Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Pusher prop, does it differ from tractor prop?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Wan - 09 Jun 2004 18:53 GMT
Hi,

I want to scratch build an electric plane with a pusher  prop. I was
told that I need a special pusher prop, but I can't find any locally.

Why is it not good to use a regular prop turned backwards and have the
motor reversed in rotation?

Wan
Doug McLaren - 09 Jun 2004 18:57 GMT
| I want to scratch build an electric plane with a pusher  prop. I was
| told that I need a special pusher prop, but I can't find any locally.
|
| Why is it not good to use a regular prop turned backwards and have the
| motor reversed in rotation?

That'll work fine.  Reversing a motor with a glow plane isn't as easy
as it is with an electric, but with an electric you can often do
exactly what you're suggesting.

Do be aware that electric motors often need to be re-timed to run
efficiently backwards.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
Join the collective.                            Meet distinctive individuals.
Travel to distant eco-spheres.                  And assimilate them.

Wan - 10 Jun 2004 00:50 GMT
> | I want to scratch build an electric plane with a pusher  prop. I was
> | told that I need a special pusher prop, but I can't find any locally.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Do be aware that electric motors often need to be re-timed to run
> efficiently backwards.

Thanks, Doug. The motor I plan to use is a geared brushless and I
don't think it needs to be re-timed?

Perhaps I should have concerns about cooling the motor since the air
will not be blown through?

Wan
Mike Norton - 10 Jun 2004 03:17 GMT
> > | I want to scratch build an electric plane with a pusher  prop. I was
> > | told that I need a special pusher prop, but I can't find any locally.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Wan

If it is a sensorless brushless motor, it will not have to be re-timed.
The Natural Philosopher - 10 Jun 2004 08:28 GMT
>>| I want to scratch build an electric plane with a pusher  prop. I was
>>| told that I need a special pusher prop, but I can't find any locally.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Thanks, Doug. The motor I plan to use is a geared brushless and I
> don't think it needs to be re-timed?

No, just swap any two leads in it to reverse it.

> Perhaps I should have concerns about cooling the motor since the air
> will not be blown through?
>
> Wan
Yvan Grondin - 09 Jun 2004 20:15 GMT
The efficency of the propeler will be very low . You can have pusher prop at
tower hobbies.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Wan
Malcolm Fisher - 09 Jun 2004 21:39 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >
> > Wan

You could try carving your own - it's not difficult although can take quite
a bit of time, but there is a great deal of satisfaction to be had when your
model flies with the prop you made.

Malcolm
AAA - 12 Jun 2004 02:00 GMT
> You could try carving your own - it's not difficult although can take quite
> a bit of time, but there is a great deal of satisfaction to be had when your
> model flies with the prop you made.
>
> Malcolm

And how many times have _you_ done that?
Malcolm Fisher - 12 Jun 2004 21:42 GMT
> > You could try carving your own - it's not difficult although can take
> quite
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> And how many times have _you_ done that?

Many many times. I started as a teenager in the late 1950s when I didn't
have much money to spare on my hobby. A piece of wood and my time cost very
little. The cost of a new prop was nearly as much as a half pint of fuel
which, at the time, I couldn't make but later learned how and still do from
time to time. I'm talking diesel here, not glow, but have mixed my own glow
fuel as well.

Latest carving was for a 10 X 5 to run in an OS Wankel given as a present
last Christmas. I most likely won't need the prop for anything else apart
from, possiby, my Black Magic which is powered by a PAW 19D.

I'll send you instructions if you really want.

Malcolm
Malcolm Fisher - 12 Jun 2004 21:52 GMT
> > You could try carving your own - it's not difficult although can take
> quite
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> And how many times have _you_ done that?

Forgot to mention that I have carved both pusher and tractor props. When I
first wanted a pusher, there were none available from my local shops so the
only way was to make my own..

Malcolm
Andrey Tarasevich - 09 Jun 2004 22:39 GMT
>> Why is it not good to use a regular prop turned backwards and have  the
>> motor reversed in rotation?
> ...
> The efficency of the propeler will be very low . You can have pusher prop at
> tower hobbies.

The efficiency of the propeller won't change at all. The efficiency of
the motor might decrease. Or not. That depends on the concrete motor.

Signature

Best regards,
Andrey Tarasevich

Paul McIntosh - 10 Jun 2004 00:04 GMT
The efficiency would be exactly the same.  If the motor is reversed and the
prop turned around, it will be blowing the same as it would have been
sucking in normal mode.

