Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"One Six Right"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tbriant@hotmail.com - 27 Mar 2007 19:48 GMT
I thought I'd post some information here about our General Aviation
film "One Six Right." If you love planes or aviation of any kind, I
think you'd enjoy our film. {Disregard if not interested.}

Here's a link to our DVD extra that we've posted on YouTube.

"Flight"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_MahVsiQ98

Tony Briant
Marketing Coordinator
"One Six Right"
tony@onesixright.com
www.onesixright.com

For further insight into how One Six Right is positively affecting
General
Aviation, please visit these links:
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Six_Right
5. http://www.apple.com/pro/profiles/terwilliger/
6. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0475994/usercomments?filter=chrono
Ed Forsythe - 27 Mar 2007 21:25 GMT
Beautiful - Thanks!

>I thought I'd post some information here about our General Aviation
> film "One Six Right." If you love planes or aviation of any kind, I
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> 5. http://www.apple.com/pro/profiles/terwilliger/
> 6. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0475994/usercomments?filter=chrono
Ledbetter - 28 Mar 2007 00:16 GMT
I saw this film and recorded it in Hi Def on my DVR.  Absolutely grea
work.

Anyone who has flown Microsoft Flight Simulator will appreciate th
segment on Meigs Field in Chicago.  Now, I start some flights at Va
Nuys.

Hats off

--
Ledbette
Doug McLaren - 28 Mar 2007 15:23 GMT
| I thought I'd post some information here about our General Aviation
| film "One Six Right." If you love planes or aviation of any kind, I
| think you'd enjoy our film. {Disregard if not interested.}

You need to be very careful here, Tony ...

Yes, this newsgroup deals with airplanes.  And yes, many of it's
readers are probably interested in general aviation, and so they may
be interested in your documentary as well.

However, your post still has little to do with *model* airplanes, and
so it's still off-topic.  And commercial in nature to boot, though
this group isn't particularly hostile to commercial posts when done
properly (some groups are much, much worse.)

And `disregard if not interested' tells us that you know your post
doesn't belong here, and decided to post it anyways.  Spam of all
sorts often has phrases like this in it in the hopes that it'll prompt
a few people to not complain about it.  You may think saying this
helps excuse an off-topic post?  It doesn't.  In fact, it makes it
worse, for the reason I just gave.

I see you posted to rec.models.scale and rec.models.rockets too --
your post is even further from on-topic on those groups.

On the bright side, many group regulars probably are interested (it's
been mentioned here by group regulars already, after all.)  And you
didn't try to be a shill and tell us about this `great new video you
just happened to find' ... honesty is a good thing.  And you only seem
to have posted to three groups (so far?), so obviously you're not
spamming all of Usenet.

In any event, I think you got away with it this time (at least in this
group -- I've no idea about the other two groups), but you need to be
very careful when advertising on Usenet -- it can backfire *very*
quickly, and even a small Usenet or email advertising `campaign' can
turn into all sorts of bad publicity and cause all sorts of problems.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
`Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.'
[Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.]

Ed Forsythe - 28 Mar 2007 21:25 GMT
C'mon Doug,
"..you need to be very careful here." sounds like a warning you have no
right to send. IMHO, we are all pilots and probably interested in all
aspects of aviation otherwise we wouldn't be involved in the hobby.
While OT may have been included in the subject line, I don't think it's a
big deal. I enjoyed the info because it stirred the juices and was
beautifully done.  There is a great deal of flexibility in Usenet and it's
there because we, the users, want it there. What we don't need/want is self
appointed moderators - no flame intended just a statement of my opinion.
Enjoy life instead of critiquing it!
Tallyho!,
Ed F.

> | I thought I'd post some information here about our General Aviation
> | film "One Six Right." If you love planes or aviation of any kind, I
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> quickly, and even a small Usenet or email advertising `campaign' can
> turn into all sorts of bad publicity and cause all sorts of problems.
Doug McLaren - 28 Mar 2007 22:33 GMT
| C'mon Doug, "..you need to be very careful here." sounds like a
| warning you have no right to send.

I disagree.  I'm doing Tony a favor, warning him of the danger.
Everything I said was true and appropriate.

| IMHO, we are all pilots and probably interested in all aspects of
| aviation otherwise we wouldn't be involved in the hobby.

Yes, many people who are interested in models are also interested in
general aviation.  That doesn't mean stuff related to GA (and not
models) should be posted here -- the GA groups are over there ---->

And rec.models.rc.air was the group that he posted to that was
*closest* to on-topic ...

We're *not* all pilots.  rec.models.scale and rec.models.rockets (the
other groups he posted to) are probably full of people who aren't
pilots.  (Are people who fly rockets called pilots?)

| While OT may have been included in the subject line, I don't think it's a
| big deal.

Well, I think it could become a big deal if he continues.  You have no
more right to say it's not a big deal than I do to warn him of the
dangers.

As for OT, it just tells us that you know your post doesn't belong
here, and yet you posted it anyways.  It's a little better if you're a
regular in the group in question, but Tony isn't even that.

| There is a great deal of flexibility in Usenet and it's
| there because we, the users, want it there.

