Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / December 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

dog fighting

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Noah Roberts - 28 Dec 2004 06:01 GMT
It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it?
Probably gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a counterpart
for RC fliers?
Steve Banks - 28 Dec 2004 07:06 GMT
Are you asking if a bunch of oversized children ever thought of smashing
their flying toys together?  I seriously doubt it. ;)

The slope gliders have a form they call combat where you try and knock the
other gliders out of the sky.  There is also a form for smaller planes where
they have streamers that the opponents try and remove, ala flag football,
though sometimes they collide as well.

All it takes is more than one willing combatant and an agreeable set of
rules, one of which is that the parciticipants should expect their plane to
be demolished sooner or later as most forms of rc combat involve close
interaction with the planes.

You could probably do a laser tag thing too, but stay away from actual
projectiles.  Yes, paintballs count as projectiles.

> It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
> opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it?
> Probably gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a counterpart
> for RC fliers?
daytripper - 28 Dec 2004 17:34 GMT
>Are you asking if a bunch of oversized children ever thought of smashing
>their flying toys together?  I seriously doubt it. ;)

You don't get around much, do you?

http://www.racores.com/current_products.html#Gremlins

/daytripper (first combat meet: 3 head-ons and a cloud of foam fragments  ;-)
Fubar of The HillPeople - 29 Dec 2004 00:57 GMT
I have one of these kits stashed in the shop. Havent built it due to lack of
somebody else (willing!) to be bashed into.

Signature

Dan
AMA605992
KE6ERB
http://www.fubar1.net
"I've heard the screams of the vegetables..."
Take out the "trash" to reply

>
>>Are you asking if a bunch of oversized children ever thought of smashing
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> /daytripper (first combat meet: 3 head-ons and a cloud of foam fragments
> ;-)
Doug McLaren - 29 Dec 2004 05:55 GMT
...
| The slope gliders have a form they call combat where you try and knock the
| other gliders out of the sky
...

| All it takes is more than one willing combatant and an agreeable set of
| rules, one of which is that the parciticipants should expect their plane to
| be demolished sooner or later as most forms of rc combat involve close
| interaction with the planes.

Slope combat isn't really about `knocking the other guy out of the
sky'.  What usually happens is that two planes bump into each other
and then they race to complete a loop or a roll.  The first one to get
that done wins, which usually means that the guy with the most speed
and/or is going in the best direction after the hit wins.

However, ever once in a while you get a chance to smack somebody else
hard, when they don't have enough speed or altitude to recover, and
their plane goes down. It's rare, but great fun when it happens.

Almost never, no matter how hard the planes hit, does a plane get
demolished, because it's usually done with the foamie flying wings.
Even the hardest hit can usually be repaired with tape.  Sometimes you
strip a servo if you didn't use a metal gear version (and apparantly
even the metal gear ones have a nylon gear that can be stripped, but
saves the rest of the servo.)  Sometimes you'll knock off a wing tip
(which I think is generally worth points too) but the plane usually
keeps flying.

(Yes, people do bring crunchies (non-foam planes -- fragile!) out to
the slope, and fly with the foamies.  The foamy pilots usually do try
to not hit the crunchies, but accidents do happen ...)

One thing that having lots of people flying on a crowded slope teaches
you is just how _hard_ it is to hit somebody's plane in the air.  Even
when you're trying.  But it's fun!

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
"Never appeal to a man's better nature.  He may not have one.
Invoking his self interest give you more leverage."  --Robert Heinlein

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 29 Dec 2004 14:13 GMT
> ... One thing that having lots of people flying on a crowded slope teaches
>you is just how _hard_ it is to hit somebody's plane in the air.  Even
>when you're trying.  But it's fun!

I'm sure you're right.

But twice in my life I've said, after both ribbons were cut, "Let's
just fly at each other and skip the ribbons."

Both times we mid-aired shortly afterward.

I've stopped inviting people to fly at my planes.  :o(

                    Marty
quietguy - 28 Dec 2004 11:11 GMT
Cant figure out how you can do that, unless the control lines are of
unequal length.  Also cutting steel wire is not easy with a wood or plastic
prop.

