Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Looking for a club/Instructor in Derbyshire/Notts area of UK

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
EGNX Flyer - 14 Nov 2006 16:49 GMT
hi all,

I guess i should start here, amongst the seasoned pros and novices
alike, in my quest for a club/instructor in my local area.

I have a Seagull 'Boomerang' 4ch sports trainer fitted with an SC.40
engine and APC 11x6 prop and want to learn to fly this before the New
Year (personal reasons which I'd rather not discuss here).

I've actually flown this plane on a few occasions before this with a
nearby club, but this was around 2 years ago, and unfortunately on the
last outing it suffered a battery failure - the battery lead
disconnected after a steep turn - and it ended up plouging the nearby
field. This resulted in a few holes in the wing section, a broken wing
spar and also a snapped section of the vertical stabilizer. All the
damage has been repaired with 1hr epoxy and balsa braces, and any holes
re-covered with SolarTrim (as per another thread i posted here).
Obviously it'll require a trained eye to look over it and deem it
airworthy, but i expected this.

So, back to my initial query, could anybody suggest a local club or
locally based instructor that could help with my gaining of a BMFA 'A'
cert? I know of only two local clubs (Leafields MAC: www.Leafields.com
and Alport Flyers: http://www.alport-mfc.fsnet.co.uk/index.htm), I have
contacted them, but so far i've received no response. Thats when i
thought i'd see if anybody else can sugget anywhere locally - there
doesnt seem to be many on the BMFA website that are within easy reach,
and anywhere further than Derby or Nottingham is a little too far for
me.

Many many thanks for taking the time to read this, i really hope you
can help me!

Thanks again

Simon
markzoom@digiverse.net - 14 Nov 2006 21:18 GMT
> hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Simon

On the Leafields website on the "contacts" page there are the telephone
numbers of 6 blokes. Try ringing them.
EGNX Flyer - 15 Nov 2006 09:46 GMT
strange as it may seem, i also saw those details, and have tried
phoning a few times - all to no response.... although it may just be my
timing.
markzoom@digiverse.net - 15 Nov 2006 10:01 GMT
> strange as it may seem, i also saw those details, and have tried
> phoning a few times - all to no response.... although it may just be my
> timing.

I have nothing to do with that club, so all I can suggest is keep
trying or just visit their field on a Sunday.
EGNX Flyer - 15 Nov 2006 16:42 GMT
> > strange as it may seem, i also saw those details, and have tried
> > phoning a few times - all to no response.... although it may just be my
> > timing.
>
> I have nothing to do with that club, so all I can suggest is keep
> trying or just visit their field on a Sunday.

Hi mark,

i understood this, and actually had a visit in mind, but in all honesty
their site isn't the greatest due to having a row of trees behind it
(leading to an unexpected gusts of wind if its in the right (wrong??)
direction) and the addition of a 4-foot dry stone wall at either end of
the strip (okay, it is about 150 feet long, but still!) isnt ideal for
landings either.
markzoom@digiverse.net - 15 Nov 2006 17:03 GMT
> > > strange as it may seem, i also saw those details, and have tried
> > > phoning a few times - all to no response.... although it may just be my
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> the strip (okay, it is about 150 feet long, but still!) isnt ideal for
> landings either.

A bit daunting for a novice...
Mayb the other club you mentioned might be a better choice, but
whatever you do, don't try it on your own! Don't know what else to
suggest, sorry.

Only other thing I can think of is you buy a cheapie electric artf and
at least get some kind of practice in before risking your main plane. I
still wouldn't recommend it though...

Either way, when you hopefully find someone to teach you, immediately
start building your next trainer, because chances are you'll write it
off anyway!
Just preparing you for the inevitable, it's a bit of a shocker seeing
your first big effort in bits, so laugh it off when it happens.
Malcolm Fisher - 15 Nov 2006 20:09 GMT
Big Snip

>> Either way, when you hopefully find someone to teach you, immediately
> start building your next trainer, because chances are you'll write it
> off anyway!
> Just preparing you for the inevitable, it's a bit of a shocker seeing
> your first big effort in bits, so laugh it off when it happens.

Many years ago, I taught myself to fly using a FF glider modified for rudder
only radio control and never suffered the "inevitable write off".

Yes I damaged it, but having built it was able to effect the necessary
repairs.

I used another modification of the same model when graduating to rudder and
elevator control with similar results but far fewer mishaps than with rudder
only and eventually graduated to power flying.

The experience with gliders meant that I have never been worried about a
"dead stick" landing as with a glider every landing approach is "dead
stick". In fact, when first using power I preferred flying the tank dry
rather than land with power on.

Malcolm
markzoom@digiverse.net - 16 Nov 2006 16:22 GMT
> Big Snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Many years ago, I taught myself to fly using a FF glider modified for rudder
> only radio control and never suffered the "inevitable write off".

I'd say that most IC power trainers that people try to fly on their own
for the first time get decked (if they don't get accidentally damaged
on the ground).

IMHO tail draggers make far better trainers than trikes, which usually
damage the front UC leg on a heavy landing.

> Yes I damaged it, but having built it was able to effect the necessary
> repairs.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Malcolm

Gliders are probably the best way to learn, but it's sometimes
difficult to find the right site.
Pointer - 15 Nov 2006 21:19 GMT
> I have a Seagull 'Boomerang' 4ch sports trainer fitted with an SC.40
> engine and APC 11x6 prop and want to learn to fly this before the New
> Year (personal reasons which I'd rather not discuss here).

Hi Simon,
Best of luck finding a tutor.
There are many BFMA instructors who thrive on the challenge, but often only
using a buddy lead.
They get a bad reputation if they lose too many models.

Once found, dont be surprised if he/she recommends the use of a 10x6 rather
than an 11x6 prop and APCs are reputed to be amongst the more efficient.
Your SC40 is probably not yet run in , if so it will certainly be
overpropped ( the engine will labour) , if it can handle the 11x6 then
unless you quickly throttle back after takeoff, your trainer  may tend to
fly ( and react)  rather faster than you would like.
P
EGNX Flyer - 15 Nov 2006 21:35 GMT
Thanks for the reply Pointer.

When i flew the plane before, it was actually via a buddy lead to my
6EXA whilst the instructor had, and used, his FF9.

As for the engine, and the previous outings its had, the last time it
was airborne was about a 20 minute flight, as were the handful before
that - would this mean its still not fully run in? How would one tell?

The engine seems to cope very well with the APC 11x6, and it was
actually recommended to me for this particular aircraft and engine by
Ajay Models nr. Chesterfield (i'm lead to believe that they're very
well known in this industry, something to do with Zenoah petrol
engines?).

anyways, many thanks for all of your replies, much appreciated.

One more thing, would anybody have an opinion as to the use of a flight
sim, AeroFly Pro Deluxe / RealFlight G3 for laying the basics down over
the winter should i not find an instructor/club??

Thanks again!!

Simon
Pointer - 15 Nov 2006 23:53 GMT
> One more thing, would anybody have an opinion as to the use of a flight
> sim, AeroFly Pro Deluxe / RealFlight G3 for laying the basics down over
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Simon

I would recommend the free download FMS
http://tinyurl.com/q4xf
a simple Google search will  find loads of additional models and landscapes
for you to play with.
You can use a cheap £10 joystick or a game controller, but best of all would
be a hook up with your Tx.
The USB cable and separateTX plug adapter should cost you about £25, but
that will give you plenty of thumb practice.

Find a model which stalls at slow speed, and do circuits as slowly and as
low as possible.
Then practice landing towards you without an unseemly cartwheel.
Master that and the real life situation will seem easy to you.
P
EGNX Flyer - 16 Nov 2006 09:46 GMT
thanks again Pointer!

the only reason i suggested AeroFly and RF G3 is that i have a couple
of friends with these sims, and they've offered to loan me one or the
other (complete with dongles and cable)  over winter should i really
need them. The only thing i will need, they advise, is the connector
cable for my 6EXA, which is the square 6-pin Futaba type.

Other than using my Futaba Tx, and forking out near £30 for a
connecting cable, can one use a USB dual-analog controller like this:
http://tinyurl.com/r2cle to control these games?
markzoom@digiverse.net - 16 Nov 2006 16:17 GMT
> > One more thing, would anybody have an opinion as to the use of a flight
> > sim, AeroFly Pro Deluxe / RealFlight G3 for laying the basics down over
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> The USB cable and separateTX plug adapter should cost you about £25, but
> that will give you plenty of thumb practice.

Lesson number 1:

Do you steer your car or bicycle with your thumb? No!
It's a bad habit to get into.

Don't use your thumb on the sticks because you have less control and it
might slip off, grip it properly between index and thumb.

> Find a model which stalls at slow speed, and do circuits as slowly and as
> low as possible.
> Then practice landing towards you without an unseemly cartwheel.
> Master that and the real life situation will seem easy to you.
> P
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 16 Nov 2006 17:49 GMT
> Lesson number 1:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Don't use your thumb on the sticks because you have less control and it
> might slip off, grip it properly between index and thumb.

Lesson number 2

Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

I bet the majority of people fly with just their thumbs, I would also
reckon that some of the best display pilots in this country also fly
that way.

Pick the method that suits YOU. I fly, sometimes in extremely cold
weather and have never had a thumb slip off the sticks yet. I have lost
the feeling in them on a number of occasions but they have always
remained in place.

Holding the sticks as advised feels totally wrong to me and I can't
control the plane the same.

Pick what feels right and ignore those who say that you shouldn't do it
that way.... same guys will tell you that the ONLY way to learn to fly
is by going to a club..... hmmmmmm !

Reg
markzoom@digiverse.net - 16 Nov 2006 19:12 GMT
> > Lesson number 1:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> reckon that some of the best display pilots in this country also fly
> that way.

You only have to go and look, or ask any decent instructor.
You'll likely also find that it's people who taught themselves, or
learnt from people who taught themselves to fly that use thumbs to
control their pride and joy.
I know some people that use their thumbs AND fly with the elevators
operating the wrong way round who learnt from a "self-taught" chap.

> Pick the method that suits YOU. I fly, sometimes in extremely cold
> weather and have never had a thumb slip off the sticks yet. I have lost
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Holding the sticks as advised feels totally wrong to me and I can't
> control the plane the same.

Like I said, it's a bad habit you picked up.

> Pick what feels right and ignore those who say that you shouldn't do it
> that way.... same guys will tell you that the ONLY way to learn to fly
> is by going to a club..... hmmmmmm !

