Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

electronic ignition

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John - 22 Jun 2004 03:11 GMT
 Though not necessarily specific to an aircraft engine, I've run across
some information concerning an after-market ignition system for Zenoah
engines that has me a bit baffled.  It may very well just be that my
comprehension of the subject is more limited than I already thought.
Anyway, the ignition is from MSD and specifically designed for the small
Zenoah 2-strokes found on go-ped brand 2 wheel scooters.  In stock form, the
engine has a fixed magneto ignition.  The MSD is a CDI type ignition with
adjustable retard from .5 to 1 degrees per every 1000 rpm.

 The installation manual for the MSD ignition says to set the static timing
at about 27 degrees BTDC.  Then adjust the retard rate for best performance.
This means the ignition will retard the timing as engine rpm increases.  I
was thought it was desirable to advance the engine timing for the upper rpm
for best performance and have less timing for starting and low rpm
operations?

 The reason I am inquiring concerning this subject is because I am
interested in adapting the small MSD ignition for installation on another
brand of small 2-stroke and not a Zenoah as it is designed.  The engine is
not for an aircraft.

 Here is a link to the manual for the MSD ignition.
http://www.factorydirectperformance.com/frm20347.pdf  There is a chart
indicating the timing retard curve on the seventh page of the manual.

 I don't understand why it would be desirable to retard the timing at
higher rpm.  This is contrary to what I though was appropriate.

 Thanks for any input.

 John
DejaVU - 22 Jun 2004 11:33 GMT
John <nope@INVALIDCHAR.com> scribed in
<10df59vn124sic6@news.supernews.com>:

> I don't understand why it would be desirable to retard the
> timing at higher rpm.  This is contrary to what I though was
> appropriate.

after ignition the fuel takes time to burn
at higher RPM, the piston is rising faster.
thus you need an earlier spark so that the charge still has time to
burn to produce max power on the falling piston before the exhaust
port opens.

now is that called advance or retard?  I get them confused....

swarf, steam and wind

--
      David  -:- the email address is real but not forever   /"\
http://terrapin.ru.ac.za/~iwdf/welcome.html                   \ /
  ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail >  - - - - - - -> X
If you receive email saying "Send this to everyone you know," / \
     PLEASE pretend you don't know me.
The Raven - 22 Jun 2004 11:51 GMT
> John <nope@INVALIDCHAR.com> scribed in
> <10df59vn124sic6@news.supernews.com>:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> now is that called advance or retard?  I get them confused....

"Advance"  is to move the ignition point earlier in the cycle, which is what
you're describing.
"Retard" is to move the ignition point later in the cycle.

The confusion often arises from how it's indicated. Which is more
"advanced": Firing at 5degrees BTDC or 10degrees BTDC?

Signature

The Raven
http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3
** President of the ozemail.* and uunet.* NG's
** since August 15th 2000.

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 22 Jun 2004 13:50 GMT
> ... Which is more
>"advanced": Firing at 5 degrees BTDC or 10 degrees BTDC?

I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."

                    Marty
Kevin M - 22 Jun 2004 23:25 GMT
| I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
| 5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."

It's BelowTDC, not BeforeTDC.
That would be true if the piston were supposed to be rising during the
spark. But you can see how an explosion before TDC would be
counter-productive, even to the point of being damaging. Thus, the more
advanced cycle would be the one that fired at 5° BTDC, and 10° would be a
more retarded cycle.

I've always thought a better way to describe it would be ATDC (AFTER TDC).
Below TDC could be interpreted either way, before or after, if you didn't
realize that the ignition is supposed to take place as the piston falls.

