Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces. Wants to be noticed, wants to be
somebody, yet he is nobody with a valid address, no background, no
verifiable contribution to modeling, no evidence that he is anything more
than a guy with lots of time on his hands with an agenda the escapes
definition.
People know who I am, where I live, what I do, what I contribute . . . . .
and while some might strongly disagree with me on some subjects I don't have
to hide from the people on this newsgroup or any other forum I participate
in. I'm glad that there are a lot of others on this NG that stand in the
same manner.
RS
Vance Howard - 24 Jun 2004 02:18 GMT
> Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces. Wants to be noticed, wants to be
> somebody, yet he is nobody with a valid address, no background, no
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> RS
Its amazing how much time you spend complaining about him. If you don't
care for him, then ignore him. Don't even read his posts. This is
America after all. Nobody is forcing you to read anything you don't want to.
Druel - 24 Jun 2004 08:21 GMT
sorry, but i didn't see the "us" in the name of this newsgroup....:)
there are people from everywhere reading this, so...
hello from croatia

Signature
Druel
WiFiHr.org
> This is
> America after all. Nobody is forcing you to read anything you don't want to.
Vance - 25 Jun 2004 02:26 GMT
> sorry, but i didn't see the "us" in the name of this newsgroup....:)
> there are people from everywhere reading this, so...
> hello from croatia
I was replying to Red. He does indeed live in the United States. I also
happen to think that C.O.Jones posts a bunch of crap, but I don't care
because I don't have to read it and I feel no urge to reply to any of it.

Signature
Hugs are great gifts,
One size fits all.
MJC - 24 Jun 2004 14:17 GMT
Red, this is a classic example of how letting someone irritate you hurts YOU
more than them. Just letting it go and forgetting about him is the absolute
best revenge.
Put him in your PLONK file and forget about it. The few times you end up
opening a note that quoted him, just let that thread die without you.
MJC
> Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces. Wants to be noticed, wants to be
> somebody, yet he is nobody with a valid address, no background, no
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> RS
C.O.Jones - 25 Jun 2004 00:27 GMT
Wondered when you'd get around to another editorial! What's the matter?
Now that McNeil is gone you need a new whipping boy? Lack the balls to take
on DB eh?
> Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces. Wants to be noticed, wants to be
> somebody, yet he is nobody with a valid address, no background, no
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> RS
The Natural Philosopher - 25 Jun 2004 01:49 GMT
> Wondered when you'd get around to another editorial! What's the matter?
> Now that McNeil is gone you need a new whipping boy? Lack the balls to take
> on DB eh?
I suspect he has more balls thatn someone with a smattering of Hispanic
that thinks COJONES is a 'cool' moniker.
Still, its apt enough, since everything you post is complete bollocks,
not to say balls, and you only have the bottle to post it on Usenet. And
no doubt your reasons for picking the moniker are some sort of feeble
attempt to convince yourself of your macho credentials and sexual potency.
Why don't ou join the Military intelligence and butt f.ck some innocent
Iraqis. If you can't get your rocks off any otherway.
Oh. You failed the inteligence test?
Never mind. You could always stand for president and f.ck a whole
country over.
Red Scholefield - 25 Jun 2004 11:13 GMT
Who says you can't learn something from this? I always thought it was
"cajones". Now you tell us its "cojones". Or could that be one of the many
variations we find. Like manouver and maneuver.
Whichever - C. O. Jones = cojones = NUTS, which I don't think will stir much
controversy except from either C. A. JONES or C. O. Jones. Did anyone ever
notice that C. O.'s appearance on the newsgroup occurred nearly
simultaneously with the disappearance of KK?
RS
"The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.c> wrote in message
> I suspect he has more balls thatn someone with a smattering of Hispanic
> that thinks COJONES is a 'cool' moniker.
Red Scholefield - 25 Jun 2004 10:31 GMT
Taking on McNeill was taking on DB for all practical purposes. I also took
him on over my Leader Members status a couple of years ago.
RS - Leader Member
> Wondered when you'd get around to another editorial! What's the matter?
> Now that McNeil is gone you need a new whipping boy? Lack the balls to take
> on DB eh?
C.O.Jones - 26 Jun 2004 16:26 GMT
> Taking on McNeill was taking on DB for all practical purposes. I also took
> him on over my Leader Members status a couple of years ago.
>
> RS - Leader Member
I also notice you do a lot of criticizing of those in office! But you seem
to never stand up and prove yourself by running yourself! Could be you're
afraid of an embarrassing defeat? Again! Or perhaps, you don't want to be
on the receiving end of rants like yours? Could that be because you know
you wouldn't be any better that what is there now? I think so!
Bottom line is, you're an a.shole Schlemiel. I'm done with you and your
little crowd of lemmings! Note, I did not say I was leaving this group!
Ted Campanelli - 27 Jun 2004 22:57 GMT
On 6/26/2004 11:26 AM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:
Aw Shucks. I guess I will have to put him where I put the trolls - PLONK.
>> Taking on McNeill was taking on DB for all practical purposes. I also
> took
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Bottom line is, you're an a.shole Schlemiel. I'm done with you and your
> little crowd of lemmings! Note, I did not say I was leaving this group!
