Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

total beginner

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John C - 11 Aug 2006 21:20 GMT
CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
-JLC
desmobob - 11 Aug 2006 21:32 GMT
SIG Kadet Sr.

http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXFF89&P=ML

Good flying,
desmobob

> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC
Skyway - 11 Aug 2006 22:42 GMT
Carl Goldberg Eagle II ARF.  I learned on an Eagle 63 which was the old kit
version that I still have to this day.  Put a good .40 2-stroke or a .52
4-stroke and you will learn to fly in no time.

Eagle II ARF
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXDJE4&P=ML

If you need everything (like radio, plane, engine and all) then might I
suggest on of the complete systems out there that includes everything you
need to fly.

Complete System
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0161p?&I=LZ1775

Hope this helps you.

> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC
John F. Hughes - 11 Aug 2006 23:33 GMT
> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC

I can recommend something even better than a kit -- a build-it-yourself
plan, called the "Trainer One". Information can be found at

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=383687

This is a simple electric trainer. Indeed, it's so simple you can build
it yourself and fly it yourself without anyone teaching you how. I know,
because I did so about a year ago.

On the one hand, it'll cost you several hours of time to build it, and
to get the parts (fanfold foam from Lowe's; a motor from Jameco; a prop
from Tower or the local hobby shop; a hot-melt glue gun; etc.) and
you'll need to actually get a transmitter, receiver, a battery pack,
and two small servos, which will make the whole thing cost a lot more
than the "just start flying" electrics from people like Hobbico. On the
good side, you'll then have a xmitter that you can keep using, and a
receiver and servos that you can re-use once the T-1 starts to bore you.
With the ready-to-fly version, everything in sight is proprietary or a
pain to salvage.

The good news is...

(a) You get a "support group" from the rcgroups crowd; they'll answer
any question you ask, and promptly and generally clearly.

(b) You built it yourself. When you break something, you'll be confident
about re-gluing it to fix it up.

(c) it's got a slightly annoying whine as it flies, but nothing that'll
annoy anyone if you use it at the local high-school football field.

(d) By building the plane, you'll begin to get some feel for how a bunch
of things work.

The bad news is...

(a) It takes time, and appears to take more money than the prebuilt
route.

(b) From the point of view of some people in this newsgroup, it's not
really getting started "in this hobby," because it's an electric rather
than an internal combustion power system.

Your mileage may vary...but it worked for me.

--John
Ted Campanelli - 11 Aug 2006 23:39 GMT
Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these great (and sometimes not
so great) words of knowledge:
> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC

I would like to suggest an alternative.  Get an ARF for your 1st plane.
 Build your "labor of love" once you have mastered the basics of flying.

It is very easy for a beginner to build a warp into the plane and not
even realize it.  In addition, when you build a plane you form an
emotional attachment to it (at least I do and almost all of the people I
know who build do also).  With an ARF you do not have to worry about if
the plane is built correctly and you do not have the degree of emotional
attachment to the plane as if you built it.  In addition, you can not
build a plane for the cost of an ARF.

A trainer is to learn on.  It will get beat up, damaged and looking ugly
 (usually).  That is a basic fact of learning how to fly.

I suggest avoiding the RTF (Ready To Fly) packages as the engine with
the majority of them is marginal (at best) in a trainer and you will, in
all probability, not be able to use the engine in a more advanced plane.
 In addition, the radios are typically a base type 4 channel transmitter.

With some careful shopping, you can get a good quality ARF (Hobbico
SuperStar or Avistar) a decent, USER FRIENDLY 46 Ball Bearing Engine
(Thunder Tiger Pro 46 or Evolution 46NT) and a decent 6 (or more)
channel COMPUTER radio. (Futaba 6EXA, HiTec Optic 6 among others)
(Computer radios allow you to store multiple models among other things)
for less than some RTF (Nexstar) and usually within $50 of most RTF.

You will then have a radio you can grow into (and will be able to do
flaps and/or retracts when you are ready) and an engine that will be
very useable in future planes also.

The biggest thing though to make your learning experience as painless as
possible and for you to learn quickly AND correctly is:  GET AN
INSTRUCTOR !!  If you join a club, they not only have a place to fly,
but provide instructors at no charge.

