatever organization they are part of just because you don't like them.
Really logical thinking there, bub.
You aren't going to affect my participation in the hobby or AMA one whit. I can't affect YOUR participation in the hobby _or_ AMA one whit, so what I think about you has no bearing on your participation in either.
Your position that AMA is all bad because you don't like me is sheer nonsense, and the sad part is that you're just too arrogant and stubborn to see what good AMA does and might do for you.
Stay on the outside if you want, but your sage counsel regarding AMA matters is singularly worthless until you have a ballot in your hand.
Otherwise, you comments about the proceedings of AMA is the real _rant_.
Red Scholefield - 29 May 2004 22:15 GMT > > Ms. Dunlap doesn't hold the office, can't hold the office, and if the > > membership of District V is disenfranchised by political wannabes, Mr. > > Brown and the surviving Executive Council will find themselves in a > > court room answering some really pointed questions about violating the > > By-Laws of a 501C(3) organization. Someone has not got this message. :-)
From: "Judith Dunlap" <tinytiger@worldnet.att.net> SNIP Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 9:44 AM Subject: Re: Leader Member
BIG SNIP
Judi Dunlap Vice President District 5
Fred McClellan - 30 May 2004 00:51 GMT On Sat, 29 May 2004 17:15:36 -0400, "Red Scholefield"
>Judi Dunlap >Vice President >District 5 Would you be so kind as to forward that missive to Dave Matthewson ?
Red Scholefield - 28 May 2004 13:48 GMT Here is the rub Fred, right after the statement about "within 3 months" they put this little jewel, " "or when a Council meeting is called or scheduled during the nominating and voting period, the outgoing Vice President (or the Executive Council in the event of his demise, incapacity, or inaction) shall make an interim appointment from among the active Associate Vice Presidents in the district."
There is an executive council meeting next weekend - is this within the "nominating and voting period"?
Sure wish we had some legal minds to help sort this out. Like define "active" for one. Maybe they should have substituted "among the Associate Vice Presidents having vital signs". This would cover most of them, while the term "active" could conceivably eliminate a few. As we know, in District V an "active" AVP was soon a former AVP in at least 5 cases in the recent past.
Red S.
> >> Why is it that when a person dies, he becomes a saint regardless of > >> how he was here? I think Fred just had the gonads to say what a lot of [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > But of course you wouldn't know that because as far as AMA is > concerned you're a complete a.s and utter ignoramus. Fred McClellan - 29 May 2004 21:47 GMT >Here is the rub Fred, right after the statement about "within 3 months" >they put this little jewel, " [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >V an "active" AVP was soon a former AVP in at least 5 cases in the recent >past. Dave Matthewson is taking a long hard look at that very section.
What he did relate is that on previous occasions of a DVPs expiration, the EC did different things according to how they felt at the time, and on the last instance noted that all previous instances were handled differently and also noted the "failing of the By-Laws" (Dave's words, not mine) to adequate define the process by which a deceased DVP is replaced.
It appears that the extant EC will have to figure out, once and for all, what the drafters of the relevant sections had in mind, if possible.
As we know full well, the EC can do whatever the EC decides they can do, and we'll all find out after the deed is done. Whether they abide by the By-Laws as written or invent yet another way to do things is not something we're likely to affect, except as some of us are consulted by those very same EC members.
I spent the better part of last evening and this morning composing a response to Dave's query on the issue, and hopefully it all made sense.
I think we have Dave to thank for helping stymie some of the more lunatic agenda items that have come from District V in recent years.
I do know that the "flood of e-mails" described by one former EC member had a major effect on two of those same nutty ideas, namely the CD punishment item and the Leader Member item.
If the EC do nothing more than abide by the By-Laws as written, they'll have to adhere to the bit about holding a special election. given that the three month interim appointment schtick is an exception to the rule, ostensibly to prevent having to pay for two elections back to back.
If they collectively choose to interpret the By-Laws every which way, who knows what course of action they'll take.
I do know that Dave is also taking a hard look at the business of handing out AMA memberships, Leader Member status, and District appointments in one fell swoop, because District V faces the distinct possibility of having a DVP who has done nothing to acquire the experience to lead a District, has been an AMA member right at four years, and has never built or flown a model aircraft.
Duh . . . that sounds awfully familiar . . . .
IFLYJ3 - 28 May 2004 11:41 GMT > > Why is it that when a person dies, he becomes a saint regardless of > > how he was here? I think Fred just had the gonads to say what a lot of [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > was up to Dave Brown and/or the EC to make the decision who to appoint. > Maybe you should take your gripes up with them? Oh! I see your logic now. When I die, everything I did while I was here will be erased.
C.O.Jones - 28 May 2004 20:41 GMT > Oh! I see your logic now. When I die, everything I did while I was > here will be erased. Not erased but probably soon forgotten! That I suspect is what really troubles most people.
Fred McClellan - 28 May 2004 05:07 GMT >I was wondering how long it would take before the real slime stepped in on >this! Congratulations Fred for not disappointing me! You've just lived up >to everything I know you are! f.ck off you sniveling little prick.
You don't _know_ a damn thing about me.
C.O.Jones - 28 May 2004 10:19 GMT I know you're a foul mouthed low life! You've demonstrated that quite well right here. Several times now! Care to make something of it? Or do you wish to continue in your typically pathetic and immature ways?
> >I was wondering how long it would take before the real slime stepped in on > >this! Congratulations Fred for not disappointing me! You've just lived up [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > You don't _know_ a damn thing about me. Fred McClellan - 29 May 2004 21:22 GMT >I know you're a foul mouthed low life! You've demonstrated that quite well >right here. Several times now! Care to make something of it? Or do you >wish to continue in your typically pathetic and immature ways? The only thing you do know is that I always reply in kind and I don't put up with self-righteous limp dicks like you.
I know how to use the seven words Lenny Bruce used to get in hot water with the FCC, a long time ago. So what ?
Who elected you moderator of the news group ?
Care to post the rules which list the words that cannot be used here ?
Your notion of morality is not binding on me or anyone else.
Don't like what I write ? Don't read it. Use the bit bucket.
Insult me, call me "real slime", "paranoid", and other derogatory terms will only get you more and more of the words which seem to drive you absolutely out of your pointy little mind.
Now you come with the threats. Real big of you, considering your hiding behind a nom de plume, like some freak yanking his pud in the closet while making nasty phone calls to little girls.
"Care to make something of it ?"
Still in Second Grade, eh ?
Go 'way, blow hard.
C.O.Jones - 30 May 2004 17:53 GMT > "Care to make something of it ?" Sure! What's your address?
Fred McClellan - 30 May 2004 23:59 GMT >> "Care to make something of it ?" > >Sure! What's your address? Wasn't my question, it was YOURS, dimwit, just like the schoolyard bully you are.
If you think I'm going to put my address in a USENET news group you're a bigger idiot than I had ever imagined.
Now f.ck off, dolt.
Rumprider - 02 Jun 2004 00:07 GMT The AMA?? WHO CARES
> Confirmed. Judi Dunlap appointed as interim District V VP. > [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > > > > > Norm Deputy Fred McClellan - 02 Jun 2004 02:10 GMT >The AMA?? WHO CARES The folks reading the original thread.
It _was_ about AMA business, after all.
Use a filter if you don't want to read it.
|
|
|