If you've got a .40 glow model it sure is.
You're not suggesting that he should trim his own plane, never having
flown before, I hope (and using his thumbs on the sticks). I've had to
sort out all manner of fatal stuff, like ailerons or rudders turning
the wrong way, engine not offset to the right, wrong CofG etc. and
that's before take-off.
A novice won't even know that he might need to use a bit of rudder on
take off and use the ailerons instead.

Sure, gliders don't have much to go wrong (I'd recommend a Precedent
Hi-Fly 2ch glider for learning on your own) but likely it will save a
lot of grief and expense if he goes to a club.

> Reg
Malcolm Fisher - 16 Nov 2006 20:06 GMT
> I would recommend the free download FMS
> http://tinyurl.com/q4xf
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The USB cable and separateTX plug adapter should cost you about £25, but
> that will give you plenty of thumb practice.

Lesson number 1:

Do you steer your car or bicycle with your thumb? No!
It's a bad habit to get into.

Don't use your thumb on the sticks because you have less control and it
might slip off, grip it properly between index and thumb.

I have been flying R/c since the early 70s, and after graduating from push
button single channel have always used my thumbs on the sticks as I don't
have, and don't want a transmitter tray such as those I have seen helicopter
pilots using.

In all those years, my thumbs have yet to "slip off the sticks".

As with most things there are some areas where there is no "right or
wrong" - use whatever is best for you.

As for FMS, one of the model outlets advertising in RCM&E has a package with
FMS on CD plus a connector cable for a TX such as a Futaba 6EXA for around
£15 which could solve the problem.

There are better sims than FSA but it's a reasonable starting point.

Malcolm

> Find a model which stalls at slow speed, and do circuits as slowly and as
> low as possible.
> Then practice landing towards you without an unseemly cartwheel.
> Master that and the real life situation will seem easy to you.
> P
markzoom@digiverse.net - 16 Nov 2006 20:23 GMT
> > I would recommend the free download FMS
> > http://tinyurl.com/q4xf
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> I have been flying R/c since the early 70s,

I started about that time.

> and after graduating from push
> button single channel have always used my thumbs on the sticks as I don't
> have, and don't want a transmitter tray such as those I have seen helicopter
> pilots using.

Well a proper instructor would have stopped you developing that habit.
And you don't need a tray for either, not even a neckstrap.

> In all those years, my thumbs have yet to "slip off the sticks".
>
> As with most things there are some areas where there is no "right or
> wrong" - use whatever is best for you.

Nothing stopping anyone using their big toe, but the pros don't fumble
with their fumbs.

> As for FMS, one of the model outlets advertising in RCM&E has a package with
> FMS on CD plus a connector cable for a TX such as a Futaba 6EXA for around
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > Master that and the real life situation will seem easy to you.
> > P
Malcolm Fisher - 16 Nov 2006 21:04 GMT
Snip

Nothing stopping anyone using their big toe, but the pros don't fumble
with their fumbs.

Most of us aren't "pros", and I have seen aerobatic and scale competition
pilots using their thumbs on the sticks as well as seeing instructors do the
same.

As said previously - do what feels "right" for you...

Malcolm
Doug McLaren - 19 Nov 2006 15:30 GMT
| > Lesson number 1:
| >
| > Do you steer your car or bicycle with your thumb? No!

That's my winner for `worst analogy of the day' award!
Congratulations!

Last I checked, you don't steer your car or bicycle with a little
stick held between your thumb and finger either.  By your analogy, we
probably shouldn't fly R/C planes like that either?

| > It's a bad habit to get into.

Perhaps it's not ideal, but I'm not sure it really qualifies as a `bad
habit'.

| > Don't use your thumb on the sticks because you have less control and it
| > might slip off, grip it properly between index and thumb.

I've heard that holding it between your finger and thumb will give you
more control, and I have noticed that more of the `really good' pilots
do this than the `average' pilots (like me.)  However, your thumb
alone does not just `slip off'.

| > and after graduating from push button single channel have always
| > used my thumbs on the sticks as I don't have, and don't want a
| > transmitter tray such as those I have seen helicopter pilots
| > using.
|
| Well a proper instructor would have stopped you developing that habit.

And in my experience, 1) most people fly with their thumbs, and 2)
this includes most instructors.  (Though if one of your requirements
for being a `proper' instructor is to not fly with your thumbs, then I
guess none of the `proper' instructors do.)

| And you don't need a tray for either, not even a neckstrap.

I never did like neckstraps.

| Nothing stopping anyone using their big toe, but the pros don't fumble
| with their fumbs.

Some do, from what I've seen.  Well, to be more precise, they
sometimes use their thumbs, but usually don't fumble.  But yes, a far
higher percentage of the `pros' use their finger/thumb than do in the
general R/C flier population, and I doubt this is a conicidence.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
No, no, you're not thinking, you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr

Morgans - 19 Nov 2006 23:55 GMT
> Some do, from what I've seen.  Well, to be more precise, they
> sometimes use their thumbs, but usually don't fumble.  But yes, a far
> higher percentage of the `pros' use their finger/thumb than do in the
> general R/C flier population, and I doubt this is a conicidence.

I'm in the "do whatever you want" camp, but I always felt insecure, and like I
would slip and crash, if I used my thumbs.
Signature

Jim in NC

Pointer - 20 Nov 2006 17:09 GMT
Simple answer I would have thought!
If you hold your Tx  then you have only your thumbs available.
Use a neck strap, then you have spare fingers.

P
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 20 Nov 2006 19:51 GMT
> Simple answer I would have thought!
> If you hold your Tx  then you have only your thumbs available.
> Use a neck strap, then you have spare fingers.

If you are going to be sensible then we are not going to talk to you.

Seriously.... I do use a neck strap and just use my thumbs, never
slipped off a stick yet and it feels both comfortable and natural.

However, unlike some I never said this was the only approved method, or
anything less than using finger and thumb was inviting disaster.

There are those who do... and there are those who don't and I would be
amazed if some top display pilots don't fly with just thumbs on the
sticks.

Reg
Malcolm Fisher - 20 Nov 2006 19:58 GMT
Snip

> There are those who do... and there are those who don't and I would be
> amazed if some top display pilots don't fly with just thumbs on the
> sticks.
>
> Reg

If you look at the pictures in the model magazines I feel sure that you will
see some showing pilots doing just that...

...or perhaps my aged memory is playing tricks yet again.

Malcolm
The Natural Philosopher - 16 Nov 2006 22:53 GMT
>>> One more thing, would anybody have an opinion as to the use of a flight
>>> sim, AeroFly Pro Deluxe / RealFlight G3 for laying the basics down over
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Do you steer your car or bicycle with your thumb? No!

Sometimes.

I've steered it with my knees as well, and on a bike, without any hands
on the bars at all. Ive even stereed it with ny rase pedalling backwards
sitting on the bars.

You steer a bike with your body. The handlebars are there to stop
falling over.

There are more ways to skin cats than just one.

> It's a bad habit to get into.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> Master that and the real life situation will seem easy to you.
>> P
Dave (Sgt. Pepper) - 17 Nov 2006 07:11 GMT
> I've steered it with my knees as well, and on a bike, without any hands on
> the bars at all. Ive even stereed it with ny rase pedalling backwards
> sitting on the bars.

What a rase lohe !
Signature

Dave (Sgt. Pepper)       Epsom, England
   Nikon D2X / D2Hs / D2H / D100 / Coolpix 5700
   My photo galleries at  http://www.pbase.com/davecq
   "I will not tolerate intolerance ... Doh!!"

Dave :^) - 17 Nov 2006 08:27 GMT
Can of worms time.....
some manufacturers put buttons on the top of the sticks so you obviously
can't use your thumbs, others knurl the tops of the sticks to give your
thumb a good grip. Sticks are also adjustable for length, short for thumbs
on top, long for finger and thumb. Obviously there is no authoritive way to
use your transmitter sticks or they would all be the same! Do whatever is
right for you, it's your hobby and there are enough regulations in this
world!
Dave :^)
p.s. Thumb man since first Futaba 6M 27AM
EGNX Flyer - 17 Nov 2006 09:43 GMT
Actually all,

I find i can fly the plane either way - thumbs only or finger and
thumb! So it makes no difference to me.

Also, the plane HAS flown, and nt just the one. If you actually read
the initial post you'll have seen i wrote:

<snip>
I've actually flown this plane on a few occasions before this with a
nearby club, but this was around 2 years ago, and unfortunately on the
last outing it suffered a battery failure - the battery lead
disconnected after a steep turn - and it ended up plouging the nearby
field.
</snip>

The plane, other than repairing what little damage there was, hasnt
been touched since the crash. AFAIK, the trim was correct at time of
the crash, and as such is still the same. Also, having learnt and
earned a real-world PPL back when i was 17, i think i know that the
ailierons are working correctly, and that the elevators move upwards to
climb, and downwards to loose altitutde - i may be a novice R/C flyer,
but please dont treat me like im the new boy at school, its very off
putting for a newcommer to this part of the web!
Brian Lambert - 17 Nov 2006 11:57 GMT
And I thougth that elevators controled speed!! Pull back on the stick to
slow down...Stick held back in a glider does not normaly lead to height
increase.

Also, having learnt and
> earned a real-world PPL back when i was 17, i think i know that the
> ailierons are working correctly, and that the elevators move upwards to
> climb, and downwards to loose altitutde - i may be a novice R/C flyer,
> but please dont treat me like im the new boy at school, its very off
> putting for a newcommer to this part of the web!
markzoom@digiverse.net - 17 Nov 2006 12:32 GMT
> Actually all,
>
> I find i can fly the plane either way - thumbs only or finger and
> thumb! So it makes no difference to me.

Use your thumbs if you want, but you'll likely have to take them off
the controls when you flick flap, undercarriage or rate switches etc.
on future planes.
TXs are designed for thumb+ index operation and the crucial switches
can usually be reached with the middle finger or very quickly with the
index.
If you use your thumbs you have to let go of the transmitter completely
with one hand.

> Also, the plane HAS flown, and nt just the one. If you actually read
> the initial post you'll have seen i wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> field.
> </snip>

> The plane, other than repairing what little damage there was, hasnt
> been touched since the crash. AFAIK, the trim was correct at time of
> the crash, and as such is still the same.

Unlikely.
Chances are the trims on both the TX and the plane have changed. In two
years disuse the wings will probably have changed warp, if they weren't
dinged in the crash as well.
Check for correct washout on the wingtips too which presumably you have
built in. If you haven't, then trim both ailerons about 2mm above the
rest of the trailing edge (if your wing is flat), to counteract
tip-stalling.

> Also, having learnt and
> earned a real-world PPL back when i was 17, i think i know that the
> ailierons are working correctly, and that the elevators move upwards to
> climb, and downwards to loose altitutde - i may be a novice R/C flyer,
> but please dont treat me like im the new boy at school, its very off
> putting for a newcommer to this part of the web!