You may also check at the local club to see if they have (or it is still
in force) a program where you can fly for 30 days at no cost to you.
The club provides the plane, instructor, fuel etc.  The program was
designed to let people try flying before they shelled out any money and
then found they may not like it.  As I said, I am not sure if this
program is still in use and not all clubs participated in that program.
Ken Day - 12 Aug 2006 02:44 GMT
>CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
>-JLC

Are you wanting a KIt or an ARF ? Many people are referring to ARF's
as KITS these days.
Are you wanting something with a minimum of work that you can learn
to fly with ? Or , are you wanting to spend many hours cutting and
glueing balsa and lite ply and then covering with Monokote or a
similiar product ?

One of the most successful trainer aircrafts I have ever seen is
a GWS Slow Stick , a little electric airplane that assembles easily
in an afternoon.
We've had three new flyers in the last two weeks. Each of them soloed
within 3 days and are having a ball. So far they have had only minor
damage to their aircraft.
After gaining experience they will move up to something that looks
more like a real airplane , maybe even build a kit.
I would not attempt to guess how many people at our field has learned
to fly on these in the last 3-4 years.

One of ..I said one of , maybe not THE easiest , kits to build as far
as  a built up balsa airplane goes would be the Goldberg Eagle or
Eaglet. Sig kits are a bit harder to build as are Great Planes and Top
Flite.

Some one mentioned a Sig Kadet Senior. They are probably the easiest
to fly of any of the built up airplanes , but they are a tough build
for a new builder..
They have so much 1/4 " stick truss construction and some 'carving'
and fitting of large balsa blocks.

I built one for my son on his 10th birthday 20 years ago. He still has
it although it was retired and hung from the ceiling a few years back.
I would venture to say that he and I together put in excess of 700
flights on it. All with an OS .61 4 Stroke which is still running just
fine.
Built one for a friend who was having a lot of trouble learning to fly
on some of the smaller trainers. In just a short while he was flying
good and having a ball.
I really believe you could tie a string to the nose and fly it as a
kite LOL

There are so many good aircraft out there and you will get many
answers here .I'm sure  all the advice will be good , just varied.
There are a lot of good guys...and gals here with a lot of experience
and I don't think anyone  would steer you wrong.

Welcome to the wonderful world of RC flying. Hope this is a help to
you.
Good luck

Ken
Andrew - 12 Aug 2006 09:31 GMT
> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC

I just bought my first plane, a Hobbico Nexstar ARF. I'll list some of
the plusses and minusses keeping in mind that I have not flown it yet.

Plus:
-100% warranty if you crash while training. Good as gold for a new flier.
-Comes with simulator software. I've become very comfortable with the
plane without having it in the air yet. Hopefully this transfers well to
real flight.
-Options include a speed brake, droops on the wings and an automatic
righting system (which I do not plan to use).
-Spare parts are plentiful.

Minus:
-Build quality is not the greatest though probably better than I could
have done.
-The box claims that you'll be flying in 20 minutes. Hardly. Expect to
spend several hours setting the plane up and ensuring that everything is
tight and wroks properly.

I can't wait to try it out.
Earl Scherzinger - 12 Aug 2006 15:13 GMT
John,

I don't know where you read that it's under a 100%  warranty if you crash
while training. NOT TRUE! Read carefully! If this was true they would have
(my estimate) 7 out of 10 returns.

I'm a somewhat experienced flyer (from 1980) so I bought the same model. It
lasted three flights. CRASH! It is NOT as easy to fly as they claim. It MUST
BE balanced.

My advice .......Get someone to help as a co-pilot (trainer radio). That is
a LOT of money to chance, unless you have deep pockets. I was very fortunate
to salvage the engine, radio and all the hardware. My loss was the cost of
the plane ($100).

To replace it I bought a Tower Trainer 40 ARF ($70)
________________________________
Earl Scherzinger 'AMA' #40329

>> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
>> -JLC
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> I can't wait to try it out.
Andrew - 12 Aug 2006 16:42 GMT
If I remember correctly the warranty requires you to train with a
designated trainer at a certified field. This is something that all
beginners should be doing anyway.