Way back when I had a go at control line (50 years ago) dog fights were all
the rage - but they were about cutting a streamer that each plane had
attached to its tail

David

> It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
> opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it?
> Probably gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a counterpart
> for RC fliers?
Steve - 28 Dec 2004 20:13 GMT
> Cant figure out how you can do that, unless the control lines are of
> unequal length.  Also cutting steel wire is not easy with a wood or plastic
> prop.
<

I guess you could reach around to your opponents lines with a sneakily
concealed pair of snips and ....... twing......twang.......

muttley-esque hehehe
Steve
John Doe - 28 Dec 2004 11:22 GMT
>It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut
>your opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try
>it? Probably gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a
>counterpart for RC fliers?

http://www.hobbyzonesports.com/Products/Detail.aspx?ProductID=HBZ2500

"X-Port for exciting optional plug-ins like the Sonic Combat Module"

I guess that is non-contact stuff, apparently it temporarily turns
off your opponents engines. I have not flown anything yet, so I
really have little idea what that is about, I just recall that from
doing a little research.
strathboy - 28 Dec 2004 12:36 GMT
It doesn't take an abundance of grey cells to envision the disaster that
could occur if a U control line were cut. Are you guys for real??? In my
neck of the woods, "combat" RC flying is very popular and does employ a
trailing streamer. Small WW2 aircraft (46" wingspans) predominate and losses
often occur.

>>It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut
>>your opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> really have little idea what that is about, I just recall that from
> doing a little research.
Keith Schiffner - 28 Dec 2004 13:58 GMT
> It doesn't take an abundance of grey cells to envision the
> disaster that could occur if a U control line were cut.
> Are you guys for real??? In my neck of the woods, "combat"
> RC flying is very popular and does employ a trailing
> streamer. Small WW2 aircraft (46" wingspans) predominate
> and losses often occur.

<fix toppost>

   Uh WHAT disaster? The destruction of yet another cookie
cutter boomtailed/foam winged combat plane? Yep some people
bring a whole quiver of planes to a meet. 4-6 isn't
uncommon. RC combat is even MORE UNSAFE...I would suggest
that strathboy go back to bed he might get hurt walking.
   Strathboy C/L combat has ONLY been going on since the
first two guys flew two different models at the same time in
the same circle...no deaths from it that I ever heard of.
You haven't flown until you did it in a circle...<sigh> I
remember when the cheap hot combat setup was the Combat
Kitten 2pack and a Cox Golden Bee with a TeeDee jug/piston
swapped on for a little more power...some white Topflight
props(almost unbreakable...but I have) and yes I remember
when Moneykote made that kind of flying cheap because you
could fix a hole with either tape or scrap moneykote and a
Zippo.

Simply put safety is an illusion my boy, just an illusion.

AAMOF I STILL own my first set of motors, even the ones we
blew up.
Signature

Nefarious Necrologist 42nd Degree
Some people ride, some just like to show off their butt
jewelry once in a while.
Dum vivimus, vivamus
<:(3 )3~ <:(3 )3~ <:(3 )~ <:(3 )~

mkirsch1@rochester.rr.com - 28 Dec 2004 17:03 GMT
Uh, the plane flying out of control, and into a pilot or spectator.
That kind of disaster.

Yes, the lines could break of their own volition, and any number of
other circumstances could occurr that would cause the plane to go out
of control. However, such accidents are far less likely to happen if
you aren't intentionally trying to destroy the very means by which the
plane is being held under control!

Safety is an illusion, but we don't have to go looking for accidents,
or give accidents any more reasons to happen than they already have.
John Doe - 28 Dec 2004 17:16 GMT
Since we're discussing the issue. Does anyone have an opinion about
the method of dogfighting I mentioned? Maybe it's been expressed but
I don't see it.

How about the (advertised) type of dogfighting using an add-on module
which can momentarily turn off your opponent's motors?

Mostly curious.

>Uh, the plane flying out of control, and into a pilot or spectator.
>That kind of disaster.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Safety is an illusion, but we don't have to go looking for accidents,
>or give accidents any more reasons to happen than they already have.
KevinM - 28 Dec 2004 22:58 GMT
> Since we're discussing the issue. Does anyone have an opinion about
> the method of dogfighting I mentioned? Maybe it's been expressed but
> I don't see it.
> How about the (advertised) type of dogfighting using an add-on module
> which can momentarily turn off your opponent's motors?
> Mostly curious.

Well, let me just say that I never have flown any RC Combat, nor hae I flown
a Firebird.
That aside, I looked at the link and I think it's a gtreat idea! Although, I
think 10 seconds is a little long. It should be adjustable.

