Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Looking for an R/C Model

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike Szewczyk - 13 Jul 2004 21:37 GMT
Hello I'm new here!

I have a question about an R/C model.  Very shortly I plan on getting a
trainer like a NexStar or Avistar (what guys in the club I visited
recommended).  I've begun building some little rubber owered flying models
like I did when I was a kid.

I'm interested in both aspects of the hobby.  The building and the flying.
So my plan is to finish a few of the more simple models (You know, the
little Guillows guys) then siging up for something "kick a.s".

I figure that I'd spend the next 3 to 6 months building the a.s kicker in my
spare time while I learn to fly using the the trainer.  Then, when
time/money permit me to finish the ass-kicker, I could take that to the
field and have them teach me how to fly it -- having the fundamentals down
on the trainer.

So I'm hoping you can help me find the model I seek.  It may not exist.

My criteria is this:

- I do most of the building.  (IE: ARF's are out, as are the 90% molded
things).
- Single Engine
- Avoid the excessively popular - P-51's, Corsair's, T-6's.
- $200 or less ($200 is the "stretch" ceiling.  I feel better closer to
$100-$150)
  That's $200 or less for the kit itself, I understand radio and engine are
extra.
  As are things like retracts and smoke.

The plane can be G.A., but so far all of the G.A. models I've seen end up
looking too much like the typical R/C ARF models.

I know the P-47 is pretty popular too, but I really like it, so that's an
option.  A Sea Fury would be cool, or a Hurricane, or maybe a Wildcat, or
maybe an Avenger would be cool.

I'd like to put some really great detail into it.  I'f I'm dreaming with
that price tag, I understand, just let me know and save me some searching.

Thanks in advance!

Mike
Mike Szewczyk - 13 Jul 2004 21:42 GMT
Oh, sorry - Gas engine, not electric.

> Hello I'm new here!
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Mike
Carrell - 13 Jul 2004 22:00 GMT
Oh, sorry - Gas engine, not electric.

"Mike Szewczyk hcgi.com>" <szewczykm@<N0SP@M> wrote in message
news:vKadneUDyZOK1WndRVn-jw@dls.net...
> Hello I'm new here!
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I figure that I'd spend the next 3 to 6 months building the a.s kicker in
my
> spare time while I learn to fly using the the trainer.  Then, when
> time/money permit me to finish the ass-kicker, I could take that to the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> $100-$150)
>    That's $200 or less for the kit itself, I understand radio and engine
are
> extra.
>    As are things like retracts and smoke.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Mike

================================================================
I'll make the assumption you want a glow fuel powered engine and not a
gasoline engine

Messerschmitt $109.99
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXAP73&P=0

Sea Fury $159.99
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXAJU1&P=0

There are lots of scale kits available for under $200.
www.towerhobbies.com is a good place to look,
as is http://www2.mailordercentral.com/quantummodels/

Using any of the search engines (yahoo, google, etc) and searching for the
names you mentioned turns up too many results to list here.

I'm fairly new to RC; flying a trainer I built from a kit, and building a
sport plane from a kit.  From what I've read and been told, a scale warbird
is not a good second plane because they tend to be fast and can have bad
stall characteristics.  I do not know this as fact, just repeating what
others have said.

Carrell
Mark Miller - 14 Jul 2004 02:48 GMT
> "Mike Szewczyk hcgi.com>" <szewczykm@<N0SP@M> wrote in message
> news:vKadneUDyZOK1WndRVn-jw@dls.net...
>> Hello I'm new here!

< some snipping >

>> I'm interested in both aspects of the hobby.  The building and the
>> flying. So my plan is to finish a few of the more simple models (You
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> the field and have them teach me how to fly it -- having the
>> fundamentals down on the trainer.

< more snipping>

> I'm fairly new to RC; flying a trainer I built from a kit, and
> building a sport plane from a kit.  From what I've read and been told,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Carrell

It's true.  I'd recommend a 3-plane-plan, rather than a 2-plane-plan -
first, go with the regular trainer.  2nd, on to something sportier - as a
kit, not an ARF.  Maybe a Sig Four-Star or a Mid-Star 40 (my personal
favorite), or a Great Planes Stik (haven't flown a GP Rapture 40, so I
can't vouch for it, but the pictures are pretty) or a Goldberg Tiger.  
Then maybe do your gorgeous scale plane as your 3rd project.  