> John,
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>>
>>I can't wait to try it out.
Skyway - 12 Aug 2006 17:07 GMT
I totally agree with Andrew.  I was not taught at a club field but rather a
college where a bunch of folks fly.  I actually paid a guy $20/Hr to teach
me (about 5 hours total).  Yep, not free, but the guy taught many people out
there and had most flying in a few hours.

Had I tried to fly my Eagle 63 by myself with no help, it would have lasted
about 15 seconds on the first take off.  The $100 I paid for instruction was
cheaper than a plane and kept me in the hobby for many years.  I am *very*
glad I chose that route.

I would really suggest (like in an above post) that you go to the hobby shop
ask some questions about local clubs and get an instructor.  Ask that
instructor what he likes to train on and go with what he suggests.  I really
feel that if I would have done it on my own, I would have gotten a bad taste
in my mouth after crashing and quit.  Please don't let this happen to you
: ) .

> If I remember correctly the warranty requires you to train with a
> designated trainer at a certified field. This is something that all
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>>>
>>>I can't wait to try it out.
Andrew - 13 Aug 2006 00:47 GMT
It happened to me 20+ years ago. I built my first plane, an LT-40, over
the winter. My first flight lasted far less than 15 seconds. I taxied
out pulled back the elevator and did a beautiful loop right into the
ground. Matchsticks.

Since then I've built two more planes and flown neither of them mostly
out of fear of crashing.

This time around buying an ARF is a real treat. It takes the stress
away, not having to worry about destroying something that took you many
hours to build. The sim software has given me enough confidence that I
almost believe I could fly without an instructor. However, this Tuesday
I will be out at the local club paying for a memebership and insurance
and beginning my training. I've always wanted to fly and I have no good
excuse as to why it took me several decades to do things right. Think of
all the airtime I've missed.

> I totally agree with Andrew.  I was not taught at a club field but rather a
> college where a bunch of folks fly.  I actually paid a guy $20/Hr to teach
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> in my mouth after crashing and quit.  Please don't let this happen to you
> : ) .
Skyway - 13 Aug 2006 01:45 GMT
Wonderfully said Andrew.  All my planes that I built from a kit would make
my knees shake when I flew them.  With ARF's it's a little differant for the
reasons you mentioned.  I have not built a kit in five years and like
ARF'ing mostly.

> It happened to me 20+ years ago. I built my first plane, an LT-40, over
> the winter. My first flight lasted far less than 15 seconds. I taxied out
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> a bad taste in my mouth after crashing and quit.  Please don't let this
>> happen to you : ) .
Andrew - 13 Aug 2006 01:52 GMT
I'm definately looking forward to building my 2nd (5th?) plane over the
next winter. Perhaps someone could recommend a suitable second model?

> Wonderfully said Andrew.  All my planes that I built from a kit would make
> my knees shake when I flew them.  With ARF's it's a little differant for the
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>>a bad taste in my mouth after crashing and quit.  Please don't let this
>>>happen to you : ) .
Skyway - 13 Aug 2006 06:20 GMT
The Sig 4 Star series would be good.  My second plane was a Carl Goldberg
Cub (kit).  If I were to do it again, I would get a World Models Super
Sports .40.  I have had three of these and they slow well for landings, can
do mild aerobatics, and is just a good plane to transition to low wing
aircraft.  At $99 dollars, its a hard ARF to beat.  Here is the link to the
Super Sports...

http://www.airborne-models.com/html/productdetails.asp?ProductID=41

There is also a newer version...

http://www.airborne-models.com/html/productdetails.asp?ProductID=42

> I'm definately looking forward to building my 2nd (5th?) plane over the
> next winter. Perhaps someone could recommend a suitable second model?
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>>>>gotten a bad taste in my mouth after crashing and quit.  Please don't
>>>>let this happen to you : ) .
Andrew - 13 Aug 2006 08:01 GMT
The 4 Star looks like it will fit the bill. It was at the top of my list
and is readily available. The Super Sports looks good too but I'm
leaning towards a kit as I have way too much time to kill in the winter.
Thanks for the advice.