And if the Users don't want it there, they will retaliate.  He posted
to three unrelated newsgroups, and he doesn't appear to ever have
posted to Usenet before (at least not under that name or address.)

It often starts out like that - a company (or just a salesman) posts
an advertisement to a few groups that are maybe marginally
appropriate, nobody complains, and so then they post to hundreds of
groups, totally unrelated groups -- then people complain.  In large
numbers.  The company gets a reputation for spamming ...

He even used (probably unintentionally) spammer words -- `Disregard if
not interested'.  Yes, all the spammers would like us to disregard
their spam if we're not interested -- they'd much prefer that to us
actually complaining about it.

I don't think his intent was to get labeled as a spammer, so I felt it
was important to warn him that it could very easily happen.

| What we don't need/want is self appointed moderators

Now who's being the self appointed moderator?  I warned Tony (via
email too, because I'll bet he doesn't read this group) that here be
dragons (and not specifically on this group) but now you're telling me
that I `have no right to send' that ?  Nuh-uh.

I never told him he can't or even shouldn't post.  I told him to be
careful.  And he should.

| Enjoy life instead of critiquing it!

What if you enjoy critiquing life?

Quit trying to moderate the group.  It's not going to work.  Instead,
go out and fly.  Here in Austin, TX it's partly cloudy with 20 mph SE
winds -- just the thing for sloping at Mansfield dam.  I even have my
plane in the car, ready to go, but work was too busy to sneak away
... argh!

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
Computers make it easy to do alot of things, but most of the things
that make it easier to do don't need to be done. -- Andy Rooney

Ron - 29 Mar 2007 04:46 GMT
Actually, I believe you will find many RC flyers also fly full size
aircraft.  For instance, in our local group of 12  rc helicopter
flyers, six of us also fly full size fixed wing and two fly full size
helicopters.  The pilot group varies from an ATP who flies left seat
for a major airline to people like me who thrash about the sky in
Wichita spam cans.  All of us enjoy the art of flying whether rc or
real, and while the original post *was* out of the topic of rc models,
it did relate to our common  interest in flying.  

Ron Kelley

>| I thought I'd post some information here about our General Aviation
>| film "One Six Right." If you love planes or aviation of any kind, I
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>quickly, and even a small Usenet or email advertising `campaign' can
>turn into all sorts of bad publicity and cause all sorts of problems.
Doug McLaren - 29 Mar 2007 05:30 GMT
| Actually, I believe you will find many RC flyers also fly full size
| aircraft.

Of course.  Did I imply something else?  If so, that was not my
intent.

And many of us tinker in ham radio -- so let's post here about some
new VHF rig!

And many of us live in houses, so let's post here about home repair.

Most of us have cars, so let's post here about the newest cars.

Many of us live in the US, so let's complain about (or praise) the
government here.  The rest of us live somewhere else, so let's
complain about (or praise) their governments too.

And most of us are male, so let's post here about some new penis
enhancement pill ...

(Though really, nothing enhances your penis like a plane with a 10+
foot wing span.  (Or a 10" wing span -- bigger isn't always better.)
Or a turbine jet that goes 200 mph.  `Yeah, he's compensating for
something ...')

| and while the original post *was* out of the topic of rc models,
| it did relate to our common  interest in flying.  

Don't forget -- he also posted to rec.models.rockets and
rec.models.scale.  Not everybody who makes car models is into flying ...

I really wasn't looking to crucify the guy (and so I didn't), and
you're right -- many people on this newsgroup are probably interested,
but I did want to let him know that he could easily get in trouble if
he continued to advertise his DVD like that.

Looks like I don't have a whole lot of support in suggesting that his
posts were inappropriate, however.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us       He who laughs last didn't get the joke.

MJKolodziej - 29 Mar 2007 05:45 GMT
> | Actually, I believe you will find many RC flyers also fly full size
> | aircraft.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> Looks like I don't have a whole lot of support in suggesting that his
> posts were inappropriate, however.

No, but if your post was to inform the OP of the danger in what he was doing
then you were on spot.  What you said very well may have happened.  If his
vid was crap(it was cool) he may have gone down in flames.
:)
mk
Ed Forsythe - 29 Mar 2007 17:09 GMT
OK Doug,
We may not agree with what you say but *you* will defend to the death your
right to say it <VBG>
Tallyho - Ed.

> | Actually, I believe you will find many RC flyers also fly full size
> | aircraft.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> Looks like I don't have a whole lot of support in suggesting that his
> posts were inappropriate, however.
David Hopper - 30 Mar 2007 01:03 GMT
>I thought I'd post some information here about our General Aviation
>film "One Six Right." If you love planes or aviation of any kind, I
>think you'd enjoy our film. {Disregard if not interested.}

This was also mentioned in a post back in the middle of December which
is where I first heard about the DVD. I'm glad I did and got a copy
for my Dad for Christmas..

David
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.