Well I found that it's better to presume a novice doesn't know and tell
him stuff he already knows than assume he does and watch him make an
obvious mistake.
I taught an active airline pilot to fly models, and he was no better
than the average novice. Every full size pilot I know that tried models
has commented that they found it more difficult than full size. (btw, I
also did a number of solos in gliders when I was 16)

The back to front elevator setup I referred to was the result of
someone who taught himself teaching a group of other people that "up
was up" on the controls.

I notice that you gave up on models for two years after the crash:
I found that preparing a novice to half expect his first plane to
crash, softened the disappointment and got them going on the next plane
immediately. There are very few novices who don't deck their .40 size
plane, either terminally or repairably, like you did.

As for those people advocating teaching yourself (not you, because you
rightly don't intend to), sure, many people do it, but a .40 size
trainer isn't the plane for it.
It is not unknown for people to try out their 3KG missile on a housing
estate playground or next to a main road.
Dave :^) - 17 Nov 2006 17:10 GMT
>> Actually all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> If you use your thumbs you have to let go of the transmitter completely
> with one hand.

Bull$hit! Different folks - different strokes -accept it! wether you fly
thumbs or thumb finger you may have to let go to adjust trims/menus etc. I
suppose you think all transmitters should be made Mode 1 or perhaps Mode 2
but not let people have choice? Your way may be best for you, but not for
everyone. I know modellers who have struggled to learn to fly for years only
because their mentor flies mode "x" while mode "y" was natural for them.
Grow up and don't try to enforce what you think is right on others, the
Gestapo disappeared years ago! Give advice if you want, but, don't try to
make rules!
Rant over!

>> Also, the plane HAS flown, and nt just the one. If you actually read
>> the initial post you'll have seen i wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> It is not unknown for people to try out their 3KG missile on a housing
> estate playground or next to a main road.
Malcolm Fisher - 17 Nov 2006 17:51 GMT
Snip

> Bull$hit! Different folks - different strokes -accept it! wether you fly
> thumbs or thumb finger you may have to let go to adjust trims/menus etc. I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> make rules!
> Rant over!

Well said Mark.

I'm glad to know that there are folks out there with some common sense...

Malcolm
Malcolm Fisher - 17 Nov 2006 17:53 GMT
> >> Actually all,
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
> > It is not unknown for people to try out their 3KG missile on a housing
> > estate playground or next to a main road.
Malcolm Fisher - 17 Nov 2006 17:57 GMT
Oops!

Made a right mess of my posts there.

Got names mixed up and then sent a message back before making my apology

Malcolm
Dave :^) - 17 Nov 2006 18:34 GMT
> Oops!
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Malcolm

I'll have a pint of that!
Dave :^)
Malcolm Fisher - 17 Nov 2006 20:00 GMT
> > Oops!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I'll have a pint of that!
> Dave :^)

Wouldn't advise a pint - I only had a short...

Malcolm
markzoom@digiverse.net - 17 Nov 2006 21:24 GMT
> >> Actually all,
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> make rules!
> Rant over!

Fly your plane with the trannie's stick up your bum, if that's what you
enjoy, but like I said:
Most transmitters are designed for thumb-index flying and the switches
layed out so you can reach them best that way. Mode 2 closest resembles
the full size.
I didn't design the transmitters, so don't blame me if it makes it less
convenient for fumb fumblers.

> >> Also, the plane HAS flown, and nt just the one. If you actually read
> >> the initial post you'll have seen i wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> > It is not unknown for people to try out their 3KG missile on a housing
> > estate playground or next to a main road.
Dave :^) - 18 Nov 2006 21:15 GMT
<snip>
Fly your plane with the trannie's stick up your bum, if that's what you
enjoy, but like I said:
Most transmitters are designed for thumb-index flying and the switches
layed out so you can reach them best that way. Mode 2 closest resembles
the full size.
I didn't design the transmitters, so don't blame me if it makes it less
convenient for fumb fumblers.
<snip>
Ooh err missus! a dummy/pram moment! perhaps you would like to show me in
ANY transmitter
manual where it states how you have to hold the sticks, except the multiplex
with the optional buttons.
I and I'm sure others on this ng remember radios advertised, boasting of
knurled stick ENDS for extra grip. Manufacturers would not limit themselves
to a market of finger/thumb fliers and miss out on the "fumb fumblers".
Perhaps you would like to post a picture of how you hold a transmitter
without neckstrap or tray while using finger and thumb at the same time as
operating switches. I've tried it with three different brands of transmitter
without success, can anyone else confirm this or name a trnsmitter where
this is possible? I think you're talking out of your ar$e!
Dave :^)
p.s. my 8 year old daughter spotted that "layed" should be spelt laid,
actually!
Dave :^) - 18 Nov 2006 21:28 GMT
Dear Gestapo,
have a look at this website
http://www.fusionmodels.co.uk/trannie_sticks.html
now go away, lie down, and say to yourself 100 times
"I must not be so anal"
Dave :^) Flying how I want!
David Hopper - 18 Nov 2006 22:47 GMT
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:28:22 -0000, "Dave :^\)"
<yourejoking@NOSPAM.noway> wrote:

>have a look at this website
>http://www.fusionmodels.co.uk/trannie_sticks.html

Cool sticks. You would think that the new Futaba FX-40 would come with
the GOLD sticks standard..  ;)

 
Signature

David - WD4JKH

Valid email: no-spam0879@mindspring.com

markzoom@digiverse.net - 19 Nov 2006 20:49 GMT
> Dear Gestapo,
> have a look at this website
> http://www.fusionmodels.co.uk/trannie_sticks.html
> now go away, lie down, and say to yourself 100 times
> "I must not be so anal"
> Dave :^) Flying how I want!

Dear Dipstick,
Of course you can fly how you want, you can also type the keyboard and
pick your nose with your thumbs if you prefer. If you find the Nintendo
way easier, use it.
Knurled stick tops are also useful for those who fly index-thumb with
the thumb partially on the top and the index against the back of the
stick,btw.
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 19 Nov 2006 17:54 GMT
><snip>
> Fly your plane with the trannie's stick up your bum, if that's what you
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> convenient for fumb fumblers.
><snip>

> Ooh err missus! a dummy/pram moment! perhaps you would like to show me in
> ANY transmitter
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> this is possible? I think you're talking out of your ar$e!
> Dave :^)

I will confirm it ! I tried both a Futaba and a Hitec Tx today.
I fly by thumb alone but when I tried holding the sticks as advised by
"Super Instructor", or whatever he is, I found that it was very
difficult to reach any of the switches, knobs, etc. In order to move
e.g. the trainer switch I had to let go of the stick on that side.
In order to reach any of the switches, knobs, while keeping my finger
and thumb on the sticks then I ended up holding the Tx with just my
little fingers supporting it underneath. I doubt a strap would make much
difference. If you want to operate with finger and thumb control on the
sticks the I reckon a Tx tray is damn near necessary in order to do it
properly.

Leaving my thumbs and fingers on the sticks meant I had no leverage with
the middle finger that was trying to move switches.

Could be that my Tx has warped in the two years since I last
straightened it with a hammer I suppose       >:-)

If the "super instructor", or whatever he is, is actually in a club I
bet it has a membership of 1 ???

Would you want to fly with a guy who has banana shaped wings 'cos the
plane is 2 years old ?

Reg
Dave :^) - 19 Nov 2006 19:31 GMT
"Super Instructor", ROFLMAO!

<snip>
> Would you want to fly with a guy who has banana shaped wings 'cos the
> plane is 2 years old ?
>
> Reg
<snip>

I would Reg, we'll have to organise something next summer.
Dave :^)
p.s. Gestapo, if you're reading this, you owe me a gear switch for a Futaba
Challenger, I dropped it while trying your neck strap/trayless transmitter
manipulation techniques!
Malcolm Fisher - 19 Nov 2006 20:05 GMT
> "Super Instructor", ROFLMAO!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Challenger, I dropped it while trying your neck strap/trayless transmitter
> manipulation techniques!

LOL

It's good to find S O Else with some common sense.

Perhaps I should amend that - I had enough sense not to try using finger and
thumb without a tray  - I just couldn't see how to support the Tx if I used
that method of operation :-)))

Malcolm
markzoom@digiverse.net - 19 Nov 2006 21:11 GMT
> > "Super Instructor", ROFLMAO!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> thumb without a tray  - I just couldn't see how to support the Tx if I used
> that method of operation :-)))

If you have trouble seeing as well as dexterity problems then RC cars
might be a more suitable hobby for you.

> Malcolm
Malcolm Fisher - 20 Nov 2006 19:52 GMT
> If you have trouble seeing as well as dexterity problems then RC cars
> might be a more suitable hobby for you.

I have no problems with actual vision - pity you don't understand colloquial
usage.

As for RC cars, vision is equally important

I also have no dexterity problem - I can use either thumbs or finger and
thumb on my Tx sticks - it's just that I, and most of the people in whose
company I have flown, prefer thumbs and in over nearly forty years of
operation,  I have never "fumbled".

Malcolm
The Natural Philosopher - 21 Nov 2006 01:53 GMT
>> If you have trouble seeing as well as dexterity problems then RC cars
>> might be a more suitable hobby for you.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Malcolm

I've seen people play guitars with their teeth..there is no 'right' way
to do anything. Just ways, all of which have advantages and disadvantages.
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 21 Nov 2006 18:49 GMT
>>> If you have trouble seeing as well as dexterity problems then RC cars
>>> might be a more suitable hobby for you.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I've seen people play guitars with their teeth..there is no 'right' way
> to do anything. Just ways, all of which have advantages and disadvantages.

Spot on that man !        >:-)

I also get cards from a charity which are painted by people using their
mouth or feet.... our "friend" would have them whipped into a more
normal method if they attended his club !

Reg
markzoom@digiverse.net - 19 Nov 2006 21:06 GMT
> ><snip>
> > Fly your plane with the trannie's stick up your bum, if that's what you
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> difficult to reach any of the switches, knobs, etc. In order to move
> e.g. the trainer switch I had to let go of the stick on that side.

It's no problem with the sets I use.

> In order to reach any of the switches, knobs, while keeping my finger
> and thumb on the sticks then I ended up holding the Tx with just my
> little fingers supporting it underneath. I doubt a strap would make much
> difference. If you want to operate with finger and thumb control on the
> sticks the I reckon a Tx tray is damn near necessary in order to do it
> properly.

Well since you have apparently spent your whole modelling life flying
with thumbs, you're sure not going to be able to change to what's
generally accepted as the more precise method in a few minutes. Do as
you please.

