Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / April 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Spektrum or Futaba 2.4 gh radio?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BCRandy - 25 Apr 2007 13:11 GMT
Before I invest in my f1rst radio system, I would appreciate
some input.  I am a beginner, and, at 62, don't see myself
going beyond sport flying.  My plan is to start with slow,
park fliers.  Perhaps later I might move up in size and
performance, but for car space reasons, to no more than a
.40 size aircraft.  I also want to use the TX with the G3
simulator.  I have definitely decided on a 2.4 gh system.
There are three available:

The new Futaba radio at $219.99....
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&W=001314955&I=LXPZT8&P=K

The DX-6 park flier system from Spektrum at $199.99
http://www.spektrumrc.com/Articles/Article.aspx?ArticleID=1535

The DX-7 system from Spektrum at $399.99
http://www.spektrumrc.com/Articles/Article.aspx?ArticleID=1624&Page=1

My questions are:
1. What are the key differences between the Futaba and the
DX-7?
2.  In a full sized radio, is the DX-7 worth the extra $
compared to Futaba?
3.  With the proper servos, is there adequate range to the
DX-6 to safely sport fly a .40 sized airplane?

TIA
Doug McLaren - 25 Apr 2007 13:39 GMT
| I also want to use the TX with the G3 simulator.

G3 comes with a perfectly fine controller of it's own -- you don't
need to pick a radio that is compatible with it, though they can all
be made to work.

| The DX-7 system from Spektrum at $399.99
| http://www.spektrumrc.com/Articles/Article.aspx?ArticleID=1624&Page=1

Actually, it's $350 rather than $400.

| My questions are:
| 1. What are the key differences between the Futaba and the
| DX-7?

Well, they work differently internally.

The DX7 has a lot more computer radio features than the Futaba -- more
mixing, better display, etc.

The DX7 comes with digital servos.  The FASST system comes with none.

The DX7 has more channels (7 vs 6) though you probably won't need all
of them.

| 2.  In a full sized radio, is the DX-7 worth the extra $
| compared to Futaba?

Depends on if you need the extra computer radio features.  You might
not for your first plane, but your second might.

| 3.  With the proper servos, is there adequate range to the
| DX-6 to safely sport fly a .40 sized airplane?

Spektrum says no.  Though it's not just about range -- they're also
worried that the big engine could block the signal even if the plane
isn't too far away.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us            Many are cold, but few are frozen.

Harry Kolomyjec - 25 Apr 2007 14:56 GMT
> | I also want to use the TX with the G3 simulator.
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> worried that the big engine could block the signal even if the plane
> isn't too far away.

One other point to consider is that the DX7 (which is down to $339 at
Horizon now.)
needs two receivers tied together, but Futaba advertises their system only
uses one.
Horace Hagen - 25 Apr 2007 15:22 GMT
>> | I also want to use the TX with the G3 simulator.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> needs two receivers tied together, but Futaba advertises their system only
> uses one.

I own a DX7 and to me the two outstanding features are "Model Match"
and "Servo Sync", in that order. Nearly everyone who has a computer radio
will attest to at least once
having chosen the wrong model on their transmitter and consequently crashed
or seriously damaged their model. Servo Sync is extremely useful for R/C
helicopters
employing Collective/Cyclic/Pitch/Mixing (CCPM).
Bob Bauer - 25 Apr 2007 15:28 GMT
One thing to remember is: you are restricted to "only the brand and type
receiver that comes with the system"  You will not be able to purchase and
use a Hitec receiver with a Futaba. The receivers are quite a bit more
expensive than standard ones.

>> | I also want to use the TX with the G3 simulator.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> needs two receivers tied together, but Futaba advertises their system only
> uses one.
Doug McLaren - 25 Apr 2007 16:46 GMT
| One thing to remember is: you are restricted to "only the brand and type
| receiver that comes with the system"  You will not be able to purchase and
| use a Hitec receiver with a Futaba.

(I'll assume that you're talking about spread spectrum gear.  And if
so, you're correct.)

| The receivers are quite a bit more expensive than standard ones.

Not that much.

Spead spectrum :

Spektrum AR7000 = 7 channel, $100.
Spektrum AR6100 = 6 channel, park flier, $50.
Futaba R606FS = 6 channel, $90
XPS 6 ch park flier = $60
XPS 8 ch            = $100

72 Mhz :

Hitec Fusion  = 9 channel, synthesized, $100
Futaba R148DF = 8 channel, crystal, $100
Futaba R148DP = 8 channel, PCM, crystal, $130
Futaba 146iP = 6 channel, PCM, crystal, park flier, $80
Futaba R319DPS = 9 channel, PCM, synthesized, $180
Hitec Electron 6 = 6 channel, crystal, $55
Multiplex Mini DS IPD = 9 channel, synthesized, $93
Hitec HFS-05MS = 5 channel, crystal, park flier = $30

Considering that all of the spread spectrum gear basically has the
same features of PCM receivers, and doesn't need to mess with crystals
at all (so you probably should compare to synthesized receivers), the
price difference really isn't that big once you stop looking at the
low end receivers.

