Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Batteries, old and new

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
wanjung@toast.net - 28 Jan 2006 23:34 GMT
Hi,

I have an idea. I am presently using 3 battery packs of 3S, Li Polies.
Each was used separately to fly  small planes (about 20 oz.) for about
25 - 30 minutes.

The idea is to connect the 3 packs in parallel to make a pack that
results in 6300 mAh (3 x 2100 Mah)

This will extend my flight time in my larger aircraft.

The question is, can an older battery be connected to newer batteries
without harm? (1 battery is over 3 years, the newest one is about a
year, while the 3rd one is about 2 years old)

The batteries are of the older generation Thunderpower. Any opinions or
suggestions?

Wan
Red Scholefield - 29 Jan 2006 01:21 GMT
As long as they are the same number of cells and all fully charged, they can
be connected in parallel for flight. They should be charged separately
however.
Signature

Red S.
Red's R/C Battery Clinic
http://www.rcbatteryclinic.com
Check us out for "revolting" information.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Wan
Paul McIntosh - 29 Jan 2006 02:59 GMT
I would say that if they all test out at the same capacity, go for it.

Signature

Paul McIntosh
RC-Bearings.com
"when steel just isn't enough"

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Wan
wanjung@toast.net - 29 Jan 2006 13:01 GMT
Thanks to both Red and Paul. I will fly when the weather here is
better. I hope to get an increase in flight time by about 40% from my
previous 18 min. to about 25 min., If my math is correct. There is one
question. Once the batteries are balanced, would they need to be
charged separately?

Wan
Paul McIntosh - 29 Jan 2006 15:54 GMT
As Red said, yes.

Signature

Paul McIntosh
RC-Bearings.com
"when steel just isn't enough"

> Thanks to both Red and Paul. I will fly when the weather here is
> better. I hope to get an increase in flight time by about 40% from my
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Wan
Doug McLaren - 29 Jan 2006 16:46 GMT
| Thanks to both Red and Paul. I will fly when the weather here is
| better. I hope to get an increase in flight time by about 40% from my
| previous 18 min. to about 25 min., If my math is correct.

It's probably close.  With the additional weight, you'll need more
power and so your flight times will decrease, but the difference is
likely to be small.

| There is one question. Once the batteries are balanced, would they
| need to be charged separately?

Red did already say yes ...

With all three packs in parallel, if you charge them, you'll be
charging all three at once and it should work just as expected.  (With
NiMH/NiCd cells this isn't right, but with LiPo and Pb cells it
should.)  But the danger is that some packs will have a lower internal
resistance than the others and so a larger percentage of the total
charge current will go into those packs, and if the difference is
large enough, you could charge that pack at a rate that's too high and
damage it.  It's relatively unlikely, but possible.

You'd probably be just fine if you charged your three pack combination
at a rate that is acceptable for the smallest pack -- i.e. if you have
a 900 mAh, 1000 mAh and 1100 mAh pack in parallel, charging at 900 mA
should be fine.  Of course, it'll also take a little over three hours
for a full charge ...

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com     There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!

wanjung@toast.net - 30 Jan 2006 01:54 GMT
(snip)You'd probably be just fine if you charged your three pack
combination
at a rate that is acceptable for the smallest pack -- i.e. if you have
a 900 mAh, 1000 mAh and 1100 mAh pack in parallel, charging at 900 mA
should be fine.  Of course, it'll also take a little over three hours
for a full charge ...(snip)

The 3 batteries are of the same voltage and capacity (3S3P
Thunderpower, 11.1 V and 2100 mAh) Three hours a long time. That's the
reason I would like to charge the whole pack at the same time as I've
done many times before with my Kokam batteries. They are also nine
celled, 3S3P and it took about an hour to recharge. Of course the
Kokams have only 4500 mAh per pack while the Thunderpower will have
6300 mAh.

I know Red said to charge the 3S packs separately. But it would be
great if I could charge the whole pack once they are balanced.
Doug McLaren - 30 Jan 2006 03:50 GMT
| I know Red said to charge the 3S packs separately. But it would be
| great if I could charge the whole pack once they are balanced.

You probably could.  99% of the time, it would work just fine.  But
that other 1% ... if something happens to one of the packs (like a
wire breaks) then suddenly the other two are now being charged at 50%
too high of a rate ...

You know, my Lacross BC-900 charger just screwed up.  It was charging
4 AA 2500 mAh NiMH cells at 500 mA like it always does, but then I
heard a sizzling, and all four cells are at like 300 degrees.  I was
thinking that I had a hot steamer, and peeled them all out of the
charger, but the charger still says it's charging at 500 mA even with
no batteries.

Not sure what happened, but since it happened to all four cells at
once, it's pretty obvious that the charger malfunctioned somehow (as
opposed to the cells suddenly shorting -- that might happen to one,
but not to all four at once.)  Which sucks, because I paid like $50
for this charger!  (Because it can peak charge four cells
individually.)

I'm not sure what would have happend if I wasn't around ... I guess it
would have kept cooking the cells ...

My point?  You need to watch your charging batteries, even the NiCd
and NiMH ones ...

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzy.com
Honk if you hate bumper stickers that say "Honk if ..."

desmobob - 30 Jan 2006 12:05 GMT
> You know, my Lacross BC-900 charger just screwed up.  It was charging
> 4 AA 2500 mAh NiMH cells at 500 mA like it always does, but then I
> heard a sizzling, and all four cells are at like 300 degrees.  I was
> thinking that I had a hot steamer, and peeled them all out of the
> charger, but the charger still says it's charging at 500 mA even with
> no batteries.

I had a similar incident with a Panasonic charger.  One cell swelled and the
charger was melted/destroyed.  Panasonic later recalled the chargers.....

I had purchased the Panansonic unit as a cheaper partner to my Maha charger.
Now, I have two Mahas.

Good flying,
desmobob
Six_O'Clock_High - 31 Jan 2006 14:37 GMT
How does the Maha compare to an Orbit?

>> You know, my Lacross BC-900 charger just screwed up.  It was charging
>> 4 AA 2500 mAh NiMH cells at 500 mA like it always does, but then I
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Good flying,
> desmobob
jackie123 - 23 Oct 2006 23:11 GMT
I think you should use 3 battery pack cause u r comparing something. And<
Alcso you would need those
Batteries,Anyway

>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Wan
jackie123 - 23 Oct 2006 23:12 GMT
I think you should use 3 battery pack cause u r comparing something. And<
Alcso you would need those
Batteries,Anyway

>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Wan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.