> Leaving my thumbs and fingers on the sticks meant I had no leverage with
> the middle finger that was trying to move switches.

???

> Could be that my Tx has warped in the two years since I last
> straightened it with a hammer I suppose       >:-)

If you can't flick the switches easily with one finger there's got to
be something wrong with it (or your finger), or it's a cheapo with
stiff switches.

> If the "super instructor", or whatever he is, is actually in a club I
> bet it has a membership of 1 ???

It's about 30 at the moment.

> Would you want to fly with a guy who has banana shaped wings 'cos the
> plane is 2 years old ?

I'd certainly keep one eye on your plane when you are flying.

If you read the OP's first post you'll find he's had to repair the wing
after a crash.

A few hours ago we straightened out a chap's tailplane under the car
exhaust because it had warped so badly in storage.


> Reg
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 20 Nov 2006 19:51 GMT
>> If the "super instructor", or whatever he is, is actually in a club I
>> bet it has a membership of 1 ???
>
> It's about 30 at the moment.

Thirty !  Thirty out of shape planes and dropped transmitters, now
that's what I would imagine is a GOOD day at your field.

Does the club have an open day ? It sounds to be better entertainment
than the Simpsons.... similar but somehow better    >:-))

>> Would you want to fly with a guy who has banana shaped wings 'cos the
>> plane is 2 years old ?
>
> I'd certainly keep one eye on your plane when you are flying.

O.K so.... you are keeping one eye on my plane and one eye on your own
so how do you find the Tx you just dropped ?

> If you read the OP's first post you'll find he's had to repair the wing
> after a crash.
>
> A few hours ago we straightened out a chap's tailplane under the car
> exhaust because it had warped so badly in storage.

I guess funny shaped model planes are endemic in your club !
You haven't been teaching building techniques as well, have you ?

Now I have to go figure what the hell is wrong with my building
technique that prevents me doing the sort of things you do at your club.
Why don't I have to steam my models and then iron them every few months?

Remember.... when building model planes it's the PLANS that roll up NOT
the model when you have finished it !!!

Reg
Tim Duke - 20 Nov 2006 00:09 GMT
> Leaving my thumbs and fingers on the sticks meant I had no leverage with
> the middle finger that was trying to move switches.

Ere Tux!  You wanna get on the M25 to get some practice out of that middle
finger !!!

From the age of 8, my ole' man tought me to use my finger and thumb -
haven't used anything since. Would try to teach others the same, but if they
are not comfortable with it, doesn't matter as long as they are par-taking
in the hobby ;-)

Tim
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 20 Nov 2006 19:51 GMT
> Ere Tux!  You wanna get on the M25 to get some practice out of that middle
> finger !!!

Been there - done that and developed a blind eye      >:-)

> From the age of 8, my ole' man tought me to use my finger and thumb -
> haven't used anything since. Would try to teach others the same, but if they
> are not comfortable with it, doesn't matter as long as they are par-taking
> in the hobby ;-)

Too true, unfortunately our "good friend" doesn't think that any method
other than rigidly gripping the sticks twixt finger and thumb is
acceptable. We were trying to point out that his supposition doesn't
apply to everyone. Indeed do that which works and feels right for you we
said.... but that appears not to be an acceptable idea. It also seems
mandatory to have banana shaped wings.... don't know why     >:-))

Besides it's raining, windy and bloody useless for flying   >:-)

Reg
Malcolm Fisher - 20 Nov 2006 19:55 GMT
> > Ere Tux!  You wanna get on the M25 to get some practice out of that middle
> > finger !!!
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Reg

Elliptical dihedral was in vogue about forty years ago and if that is a
description of banana shaped wings I can go along with that :-)))

Malcolm
markzoom@digiverse.net - 20 Nov 2006 20:28 GMT
> > Ere Tux!  You wanna get on the M25 to get some practice out of that middle
> > finger !!!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> other than rigidly gripping the sticks twixt finger and thumb is
> acceptable.

??? If you can't fly index-thumb, then what's widest accepted as the
more precise way has to give way to the easier one.
I'd be failing a noob if I didn't get him to try the former first. Not
come across a single one who couldn't do it right from the start

> We were trying to point out that his supposition doesn't
> apply to everyone. Indeed do that which works and feels right for you we
> said.... but that appears not to be an acceptable idea. It also seems
> mandatory to have banana shaped wings.... don't know why     >:-))

Sure, it's intuitive to just grab the transmitter and prod with the
thumbs, but then it's also more intuitive to hold a golf club like an
axe and a fork like a spear.

> Besides it's raining, windy and bloody useless for flying   >:-)
>
> Reg
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 21 Nov 2006 18:49 GMT
> ??? If you can't fly index-thumb, then what's widest accepted as the
> more precise way has to give way to the easier one.
> I'd be failing a noob if I didn't get him to try the former first. Not
> come across a single one who couldn't do it right from the start

It's only more precise to those who advocate it... that's 'cos it FEELS
right to them. To those who find it feels far from right then it is a
cumbersome and imprecise method because it doesn't work for them.

It's not brain science... you pick the damned thing up and a couple of
minutes playing establish the most effective method for THAT person.
Those bludgeoned into using it by your good self, 'cos they're newbies
and go along with what they are told, may in fact be hampered for life by
your interference.... all those potential display, aerobatic and 3D
pilots messsed up right at the start !

You sound like the old fashioned teachers who made left handed kids
write with the right hand 'cos that was the proper way to do it !
They got belted everytime they used their right hand for anything.

> Sure, it's intuitive to just grab the transmitter and prod with the
> thumbs, but then it's also more intuitive to hold a golf club like an
> axe and a fork like a spear.

Ah, I see you don't understand that either....
The golf club is held like an axe 'cos the player is showing his true
feelings towards the game.... just watch them on telly and count how
many times they smile - nuff said !

The fork is indeed used as a spear, it's an eel fork and that is the way
it is used to catch them.

Reg
markzoom@digiverse.net - 21 Nov 2006 20:31 GMT
> > ??? If you can't fly index-thumb, then what's widest accepted as the
> > more precise way has to give way to the easier one.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> your interference.... all those potential display, aerobatic and 3D
> pilots messsed up right at the start !

If you'd actually looked into it, you'd have found that those who
change, virtually always change to index-thumbs, not the other way
around. Why do you think that might be?

> You sound like the old fashioned teachers who made left handed kids
> write with the right hand 'cos that was the proper way to do it !
> They got belted everytime they used their right hand for anything.

ITYM "left"....

> > Sure, it's intuitive to just grab the transmitter and prod with the
> > thumbs, but then it's also more intuitive to hold a golf club like an
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The fork is indeed used as a spear, it's an eel fork and that is the way
> it is used to catch them.

So that's how you eat? Do you use a knife?

> Reg
Malcolm Fisher - 21 Nov 2006 20:35 GMT
Big Snip

> So that's how you eat? Do you use a knife?

Yes, and a spoon - forks were a very late introduction to eating etiquette,
but that doesn't make them mandatory.

Malcolm
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 00:58 GMT
> Big Snip
> >
> > So that's how you eat? Do you use a knife?
>
> Yes, and a spoon - forks were a very late introduction to eating etiquette,
> but that doesn't make them mandatory.

So who said anything is mandatory?
Index-thumb is simply accepted as the more precise method and it's
usable by all noobs (also useful if they start on heli, or if they take
up full-size, which is *never* flown with thumbs).

Like I said:  Thumbers convert to index-thumb but next to nobody
converts to the thumb way, explain that.

> Malcolm
Dave :^) - 22 Nov 2006 09:10 GMT
>> Big Snip
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Like I said:  Thumbers convert to index-thumb but next to nobody
> converts to the thumb way, explain that.

Dear Anally retentive,
   I notice you've dropped all reference to "without a tray or neckstrap"
Our club which has fliers of both persuasions had a test session, "without a
tray or neckstrap" and ALL found it totally impractical. Without good
support for the body of the transmitter, the movement of one stick caused a
movement of the transmitter which was transferred to the other stick, not
very good for precise control.
Dave :^)
p.s. I'm teaching my 12 year old autistic son to fly, your reluctance to
accept others views is one of his traits, as is an inability to mix
socially. I think you may need a check up!

>> Malcolm
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 09:55 GMT
> >> Big Snip
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Dear Anally retentive,
>     I notice you've dropped all reference to "without a tray or neckstrap"

??? Because it's not relevant, Mr.Nintendo. Unless you've got a
disability neither is necessary for flying Index-thumb.

> Our club which has fliers of both persuasions had a test session, "without a
> tray or neckstrap" and ALL found it totally impractical.

Well our club don't (and btw. I did NOT even teach most of them at this
one).

> Without good
> support for the body of the transmitter, the movement of one stick caused a
> movement of the transmitter which was transferred to the other stick, not
> very good for precise control.

Cobblers. They just aren't relaxed. Fly Nintendo if you want, though.

> Dave :^)
> p.s. I'm teaching my 12 year old autistic son to fly, your reluctance to
> accept others views is one of his traits, as is an inability to mix
> socially. I think you may need a check up!

And I bet you're teaching him to fly the way you do.

As for a correlation between "mixing socially" and flying thumbs. It's
the way people start when they try to learn on their own.

You forgot to answer this:
"Thumbers convert to index-thumb but next to nobody tries to converts
to the thumb way, explain that."

> >> Malcolm
Allan - 22 Nov 2006 10:03 GMT
> Like I said:  Thumbers convert to index-thumb but next to nobody
> converts to the thumb way, explain that.

How do you know? Have you done a survey?

Oops! Couldn't resist!!

Allan
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 13:00 GMT
> > Like I said:  Thumbers convert to index-thumb but next to nobody
> > converts to the thumb way, explain that.
>
> How do you know? Have you done a survey?

It's called a "google search" though you are, of course, free to use
any search engine....

> Oops! Couldn't resist!!
>
> Allan
Allan - 22 Nov 2006 14:17 GMT
>> How do you know? Have you done a survey?
>
> It's called a "google search" though you are, of course, free to use
> any search engine....

So, as a matter of interest what were the a) numbers using thumbs? b)
numbers using index-thumbs? and c) those using neither (i.e. index only)?
What were the total number of people asked and how many responded?

Thanks

Allan
Dave :^) - 22 Nov 2006 14:33 GMT
Allan,
Sensible question!
(number asked = 1?)