Kev
Todd Klondike - 23 Jun 2004 00:02 GMT
"Kevin M" <kevmit@swball.com> posted message
ID<Tl2Cc.2416$297.2259@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>on Tue, 22 Jun 2004
22:25:55 GMT
>| I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
>| 5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Kev

I'm gonna have to call BS on this.  While I'm no expert on model
engines, I am an expert on automotive gasoline engines, all of which
are currently 4-stroke.  On an auto, BTDC does, in fact, stand for
Before Top Dead Center.  The spark fires while the piston is still
rising, and for the reasons stated elsewhere in this thread.

If you have references indicating otherwise for model 4-stroke
engines, I'd sure like to see it.
Roger - 23 Jun 2004 02:28 GMT
You win the cookie.
BTDC=Before Top Dead Center
If you look at the timing wheel on a 4 stroke auto engine,  0 is top
dead center. Advanced timing (10 degrees BTDC, for example)will be at
the pointer before 0 will, if you turn the engine the way it is supposed
to turn.
Don't know who taught the Kevin his engines, but I don't want him/her
working on MY cars....

Roger

> "Kevin M" <kevmit@swball.com> posted message
> ID<Tl2Cc.2416$297.2259@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>on Tue, 22 Jun 2004
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> If you have references indicating otherwise for model 4-stroke
> engines, I'd sure like to see it.
RedFred1 - 23 Jun 2004 00:32 GMT
>Below TDC could be interpreted either way, before or after, if you didn't
>realize that the ignition is supposed to take place as the piston falls.

I've always heard/read before TDC...I have also heard/read that ignition starts
before TDC and contunues until after TDC where the exhaust port opens.

I could point you to several articles on the subject, but if you do a google
search on it, you can find them on your own.

Good luck!

FredD
John - 23 Jun 2004 02:25 GMT
> | I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
> | 5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Kev

 BelowTDC?  Are you serious?  I'm pretty sure that is not correct.

 John
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 23 Jun 2004 02:51 GMT
>| I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
>| 5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."

>It's BelowTDC, not BeforeTDC.

As Todd and Red have already said in reply to you, I respectfully
disagree.

Here's a professional site discussing how NASCAR Cup
engines use VERY advanced timing (29 degrees or so
before top dead center):

<http://www.circleracingonline.com/technical/msd_1.html>

>That would be true if the piston were supposed to be rising during the
>spark. But you can see how an explosion before TDC would be
>counter-productive, even to the point of being damaging.

Fuel doesn't "explode."  It burns.  As someone pointed out earlier
in this thread, it takes time for the flame front to spread across
the combustion chamber.  Start the burn too soon and you get
"knocking" (very unhealthy).  Start it too late and you waste
fuel and power.

>... I've always thought a better way to describe it would be ATDC (AFTER TDC).

People do use ATDC--and BBDC and ABDC, too:
<http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/camshaft.html>
<http://autorepair.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-783.htm>

When starting an engine, it's very, very helpful to retard the
spark (have it come later rather than earlier).  That helps prevent
backfiring.

                        Marty
The Natural Philosopher - 23 Jun 2004 09:48 GMT
> | I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
> | 5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."
>
> It's BelowTDC, not BeforeTDC.

Not in any book I have ever read on the subject

> That would be true if the piston were supposed to be rising during the
> spark. But you can see how an explosion before TDC would be
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Kev

Complete bollocks.

IC engines fire before the piston completes the rise, in order that the
delay in flame propagation through the mixture gives peak pressures at
or around TDC.

To early, and the detonation retards the compression stroke, and you get
knocking, too late and the mixture is not up to pressure before the
power stroke has already nearly completed, and you end up with burning
gases rushing through the exhaust ports, which are then burnt.

Timing needs to be more advanced the faster the RPM, as the flame
propagation delay is a constant time interval, not a constant angular
issue :-)
The Raven - 23 Jun 2004 12:45 GMT
> | I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
> | 5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."
>
> It's BelowTDC, not BeforeTDC.

Actually, it's BEFORE.

> That would be true if the piston were supposed to be rising during the
> spark.

Which is exactly what's done.

> But you can see how an explosion before TDC would be
> counter-productive, even to the point of being damaging.

