Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rascal 110

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Vegasfan - 26 Nov 2006 02:01 GMT
I'm considering a Rascal 110. Any comments,opinions? If I go with a gas
engine, what do you recommend?
Frank Schwartz - 26 Nov 2006 03:49 GMT
>I'm considering a Rascal 110. Any comments,opinions? If I go with a gas
>engine, what do you recommend?

My buddy had one of these. Pretty plane. Flew nicely, but was grossly
over powered with a Saito 180. It would take off in ten feet and climb
vertically at full power.  We had to fly it most of the time with 1/3
power.  I think any gasoline engine would be too big for it.   Go with
what the instructions recommend...which I do not remember at this
time.
Storm's Hamilton - 26 Nov 2006 04:33 GMT
I have a Zenoah 20 that would probably be too small for it.  Seems like
there's a damaged one at http://www2.mailordercentral.com/quantummodels/
Vegasfan, do you have the means to carry it around?  Looks pretty big.
mk

>>I'm considering a Rascal 110. Any comments,opinions? If I go with a gas
>>engine, what do you recommend?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> what the instructions recommend...which I do not remember at this
> time.
Vegasfan - 26 Nov 2006 19:51 GMT
I assume the wing is not a one piece. If it is, I'm sure  I can take
it off for transport and put it in the bed of my pickup which has an 8
foot bed. I'll have to secure it somehow so it doesn't take off on it's
own on the way out to the field. I have a 20 acre field about 6 miles
from my house that I own and I like to fly there by myself.

> I have a Zenoah 20 that would probably be too small for it.  Seems like
> there's a damaged one at http://www2.mailordercentral.com/quantummodels/
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>what the instructions recommend...which I do not remember at this
>>time.
Robbie and Laura Reynolds - 26 Nov 2006 20:40 GMT
Your comments about your pickup reminded me of a friend I had a few
years ago who had a Big John biplane.  He used to transport it in the
back of his pickup truck, assembled.  He didn't tie it down in any way.
I asked him whether he was concerned about it flying out of the back of
the truck, and he told me that there was a pocket of calm air right
behind the cab.  Sure enough, about a week later he was driving along
and he saw it in the rear view mirror, jumping out of the truck.  He
used to pay me to fix that plane for him whenever it broke, which was a
lot because it was mostly made of lite ply.  Anyway, I've always
preferred minivans for transporting big planes.  I built myself a Big
John about ten years ago and had to transport it in the largest vehicle
I had at the time, which was a 1965 Ford Fairlane.  That was a pain.
I'm amazed at how they could get so little functional space out of such
big cars back then.

>     I assume the wing is not a one piece. If it is, I'm sure  I can take
> it off for transport and put it in the bed of my pickup which has an 8
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >>what the instructions recommend...which I do not remember at this
> >>time.
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 26 Nov 2006 20:48 GMT
>    I assume the wing is not a one piece.

I think you are correct.

I helped a friend fish his servo lead out of the
wing at the field.  I'm pretty sure that the
wing is held together by a tube or two, then
bolted to the fuselage.

> ... I have a 20 acre field about 6 miles
>from my house that I own and I like to fly there by myself.

Nice!

I'm sure you'll enjoy the Rascal.  

            Marty
Signature

The Big-8 hierarchies (comp, humanities, misc, news, rec, sci, soc, talk)
are under new management.  See http://www.big-8.org for details.

Jim Slaughter - 27 Nov 2006 19:24 GMT
tube spar and struts. Very strong.

>>    I assume the wing is not a one piece.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Marty
Jim Slaughter - 27 Nov 2006 19:23 GMT
two piece wing

>    I assume the wing is not a one piece. If it is, I'm sure  I can take it
> off for transport and put it in the bed of my pickup which has an 8 foot
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>>what the instructions recommend...which I do not remember at this
>>>time.
Jim Slaughter - 27 Nov 2006 19:21 GMT
I had a 2.4 cubic inch gasser on mine! It flew great but flew at about 25%
power most of the time. A saito 1.80 will work just fine. I know a lot of
people flying it with that engine.

>>I'm considering a Rascal 110. Any comments,opinions? If I go with a gas
>>engine, what do you recommend?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> what the instructions recommend...which I do not remember at this
> time.
Jim Slaughter - 27 Nov 2006 19:20 GMT
Best plane you will ever fly. It is awesome! I flew mine with a gas engine.
LOVED IT until a brand new SR Battery pack took it out!

> I'm considering a Rascal 110. Any comments,opinions? If I go with a gas
> engine, what do you recommend?
Frank Schwartz - 27 Nov 2006 21:11 GMT
Re your SR battery pack, Jim.  I lost a Q-500 to a new SR pack as
well.  Problem is the so called welded straps on the cells.  Now, I
open the pack and solder them over the crummy welds.  No more
planes lost to bad battery connections!  And I still maintain the
Saito 180 is totally too much power for the Rascal 110. If you fly a
plane with a motor that has to be throttled back all the time to one
third or one fourth throttle,  logic should tell you that you have too
large an engine...
Frank
Jim Slaughter - 27 Nov 2006 22:51 GMT
I just don't buy SR packs anymore.

I like having extra power for when it's needed. Also, you get long flight
times on a smaller tank when running an engine at less than full throttle.

We all have our favorite opinions. This is just one of mine. Your position
is perfectly valid also! :-)

> Re your SR battery pack, Jim.  I lost a Q-500 to a new SR pack as
> well.  Problem is the so called welded straps on the cells.  Now, I
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> large an engine...
> Frank
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.