FWIW,
Kev
Fubar of The HillPeople - 29 Dec 2004 01:05 GMT
Looks like fun but I have only flown one of those type of planes and it
wasnt equiped for it.
An add on module for Zagis or Sky Scooters or something would be cool and
probably ok for the "The entire world should be padded" mindset group.
When I think of the dirtclod wars, bb gun fights, homemade nailgun battles,
lemon combats, an interesting keep you on your toes game we called "catch
the spear", hatchet toss, and underground forts we considered fun as kids...
Not one kid I ever knew got his eye shot out neither!
Wouldnt trade those days for all the nerf sporks in the world.
Signature

Dan
AMA605992
KE6ERB
http://www.fubar1.net
"I've heard the screams of the vegetables..."
Take out the "trash" to reply

> Since we're discussing the issue. Does anyone have an opinion about
> the method of dogfighting I mentioned? Maybe it's been expressed but
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> accidents,
>>or give accidents any more reasons to happen than they already have.
John Doe - 29 Dec 2004 02:50 GMT
>Looks like fun but I have only flown one of those type of planes
>and it wasnt equiped for it.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>knew got his eye shot out neither! Wouldnt trade those days for all
>the nerf sporks in the world.

Then I grew up and realized we could have just as much fun while
minimizing the risks.
Keith Schiffner - 29 Dec 2004 02:55 GMT
> "Fubar of The HillPeople" <fubar1@trashsocal.rr.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> while
> minimizing the risks.

Ghu another nanny attitude...can't stand that attitude from
ANYONE. G'bye nanny...
Fubar of The HillPeople - 29 Dec 2004 05:18 GMT
Well, minimum risk would be to sit in an underground steel vault, in the
dark, padded walls, wearing a nerf suit, eating only soy, drinking distilled
water, thinking only happy thoughts.
Phooey!
And I refuse to grow up anyway so neener neener neener.

Signature

Dan
AMA605992
KE6ERB
http://www.fubar1.net
"I've heard the screams of the vegetables..."
Take out the "trash" to reply

>
>>Looks like fun but I have only flown one of those type of planes
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Then I grew up and realized we could have just as much fun while
> minimizing the risks.
Morris Lee - 28 Dec 2004 12:54 GMT
> It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
> opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it?
> Probably gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a counterpart
> for RC fliers?

Noah, there are AMA sanctioned RC combat events out there in which a long
streamer is attached to the tail of each plane.  The object is to cut as
many streamers as you can without getting your own cut.  It isn't full
contact, although midairs do take their toll.  Most of the combat planes are
designed to take quite a bit of abuse and most fly on a .15 to .25 engine.
RC Report has a monthly column on flying combat, and there are several
vendors who sell combat kits.

Morris
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 28 Dec 2004 13:54 GMT
> ... RC Report has a monthly column on flying combat ...

RCR had a monthly column.  I think it's been cancelled.

                Marty
John Doe - 28 Dec 2004 16:48 GMT
><flydog9removetoreply@ntelos.net> wrote:
>
>> ... RC Report has a monthly column on flying combat ...
>
>RCR had a monthly column.  I think it's been cancelled.

Remember the Magnum PI episode where Higgins and his friend were
staging aerial combat with radio controlled aircraft. Magnum was awoken
by the noise, and he picked up a shotgun, stepped outside and went
BOOM.

I guess electric are much quieter, heheh.
davegore@direcway.com - 29 Dec 2004 02:24 GMT
Noah, I flew controlline combat in the '50 with the cheapest plane I
could build.  Flew on a McCoy .09 and we had bunches of crashes.  That
was the point of the cheap plane which was light and could fly like
hell with the .09.  Loved it and never had a problem about rebuilding
that 'skunk' plane after it dug a hole in the turf.  Dave
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 28 Dec 2004 13:07 GMT
>It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
>opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it?
>Probably gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a counterpart
>for RC fliers?

Some of us fly RC combat.

We tie streamers to the tails of the airplanes and try to
cut the streamers.

Sometimes we miss and hit each other's planes.

It's a lot of fun, by and large.

                Marty
Six_O'Clock_High - 28 Dec 2004 16:39 GMT
>>It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
>>opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Marty

I learned that if you aim for the streamer, you always miss.  However, if
you aim for the aircraft you only miss mostly.
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 28 Dec 2004 17:02 GMT
>I learned that if you aim for the streamer, you always miss.  However, if
>you aim for the aircraft you only miss mostly.

I'm sure you're right.  I've heard other good pilots say that.