> The Sig 4 Star series would be good.  My second plane was a Carl Goldberg
> Cub (kit).  If I were to do it again, I would get a World Models Super
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>>>>>gotten a bad taste in my mouth after crashing and quit.  Please don't
>>>>>let this happen to you : ) .
Storm's Hamilton - 13 Aug 2006 14:33 GMT
> The 4 Star looks like it will fit the bill. It was at the top of my list
> and is readily available. The Super Sports looks good too but I'm leaning
> towards a kit as I have way too much time to kill in the winter. Thanks
> for the advice.

I have a BTE Venture 60 on the shelf (like a 4 star) but no TIME.
http://www.btemodels.com/index.html

mk
(who is envious of Andrew's time)

>> The Sig 4 Star series would be good.  My second plane was a Carl Goldberg
>> Cub (kit).  If I were to do it again, I would get a World Models Super
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>>>>>>would have gotten a bad taste in my mouth after crashing and quit.
>>>>>>Please don't let this happen to you : ) .
H Davis - 13 Aug 2006 09:51 GMT
Andrew, I've asked that same question many time to see what various people
recommend. The answer I get very frequently is Sig Four Star 40 or 60.

Harlan.

> I'm definately looking forward to building my 2nd (5th?) plane over the
> next winter. Perhaps someone could recommend a suitable second model?
R.J. Roman - 12 Aug 2006 17:44 GMT
We just released our specially-packaged GWS Pico Stick (smaller version of
Slow Stick), which we are offering with our CD-ROM brushless outrunner
motor.  This package is lighter, more powerful, and quieter than the stock
IPS-powered Pico Stick.  Unlike the stock brushed motor IPS drive, our CDR
motor will run maintenance-free "forever" and without a noisy gearbox.  It
makes a great "first plane" for beginners, as well as a relaxing flyer for
the seasoned R/C pilot.  With our CDR motor, the plane is capable of really
nice loops and powerful climbs to altitude.  Check it out!

Randy
Model Airplane Engineering
www.M-A-E.com

> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC
Johnny Borborigmi - 13 Aug 2006 03:38 GMT
> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC

EasyStar! RTF!!!!!

It rocks!
WhistleHEad - 03 Sep 2006 02:22 GMT
"John C" <jcvmf214@optonline.net> wrote in news:4E5Dg.49$Rh7.9
@newsfe11.lga:

> CAn someone recommend a kit for a total beginner in the hobby?
> -JLC

I started the hobbie last year in the same state as you.  I didn't have a
clue. I walked into 3 different shops looking for advice.  2 shops were
larger establishments, one smaller and more personable.  I bought from
the smaller of the 3 because of the personalize service.  

I asked the shop keeper what I needed to start.  He recommended 2
aircraft.

1) the Sig Kadet and
2) the Seagull Boomerang.

I chose the Boomerang because of the semi-simeterical wing as it would
allow me to expand my flying after ground school without having to buy a
new aircraft right away.  

I bought a HiTech Optic6 with flight pack and an OS46 engine to complete
the package.  

The ARF Boomerang only cost $117.00 and by the time I bought the engine,
Radio/receiver, flight box and all the necessities to get started the
total ran just under $1000.00.  

The kit was high quality and was easy to put together. I was empressed
that the hinges were plastic with metal pins (not CA Hinges) and were
actually pinned into location. I had the model completed and first flight
was within the week.  

Ensure you join a club that has an excellent ground school.  I have a
very demanding job and could not attend regularly, however, with the
quality of instructors that assisted me I achieved earning my wings
within 8-10 flights.  The plane really helped as well, it is real stable
and forgiving and flys like a hawk.

Always look to and listen to the more experienced flyers for advise and
learn from their mistakes, not yours.  It is less expensive that way.

Another help is to buy a high quality Flight Simulator.  One that uses an
actual controller that resembles the radio you will use (not a joystick).  
I chose the Real Flight G3 Simulator from Great Planes.  Although it cost
$245.00, it has saved me over $60,000 in airplanes.

I have moved from the top winged Boomerang trainer to a SIG 4-Star 60.
This is an excellent 2nd plane and is an excellent 1st low winged
aircraft if that is the way you intend to go.  

I still fly my Boomerang regularly as well as my 4-Star.  

Remember, what goes up must come down and a Boomerang always comes back.

Have fun.

Brad
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.