As I read and reserch lipos, I'm finding that it seems many folks are having
trouble with packs that are just sitting there. Apparently leaving a lipo in
a hot car can start a fire. A lipo that has been in a crash can later burst
into flames. It's odd..Why? Because I leave my cell phone and laptop in a
hot car all the time. I've dropped my cell phone a couple times as well,
once from 15 feet up right onto concrete (amazingly the phone still works).
When I get home I don't put these items into fire proof safes. I've never
worried about it. These statements apply to MILLIONS of people, yet I've
never heard anything about the dangers of lipo fires outside of our hobby.
No dire warning from Consumer Reports, nothing. What gives? Why does it seem
that these batteries are getting a reputation in the hobby akin to dynamite
or C-4 when the rest of the world gets along just fine with the technology?
Red Scholefield - 26 Jun 2004 12:49 GMT
There is a very simple explanation. All the commercial applicatons employ
safety devices built into the battery pack. Note that none of the "majors",
Sanyo, Panasonic, SAFT sell bare lithium cells directly to the hobby market.
They do not want the liability. Lipo cells do not spontaniously
self-destruct. There must be an external stimulus. Deep dischare, short
circuit, overcharged etc. to initate an incident.

Signature
Red S.
The Battery Clinic
www.rcbatteryclinic.com
> As I read and reserch lipos, I'm finding that it seems many folks are having
> trouble with packs that are just sitting there.
SNIP
>Why does it seem
> that these batteries are getting a reputation in the hobby akin to dynamite
> or C-4 when the rest of the world gets along just fine with the technology?
Red Scholefield - 26 Jun 2004 17:14 GMT
Lithium packs made for commercial accounts have safety circuits built into
the battery pack. Notice you don't see the majors like Sanyo, Panasonic or
SAFT selling raw cells directly to the hobby market. Lithium packs do not
self destruct without some external influence. Shorts, overcharge, too deep
a discharge, physical damage, are some causes of lithium battery incidents.
--
Red S.
Red's R/C Battery Clinic
http://www.rcbatteryclinic.com
Check us out for "revolting" information.
> As I read and reserch lipos, I'm finding that it seems many folks are having
> trouble with packs that are just sitting there.
Frank - 26 Jun 2004 19:28 GMT
So what about what I'm hearing about lipos catching fire for no other reason
than being in a hot car? There are very few accounts of this specific
scenario, but they exist.
> Lithium packs made for commercial accounts have safety circuits built into
> the battery pack. Notice you don't see the majors like Sanyo, Panasonic or
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> having
> > trouble with packs that are just sitting there.
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jun 2004 20:06 GMT
> So what about what I'm hearing about lipos catching fire for no other reason
> than being in a hot car? There are very few accounts of this specific
> scenario, but they exist.
We discussed this at length on the e-zone.
The tentative hypothesis that fits the facts is that the cells
distorted under the heat, and shorted internally.
>>Lithium packs made for commercial accounts have safety circuits built into
>>the battery pack. Notice you don't see the majors like Sanyo, Panasonic or
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
>>>trouble with packs that are just sitting there.
Red Scholefield - 27 Jun 2004 12:33 GMT
Was the switch left on perhaps? Was there any study done to determine the
actual cause? There are far too many of these I knew a guy that knew a guy
that . . . . . . . . in this hobby . . . . . Can you give us the benefit
any details of one specific account? Otherwise its hearsay. . . not
admissable evidence. The CPSC would love to hear about any spontanious
"incidents. Sounds like more of Dave Brown's "models being flown at $25,000
feet". :-)

Signature
Red S.
The Battery Clinic
www.rcbatteryclinic.com
"Frank" <frankc29@REMOVETHISearthlink.net> wrote in message
> So what about what I'm hearing about lipos catching fire for no other reason
> than being in a hot car? There are very few accounts of this specific
> scenario, but they exist.
Frank - 27 Jun 2004 17:57 GMT
True, you have to rely on heresay in these matters, and it's nothing that
will hold up in court. But I never heard these stories with Nicd or Nimh. I
also never went to bed wondering if my shop was going to be there in the
morning, firesafe or no. I have 7 lipos now, and I love their performance.
I'm taking all the precautions I'm supposed to and hope that this is getting
overblown in some way, and that the spontaneous combustion stories have more
to them than meets the eye.
Frank
> Was the switch left on perhaps? Was there any study done to determine the
> actual cause? There are far too many of these I knew a guy that knew a guy
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > than being in a hot car? There are very few accounts of this specific
> > scenario, but they exist.
Doug McLaren - 27 Jun 2004 18:14 GMT
| True, you have to rely on heresay in these matters, and it's nothing
| that will hold up in court. But I never heard these stories with
| Nicd or Nimh. I
Then you haven't listened very carefully. It does happen, it's just
rare.
I'm guessing that *more* NiCd and NiMH cells have caused fires than
LiPo batteries over the years. Probably the number one cause is
something that shorts out the pack, either internally or externally,
causing something to get red hot and start a fire. Damage to the pack
and poor wiring would be the likely culprits.
Of course, my statement is rather misleading -- NiCd and NiMH
batteries have been around a lot longer than LiPoly, and I only
mentioned LiPoly and not LiPoly/LiIon. Also, when something goes
wrong with a NiCd/NiMH pack, it's normally not the pack itself that
burns but it starts something else on fire. But even so ...

Signature
Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
After their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to
suspect Hungry.
The Natural Philosopher - 29 Jun 2004 02:14 GMT
> Was the switch left on perhaps? Was there any study done to determine the
> actual cause? There are far too many of these I knew a guy that knew a guy
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "incidents. Sounds like more of Dave Brown's "models being flown at $25,000
> feet". :-)
Its all discussed on te E-zone.
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jun 2004 20:05 GMT
> As I read and reserch lipos, I'm finding that it seems many folks are having
> trouble with packs that are just sitting there. Apparently leaving a lipo in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> that these batteries are getting a reputation in the hobby akin to dynamite
> or C-4 when the rest of the world gets along just fine with the technology?
I think the key issues that have been identified are that hot lipos
produce gas, and deform. They are supposed to then pop and vent the gas,
but sometimes the pressure doesn't result in proper venting, and the
cells short internally under pressure, go red hot and woof.
The key is to keep idle packs at less than 75C. More than that and they
are destroyed anyway, and may, if they short, catch fire was well.
Packs used in cell phones are designed for lower discharge rates and
don't either have the same liquids in them that gas, or have the
electrodes so close together that shorting out internally is such an issue.