It gives me the shivers just thinking about using that as a
strategy.  I've had enough mid-airs in my career.  I'll take
the low road, thanks.  :o)

                Marty
Six_O'Clock_High - 29 Dec 2004 06:28 GMT
>>I learned that if you aim for the streamer, you always miss.  However, if
>>you aim for the aircraft you only miss mostly.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Marty

My friend, that is why I refuse to fly combat with anything larger than a
.25.  And then only with other stringently enforced safety rules.  Too many
mid-airs with running planes exiting the fray sans control.
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 29 Dec 2004 14:17 GMT
> ... Too many
>mid-airs with running planes exiting the fray sans control.

Darkest moment of my combat career: We had six or seven planes
in the air.  Two hit each other.   Bagwell said, "Look at that!"
So I looked.  Then I couldn't find my plane.  I didn't call for help.
I didn't turn off the engine.  I kept trying to find it by myself.

It hit almost straight down out in the middle of the field--just
by dumb luck.  It could have gone anywhere and hit anybody.

So I've got new rules of engagement for myself:

1. Never look far away from my own plane.

2. Turn off the engine immediately if it gets lost.

3. Yell for help.

I haven't had to try #2 or #3 yet.  #1 is working OK, so far.

                    Marty
Six_O'Clock_High - 29 Dec 2004 16:10 GMT
>> ... Too many
>>mid-airs with running planes exiting the fray sans control.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Marty

Marty,

My worst moment was when someone took out 1/2 of my right wing on a .25
sized three channel combat bird (QB-15 from Pilot).  We were right over the
runway and my plane made this turning dive for the pitts and a crowd of
people.  I could not stop the turn or the dive and the distance was too
short to plant it early, but I managed to guide it over them and into the
parking lot where it damaged an easily repariable (just cost $) car.  I will
never forget the sick feeling that it was going to drop out of control into
the middle of a bunch of folks.  THAT cured me of any desire for larger
engines and insured that any further combat would be at wide open places
where the spectator set back was a good LONG distance.  A few years later
folks started doing R/C combat with 40 sized and larger engines.

Jim
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 29 Dec 2004 20:00 GMT
> ...  THAT cured me of any desire for larger
>engines ...

I'm happy with .36-powered Gremlins (48" wing).  That's
plenty for having fun in our normal windy conditions.

> ... and insured that any further combat would be at wide open places
>where the spectator set back was a good LONG distance.

Very wise.  I'm so happy my plane crashed well out in mid-field,
but it was pure, dumb, providential luck.

> A few years later
>folks started doing R/C combat with 40 sized and larger engines.

I briefly had a .46-size "F-16".  It was an interesting plane to
play with, but not much fun for combat.  The streamers wore
away quickly and it required huge swooping turns.  The
Gremlins seem to me to be a lot more fun.

                    Marty
PaulBK58 - 30 Dec 2004 04:53 GMT
not sure how it is done elsewhere, but in so cal combat contests, points are
only awarded for kills, which means the pilot knocks the other guy to the
ground, while continuing to fly.  the "victor" must complete a roll right away
to earn the point. it is a whole lot of fun and will make anyone a better
pilot.

as far as safety, i have been hit twice in the side of the head by combat
wings, once by my own airplane, and with the exception of an increased appetite
for chocolate chip cookies, i don't think there were any long term effects.  i
like epp leading edge, and white foam for the body, and all my wings come from
bob mellen at www.flyingfoam.com.  build and bash em.
The Natural Philosopher - 28 Dec 2004 21:45 GMT
> It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
> opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it? Probably
> gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a counterpart for RC
> fliers?

Not line cutting, but streamers attached to teh tail

Done with RC too, or the modern equivalent - a beeper that goes off when
someones transmitter is pointing at yur model (a small transmitter
mounted in the plane that is)

You can buy the kit from somewhere or other - combats systems.
Fubar of The HillPeople - 29 Dec 2004 00:56 GMT
Yeah, its called Slope Combat. You use EPP slope planes, usually looking
like WWII fighters and try to knock each other out of the sky.
Great fun!
I think the glow equivalent uses specialized planes with streamers.

Signature

Dan
AMA605992
KE6ERB
http://www.fubar1.net
"I've heard the screams of the vegetables..."
Take out the "trash" to reply

> It used to be a practice among line controllers to dogfight (cut your
> opponent's line).  Is this still done?  Any of you guys try it? Probably
> gets pretty expensive when you loose :P  Is there a counterpart for RC
> fliers?
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 29 Dec 2004 01:25 GMT
>Yeah, its called Slope Combat. You use EPP slope planes, usually looking
>like WWII fighters and try to knock each other out of the sky.

>Great fun!

Somebody was having indoor EPP combat with electrics, I think.

They rented out a golf or tennis dome late on a Saturday night.

                    Marty
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.