Greg - 25 Jun 2004 02:39 GMT
> Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces. Wants to be noticed, wants to be
> somebody, yet he is nobody with a valid address, no background, no
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> RS
Very true Red. I've never met a supposed self-made millionaire that 1)
brags about it, 2) hides out in the snipe field and 3) seems to thrive on
the taste of shoe leather. Maybe his corvette is in the shop....which is
probably a good thing considering his "wealth" of knowledge.
Greg
Sisyphus - 26 Jun 2004 19:30 GMT
Do a whois on yougotit.com and look at the administrative contact.
Next do a search on that name in the people directory at yahoo and see
that the name, home phone and adress match. This is the identity of
Mr. C.O. Jones and includes his home address. Not much of a mystery.
People in glass houses.....
I personally don't want any internet surfin' chucklehead to know my
actual identity, but I personally know and have flown with at least
one regular poster to this forum, and I am willing to provide that
information to INDIVIDUALS who request it.
I refrain from attacking people on the net and I do not try to
intimidate people. Mr "C.O.Jones" has threatened me on this forum, so
I have found out who he is through sources that are available to
anyone who cares to investigate. Know thy enemy. When a man
threatens me, I get his number, so to speak. If Mr. Jones continues
to be threatening, I know exactly who the threat is comming from, and
where he hangs his hat. Since "C.O." is obviously a 50+ year old wind
bag, I dont take his threat TOO seriously, but you never know.
> Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces. Wants to be noticed, wants to be
> somebody, yet he is nobody with a valid address, no background, no
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> RS
Warren - 26 Jun 2004 20:12 GMT
> Do a whois on yougotit.com and look at the administrative contact.
> Next do a search on that name in the people directory at yahoo and see
> that the name, home phone and adress match. This is the identity of
> Mr. C.O. Jones and includes his home address. Not much of a mystery.
Ummm.... no...
Thats the address of the registrant and administrative contact of
yougotit.com, and not neccessarily that of CO Jones. Just because he
uses "ifyouneedit@yougotit.com" doesn't make him the owner of that
domain. Additionally, since he has a history of bogus/invalid
information here, you can safely assume that not only is he not the
owner of yougotit.com but that it's not even a valid email address for
him or anyone else.
Warren.
Red Scholefield - 26 Jun 2004 21:08 GMT
If you try to e-mail cojones back channel to the address
ifyouneedit@yougotit.com you will get a bounce. Address unknown.
RS
> > Do a whois on yougotit.com and look at the administrative contact. This
is the identity of Mr. C.O. Jones and includes his home address.
> Ummm.... no...
> Thats the address of the registrant and administrative contact of
> yougotit.com, and not neccessarily that of CO Jones. Just because he
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Warren.
C.O.Jones - 26 Jun 2004 22:57 GMT
My! My! My! How the mighty are clueless! Or would that be, mighty
clueless?
> Do a whois on yougotit.com and look at the administrative contact.
> Next do a search on that name in the people directory at yahoo and see
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> >
> > RS
Red Scholefield - 26 Jun 2004 23:05 GMT
From: "C.O.Jones" <ifyouneedit@yougotit.com>
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc.air
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces
>I'm done with you and your little crowd of lemmings!
Well, that lasted about 6 hours!
RS
> My! My! My! How the mighty are clueless! Or would that be, mighty
> clueless?
C.O.Jones - 27 Jun 2004 13:13 GMT
> From: "C.O.Jones" <ifyouneedit@yougotit.com>
> Newsgroups: rec.models.rc.air
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Well, that lasted about 6 hours!
Ah! So you regard Sisyphus as one of your little lemmings! Let's cut to
the chase and make it simple, should I assume you regard the entire group as
your lemmings?
I have nothing against you Red other than this seeming desire of yours to
attack people who disagree with you. The more they disagree the more you
attack. Makes one wonder!
Ted Campanelli - 27 Jun 2004 23:03 GMT
On 6/23/2004 8:27 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:
> Interesting dilemma C. O. Jones faces. Wants to be noticed, wants to be
> somebody, yet he is nobody with a valid address, no background, no
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> RS
On a personal note:
1. I am not a "lemming"
2. Red says what he thinks.
3. Red participates.
4. Red is knowledgeable AND SHARES HIS KNOWLEDGE.
5. Red IS NOT AFRAID to have people know where he lives.
6. Jones, can you do and say the same things (2 - 5) about yourself
HONESTLY ??? I DON'T THINK SO.
C.O.Jones - 28 Jun 2004 00:37 GMT
> On 6/23/2004 8:27 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
> great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 6. Jones, can you do and say the same things (2 - 5) about yourself
> HONESTLY ??? I DON'T THINK SO.
Well, I might try but, since you PLONKed me a few minutes ago, I guess my
effort would be wasted.
And if your #5 is a requirement for credibility, I suggest you start with
Sisyphus to name just one! Otherwise you open yourself to all manner of
hypocrisy!
Mike R. - 28 Jun 2004 02:36 GMT
You know you and Jones need to go to a gym rent a boxing ring out and
go at it. Probaly be one boring bitch slap fight.
Mike