Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Which Park Flyer is best?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tom Crabtree - 10 Jun 2004 03:10 GMT
TIA for any answers this post brings.

I'm fairly a newbie, solo'ed in my SIG LT40 a few months ago.
*WHEW*
*What a RUSH!!!*
Any silly fool can get one in the air, takes balls 'o steel to get it
back on the ground in one piece!  I hate cross winds!

The airfield is a few miles away and there's a Junior College with a
nice large grassy soccer field just around the corner.  Would love to
have a plane that I could fly after work when the wind dies down,
without all the fuss of my LT40.  Not to say that I don't love the smell
of nitro ('cuz I do...), but would be nice to get some air time in small
bites after work.

What park flyer would be best?  I'd prefer electric, and something that
takes off and lands like the big birds.  Something that will handle a
little wind, and still do loops, rolls, etc.  Something that will fly
slow enough to have fun with, and fast enough to make it interesting.

I don't want a wing plane, whatever it is, it's got to have landing
gear.  I love to watch the Zagi's combat, but feel a little cheated when
you've got to throw them into the air and land them on their bellies.

It's got to be big enough to see and not one of those boom and pod silly
little toys that seem to be the rage.  (don't care how good they fly,
they just look silly).

Ideas, guys & gals?

Appreciate the help.

TomC
RC Lurker
The Natural Philosopher - 10 Jun 2004 08:31 GMT
> TIA for any answers this post brings.
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Appreciate the help.

Tough call. To be large and fast enough to handle wind makes it rather
large for flying round parks..

I'd say you need somethig in the speed 400 or even larger class...maybe
a Sig Rascal would suit you.

Google for it.

> TomC
> RC Lurker
Mark Lee - 10 Jun 2004 09:43 GMT
> TIA for any answers this post brings.
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> TomC
> RC Lurker

A GWS Beaver fills most of the bill - except for rolls - as it's rudder
and elevator.  But you need something fairly slow if it's only one soccer
field.  Geared 300 motor, 1100 or 2200mAh 2-cell Li-ion/poly.  Climbs
well, loops and can take a little wind.  Can carry a small glider on top,
too.  R-o-Gs well, lands beautifully and flies for 30mins or an hour
depending on battery.  That's a lot of touch and goes.  And it's very
quiet, too.
Signature

Mark Lee

Randall Roman - 10 Jun 2004 12:59 GMT
Check out our "Nemesis 3D-II" parkflyer at www.m-a-e.com .  Fully aerobatic
for sport or 3D.  Tough, handles winds up to 10mph with ease.  Check out the
videos on our site... especially the one on landing gear.

Randy
Model Airplane Engineering
www.M-A-E.com

> TIA for any answers this post brings.
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> TomC
> RC Lurker
Robert A. Plourde Jr. - 10 Jun 2004 16:22 GMT
GWS E-Starter?  That might do it for you, with the 400 motor.

> TIA for any answers this post brings.
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> TomC
> RC Lurker
Morris Lee - 10 Jun 2004 20:42 GMT
> TIA for any answers this post brings.
<snip>
> I don't want a wing plane, whatever it is, it's got to have landing
> gear.  I love to watch the Zagi's combat, but feel a little cheated when
> you've got to throw them into the air and land them on their bellies.
<snip>
> TomC
> RC Lurker

How come?  I've had a Zagi for two years and I've had a blast with it.  I've
since replaced it with a Unicorn, a wing that's a bit larger and IMHO flies
better.  One thing that can be said with all the foam wings is that they're
darn near indestructible.  I will be honest and say that they're harder to
see than conventional airplanes, especially from the edge, and that they
don't have a trainer's self-righting tendencies.  Also, a lot of "Speed 400"
planes require a hand launch, especially from a grass field.

Morris
kokomoNOSPAMkid@hotmail.com - 10 Jun 2004 23:04 GMT
> TIA for any answers this post brings.
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> TomC
> RC Lurker

I have a Northeast Sailplane AcroPhat which is very aerobatic and will
handle a reasonable amount of wind.  It is an ARF with wood and monocote
construction.  I have a brushless motor (don't know the make and model)
that I got from NES with the plane.  So far, I've flown it with 8 cell
NiMH batteries and get maybe 6-7 minute duration, but I may start using
lithium batteries as soon as I build a fireproof bunker to store them
in.
Marlowe - 11 Jun 2004 05:27 GMT
I like the Graumpner "Tipsy" foam pusher park flyer.  I like the fact that
you can pack it up in the box that it came in and keep it in your car until
ready to fly.  I fly mine in an area next to my house, but I have 35 acres
of land.  I found it a forgiving, stable flyer that will give you lots of
stick time.  On the minus side, only rudder and elevator and no landing
gear.  Also the foam will splatter into many small pieces if crashed hard.
That happened to my first one and so I'm now on my second Tipsy.

> TIA for any answers this post brings.
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> TomC
> RC Lurker
Bill Sheppard - 11 Jun 2004 19:38 GMT
>I like the Graupner "Tipsy" foam pusher
>park flyer.

I got a Tipsy when they first came out 2½ years ago, as my first ever
RC plane and learned to fly on it.
              It always flew 'OK' but not a barn burner with that high
revving shallow pitch prop. I assumed Graupner had optimized the prop to
the plane. NOT!
                Four months ago I got the bright idea of trying a
higher pitch prop, a Gunther 4.9X4.3, otherwise known as the 'Wingo'
prop (also used on Zagis). The plane was totally transformed! It
acquired a phenomenal climb rate, would loop from level flight, and ROG
off asphalt using just a belly skid. The motor is the stock 280. I had
been concerned the higher pitch would stress the motor, but so far there
is no sign of stress and it is barely warm on landing. The plane will
cruise at much lower throttle, with the motor just ticking over. Whereas
before, it took high throttle with the prop wailing away just to
maintain altitude.
                I'm careful to use high throttle only briefly, for
takeoff, climbout, accelerating to loop, and brief speed runs.
Continuous high throttle is never called for. The plane is flown an hour
or more just about every day. It has now acquired permanent landing gear
and steerable tail wheel, and is a pure joy to fly.
                    One caveat is the plane is extremely fragile, and
from the outset requres considerable beefing up with packing tape.
                    I can't imagine Graupner's rationale for using (and
continuing to use) that silly, rediculous folding prop which hugely
impairs the plane's performance.
               Bill (oc)    
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.