Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / February 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

hydraulics

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Terence Lynock (MSW) - 13 Feb 2007 11:45 GMT
Already sent this once but didnt show up, has anyone tried using
hydraulics for operating retracts instead of compressed air bottles? it
would be quite easy to do using clinical syringes and a small motor
drive with micro limit switch's.
A small motor working a rack and pinion to operate the master cylinder
which connects to two rams on the u/c legs all made from polypropylene
syringes would be light and practically maintanance free with no need
for air bottles or recharging, have a drawer full of syringes of
different sizes which I use for glue and oil etc so may play around with
the idea, the long thin 1ml syringes would make excellent rams
strengthened with thin wall brass tube on the outside,

                                              regards,                
  Terry
Ed Cregger - 13 Feb 2007 13:13 GMT
> Already sent this once but didnt show up, has anyone tried using
> hydraulics for operating retracts instead of compressed air bottles? it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>                                               regards,
>   Terry

-----------

I haven't heard of anyone using hydraulics, but you can bet that someone has
at some point.

Hydraulic fluid weighs more than air, plus you need a pump and a power
source. Weight is critical in our models. I don't see it as a practical
solutions for average sized models. Maybe on some monster scale bomber?

Ed Cregger
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 13 Feb 2007 13:51 GMT
>Already sent this once but didnt show up, has anyone tried using
>hydraulics for operating retracts instead of compressed air bottles? it
>would be quite easy to do using clinical syringes and a small motor
>drive with micro limit switches.  ...

I haven't heard of anyone doing that, but it sounds like
it might be a workable system.

A few nay-sayers from the past:

<http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=hydraulics&num=10&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&a
s_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=rec.models.rc.air&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q
&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=13&as_maxm=2&as_maxy=2007&safe
=off
>

                Marty
Signature

Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See http://www.big-8.org for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.

Terence Lynock (MSW) - 13 Feb 2007 14:48 GMT
The message <12t3gj37ltm5l21@news.supernews.com>
from "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski@canisius.edu> contains these words:

> I haven't heard of anyone doing that, but it sounds like
> it might be a workable system.

> A few nay-sayers from the past:

A small geared motor working a push-pull rack and pinnion connected to
the plnnger of a 4 ml syringe which in turn feeds two 2 ml syringes
would give ample power to raise or lower a couple of u/c legs weighing a
couple of ounces each,  you have a ready made high pressure piston and
cylinder with a syringe which cost about 10c each and hydraulics are
much more effective than air pressure as it is positive with no lag from
the need to compress first before anything happens.
Fluid is heavier than air but you only need about 10 ml of it and you
can do away with your air bottle, valve and other gear so weight for
weight it is comparable if not slightly lighter overall,  size for size
a hydraulic ram will produce much more power than a pneumatic ram
because once you have a cylinder full of fluid you have 100% positive
pressure unlike airwhere you have to force in more and more to get a
rise in power both being dependant on the source of pressure of course.
To me some jobs on models could be powered by hydraulics instead of
servos and you can feed a hydraulic line where you may not even be able
to get a snake to go, if you need two wing servos for instance for your
ailerons why not a central hydraulic feed to two rams which would fit
into the wings much easier requiring much less space and be lighter  and
also not need wiring looms and such.
If an undercarriage leg needs one ram and lot of air to raise it then
another to lower it (unless it acts by gravity) you can replace this
with one slave cylinder that works under vacuum to raise and compression
to lower as it is a sealed system, all we would be doing is copying the
full sized practice I suppose,

                                       regards,                       Terry
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 13 Feb 2007 15:06 GMT
>A small geared motor working a push-pull rack and pinnion connected to
>the plnnger of a 4 ml syringe which in turn feeds two 2 ml syringes
>would give ample power to raise or lower a couple of u/c legs weighing a
>couple of ounces each ...

It sounds like you are familiar with hydraulics.

You may be able to make it work.

Go for it!

Then let us know how it all turns out.

Two problems that occurred to me after my last post:

1. Won't you need to bleed each line?  Seems to me
that air in hyrdraulic lines is a bad thing.

2. A leaky fitting is going to make a mess.  That
doesn't happen with air, although failure of a gear
might make a different kind of mess.

