> I think the 6XAS is a later version of the set which I am referring to.
> Basically what I want to do is to have a seperate servo controlling the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> asking the group if they know of any
> method with this TX to achieve this end.
>> I think the 6XAS is a later version of the set which I am referring to.
>> Basically what I want to do is to have a seperate servo controlling the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> switches, and RX channels is what you want, the EVO is the machine you
> need.
I have never actually used one, but I understood the Evo didn't have free
assignment of RX channels ?
I haven't used the 6XA either, but I just dowwnloaded the manual from
<http://www.futaba-rc.com/manuals/notes-6x.html> and it definitely shows V-Tail
and Flaperon mixing. If the plane doesn't have a rudder then of course you can
just use the V-Tail mix with the rudder proportion set to 0%, this may not be
any use though.
What is the exact problem you are experienceing with the PMixes approach ? I
assume you've tried setting a PMix from ch2 to ch5 with control proportions of
100% in both directions ? Does the gear switch still affect the ch5 elevator
when you do this ? If so then try setting the other PMix from ch5 to ch5 (ie to
itself) with control proportions of 0% ?
It's hard to guess what will work without actuyally having a 6XA to hand, but
if the worst comes tot he worst then Schulze make RXs with on-board programmable
mixers, SMC <http://www.sussex-model-centre.co.uk/> and West London Models
<http://www.westlondonmodels.com/> both stock these. Good but pricey...
Hth,

Signature
Boo
The Natural Philosopher - 01 Nov 2006 16:19 GMT
>>> I think the 6XAS is a later version of the set which I am referring to.
>>> Basically what I want to do is to have a seperate servo controlling the
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> Hth,
I think the problem is he wants V tail AND flapperon..and they are not
IIRC available.
The Futabas do the basic stuff (fairly) easily, though I find the logic
a pain...the Evos simply throw away the concept of 1 stick=1 channel and
split the thing into three logical layers..sticks buttons and switches
(input devices) that feed mixers (many in to many out abstractions) ,
that feed output channels (one or more servos all doing the same thing,
a slot on the receiver). This is more complex for a bog standard setup,
but its a heck of a lot more flexible.
Once you step beyond what the Futaba thinks is what you want to do, its
not worth fighting the system. Get the Evo.