There are a lot of things to learn about building big RC planes.  I
promise that building a sport kit first will make your scale project come
out better.  Also, you'll be much more ready to fly it.  

Also . . . I've done a lot of instructing over the years.  I'd be really,
really nervous about flying someone else's beautiful scale warbird on its
first flight - there are so many things that can go wrong, and I'd
really, really hate to crash someone else's plane.  

Signature

"Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls would scarcely
get your feet wet."
 - Deteriorata

David Hopper - 14 Jul 2004 04:06 GMT
>.....  Maybe a Sig Four-Star or a Mid-Star 40 (my personal
>favorite), or a Great Planes Stik (haven't flown a GP Rapture 40, so I
>can't vouch for it, but the pictures are pretty) or a Goldberg Tiger.  

I picked up a used Four Star 40 and love flying this plane. It is my
3rd plane (just soloed back in March) and to me it flies better than
the trainers.

 
Signature

David - WD4JKH

Valid email: no-spam0879@mindspring.com

SKYLANE42 - 14 Jul 2004 13:58 GMT
PICA FW-190,  Great flying plane.  forget the retracts and just fly it 4
channel.  PICA Waco,  also a great flyer.  I would teach anyone to fly on
either one.  I have had one FW and 3 Wacos.. Both 60 size planes.
Brian - 14 Jul 2004 00:23 GMT
> I know the P-47 is pretty popular too, but I really like it, so that's an
> option.  A Sea Fury would be cool, or a Hurricane, or maybe a Wildcat, or
> maybe an Avenger would be cool.

> I'd like to put some really great detail into it.  I'f I'm dreaming with
> that price tag, I understand, just let me know and save me some searching.

It really depends on your definition of "kick a.s."

If you're planning on spending a lot of time and money on this second plane,
adding retracts, building with flaps, adding an inverted engine with enclosed
cowling, airbrushing a desert camoflauge motif on it, and going for some wild
wing design that has more than two pieces (panelB left, outward panel B left,
airbrake B1) then I would rething your strategy.

Try a high wing high dihedral for your first plane.  Graduate to a low wing
symmetrical design for your second, assuming the first survived long enough
to become proficient.  You might even want to try a variety of sport planes
after that:  ugly stick, pylon racer, whatever.  Then go for the uber creation.

Not trying to burst your bubble or anything.  This hobby is full of stories
about people who bit off more than they could chew and drove $2500.00 or more
straight into the ground.  

On the other hand, if you are talking about some nearly stock TopFlite sport
scale warplane kit with no fancy stuff, it still wouldn't make a good second
plane.  But at least it won't be so hard on the checkbook.
Mike Szewczyk - 14 Jul 2004 02:28 GMT
LOL.  OK I get it.  So what B.I.Y. sport kit might I look at?

Is that really the transition?  Is a warbird really more squirrelly than a
low wing symmetrical sport plane?

Oh, also, I should add that I have no intention of flying the uber creation
myself until I can actually fly it.  I'd go through the trainer planes
first.  I'd fly with the club hotshots on the buddy box for a while before I
ever took the thing myself.

I figure the uberplane will take me a long time to put together.  I want
something to do on the rainy days and those days when I need to decompress
after work by building.  Slow and sure, all the while following the path you
described, buying the ARF's to train on.

> > I know the P-47 is pretty popular too, but I really like it, so that's an
> > option.  A Sea Fury would be cool, or a Hurricane, or maybe a Wildcat, or
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> scale warplane kit with no fancy stuff, it still wouldn't make a good second
> plane.  But at least it won't be so hard on the checkbook.
Morris Lee - 14 Jul 2004 13:22 GMT
> LOL.  OK I get it.  So what B.I.Y. sport kit might I look at?
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> after work by building.  Slow and sure, all the while following the path you
> described, buying the ARF's to train on.

The big thing is wing loading.  Scale warbirds often are rather heavy.  They
often require lead in the nose for balance, plus the extra weight for
retracts, etc., weight of a scale paint job. The extra weight requires the
plane to fly faster to generate the lift required to fly the heavier plane.
There are also "scale effects"; the air is more viscous to a scale P-51,
say, than the real thing, and this affects the way the model flies.