Markzoom?
One of the best bit's of advice in the world ever,
" when in a hole stop digging"
You're impressing no-one but yourself!, as for Nintendo? you may play
computer games all you want but I'd rather go out and fly. IMHO I find
computer games a rather sad alternative to real life, but if that's what
you're into, then I hope you enjoy them.
Dave :^) unofficial candidate for the common sense party.
Allan - 22 Nov 2006 14:55 GMT
Actually I think he is just a timewaster out to provoke response and having
fun at our expense

Allan

> Allan,
> Sensible question!
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> you're into, then I hope you enjoy them.
> Dave :^) unofficial candidate for the common sense party.
Dave :^) - 22 Nov 2006 15:20 GMT
> Actually I think he is just a timewaster out to provoke response and
> having fun at our expense
>
> Allan

Welcome to the party!
Dave :^)
Travec The Dacian - 22 Nov 2006 16:22 GMT
>Actually I think he is just a timewaster out to provoke response and having
>fun at our expense

I found the following paragraphs in an old flying book called, "Learn
to Fly by The Seat of Your Pants" by Hamish A McGobligan Jr, 1908.

"The thumb and forefinger method of control can give reasonably
accurate control, but only if you are certain you don't accidentally
have both legs down the same side of your underpants.  It's a mistake
that's all to easy to make on a cold morning and the results can be
catastrophic. Careful checks should be made before each flight as your
plane will have a tendency to pull to the left or right (depending on
which side your underpants both your legs are down).
If you want to avoid mistakes entirely, wear a kilt."

The book goes on to say that one should always keep an watchful eye on
the orientation of one's head, one's @rse and the transmitter. Failure
to do so can cause a variety of upsets when one least expects it,
especially when teaching others how to fly."

It's all true.  I swear it!

Travec.
Dave :^) - 22 Nov 2006 17:40 GMT
>>Actually I think he is just a timewaster out to provoke response and
>>having
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Travec.

ROFLPMSL
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 16:14 GMT
> Allan,
> Sensible question!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> " when in a hole stop digging"
> You're impressing no-one but yourself!

Who's trying to impress?

>, as for Nintendo? you may play
> computer games all you want but I'd rather go out and fly. IMHO I find
> computer games a rather sad alternative to real life, but if that's what
> you're into, then I hope you enjoy them.

I've never used a Nintendo, but that clearly went over your head.

> Dave :^) unofficial candidate for the common sense party.

Common sense would be doing a google on it yourself, since you
apparently care that much.
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 15:50 GMT
> >> How do you know? Have you done a survey?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Allan

It was a google search, not a survey. I found plenty of thumbers
switching to index-thumb, but not a single one switching to thumbs from
index-thumb.
I read accounts of two different aerobatic competitors changing over
and noticing a great improvement with index-thumb.

In the US, there seem to be marginally more people using thumbs. As
would be expected, many got used that method before they twigged there
was another way.
It seems likely that thumbs will get more followers in the UK too, as
small electric artf planes are now readily, cheaply and widely
available even in toy shops that make joining a club or any tuition
basically unnecessary. A few of these people will likely progress onto
bigger IC planes and continue flying the Nintendo way.
Malcolm Fisher - 22 Nov 2006 17:01 GMT
> It was a google search, not a survey. I found plenty of thumbers
> switching to index-thumb, but not a single one switching to thumbs from
> index-thumb.
> I read accounts of two different aerobatic competitors changing over
> and noticing a great improvement with index-thumb.

Yet there are still plenty who only use their thumbs. Perhaps your search
didn't reach everyone of either persuasion.

> In the US, there seem to be marginally more people using thumbs. As
> would be expected, many got used that method before they twigged there
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> basically unnecessary. A few of these people will likely progress onto
> bigger IC planes and continue flying the Nintendo way.

Who is this great teacher Nintendo? I've never heard of him/her.

BTW, I was looking back at the series of articles produced as inserts in
RCM&E some years ago, written by Bill Birkenshaw et al. In one of the
pictures showing teacher and trainee using a buddy box system, both were
using thumbs.

As has been said ad nauseam - use what you feel is the best way for you -
whatever that is.

Malcolm
Travec The Dacian - 22 Nov 2006 17:11 GMT
>It seems likely that thumbs will get more followers in the UK too, as
>small electric artf planes are now readily, cheaply and widely
>available even in toy shops that make joining a club or any tuition
>basically unnecessary.

I've lurked on this thread for a while but I simply must take issue
with that one.  The fact that a plane is small, electric or artf
doesn't in any way preclude the need for beginners' instruction, as I
found out some time ago to my cost.  You're clearly making this up as
you go along mate.  I would seriously give up now if I were you.

Travec
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 18:44 GMT
> >It seems likely that thumbs will get more followers in the UK too, as
> >small electric artf planes are now readily, cheaply and widely
> >available even in toy shops that make joining a club or any tuition
> >basically unnecessary.

> I've lurked on this thread for a while but I simply must take issue
> with that one.  The fact that a plane is small, electric or artf
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Travec

What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
You rarely see them at clubs.

tinyurl.com/h3vag

Down to 22 quid including charger and postage. Thats cheaper than
joining a club with  insurance.

Of course people should get tuition, and you found out why, but *they*
will find it unnecessary to bother, just like you didn't. And I bet
you're flying thumbs now too.
Morgans - 22 Nov 2006 18:59 GMT
> What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
> You rarely see them at clubs.

Most fly ones or twice, for a flight of a few seconds or a few minutes, before
the non pilot smashes them into a million bits.
Signature

Jim in NC

markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 22:18 GMT
> > What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
> > You rarely see them at clubs.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> Jim in NC

And that, boys and girls, is why you should teach people how to fly
them, the best way you know how.
The Natural Philosopher - 23 Nov 2006 00:47 GMT
>>> What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
>>> You rarely see them at clubs.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> And that, boys and girls, is why you should teach people how to fly
> them, the best way you know how.

Two statements not at all based on fact.
markzoom@digiverse.net - 23 Nov 2006 10:39 GMT
> >>> What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
> >>> You rarely see them at clubs.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >
> Two statements not at all based on fact.

And the facts are?
The Natural Philosopher - 24 Nov 2006 00:13 GMT
>>>>> What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
>>>>> You rarely see them at clubs.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> And the facts are?

1/. Most fly several times, (I assume that 'ones' is supposed to be
ONCE) and survive well enough to either enthuse the customer for
something better, or make him feel its all a bit more than he cares to
get involved with.

2/. And that, boys and girls, is why an instructor is not really
necessary at all.
The Natural Philosopher - 23 Nov 2006 00:46 GMT
>> What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
>> You rarely see them at clubs.
>
> Most fly ones or twice, for a flight of a few seconds or a few minutes,
> before the non pilot smashes them into a million bits.
Not according to my LHS, who reckon that the people who buy them don;t
come back anything like as much as the guys who by 40 ARTF 'trainers' -
so called. Actually fast heavy and very dangerous weapons of minor
destruction, with a propensity to quit at bad moments.
Doug McLaren - 22 Nov 2006 19:30 GMT
| What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:

They fly for 15 seconds, then crash.

| You rarely see them at clubs.

No, you don't normally see crashed planes at clubs.  You might see a
plane crash, but once it crashes it doesn't usually come back until
it's repaired.  Of course, if you just buy a plane and crash it 15
seconds later, often it's never repaired, even if repairable ...

Some clubs are also hostile to the small electric planes.  However,
the local glow club was quite fascinated by my Ultrastick 25e -- it's
not that big, but it's still the biggest electric that many of them
had seen.  And it flew very nicely ...

I do understand that you can teach yourself to fly with the right
plane (slow, foam, prop in back, simulator time) but any sort of
instruction greatly assists the process.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
"I often quote myself; it adds spice to my conversation."
-- George Bernard Shaw

markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 20:14 GMT
> | What do you think happens to all dem planes on Ebay and in toy shops ?:
>
> They fly for 15 seconds, then crash.

Most likely.

> | You rarely see them at clubs.
>
> No, you don't normally see crashed planes at clubs.  You might see a
> plane crash, but once it crashes it doesn't usually come back until
> it's repaired.  Of course, if you just buy a plane and crash it 15
> seconds later, often it's never repaired, even if repairable ...

Yup.

> Some clubs are also hostile to the small electric planes.

Sadly true.

> However,
> the local glow club was quite fascinated by my Ultrastick 25e -- it's
> not that big, but it's still the biggest electric that many of them
> had seen.  And it flew very nicely ...

I find them just as much fun as any other type of RC aircraft. Much
simpler in the winter coz your hands (especially the t h u m b s) dont
get so cold like they do with IC planes, and you get to warm them on
the batteries afterwards.

> I do understand that you can teach yourself to fly with the right
> plane (slow, foam, prop in back, simulator time) but any sort of
> instruction greatly assists the process.

Absolutely. The point is that a *lot* of people try to start with these
on their own nowdays (using thumbs) and some go on to a club and try
bigger stuff.

> --
> Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
> "I often quote myself; it adds spice to my conversation."
> -- George Bernard Shaw
Dave Lane - 23 Nov 2006 09:33 GMT
> Of course people should get tuition, and you found out why, but *they*
> will find it unnecessary to bother, just like you didn't. And I bet
> you're flying thumbs now too.

                         Troll O Meter

        0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10
        ___________________________________________________
        |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
        ---------------------------------------------------
                             ^
                             |
markzoom@digiverse.net - 23 Nov 2006 11:22 GMT
> > Of course people should get tuition, and you found out why, but *they*
> > will find it unnecessary to bother, just like you didn't. And I bet
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>          ---------------------------------------------------
>                               ^

??? The vast majority of people who teach themselves, fly with thumbs.
How is that a "troll"?
It also stands to reason that a stranger who is a "thumb flier" is less
*LIKELY* to be aquainted with all the aspects of RC flight, including
safety ones, even if he can by now fly the plane. And that's not a
troll either, just logic you might find uncomfortable.

                            |
Dave Lane - 23 Nov 2006 13:53 GMT
>>> Of course people should get tuition, and you found out why, but *they*
>>> will find it unnecessary to bother, just like you didn't. And I bet
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> safety ones, even if he can by now fly the plane. And that's not a
> troll either, just logic you might find uncomfortable.

                         Troll O Meter Updated Reading

        0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10
        ___________________________________________________
        |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
        ---------------------------------------------------
                                                     ^
                                                     |
Malcolm Fisher - 24 Nov 2006 19:28 GMT
> >>> Of course people should get tuition, and you found out why, but *they*
> >>> will find it unnecessary to bother, just like you didn't. And I bet
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>                                                       ^
>                                                       |

Dave, you are far too conservative.
I think your troll meter needs recalibrating...