Not saying it can't be done.  In the google search
I did, it showed that there was a commercial hydraulic
system on the market circa 1998.

                Marty
Signature

Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See http://www.big-8.org for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.

Terence Lynock - 13 Feb 2007 17:12 GMT
The message <12t3kvuse5hi096@news.supernews.com>
from "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski@canisius.edu> contains these words:

> Not saying it can't be done.  In the google search
> I did, it showed that there was a commercial hydraulic
> system on the market circa 1998.

>                 Marty

Properly done the whole thing could be kept down to 2 or 3 ounces by
using medical syringes, may give it a go on a test rig soon as I have
time and see how it works in theory,

                        regards,     Terry
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 13 Feb 2007 19:05 GMT
>Properly done the whole thing could be kept down to 2 or 3 ounces by
>using medical syringes, may give it a go on a test rig soon as I have
>time and see how it works in theory,

"One observation is worth 10,000 expert opinions."

Let us know how it turns out!

                Marty
Signature

Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See http://www.big-8.org for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.

David Williams - 13 Feb 2007 19:05 GMT
> Already sent this once but didnt show up, has anyone tried using
> hydraulics for operating retracts instead of compressed air bottles? it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>                                               regards,
>   Terry

Jet boys have them -
http://www.modelltechnik.at/eindex.htm

Cheers,
David
Terence Lynock - 13 Feb 2007 20:34 GMT
The message <fe6dnX1Ol6xylk_YnZ2dneKdnZypnZ2d@brightview.com>
from "David Williams" <newsreply@remove-me.dandcwilliams.com> contains
these words:

> Jet boys have them -
> http://www.modelltechnik.at/eindex.htm

> Cheers,
> David

Nice bit of kit David and proves it works but cant understand why they
have a fluid bag and exhaust system when it would work with a closed
recirculator system, means using a double acting piston so the fluid
under pressure pushes the piston down the tube and the oil behind it
which is unpressured back to the sealed tank, when the valve changes it
works in reverse and the pressure changes sides etc causing the piston
to go up the tube again pushing the unpressured fluid back to the tank.
There are a number of ways to do it but what you need is as few joints
and seals as possible and keep it simple to keep the weight down, using
small bore polypropylene pipe instead of steel or copper and engineering
plastics where possible,

                                       regards,                    Terry
Six_O'Clock_High - 14 Feb 2007 02:33 GMT
I have a friend in San Angelo who build a complete hydraulic system (but
from scratch) for his 19 sized P51's just to go faster than me.  It worked
very well :(.   He is a machinist.   However one word of warning, most
medical equipment will not tolerate hydrocarbons very well.

> The message <fe6dnX1Ol6xylk_YnZ2dneKdnZypnZ2d@brightview.com>
> from "David Williams" <newsreply@remove-me.dandcwilliams.com> contains
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>                                        regards,                    Terry
Morgans - 14 Feb 2007 03:19 GMT
> However one word of warning, most medical equipment will not tolerate
> hydrocarbons very well.

So why use anything but water?

Hydrocarbons are used for heat transfer properties, freezing resistance, and
a couple other properties.  Water is all that is needed for RC.
Signature

Jim in NC

Frank Schwartz - 14 Feb 2007 04:40 GMT
You fellows missed the boat...there WAS a company that made a system
called hydrolocks or hydralocks (I think it was) that used brake fluid
in the system instead of air.  I had a system somewhere, if anyone is
still interested, I can dig them up.  The idea seemed very logiical
when it first came out and I bought a set...never got aound to using
it, however,
Frank Schwartz
Tom Minger - 15 Feb 2007 02:32 GMT
Hydrlocks used a combination of pneumatic and hydraulic. That allowed the
modeler to use existing air control syslems from Rohm, etc and still
capitalize on the power of the hydraulics. Their claim to fame was that long
and/or heavy landing gear, or gear that really need to stay up in high G
maneuvers benefited from the incompressibility of the hydraulic fluid. We
used refrigeration oil as the hydraulic fluid because it got along with the
o-rings in the then commercially available retract systems, and with the
diaphragms in the pneumatic/hydraulic interface cylinders. They worked
great. It was not difficult to get all the air out of the hydraulic side of
the system by simply manually cycling the gear cylinders and having the hose
ends in a jar of the oil. You just kept cycling until no more bubbles
appeared.