True, but the flame front takes time to travel and ignite all the mix SO at
higher RPMs you advance the ignition point so as to get a chance to light
the mix before the piston is back on it's way down.....

> Thus, the more
> advanced cycle would be the one that fired at 5° BTDC, and 10° would be a
> more retarded cycle.

Sorry, that's not right.

> I've always thought a better way to describe it would be ATDC (AFTER TDC).

They do use the term ATDC but there are very few instances where you'd want
to light the mix after the piston has reached max compression and is now
decreasing.

> Below TDC could be interpreted either way, before or after, if you didn't
> realize that the ignition is supposed to take place as the piston falls.

Ignition on 99% of all four strokes starts before the piston reaches TDC.

Signature

The Raven
http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3
** President of the ozemail.* and uunet.* NG's
** since August 15th 2000.

The Raven - 23 Jun 2004 12:41 GMT
> > ... Which is more
> >"advanced": Firing at 5 degrees BTDC or 10 degrees BTDC?
>
> I guess 10 degrees Before Top Dead Center.  5 degrees BTDC is
> 5 degrees later in the cycle, therefore more "retarded."

Yup, that's basically it.

Signature

The Raven
http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3
** President of the ozemail.* and uunet.* NG's
** since August 15th 2000.

John - 23 Jun 2004 02:12 GMT
>   Though not necessarily specific to an aircraft engine, I've run across
> some information concerning an after-market ignition system for Zenoah
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>   John

 From the manual for the MSD ignition...

 "The MSD Kicker Ignition allows you to adjust the rate of retard from .5°
per thousand rpm to 1° per thousand rpm. This can be done with just a simple
turn of a screw."

 "MSD recommends that you start out at 27° BTDC. This will be approximately
7° advanced over stock."

 "For best performance set the static timing as high as possible without
having detonation or signs of over heating. This should be in the 25 to 29
degree range."

 "The Kicker Ignition has a built in timing adjustment. This adjustment
provides a rate of retard as rpm increases. With the adjusting screw In the
full counterclockwise position the Kicker Ignition will retard the ignition
timing at a rate of ½°per 1000 rpm. With the timing adjustment screw in the
full clockwise position the MSD Kicker Ignition will retard the timing at a
rate of 1°per 1000 rpm. Figure 8 shows the timing curve of the Kicker
Ignition."
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 23 Jun 2004 04:10 GMT
>>   Here is a link to the manual for the MSD ignition.

>> http://www.factorydirectperformance.com/frm20347.pdf  There is a chart
>> indicating the timing retard curve on the seventh page of the manual.

AH!  That explains everything!

The MSD ignition is a problem-solver for folks who have hopped up
their engine in some way.  Here is the first two sentences of the
manual, which you left out of your quotation:

"The MSD Kicker Ignition System is a high output multiple spark
capacitive discharge ignition system (MSD) with the ability to adjust
the timing curve for different engine combinations. If you increase
the compression, run high octane fuel, advance the initial timing, or
have ported your engine, then you will need to adjust your timing
curve accordingly."

>>   I don't understand why it would be desirable to retard the timing at
>> higher rpm.  This is contrary to what I though was appropriate.

The MSD folks are comparing their stuff to a standard timing cure;
after you've made one of the tweaks that affects timing, you use the
MSD stuff to shift the curve to fit the hopped-up engine.

Same thing happens with Harleys: if you put two plugs
in the heads, you then have to retard the ignition from
the standard curve because now you've got two flame
fronts spreading the fire instead of one.

In the initial setup of the MSD system, you start with static
timing that is advanced 7 degrees over the standard system:

"MSD recommends that you start out at 27° BTDC. This will be
approximately 7° advanced over stock."

Then you go for a ride.  If you get detonation (ignition too
advanced), then you start tweaking for retardation at
higher RPM to solve the problem of detonation.

                Marty
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.