Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

disturbance on channel 51

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fil - 07 Jul 2004 06:48 GMT
I have a Alpha 21 glider (only 2 servo's) with electro motor speed 600. I
used it frequently with my own transmitter on channel 42 (40 Mhz) without
problems. I replaced the christal with a channel 51 one in order to fly with
my son's transmitter (royal EVO 9). The plane has now disturbances and goes
out of control for 3 or even 4 seconds. After an emergency landing, I
replaced the christal with another one (also channel 51). This doesn't make
any difference.

Any idea ??

Thanks

Fil
jeboba - 07 Jul 2004 14:18 GMT
What kind of receiver? It sounds like the EVO isn't talking to the receiver
very well!
Is ch 51 a known problem frequency in your area?

> I have a Alpha 21 glider (only 2 servo's) with electro motor speed 600. I
> used it frequently with my own transmitter on channel 42 (40 Mhz) without
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Fil
Fil - 07 Jul 2004 22:32 GMT
Receiver is a multiplex standard receiver 5-7 channel(no IPD).
The channel 51 is not a known problem in our club.
I think I can exclude the transmitter problem because I tested it also with
an older multiplex transmitter (4 channel - no computer - channel  51) and
it delivered the same problems. The EVO has been used for flying other
planes without disturbance.
I wonder that the problem occurs on channel 51 and not on channel 42 with
the same plane, the same motor, the same speed controller and the same
receiver.
The problem occurs when the motor is running as well as in the gliding
phase. Probably the receiver is out-of-tune.
I will replace the receiver with another one (IPD) in the glider and do the
tests again. This can take a few days because we currently have very bad
weather and a bad forecast for the next days here in Belgium.

Regards

Fil

> What kind of receiver? It sounds like the EVO isn't talking to the receiver
> very well!
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> > Fil
Morris Lee - 07 Jul 2004 14:53 GMT
> I have a Alpha 21 glider (only 2 servo's) with electro motor speed 600. I
> used it frequently with my own transmitter on channel 42 (40 Mhz) without
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Fil

Here in the U.S., they suggest we don't go more than two or three channels
away from the receiver's original channel without sending the receiver back
to be retuned.   There are several components in the receiver besides the
crystal that determine the exact frequency it picks up.  An out-of-tune
receiver can cause the problems you've described.  Also, this may make the
receiver more susceptible to radio interferance from the motor/ESC.

Morris
James D Jones - 07 Jul 2004 22:38 GMT
>> I have a Alpha 21 glider (only 2 servo's) with electro motor speed
>> 600. I used it frequently with my own transmitter on channel 42 (40
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> described.  Also, this may make the receiver more susceptible to
> radio interferance from the motor/ESC.

Bunk!  Most brands of receivers sold in the USA are purchased without
a crystal installed.  One selects the crystal of choice.  Futaba does
restrict interchageability to only half of the 72 MHz band, but it
doesn't restrict crystal choice on any other band.  Perhaps you are
thinking about transmitter crystals?  In the USA, changing them without
retuning is actually illegal.  However, like you say, two or three
channels is probably safe.

Jim - AMA 501383
TX_QBALL@webtv.net - 08 Jul 2004 13:18 GMT
We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
one "hole in a new roof.....
Flying Tiger - 08 Jul 2004 16:34 GMT
> We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> one "hole in a new roof.....

Channels 50,51,52 are used for babyphones and other
remote control devices such as remote power plugs.

e.g.

http://www.mp3-music-shop.de/B_22xxx260017_BABYPHONE40MHZ.htm

The frequencies match exacly channels 50,51,52.

Google for

babyphones+40 Mhz. and compare the exact frequency
of your x-tall..

You;ll be amazed...

F.
Fil - 09 Jul 2004 06:52 GMT
This is really amazing. Thanks for this info. We will check out the area
around the field with a scanner.

Fil

> > We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> > one "hole in a new roof.....
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> F.
Six_O'Clock_High - 10 Jul 2004 02:39 GMT
I will bite.  WHAT are REMOTE POWER PLUGS?

> > We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> > one "hole in a new roof.....
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> F.
Flying Tiger - 10 Jul 2004 22:54 GMT
> I will bite.  WHAT are REMOTE POWER PLUGS?

Will try to explain, those are devices to switch on lamps etc.
they  work on 40 Mhz too. also in the 50 to 52 channel range.

You can put such device between your lamp ( or other thing you want to
switch remotely) and power mains.

They look like a timer, but are not time controlled, but with a
remote control, similar to the tv ones.

http://www.globalsources.com/gsol/Index/1/3page/2ProductDetail/3product_id/28842
329180/3action/2GetProduct/3action/2GetPoint/3point_id/23000000171787/3catalog_i
d/22000000003868?a=b

Six_O'Clock_High - 11 Jul 2004 06:18 GMT
Thanks for the info.  Interesting and educational.  I even know of a few
applications.

> > I will bite.  WHAT are REMOTE POWER PLUGS?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They look like a timer, but are not time controlled, but with a
> remote control, similar to the tv ones.

http://www.globalsources.com/gsol/Index/1/3page/2ProductDetail/3product_id/28842
329180/3action/2GetProduct/3action/2GetPoint/3point_id/23000000171787/3catalog_i
d/22000000003868?a=b

Fil - 12 Jul 2004 04:59 GMT
It seems that your opinion (Flying Tiger) points to the right direction.
We went to another location (slope) and everything goes fine. Back on our
club air field I replaced the receiver with another one (Same type): the
disturbances are still there.
Finally I replaced the transmitters christal with another one (channel 51)
without any result.
During next week we will test on channel 49.

Fil

> > We had many hits on channel 50, so did away with it...Numerous hits and
> > one "hole in a new roof.....
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> F.
Flying Tiger - 12 Jul 2004 19:27 GMT
> It seems that your opinion (Flying Tiger) points to the right direction.

Would you be so kind and post the result off the scanner?
And don;t forget not only use scanner on the field but drive around the
field in 1 km range to pinpoint disturbances.

When your plane is up in the sky, the receiver may take that signals, which
cannot be heared at the field itself.

Look for buildings etc...places where people are.

F.
Fil - 19 Jul 2004 05:59 GMT
Yesteray we used a scanner to check for hits on channel 51.
No hits could be triggered on the field, neither around the field. A 2 km
range around the field has been tested, but no signals have been picked up.
Although, the scanner produced some noise (0,5 sec to max 3 sec periods).
I'm not an expert, but the owner of the scanner said me that this noise is
not a signal that can cause the disturbance.
The plane still goes out of control for short time periods on channel 51. I
switched now to channel 43 (40595 Mhz). Problems are solved.

Fil

> > It seems that your opinion (Flying Tiger) points to the right direction.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> F.
jjvb - 19 Jul 2004 14:11 GMT
Perhaps one of your 51 crystals had a problem.

John VB

> Yesteray we used a scanner to check for hits on channel 51.
> No hits could be triggered on the field, neither around the field. A 2 km
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Fil
Fil - 20 Jul 2004 05:45 GMT
I replaced the receiver cristal with 3 different ones (all channel 51).
I did the same in another receiver of the same type.
I also replaced the transmitter's cristal with another one.

Fil

> Perhaps one of your 51 crystals had a problem.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > Fil
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.