Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / December 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GP Patriot XL!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Phi - 24 Feb 2005 22:09 GMT
Hi,
I wonder if anyone out there is building and flying the Great-Plane Patriot
XL with an OS-91FX?  Does this engine require a special type of engine mount
since it generates lots of  vibration.

Thanks In Advance!

Phi
John Graham - 24 Feb 2005 23:21 GMT
> Hi,
> I wonder if anyone out there is building and flying the Great-Plane Patriot
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Phi

Phi,
Checkout RCU ,
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/Patriot_or_Patriot_XL%3F/m_2690940/tm.htm
Here is a link about it and the forum that this came from also deals with
speed prop planes.
John
TX_QBALL@webtv.net - 25 Feb 2005 13:27 GMT
I"ve had my Pat for over two years now.
I put a MVVS 49 with pipe and it's a fine combination.Quiet a bit of
lead in the tail. With the 91,you'll have one heavy weight and probably
won't gain that much and the balsa cowling around the engine will really
be carved away.

If your dead set for the 91 I'd use a vibration mount but your really
gonna be squeezing it in,if at all.

2 cents
Don Hatten - 27 Feb 2005 19:55 GMT
He's talking about the .60 - .90 size Patriot XL  not the .40 size Patriot

Don

> I"ve had my Pat for over two years now.
> I put a MVVS 49 with pipe and it's a fine combination.Quiet a bit of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> 2 cents
Phi - 01 Mar 2005 07:42 GMT
Hello Folks,
Thanks for all comments!  It seems that I haven't really got a straight
answer so far.  From talking to several guys at the field who recommended a
Sullivan engine mounting that uses gromet to damp out the vibrations.
Others said that would make the vibration worse since engine and mounting
are not one solid piece.  These are all theories and none of them really
tests it.  Hopefully someone will come alone with a better tested solution.

Thanks again!

Phi

> He's talking about the .60 - .90 size Patriot XL  not the .40 size Patriot
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > 2 cents
Nikolizer1 - 21 Aug 2008 16:43 GMT
Phi Wrote:
> Hi,
> I wonder if anyone out there is building and flying the Great-Plan
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Phi

I recently built a GP Patriot XL and haven't flown it. It has a Supe
Tigre .61 on it. I have done many ground tests with it. It does vibrate
but not very much. To prevent the vibration, I simply made the idl
higher than normal so it wouldn't rattle around. Hope this helps   :D

Nikolizer

--
Nikolizer
Morgans - 23 Aug 2008 03:22 GMT
> I recently built a GP Patriot XL and haven't flown it. It has a Super
> Tigre .61 on it. I have done many ground tests with it. It does vibrate,
> but not very much. To prevent the vibration, I simply made the idle
> higher than normal so it wouldn't rattle around. Hope this helps   :D

I assume both of you have balanced your prop  _and spinner_ very well, and
using a good method?
Signature

Jim in NC

Nikolizer1 - 25 Aug 2008 02:21 GMT
Morgans Wrote:

> I assume both of you have balanced your prop  _and spinner_ very well
> and
> using a good method?
> --
> Jim in NC

Well, I don't usually worry about the nose cone. It has a 12x8 spor
prop on it. a couple days ago, I took it out for another ground chec
and then the throttle barrel popped out. Took care of that and she run
great.

I'll be sure to post some pics soon

--
Nikolizer
lightthings - 24 Dec 2009 01:17 GMT
Nikolizer1 Wrote:
> Well, I don't usually worry about the nose cone. My friend gave me this
> propeller for this engine, because its what he recommended for speed. It
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Here are some pics if you are interested.

Not bad craftsmanship for a 15 year-old huh?  :p

Still waiting for someone else to blow your horn?
Flown it yet?
LT

Signature

lightthings

Vance Howard - 24 Dec 2009 01:58 GMT
> Nikolizer1 Wrote:
>> Well, I don't usually worry about the nose cone. My friend gave me this
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Still waiting for someone else to blow your horn? Flown it yet?
> LT

Let's just rain all over a kids enthusiasm.

Signature

To reply by email: vhoward1122 at gmail dot com

Six_O'Clock_High - 24 Dec 2009 18:52 GMT
>> Nikolizer1 Wrote:
>>> Well, I don't usually worry about the nose cone. My friend gave me this
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Let's just rain all over a kids enthusiasm.

Yeah, doing that makes it clear that you don't want new folks in the hobby
unless they are over 90 or so. .  .
MJKolodziej - 25 Dec 2009 00:28 GMT
> Nikolizer1 Wrote:
>> Well, I don't usually worry about the nose cone. My friend gave me this
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Flown it yet?
> LT

Nikolizer1, it looks good!
mk
desmobob - 25 Dec 2009 00:35 GMT
Nikolizer1 Wrote:
> Not bad craftsmanship for a 15 year-old huh?  :p
>
> Here are some pics if you are interested.

It looks fast just sitting there.  :D

Nice job... I hope it flies as good as it looks!  I love the sound of
those old Super Tigre mufflers.  I have a bunch of old ST engines from
.25 on up, and most are old enough to have those neat exhausts.  Great
stuff! The new ones are big and ugly.  

Good flying,
desmobob

Signature

desmobob

ecregger - 25 Dec 2009 03:26 GMT
> Nikolizer1 Wrote:
>> Not bad craftsmanship for a 15 year-old huh?  :p
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Good flying,
> desmobob

It's true, the old Super Tigre engines were lean and mean. The new stuff is
too PC to be exciting like the old engines.

Ed Cregger

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.