--
Paul McIntosh
http://www.rc-bearings.com
> The efficency of the propeler will be very low . You can have pusher prop at
> tower hobbies.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> > Wan
The Natural Philosopher - 10 Jun 2004 08:28 GMT
> The efficency of the propeler will be very low . You can have pusher prop at
> tower hobbies.

Rubbish.

>>Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>>Wan
emcook@yahoo.com - 09 Jun 2004 22:08 GMT
I have emailed several prop manufacturers and all have assured me that
a pusher prop is a mirror image of their tractor props.

Mount a tractor prop on the engine to where you can read the face side
of the prop from standing in front of the plane looking back at the
motor.

The face side of a tractor prop points forward regardless of whether
its mount on the front, or the back of the plane.

Reverse the motor's rotation and everything should work just fine, and
be just as efficient as a pusher prop. Assuming the electric motor is
as efficient reversed.

>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Wan
The Natural Philosopher - 10 Jun 2004 08:27 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Why is it not good to use a regular prop turned backwards and have the
> motor reversed in rotation?

That's what everyone else does Wan.

Only slimers that can't run backwards properly need a specaial prop.

> Wan
Wan - 11 Jun 2004 08:42 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Only slimers that can't run backwards properly need a specaial prop.

TNP, Very interesting. I was checking my new AXi 2212/34 and it was
rotating clockwise looking at it from the  front, wrong for a tractor
prop. The leads to the motor were correctly connected to color code.

Then I switched the power leads, red to black, black to red, and it
ran correctly.

Would switching ANY  two leads do the same as suggested by another
poster here?

Wan
PCPhill - 11 Jun 2004 12:05 GMT
In  a brushless motor, yes.  Switch all three leads and it won't change the
direction.

PCPhill

"> TNP, Very interesting. I was checking my new AXi 2212/34 and it was
> rotating clockwise looking at it from the  front, wrong for a tractor
> prop. The leads to the motor were correctly connected to color code.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Wan
The Natural Philosopher - 11 Jun 2004 12:43 GMT
>>>Hi,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Would switching ANY  two leads do the same as suggested by another
> poster here?

Yes.

> Wan
Ash Wyllie - 11 Jun 2004 13:35 GMT
Wan opined

>> > Hi,
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>rotating clockwise looking at it from the  front, wrong for a tractor
>prop. The leads to the motor were correctly connected to color code.

>Then I switched the power leads, red to black, black to red, and it
>ran correctly.

>Would switching ANY  two leads do the same as suggested by another
>poster here?

That is what an article I read claimed.

                        -ash
                        Cthulhu for President!
                        Why vote for a lesser evil?
Wan - 12 Jun 2004 13:22 GMT
> Wan opined
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>                          Cthulhu for President!
>                          Why vote for a lesser evil?

Thanks everyone. Everything I've read here have been reassuring that I
can use a tractor prop as a pusher. The major reason why a pusher
plane is to keep my gear box from being broken on bad landing by
having the prop in the rear. (I'd rather build a tractor plane)

A direct drive would eliminate the gear box, but why don't they make
gear boxes with less brittle plastic? And there is no glue I know of
that will adhere to that plastic for repairs. No more geared motors
for me in the future.

Wan
The Natural Philosopher - 14 Jun 2004 00:24 GMT
>>Wan opined
>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Wan
Crash less. Besides you can get spares.
Wan - 14 Jun 2004 13:36 GMT
> >>Wan opined
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> > Wan
> Crash less. Besides you can get spares.

Is this you speaking, TNP?
Absolutely crash less! But where can I get spares now? I expressed the
same sentiments in my other post about direct drive and prop sizes.

Wan
The Natural Philosopher - 14 Jun 2004 23:42 GMT
>>Crash less. Besides you can get spares.
>
> Is this you speaking, TNP?
> Absolutely crash less! But where can I get spares now? I expressed the
> same sentiments in my other post about direct drive and prop sizes.

Not sure what box you have. But see other post for lots of places to get
box spares.

> Wan
Wan - 15 Jun 2004 03:31 GMT
> >>Crash less. Besides you can get spares.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Not sure what box you have. But see other post for lots of places to get

TNP, Thanks for the suggestion. I book marked several sites and found
the gearbox I needed. I will be studying as to what else is available.

I also found one the motors I purchased, an AXI 2212/34 bruhless for a
little less than what I paid at the hobby shop. But I have it  sooner.

For what it's worth, I'd rather have a brushless direct drive than a
geared one. Perhaps because they're more efficient without the gears?

Wan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.