They did add weight (this was back in the days when most scale or pattern
ships were 60 size machines), but it wasn't more than a couple of ounces. It
was a small price to pay when compared to flying a round of scale with the
gear partially hanging out and eating the resuiltant point loss. They did
make a mess if you had an "accident", but usually it didn't matter as the
plane was likely a write off anyway.

Modern systems seem to be engineered a little better, making these add ons
not required.

My recollections anyhow....

> You fellows missed the boat...there WAS a company that made a system
> called hydrolocks or hydralocks (I think it was) that used brake fluid
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> it, however,
> Frank Schwartz
Terence Lynock (MSW) - 14 Feb 2007 11:28 GMT
The message <LcvAh.1413$vc4.133@newsfe03.lga>
from "Morgans" <jessmorgan@charter.net> contains these words:

> So why use anything but water?

> Hydrocarbons are used for heat transfer properties, freezing
> resistance, and
> a couple other properties.  Water is all that is needed for RC.

Hi Jim,
              I have problems when using water in hypodermic syringes
as it doesnt lubricate the piston and causes the rubber seal to grab or
stick, you could use a mix of water and washing up liquid which would do
the trick otherwise a low viscosity oil like baby oil or sewing machine
oil,

                               regards,              Terry
CM - 14 Feb 2007 18:09 GMT
KY Jelly works well once you get the air out. - Don't ask.
> The message <LcvAh.1413$vc4.133@newsfe03.lga>
> from "Morgans" <jessmorgan@charter.net> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>                                regards,              Terry
Morgans - 14 Feb 2007 21:00 GMT
> Hi Jim,
>               I have problems when using water in hypodermic syringes
> as it doesnt lubricate the piston and causes the rubber seal to grab or
> stick, you could use a mix of water and washing up liquid which would do
> the trick otherwise a low viscosity oil like baby oil or sewing machine
> oil,

Good point.

Sewing machine oil would have the hydrocarbons issue, again.  Baby oil,
perhaps that would be good.

How about mineral spirits?  That is not oil based, is it?
Signature

Jim in NC

Terence Lynock (MSW) - 14 Feb 2007 22:01 GMT
The message <RLKAh.99$Ry.55@newsfe05.lga>
from "Morgans" <jessmorgan@charter.net> contains these words:

> Sewing machine oil would have the hydrocarbons issue, again.  Baby oil,
> perhaps that would be good.

> How about mineral spirits?  That is not oil based, is it?

Hi Jim,
           it would be best to stay away from anything from crude oil
origin I think if using plastics in the system, maybe as you say a
vegetable or mineral oil would be safest for long term use in a system
that may be hard to get at once the airframe is constructed and covered,

                                               regards,                 Terry
Terence Lynock (MSW) - 14 Feb 2007 11:28 GMT
The message <2yuAh.1865$Jl.398@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
from "Six_O'Clock_High" <Six_O'Clock_High@Target_Lock.Guns> contains
these words:

> I have a friend in San Angelo who build a complete hydraulic system (but
> from scratch) for his 19 sized P51's just to go faster than me.  It worked
> very well :(.   He is a machinist.  

Hi,
       I think if you search around salvaging motors and so on from old
VCR's and the like and the amount of ready made fittings on the market
originally meant for other applications but are adaptable then you can
cut the need for machining capability down to a bare minimum, cylinders
for instance can be fabricated from K&S brass tube using two lengths one
inside the other for strength if needed.
Once I have learned the art of actually getting a model off the foor and
flying it then putting it down again in the same condition it left in I
have a string of plans I want to build from and they will all need
retracts, a Spit F22, Fw Ta152, Supermarine Spiteful/Seafang (the
ultimate laminar flow winged Spit F24), Hawker Fury/Sea Fury and maybe
Bearcat so will experiment on building one-off systems for them from
ready made componants or fabricate my own if nothing is available.
One legacy from my many years of building scale sailing ship models is a
good collection of tools including mini-lathe and lots of other stuff so
will keep you posted as to how things progress, my main aim will be to
keep it as practical and simple as possible so that it is lightweight
and reliable,

                                        best regards,            Terry
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.