There are a number of great "second" planes that will get you proficient
enough to fly your warbird.
Thes include (not in any particular order of preference), Goldberg Tiger 2,
Sig 4-Star, Great Planes Easy Sport, or any of the "Stik" designs.  You may
even want to get some plans and try your luck at scratch building.  RCM's
Cloud Dancer 40 plans build into an agile, great-flying sport plane.
(Ace/Thunder Tiger makes an ARF version.)  One caveat, though, is that it's
heartbreaking when dumb thumbs turn the creation you've worked so long and
hard on into toothpicks.

Morris
Mike Szewczyk - 14 Jul 2004 16:05 GMT
> (Ace/Thunder Tiger makes an ARF version.)  One caveat, though, is that it's
> heartbreaking when dumb thumbs turn the creation you've worked so long and
> hard on into toothpicks.

This may sound dumb, but I want to be so attached to my next few models that
I'll be devistated if they crash.  I've done so many dumb things in the past
when I
was excited and in a hurry.  So the extra care I'm putting into the model
will translate
into my being much more careful with how I use it.
Morris Lee - 15 Jul 2004 13:55 GMT
> > (Ace/Thunder Tiger makes an ARF version.)  One caveat, though, is that
> it's
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> will translate
> into my being much more careful with how I use it.

Mike, I've found the opposite to be true.  I've had the most fun with
something cheap enough that I can just shrug when it meets terra firma at
too high a speed.  When I have a big time/emotional investment in a plane, I
worry about crashing it, and it spoils my fun! :-)

Morris
Mike Szewczyk - 14 Jul 2004 16:44 GMT
<SNIP> Cloud Dancer 40 plans build into an agile, great-flying sport plane.
> (Ace/Thunder Tiger makes an ARF version.)  One caveat, though, is that it's
> heartbreaking when dumb thumbs turn the creation you've worked so long and
> hard on into toothpicks.

Wow, I really like the looks of the Cloud Dancer.  It's not as boxy as the
other
Sport RC planes I've seen.  To be frank, it's part of why I didn't want to
build
one.  I didn't want to spend a bunch of time working on a plane and have it
look like nothing special.

I already like how the Cloud Dancer looks and I see potential for adding my
own "flare" without altering flight characteristics.

I've checked and I've found ARF or Plans.  I was hoping to find a kit.  Do
you
know if anyone makes one?

Ted Campanelli said: "For a "kick a.s" model, why not find a plane you want,
then get the
plans and either do everything yourself or have the parts laser cut."

Is there a place to have stuff laser cut??  What does that cost?

Thanks again!

Mike
Ted Campanelli - 14 Jul 2004 14:00 GMT
On 7/13/2004 4:37 PM Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these
great (and sometimes not so great) words of knowledge:

For a "kick a.s" model, why not find a plane you want, then get the
plans and either do everything yourself or have the parts laser cut.  If
you want something "unusual", that is the way to do it.  I did a FW-56
Stosser that way.  Flies great, but does have a semi-nasty tip stall if
the speed gets too slow.

Cleveland models  http://www.clevelandairline.com/  has some really neat
AND unusual planes/plans.

Just my $0.02 worth.

> Hello I'm new here!
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Mike
Mike Szewczyk - 14 Jul 2004 16:44 GMT
> For a "kick a.s" model, why not find a plane you want, then get the
> plans and either do everything yourself or have the parts laser cut.  If
> you want something "unusual", that is the way to do it.  I did a FW-56
> Stosser that way.  Flies great, but does have a semi-nasty tip stall if
> the speed gets too slow.

Ted, where would you have parts laser cut?
Malcolm Fisher - 16 Jul 2004 19:55 GMT
> > For a "kick a.s" model, why not find a plane you want, then get the
> > plans and either do everything yourself or have the parts laser cut.  If
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Ted, where would you have parts laser cut?

FWIW I reckon you can't beat the whole exercise of transferring components
from plan to wood, cutting them yourself and the assembling the whole model.
There's a great deal of satisfaction gleaned that way when you see the
finished plane...

....and then when you see it airborne  it's .....WOW - I DID THAT!

Malcolm
MJC - 14 Jul 2004 14:16 GMT
Dynaflite large scale PT-19 and use a Zenoah G-23.
That's my .02

MJC

> Hello I'm new here!
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Mike
AAA - 19 Jul 2004 08:46 GMT
> Hello I'm new here!
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> I'd like to put some really great detail into it.  I'f I'm dreaming with
> that price tag, I understand, just let me know and save me some searching.

Sounds like you're looking for an F-18 Turbine.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.