:-)))

Malcolm
Dave Lane - 27 Nov 2006 11:30 GMT
> "Dave Lane" <pss005@bangor.ac.uk> wrote in message
> <snip>

>>                           Troll O Meter Updated Reading
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> :-)))

 it's a logarithmic scale....  :+)
The Natural Philosopher - 23 Nov 2006 00:44 GMT
>> It seems likely that thumbs will get more followers in the UK too, as
>> small electric artf planes are now readily, cheaply and widely
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Travec

I wonder how the first ever RC pilot ever got his training?

Training has never been necessary, just a way to prevent complete noobs
armed with 40 powered spitfires from demolishing the row of grinning
spectators (and their cars) when he maidens it.

With a lone guy away from a club armed with a piece of 12oz foamie crap
with a can motor stuck up its arse, who cares? If he wants to fly it, he
will eventually learn, or if he doesn't give up in disgust..who cares?

Ive never has a single second of instruction from anyone..and I can fly
well enough to pass the B test, if I could ever be bothered to take it.
Doug McLaren - 23 Nov 2006 03:51 GMT
| I wonder how the first ever RC pilot ever got his training?

He probably had experience with CL and/or FF first.

In fact, he probably took a FF plane and added some rudder control,
and was absolutely tickled pink when he had some small amount of input
on where the plane went, and even if the plane crashed, he probably
considered that flight to be a resounding success.

But I'm guessing that's not the answer you're looking for ...

Of course, you could look at the history of (full scale) aviation
itself -- several of the pioneers died in their contraptions, even
before the Wright Brothers made their historic flight.  They didn't
know how to build their planes, how to fly them -- this stuff had to
be worked out by trial and error, and errors often hurt.

| Training has never been necessary, just a way to prevent complete noobs
| armed with 40 powered spitfires from demolishing the row of grinning
| spectators (and their cars) when he maidens it.

With a 0.40 powered Spitfire or almost any other 0.40 powered plane
(except for the 0.40 sized foamies and spads, but even they won't
survive every crash) you'd better get some sort of instruction, or
your first crash will demolish the plane.  If you're determined enough
you may get the hang of it, but you'd better be really determined and
have a good sized budget to figure it all out on your own.

| With a lone guy away from a club armed with a piece of 12oz foamie crap
| with a can motor stuck up its arse, who cares? If he wants to fly it, he
| will eventually learn, or if he doesn't give up in disgust..who cares?

I'll bet he cares.  Maybe he'll figure it all out, maybe he'll give up
in disgust.

If you don't care, maybe you're not the best person to tell everybody
that they don't need instruction?  Technically, you're right -- people
*do* succeed without instruction.  But any sort of instruction, even
just a few pointers from a friend who watches or some time on a
simulator, can make the learning curve a lot less painful.

Yes, things have gotten a lot easier, with foamies becoming common and
cheap and being so light that they can survive most crashes.  But even
so, instruction helps.

| Ive never has a single second of instruction from anyone..and I can fly
| well enough to pass the B test, if I could ever be bothered to take it.

And that's great.  But most people new to the hobby are not you.  How
many times did you have to repair your plane before you got the hang
of things?

(And what's the `B test' anyways?)

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
Controller: "Air Force 53, it appears your engine has.... disregard
transmission, I see you've already ejected."

markzoom@digiverse.net - 23 Nov 2006 11:06 GMT
> | I wonder how the first ever RC pilot ever got his training?
>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> (And what's the `B test' anyways?)

(This thread is crossposted to two RC aircraft groups, a GB and a
mainly US one)
The "b" test is an achievement scheme:
http://www.bmfa.org/handbook/hbook_7.html
The 'B' Certificate which is designed to recognise the pilot's
more advanced ability and a demonstrated level of safety suitable for
flying at a public display'.

What some US chaps might not realise is that the UK is far more crowded
than the US and RC clubs or individuals here often have to fly from
fields close to busy roads or with housing not too far away.

Totally agree with your post, btw.

I'm wondering how many people here actually have taught someone else to
fly?

> --
> Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
> Controller: "Air Force 53, it appears your engine has.... disregard
>  transmission, I see you've already ejected."
Malcolm Fisher - 24 Nov 2006 19:40 GMT
> I'm wondering how many people here actually have taught someone else to
> fly?

I, for one, have taught several people to fly, and some, particularly those
who can find more time to practise, now can "outfly" me - but then I only
fly for my personal enjoyment and self appointed levels of achievement and
have no interest in competition which some of my pupils have indulged.

I have always stressed the need for safety and awareness of any bystanders.

BTW I know that I could achieve the necessary standard for the BMFA
achievement schemes but as already stated I am not interested in competition
or displaying to a public audience. In any case I mostly fly alone - not
recommended by many - but am prepared to accept any liability for my actions
and the consequences should I manage to cause myself any injury.

Malcolm

er: "Air Force 53, it appears your engine has.... disregard
> >  transmission, I see you've already ejected."
Robbie and Laura Reynolds - 24 Nov 2006 20:54 GMT
> I'm wondering how many people here actually have taught someone else to
> fly?

Quite a few, I'm sure.  I've met several guys on this group over the
years who have taught lots of people to fly.  

I've taught several people to fly myself.  By the way, I'm a thumb
flyer, and I am self taught.  My brother in law is a finger-thumb guy,
and he is also self taught.  I always assumed that he used the
finger-thumb method because of his personality.  It looks more
impressive and precise, and he likes that.  He's an Air Force officer,
so it fits his image, but image is all it amounts to.

I've been thinking about what you've said about the difference between
the two methods of stick control, and I believe that your entire
argument can be summed up in one statement.  The less you look like an
ape wielding a club, the better.  I understand this concept very well
because I've met so many people who fall into that line of thinking, but
it is based solely on image.  Whether you are operating a sophisticated
piece of equipment or simply wielding a club, it really doesn't matter
what you look like.  A lot of people have a similar hangup about proper
guitar technique.  You are "supposed to" keep your thumb tip against the
back of the guitar neck at all times and keep your thumb arched so your
palm doesn't touch the neck.  However, if you look at some of the most
accomplished guitar players you'll notice that a lot of them have their
hands wrapped around the neck like an ape with a club.  I'm not going to
argue with them.  These are people who are getting the sound that they
want, so how can you tell them they are wrong?   The only thing they are
really doing wrong is violating somebody's idea of what is proper, just
like a thumb flyer.  If you hadn't decided that one way must surely be
better than the other, which it apparently isn't, there would be no
difference between the two methods besides personal preference.
markzoom@digiverse.net - 24 Nov 2006 23:12 GMT
> > I'm wondering how many people here actually have taught someone else to
> > fly?
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> better than the other, which it apparently isn't, there would be no
> difference between the two methods besides personal preference.

My defence of the index-thumb grip has nothing to do with "looks".
It IS generally accepted as the more precise way (thumbs is supposed to
be faster).
Novices need precision far more than they need the speed for snap
aerobatics.
It IS a tiny bit more difficult to get used to for someone starting
from scratch.
My position remains that unless a novice really has significant
problems with grip after the first few flights, he should start on
index-thumb. They have to start one way or the other and this is what
people change *to* rather than *from* as can be discovered from a few
googles.
I'm getting bored with this subject so I'll let the thumbers have the
last word
(and I've just been to the model shop and got a load of gear to get on
with!).
Travec The Dacian - 25 Nov 2006 02:06 GMT
>I'm getting bored with this subject so I'll let the thumbers have the
>last word

Thank the Lord!  Having totally hijacked this thread with his utterly
bovine refusal to accept anyone else's point of view but his own, this
geezer now says he is 'bored' with it.  Glory be!  Hallelujah!

But think of this before you go, markzoom.  How many people in this
entire thread have you converted to your way of thinking?  Let me
answer that for you.  The answer is ZERO.  Not one solitary person has
changed his mind since the first time you opened your fat gob.  You
are nothing but a troll.  You are the total antithesis of what these
newsgroups stands for.

Can't you see that banging on endlessly about the same thing just to
prove you are right only alienates more and more people?  Frankly,
whether you *are* right or wrong, you have shown yourself to be a
chromium plated @sshat of the first order who refuses to even consider
another PoV but his own.  I, like many others, will be glad never to
hear another word from you.

So enjoy building your new models.  At least that's something to do
with your fingers other than using them to post more of your endless
crap here.

Someone asked earlier if you are autistic.  If you are then I
apologise for my rant, but I would ask that your carer(s) take time to
censor your online activities a little bit more than of late.

Either way, I have to say it will be nice to see the back of you
whenever you DO eventually decide to STFU once and for all!  

Travec.
Doug McLaren - 25 Nov 2006 04:38 GMT
| But think of this before you go, markzoom.  How many people in this
| entire thread have you converted to your way of thinking?  Let me
| answer that for you.  The answer is ZERO.

But that's pretty much the norm for discussions like this -- no matter
how reasonable you are, how well reasoned your arguments, how
convincing your citations, you're unlikely to convince somebody who
has already made up their mind.  Sometimes you will, but it's rare.

I'm not saying that markzoom isn't a troll -- just that he isn't for
the reasons you gave.

Really, his problem in this thread was that not only did he not change
anybody's mind, but nobody agreed with him in the first place, and yet
he still clung to his idea that his way was the only right way, and
everybody else was wrong.

I went flying today, flying my US 25e and my 100" Impulse electric
glider.  It was quite windy, but I was still finding plenty of lift
for the glider.  I hope I can go out again tomorrow!

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
"Rehtob," said Pooh, as the transporter malfunctioned.

Storm's Hamilton - 25 Nov 2006 05:19 GMT
Where did you fly?
mk

> | But think of this before you go, markzoom.  How many people in this
> | entire thread have you converted to your way of thinking?  Let me
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> glider.  It was quite windy, but I was still finding plenty of lift
> for the glider.  I hope I can go out again tomorrow!
Doug McLaren - 25 Nov 2006 21:41 GMT
| Where did you fly?

[ removed the UK from the groups ]

Well, there's two clubs I fly at -- the Hill Country Aeromodelers in
South Austin, and the Austin Silent Flyers in Pflugerville.

I've found that I like flying gliders most of all -- finding lift is
fun -- so I went to the ASF field first, but I caught the last person
leaving.  I much prefer to not fly alone, so I flew for a little
while, and then went down to the HCAM field and flew there for a
while.

Powered planes are fun too, but basically I just poke holes in the
sky, and I'm not really so interested in aerobatics, so gliders are
more fun.)

The most fun of all is slope flying on a good slope with lots of wind
and company, but alas with the sale of Dave's place, there hasn't been
much slope flying done around here, and I haven't seen any of the
regulars in a while.  There's still places to fly, but they're either
marginal (Murchison middle school) or risky (Mansfield Dam) or far
away (Georgetown Dam, Canyon Lake) or require winds that are rarely
available this time of year.

