Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / February 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

props.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Terence Lynock (MSW) - 07 Feb 2007 21:51 GMT
Thinking on building a 42'' span trainer that calls for a Speed 400 and
2.33/1 gearbox driving a 9x5 slimprop, as I have decent 9x6 nylons and a
8x6 Masterprop spare can I use one of these and what effect will it have
compared to the 9x5?, will a slightly higher pitch cause the motor
problems? (Graupner 400 motor and gearbox),

                                regards,                  Terry
Doug McLaren - 08 Feb 2007 02:18 GMT
| Thinking on building a 42'' span trainer that calls for a Speed 400 and
| 2.33/1 gearbox driving a 9x5 slimprop, as I have decent 9x6 nylons and a
| 8x6 Masterprop spare can I use one of these and what effect will it have
| compared to the 9x5?, will a slightly higher pitch cause the motor
| problems? (Graupner 400 motor and gearbox),

The 9x6 will cause slightly higher power consumption at the same
throttle level, and therefore slightly higher heat.  It might give you
slightly better performance.

The 8x6 could go either way vs. the 9x5.  If you had a 3D plane it
probably wouldn't work as well, but a trainer rarely does 3D, so ...

It's hard to be more specific without knowing the specifics about your
entire power system and putting them into Motocalc or something
similar.  But if 9x5 works well, the other two props will probably
work OK as well.

And really, props like that are cheap, so try what you've got.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
There is always one item on the screen menu that is mislabeled and should
read "ABANDON HOPE ALL YE WHO ENTER HERE".

Terence Lynock (MSW) - 08 Feb 2007 11:07 GMT
The message <1170900880.1699@frenzied.us>
from "Doug McLaren" <dougmc+usenet-20070207@frenzied.us> contains these words:

> It's hard to be more specific without knowing the specifics about your
> entire power system and putting them into Motocalc or something
> similar.

Hi Doug,
                the plans recommend a 9x5 slimprop and Speed 400 which
I have a couple as last night I bought a  new Graupner 2:33/1 gearbox
and Graupner Speed 400 motor all still in the original packaging for
about $17 on eBay which is exactly what is recommended so if it would be
better to buy the correct prop then no problem, not bought or even
decided what electronics  kit I will install as yet as I have only just
decided to build a decent sized trainer to get into the air with.
A lot of newbies think twice I think about building their own airframes
but afte 30 years of building scale sailing ship models working from
plans anything up to 300 years old and so on that sort of stuff is no
mystery, it is the electronics and power trains I need to learn about as
my ship models all relied on wind.

But if 9x5 works well, the other two props will probably
> work OK as well.
> And really, props like that are cheap, so try what you've got.

Just thought it a waste of money buying a prop if I have one in my box,
while on the subject I have aquired a graupner 4.7/4.7 speed prop from
somewhere described as a CAM(?) prop and wondered what it is for or what
use I can put it to,

                                              regards,          Terry
Ken Day - 08 Feb 2007 20:14 GMT
>I have aquired a graupner 4.7/4.7 speed prop from
>somewhere described as a CAM(?)
>prop and wondered what it is for or what
>use I can put it to,
>
>                                               regards,          Terry
Those props are used on very high rpm motors such as pylon
racers and other high speed aircraft.
I use the graupner cam props in the 5.25 x 5.25 range
on my VIP electric pylon racer which turns in excess of
25,000 rpm. These props are very stiff and true.

CAM simply means computer aided manufacturing.

I buy quite a few of these at $5.00 each. Usually break
one every couple flights since I have to belly land and
these little guys don't slow down very well. Seems as though
the prop ends up stopping vertical more than horizontal. :-(
.
Ken
Terence Lynock (MSW) - 08 Feb 2007 21:34 GMT
The message <ph0ns2hvq1r6i2ht9h6opqhb7oa5vh06cv@4ax.com>
from Ken Day <kd1942@aol.com> contains these words:

> Those props are used on very high rpm motors such as pylon
> racers and other high speed aircraft.
> I use the graupner cam props in the 5.25 x 5.25 range
> on my VIP electric pylon racer which turns in excess of
> 25,000 rpm. These props are very stiff and true.

Thanks Ken,  just wondered if it was of any use so will leave it in the
box for now, it came with a Race 480 and prop adaptor as I recall bought
off eBay still in original packing for about $7 the lot so I got my
monies worth I think, you see quite a few sets like that bought for some
project or other that never took shape then it all ends up on eBay,

                          regards,                       Terry
The Natural Philosopher - 08 Feb 2007 23:50 GMT
> The message <1170900880.1699@frenzied.us>
> from "Doug McLaren" <dougmc+usenet-20070207@frenzied.us> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>                                                regards,          Terry
speed 400 direct drive on 8 cells..or 3s LIPO if you want a brief
experience.
The Natural Philosopher - 08 Feb 2007 05:07 GMT
> Thinking on building a 42'' span trainer that calls for a Speed 400 and
> 2.33/1 gearbox driving a 9x5 slimprop, as I have decent 9x6 nylons and a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>                                  regards,                  Terry

www.shaman.co.uk/models/cans

for all your speed motor gears and props issues.

The best ever on a 2.33 400 (6v) is a APC E 7x5 prop and 3s LIPO.

APC 8x6 is not bad on 8 round cells.
APC 9x6 loads it up too much..its no better and the current is higher
and the motor is hotter.

9x5 is probably too little pitch speed for most planes.

I had a master airscrew 8x6. In fact I still have it. I now use it to
pick my nose.

It proved unable to actually propel an aircraft.
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 09 Feb 2007 23:10 GMT
> I had a master airscrew 8x6. In fact I still have it. I now use it to
> pick my nose.

At what RPM?

   Dan
The Natural Philosopher - 10 Feb 2007 01:08 GMT
>> I had a master airscrew 8x6. In fact I still have it. I now use it to
>> pick my nose.
>
>  At what RPM?

Hmm.

>     Dan
MJKolodziej - 10 Feb 2007 01:15 GMT
>> I had a master airscrew 8x6. In fact I still have it. I now use it to
>> pick my nose.
>
> At what RPM?
>
>    Dan

That would probably depend on the boger %
mk
Morgans - 10 Feb 2007 02:24 GMT
> That would probably depend on the boger %

I don't know about the RPM's, but I would estimate that cruise would be
getting 6.5 boogers per minute. <g>
Signature

Jim in NC

Terence Lynock (MSW) - 10 Feb 2007 12:24 GMT
The message <I1azh.64$VJ4.62@newsfe04.lga>
from "Morgans" <jessmorgan@charter.net> contains these words:

> I don't know about the RPM's, but I would estimate that cruise would be
> getting 6.5 boogers per minute. <g>

Its when the buggers go into reverse pitch  it makes your eyes
water................

                                regards,                    Terry
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.