> We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> one "hole in a new roof.....
Channels 50,51,52 are used for babyphones and other
remote control devices such as remote power plugs.
e.g.
http://www.mp3-music-shop.de/B_22xxx260017_BABYPHONE40MHZ.htm
The frequencies match exacly channels 50,51,52.
Google for
babyphones+40 Mhz. and compare the exact frequency
of your x-tall..
You;ll be amazed...
F.
Fil - 09 Jul 2004 06:52 GMT
This is really amazing. Thanks for this info. We will check out the area
around the field with a scanner.
Fil
> > We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> > one "hole in a new roof.....
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> F.
Six_O'Clock_High - 10 Jul 2004 02:39 GMT
I will bite. WHAT are REMOTE POWER PLUGS?
> > We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> > one "hole in a new roof.....
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> F.
Flying Tiger - 10 Jul 2004 22:54 GMT
> I will bite. WHAT are REMOTE POWER PLUGS?
Will try to explain, those are devices to switch on lamps etc.
they work on 40 Mhz too. also in the 50 to 52 channel range.
You can put such device between your lamp ( or other thing you want to
switch remotely) and power mains.
They look like a timer, but are not time controlled, but with a
remote control, similar to the tv ones.
http://www.globalsources.com/gsol/Index/1/3page/2ProductDetail/3product_id/28842
329180/3action/2GetProduct/3action/2GetPoint/3point_id/23000000171787/3catalog_i
d/22000000003868?a=b
Six_O'Clock_High - 11 Jul 2004 06:18 GMT
Thanks for the info. Interesting and educational. I even know of a few
applications.
> > I will bite. WHAT are REMOTE POWER PLUGS?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They look like a timer, but are not time controlled, but with a
> remote control, similar to the tv ones.
http://www.globalsources.com/gsol/Index/1/3page/2ProductDetail/3product_id/28842
329180/3action/2GetProduct/3action/2GetPoint/3point_id/23000000171787/3catalog_i
d/22000000003868?a=b
Fil - 12 Jul 2004 04:59 GMT
It seems that your opinion (Flying Tiger) points to the right direction.
We went to another location (slope) and everything goes fine. Back on our
club air field I replaced the receiver with another one (Same type): the
disturbances are still there.
Finally I replaced the transmitters christal with another one (channel 51)
without any result.
During next week we will test on channel 49.
Fil
> > We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> > one "hole in a new roof.....
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> F.
Flying Tiger - 12 Jul 2004 19:27 GMT
> It seems that your opinion (Flying Tiger) points to the right direction.
Would you be so kind and post the result off the scanner?
And don;t forget not only use scanner on the field but drive around the
field in 1 km range to pinpoint disturbances.
When your plane is up in the sky, the receiver may take that signals, which
cannot be heared at the field itself.
Look for buildings etc...places where people are.
F.
Fil - 19 Jul 2004 05:59 GMT
Yesteray we used a scanner to check for hits on channel 51.
No hits could be triggered on the field, neither around the field. A 2 km
range around the field has been tested, but no signals have been picked up.
Although, the scanner produced some noise (0,5 sec to max 3 sec periods).
I'm not an expert, but the owner of the scanner said me that this noise is
not a signal that can cause the disturbance.
The plane still goes out of control for short time periods on channel 51. I
switched now to channel 43 (40595 Mhz). Problems are solved.
Fil
> > It seems that your opinion (Flying Tiger) points to the right direction.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> F.
jjvb - 19 Jul 2004 14:11 GMT
Perhaps one of your 51 crystals had a problem.
John VB
> Yesteray we used a scanner to check for hits on channel 51.
> No hits could be triggered on the field, neither around the field. A 2 km
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Fil
Fil - 20 Jul 2004 05:45 GMT
I replaced the receiver cristal with 3 different ones (all channel 51).
I did the same in another receiver of the same type.
I also replaced the transmitter's cristal with another one.
Fil
> Perhaps one of your 51 crystals had a problem.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > Fil