Today might have been a good day for Mansfield dam -- 10-20 mph S
winds -- but my wife wasn't feeling well, so I stayed home with the
kids.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
"Bother," said Pooh as he prepared Christopher Robin for human sacrifice.

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 26 Nov 2006 01:59 GMT
> ... Powered planes are fun too, but basically I just poke holes in the
>sky, and I'm not really so interested in aerobatics, so gliders are
>more fun.)

My buddy and I flew a glider this year up here in Buffalo.

We took turns towing it it up with his trainer.  We broke
it a few times, but not badly enough to scrap.  We found
some lift every day, but not down low.

>The most fun of all is slope flying on a good slope with lots of wind
>and company ...

Haven't got a good public site for that in our neighborhood.
There's one place ~40 miles south of here, but the winds
are variable and I think it's mostly for a group of friends.
I suppose I ought to go search the Niagara escarpment.  I've
got a friend with a small airport that hosts a glider club.
They may be using slope lift.

                    Marty
Signature

The Big-8 hierarchies (comp, humanities, misc, news, rec, sci, soc, talk)
are under new management.  See http://www.big-8.org for details.

Allan - 25 Nov 2006 11:30 GMT
People like markzoom will always exist and try to take over. I think that it
takes two to play, hence if he had been ignored then it would never have
happened. He was effectively democratically voted in by a trail of
responders...

People just kept rising to the bait!

Allan
Dave :^) - 25 Nov 2006 13:00 GMT
> People like markzoom will always exist and try to take over. I think that
> it takes two to play, hence if he had been ignored then it would never
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Allan

But I'd still like to smack him in the face!
Dave :^)
Robbie and Laura Reynolds - 25 Nov 2006 16:07 GMT
> People like markzoom will always exist and try to take over. I think that it
> takes two to play, hence if he had been ignored then it would never have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Allan

On the other hand, if the discussion hadn't occurred we wouldn't have
been treated to the entertaining tantrum on the part of the original
poster.  That was quite amusing.
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 26 Nov 2006 16:22 GMT
> I'm getting bored with this subject so I'll let the thumbers have the
> last word
> (and I've just been to the model shop and got a load of gear to get on
> with!).

I hope you thumbed through some magazines and catalogues before deciding
on your purchases !

Reg
markzoom@digiverse.net - 26 Nov 2006 18:33 GMT
> > I'm getting bored with this subject so I'll let the thumbers have the
> > last word
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Reg

No, I looked on the net and ebay first.
I only really get stuff from shops when it's not available or not
cheaper on the net these days. You can get the same quality stuff
direct from China at a fraction of the price. Occasional bargains to be
had at shows too.
Allan - 26 Nov 2006 20:34 GMT
Hey oop lads! He's doing it again!!

Allan

>> > I'm getting bored with this subject so I'll let the thumbers have the
>> > last word
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> direct from China at a fraction of the price. Occasional bargains to be
> had at shows too.
Storm's Hamilton - 26 Nov 2006 21:38 GMT
>> > I'm getting bored with this subject so I'll let the thumbers have the
>> > last word
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> direct from China at a fraction of the price. Occasional bargains to be
> had at shows too.

There is a local (45 miles away) hobby shop I try to get most stuff from.
He'll match or beat most web prices.  I mentioned a new Zenoah 20 in another
thread, it cost me $280. USD.  That's really good.

mk(thread hijacking accomplice)
markzoom@digiverse.net - 26 Nov 2006 22:26 GMT
> >> > I'm getting bored with this subject so I'll let the thumbers have the
> >> > last word
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> He'll match or beat most web prices.  I mentioned a new Zenoah 20 in another
> thread, it cost me $280. USD.  That's really good.

A CDI ignition 26cc engine including post from Hong Kong is about $255,
a bit less if you buy more than one:
Ebay.co.uk    item:  280033680861

Still not as cheap as a strimmer/weedcutter engine, cheaper than most
glows, a used one can cost nothing in money terms.

> mk(thread hijacking accomplice)
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 22 Nov 2006 19:00 GMT
> If you'd actually looked into it, you'd have found that those who
> change, virtually always change to index-thumbs, not the other way
> around. Why do you think that might be?

Indecision ?  Perhaps they change back again without letting on ? people
can be soooooo devious. Why would I want to look into it ? I am not
very interested in why someone uses thumbs alone as opposed to finger and
thumb. I was only responding to someone who seems to think there is only
one way to do it. Fancy trawling around the net to see who does what
with their finger and thumbs. You really must get a life ! I couldn't
give a stuff who does it whichever way... but there again, I wouldn't go
spouting that there is only one correct way !

While you are trawling about and believing the things you come across on
the net can I just point out that there's this guy in Nigeria that I
have heard of. He is looking to transfer a LOAD of money into a bank
account here.... I could mention you... he comes across as believable.

>> You sound like the old fashioned teachers who made left handed kids
>> write with the right hand 'cos that was the proper way to do it !
>> They got belted everytime they used their right hand for anything.
>
> ITYM "left"....

I am pleased to see that you are paying attention then.

>> The fork is indeed used as a spear, it's an eel fork and that is the way
>> it is used to catch them.
>
> So that's how you eat? Do you use a knife?

I see this one went completely over your head, never mind I can twiddle
my thumbs while you catch up.

Reg
Dave :^) - 22 Nov 2006 19:14 GMT
Dear impotent and socially inept,
   please post the URLs for all these sites where you get your cast in
stone information regarding stick manipulation techniques, I can't find any.
Perhaps I should add the info to my webpage?
Dave :^)
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 19:57 GMT
> Dear impotent and socially inept,
>     please post the URLs for all these sites where you get your cast in
> stone information regarding stick manipulation techniques, I can't find any.

I'm glad you asked for help before attempting to use a search engine
but I suggest you get instruction from a more suitable person and not
use a Nintendo keypad in your endeavours.

> Perhaps I should add the info to my webpage?

Excellent idea.
Here is a useful link:

http://tinyurl.com/zbzyg

> Dave :^)
Dave :^) - 22 Nov 2006 20:19 GMT
> Excellent idea.
> Here is a useful link:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/zbzyg

So now you prove that you're talking sh.t, as shown earlier in the thread
you are unable to provide any evidence to back up your verbal diahorea. I
really hope that someone in your club, if you are actually in a club, knows
you from your posts here, if so, they must be pissing themselves at what a
tit you're making of yourself.
If there is anyone who knows "markzero who has a nintendo fixation" please
say hello.
Dave :^)
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 22:20 GMT
> > Excellent idea.
> > Here is a useful link:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> say hello.
> Dave :^)

Hehehe, gotcha!
markzoom@digiverse.net - 22 Nov 2006 19:44 GMT
> > If you'd actually looked into it, you'd have found that those who
> > change, virtually always change to index-thumbs, not the other way
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> have heard of. He is looking to transfer a LOAD of money into a bank
> account here.... I could mention you... he comes across as believable.

You might like to refer him to    "thescamb aiter.com" or "41 9 e
ater.com" (no spaces in either links)  who have fun with that kind of
thing. I gather one chap managed to dupe a certain "wealthy" africon
gent into paying for ten separate shipments of assorted scrap
(including dead washing machines, old toilets and broken cookers) to
Nigerio.

> >> You sound like the old fashioned teachers who made left handed kids
> >> write with the right hand 'cos that was the proper way to do it !
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Reg
Humpty Dumpty - 23 Nov 2006 14:09 GMT
I learned to fly myself a few years ago, and that was with low wing plane
with a .60 glow, not a problem, I never crashed whilst learning. I can fly
using both methods, thumb and thumb/finger. I can fly fairly complex 3d
manoeuvres using both methods without any hangups.

I have teached a few people how to fly since with great success.

Use common sense, learn to respect other peoples opinions and 99.9% of the
time things will be fine. There enough rules and regulations in this country
as is. By all means give friendly advice, but let people be free to think
for themselves.
markzoom@digiverse.net - 19 Nov 2006 20:40 GMT
> <snip>
> Fly your plane with the trannie's stick up your bum, if that's what you
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> without neckstrap or tray while using finger and thumb at the same time as
> operating switches.

I can't be bothered to post a picture but you can ask a Thumb-index
flyer at your club to show you. My Futaba FF8 has 4 switches per side
and I can operate all of them with my middle fingers or third fingers.
The three dial switches in the middle are a pain either way you hold
it. I would have prefered slides there.

> I've tried it with three different brands of transmitter
> without success, can anyone else confirm this or name a trnsmitter where
> this is possible? I think you're talking out of your ar$e!

Well it's no problem with my FF8.

> Dave :^)
> p.s. my 8 year old daughter spotted that "layed" should be spelt laid,
> actually!

Tell her "well done". Here in GB kids used to be really cr.., err "bad"
at spelling.
Pointer - 26 Nov 2006 11:42 GMT
All right kiddies,
Just because I mentioned that a PC sim would be a good way of getting thumb
practice.

I am now very bored listening to all the hot air, but it certainly shook
this NG into activity!

Now for another controversial topic...
About the BFMRA and its forum...............................!

P
Allan - 26 Nov 2006 15:35 GMT
Who?

Allan

> All right kiddies,
> Just because I mentioned that a PC sim would be a good way of getting
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> P
Pointer - 26 Nov 2006 16:56 GMT
So...... I belong to the 'research' division!
try anything, me!

P

> Who?
>
> Allan

>> Now for another controversial topic...
>> About the BFMRA and its forum...............................!
>>
>> P
markzoom@digiverse.net - 26 Nov 2006 18:42 GMT
> So...... I belong to the 'research' division!
> try anything, me!

Ah yes "BFMRA":
Brickfield Close , Field Lane , Mulberry Crescent Residents Association
BFMRA

> P
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >>
> >> P
Allan - 26 Nov 2006 20:33 GMT
Hey oop lads! He's doing it again!!

Allan

>> So...... I belong to the 'research' division!
>> try anything, me!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> >>
>> >> P
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 17 Nov 2006 20:30 GMT
> Use your thumbs if you want, but you'll likely have to take them off
> the controls when you flick flap, undercarriage or rate switches etc.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> If you use your thumbs you have to let go of the transmitter completely
> with one hand.

By 'eck lad your so full of crap!
If Tx are indeed designed for thumb and index finger use only then....
why the hell do they knurl the top of the sticks on many Tx's so that
your thumb has a good grip. I guess the manufacturer decided his
production team needed the machining practice ?

You and your comments are the reason why many people object to
statements that the only way to learn is to join a club.
If club members are as opinionated and stubborn as you then the last thing
they want to do is join a club.

All you have done is offer the original poster advice that he neither
sought nor needed.

Your advice.... that after two years the wings will have warped....

This makes me wonder if you have built model planes, and if you did what
sort of state they ended up in ! If your wings have warped after two
years then perhaps you had better stick with  better designs or
alternatively ARTF and hope they were properly built !

I guess the crankshafts on your engines sag out of shape after a few
months of non-use.

Reg
markzoom@digiverse.net - 17 Nov 2006 23:45 GMT
> > Use your thumbs if you want, but you'll likely have to take them off
> > the controls when you flick flap, undercarriage or rate switches etc.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> your thumb has a good grip. I guess the manufacturer decided his
> production team needed the machining practice ?

Nope, they are knurled on top for the thumb users. The switches are
however laid out for thumb-index users, go check.

A consensus is that "thumbs is easier" and "thumb-forefinger is more
precise". Take your pick. Quite a lot of people start off all thumbs
and later change to thumb-index, but rarely the other way around.
It's really not such a big deal, but look at what the best, and worst,
pilots use.

There is also a test:
Grab the transmitter and look at the ceiling (not the controls).
Push the stick exactly into the top left corner without looking a few
times.
See how accurately you can do it with both methods.

> You and your comments are the reason why many people object to
> statements that the only way to learn is to join a club.

There's a bunch off stuff you won't know unless someone bothers to
show you, (and quite a few won't bother). It's sure easier to absorb it
here than on the field all at once.
Here's a nice site about *teaching* people to fly:
http://webpages.charter.net/rcfu/BegInfo/TeachRC.html

> If club members are as opinionated and stubborn as you then the last thing
> they want to do is join a club.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Your advice.... that after two years the wings will have warped....

They are sure likely to have changed warp slightly if they are built-up
film covered ones. I sure wouldn't rely on the presumtion that the
trims are spot on because "they were fine when I put them away two
years ago after I crashed the plane", would you?

> This makes me wonder if you have built model planes,

Over 20, most from scratch.

> and if you did what
> sort of state they ended up in !

I decked my first RC pride and joy on the first outing alone. Some went
in because of radio interference etc. Thanks to being kindly given
excellent instruction from someone after the first disaster, I have
only written off one other plane due to pilot error since 1975 on the
first test flight  (a hand launched fun fighter Me109, which turned
into the ground on launch).

> If your wings have warped after two
> years then perhaps you had better stick with  better designs or
> alternatively ARTF and hope they were properly built !

There are a whole bunch of reasons why wings can warp in 2 years
storage that have zilch to do with how well they are built.
You go presume the trims are still identical after some crash two years
ago, and I won't. Most don't even presume them to remain spot on during
the flight  and on subsequent flights, because it depends on how much
fuel there is in the tank, wether there's a lump of sheep sh.t stuck on
the wing, it's been standing in the full sun, someone tripped over the
plane while you weren't looking, etc.etc.etc.

> I guess the crankshafts on your engines sag out of shape after a few
> months of non-use.

Well you keep guessing. I sure hope you never teach anyone to fly.

> Reg
EGNX Flyer - 22 Nov 2006 18:53 GMT
RIGHT! enough is enough.

Can you children PLEASE stop bloody arguing about fingers, thumbs and
thumb fumbling! Whether you use thumbs only, or thumb and index finger
the important thing is you're partaking in the hobby, am I not correct?

As a new member to this group and new-comer to R/C flight, this really
ISN'T what i'd expect from grown up and sensible adults that I expected
you all to be!

It makes me feel ashamed to think that I am part of this group and to
think that I am among those supposed to be experienced enough to
tolerate each others quirks and differences.

For those of you who HAVE been adult enough to supply USEFUL
information, I thank you kindly, and to the others i ask that you grow
up and learn to tolerate the differences others may have - at least
we're all partaking in the same hobby!

I'm going to now offically close this topic, so please no more commets
thank you, i've read enough!
Robert Scott - 22 Nov 2006 19:22 GMT
> It makes me feel ashamed to think that I am part of this group and to
> think that I am among those supposed to be experienced enough to
> tolerate each others quirks and differences.

Don't get the wrong impression of the newsgroup... most people DIDN'T
participate in Mr. Thumb-and-fingers-only's troll-fest.  There are a lot of
good people here and a lot of collective experience.  In the future, you
might also want to try searching for answers to your questions at:

RC Groups ( http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/index.php? -- more electric
flight oriented) and RC Universe (http://www.rcuniverse.com/index.cfm  --  
not my favorite due to heavy and questionable moderation).

Good flying,
desmobob
Doug McLaren - 22 Nov 2006 19:34 GMT
| Can you children PLEASE stop bloody arguing about fingers, thumbs and
| thumb fumbling!

Um, dad, most of us haven't been children for many decades.  We grew
up, we moved out.  Many of us are probably even older/more mature than
you.

| As a new member to this group and new-comer to R/C flight, this
| really ISN'T what i'd expect from grown up and sensible adults that
| I expected you all to be!

And obviously new to Usenet too.

| I'm going to now offically close this topic,

Good luck with that.

| so please no more commets thank you, i've read enough!

Don't let the door hit your butt on the way out ...

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
"I often quote myself; it adds spice to my conversation."
-- George Bernard Shaw

EGNX Flyer - 22 Nov 2006 23:15 GMT
some people are just purely childish. seriously, with comments like
that in the post above, how am i to get a good impression of my peers!

<snip>
"Um, dad, most of us haven't been children for many decades.  We grew
up, we moved out.  Many of us are probably even older/more mature than
you."
</snip>

I may be in my early 20's (and actually a father myself thank you!),
and a new member to USENET and this particular part of it, but i could
damn well assure you that my mental age is far beyond that of the
physical age of some of those people posting here!

On top of all of that, stupid, and childish comments like that snipped
above, in addition to "Good luck with that" and "Don't let the door hit
your butt on the way out ..." really do make me think that i dont want
to be a part of this at all - i also have a hint that Doug's a typical
obnoxious American, in his later years, with the attitude of a 4 year
old, and a brain to match... wait, that sounds like President Bush too!

Maybe i should stick to the groups that are more welcoming and less
hostile to new members.. maybe i should find a new hobby, i dont want
to be related to the scum i've seen and heard in this topic.
Doug McLaren - 23 Nov 2006 01:07 GMT
| some people are just purely childish

Perhaps, but I'm willing to give you another chance to make a better
impression.

In any event, statements like `Can you children PLEASE stop bloody
arguing about fingers, thumbs and thumb fumbling!' aren't likely to
have the effect you're looking for, unless you're actually speaking to
your own children, or at least speaking from some sort of position of
authority.

When speaking to adults like that, it's generally considered to be
insulting, at least on this side of the pond, though I'm guessing it's
no different on the other side.

| seriously, with comments like that in the post above, how am i to
| get a good impression of my peers!

Well, you could try to post again, this time not trying to be such a
condescending twit ...

| I may be in my early 20's (and actually a father myself thank you!),
| and a new member to USENET and this particular part of it, but i could
| damn well assure you that my mental age is far beyond that of the
| physical age of some of those people posting here!

Of course.  The vast majority of people think they're more mature than
average (median, to be more precise) -- it's human nature.

| On top of all of that, stupid, and childish comments like that snipped
| above, in addition to "Good luck with that"

... said in response to `I'm going to now offically [sp] close this
topic'.

Here's a hint for you -- you don't get to close this topic, at least
not officially.  Even having made the original post doesn't give you
that right.

| and "Don't let the door hit your butt on the way out ..."

... said in respond to `so please no more commets [sp] thank you, i've
read enough' -- we'll post whatever comments we want, thanks.

| really do make me think that i dont want to be a part of this at all

Of course.  And I wouldn't want you to let the door ...

| i also have a hint that Doug's a typical obnoxious American, in his
| later years, with the attitude of a 4 year old, and a brain to
| match...

And I have a hint that you're just upset that you have no special
authority here, you're not being given the respect that you feel you
deserve, and so now you're flinging random insults on the off chance
that something sticks.

| wait, that sounds like President Bush too!

You sound confused.  I take offense at your insults and your attempts
to run the group, and now I'm like Bush?  Have you considered that
maybe you're the one playing Bush's role here, trying to tell the rest
of the world what to do?

[ was this another attempt at an insult, this time aimed at the entire
 country?  If so, it didn't seem very well thought out, and you're
 not impressing me. ]

| Maybe i should stick to the groups that are more welcoming and less
| hostile to new members..

Of course, if you put your foot in your mouth over there like you did
here, you'll probably find the response to be similar.

This is a generally friendly group.  markzoom is not a typical member
-- he's pretty new here, but apparantly not to Usenet.  Googling for
his other posts is quite ... informative (and I never thought to do it
until now.)

| maybe i should find a new hobby, i dont want to be related to the
| scum i've seen and heard in this topic.

If you were paying attention, you'd probably have noticed that most of
the people participating were generally helpful.  Yes, it looks like
we were trolled.  But that's OK -- it's not the first time, and won't
be the last.  Life goes on ...

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
Smoke me a kipper; I'll be back for breakfast!

tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 23 Nov 2006 18:56 GMT
> This is a generally friendly group.  markzoom is not a typical member
> -- he's pretty new here, but apparantly not to Usenet.  Googling for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> we were trolled.  But that's OK -- it's not the first time, and won't
> be the last.  Life goes on ...

I reckoned it was a deliberate attempt to pass a very wet and windy
spell of no flying weather. A touch of cabin fever sets in !

It had to be a troll - but hell, the rains streaming down the windows
let's join in.

I guess the wannabe "moderator" is another participant in the "banish
the boredom stakes". If not then he is following a difficult road !

I have been polite (ish) and not sworn, well hardly at all  >:-))

Don't get me started on Bush though.....

Reg
markzoom@digiverse.net - 23 Nov 2006 22:23 GMT
> > This is a generally friendly group.  markzoom is not a typical member
> > -- he's pretty new here, but apparantly not to Usenet.  Googling for
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Don't get me started on Bush though.....

If you're really bored you should check out the politics NGs. The Bush
followers are getting a bit thin on the ground there now but plenty of
his master's supporters there.

> Reg
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 23 Nov 2006 18:56 GMT
> Maybe i should stick to the groups that are more welcoming and less
> hostile to new members.. maybe i should find a new hobby, i dont want
> to be related to the scum i've seen and heard in this topic.

I will have a pint, no make that two, of whatever you are drinking and
just set my feet up and watch awhiles         >:-))

Don't you just LOVE usenet ?          >:-))

Reg
markzoom@digiverse.net - 23 Nov 2006 19:30 GMT
> > Maybe i should stick to the groups that are more welcoming and less
> > hostile to new members.. maybe i should find a new hobby, i dont want
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Reg

And all that because I suggested he use index and thumb to fly his
plane....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.