For example, the Futaba RX generally meant for 0.40 sized glow planes
is the 148DF, at $100.  To be fair, you can same some money by getting
a Hitec RX, but not that much.

The SS gear is way cheaper than synthesized PCM gear.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
After their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to
suspect Hungry.

Doug McLaren - 25 Apr 2007 15:47 GMT
| One other point to consider is that the DX7 (which is down to $339 at
| Horizon now.)

Where?  http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=SPM2710
still says $349.99.

Oh, I see --
http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=SPM2720 is
$339.99, but that's with mini non digital servos and the park flier
RX.

| needs two receivers tied together, but Futaba advertises their system only
| uses one.

The Spektrum AR7000 RX is tiny, even when all combined.  The pictures
make it look big, but if you look at it, it's tiny.  13 grams total.

The Futaba R606FS RX (which comes with the FASST 6EX) is 10 grams.

For a park flier, you can get the AR6100 for the DX7 and it's only
3.5 g.

For comparison, Futaba's venerable (and discontinued) R127DF RX is 40
grams.

Considering that the original poster wants a 0.40 sized plane, I don't
think 3 extra grams from the AR7000 would really be a problem.

Signature

Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us
EARTH FIRST!  We'll mine the other planets later.

Charles & Peggy Robinson - 26 Apr 2007 05:27 GMT
I have been kicking this around lately.  I'm an Electronics Tech and
Engineering Tech ( Elect) for lots of years.  I've been keeping an eye
on the various SS technologies available.

  Futaba's system is a frequency-hopper.  IOW, it changes frequencies
within the band to establsh the link between Tx and Rx.  This probably
increases the latency. (time between when you move the stick and when
the servo moves), but no big deal.  Futaba's radio has two antennae,
located perpendicular to one another and separated a bit. Futaba has
only one Rx on the market announced.  My take is that they're rushing to
catch up.

  Spectum started out with a park flyer system with limited range;
probably because of Tx low power output and a short antenna that could
be masked by masses in the model, at long range.  The new DX7 Spectrum
radios transmits on two freqs in the band and use two Rx & antenaes to
get frequency redundancy.

 Futaba sells the Tx and Rx for $210.  Spectrum Sells the Tx, RX,
servos, switch, battery and servos for $350.

  It depends on what you want.

   CR

.

> Before I invest in my f1rst radio system, I would appreciate
> some input.  I am a beginner, and, at 62, don't see myself
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> TIA
Ed Cregger - 26 Apr 2007 07:15 GMT
>  I have been kicking this around lately.  I'm an Electronics Tech and
> Engineering Tech ( Elect) for lots of years.  I've been keeping an eye on
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>    CR
BCRandy - 26 Apr 2007 13:47 GMT
Very helpful responses - thanks to all.  I'm going to go
with the DX-7 - it has more features and offers more
flexibility in the long run and, as pointed out, the cost
isn't really that different.  I'll pick up the small RX for
my park flyer.

One final question....  Can different brands and models of
servos be used with the DX-7?  I don't see why not, but
would like a little reassurance.

>>  I have been kicking this around lately.  I'm an
>> Electronics Tech and Engineering Tech ( Elect) for lots
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>
>>    CR
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 26 Apr 2007 13:53 GMT
>One final question....  Can different brands and models of
>servos be used with the DX-7?  I don't see why not, but
>would like a little reassurance.

So far, yes.  Once the RX decodes the TX output, the
communication with the servos follows the industry
standard.  

You may already be familiar with the differences
between the plastic housings on the servo leads
(Futaba, JR, Airtronics).  I think there has been
a move to the "Z connector" (based on the JR
design?) which makes it easier to mix brands of
servos without having to modify the housings.

                Marty
Signature

Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See http://www.big-8.org for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.

G-Dawg - 27 Apr 2007 02:52 GMT
Go for the AR6100 instead of the AR6000... It is DSM2 capable (the latest
Spektrum), and it is nice and small. However, AR6000 works with both DX6 and
DX7. AR6100 is DX7 only.

> Very helpful responses - thanks to all.  I'm going to go with the DX-7 -
> it has more features and offers more flexibility in the long run and, as
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>>
>>>    CR
PCPhill - 27 Apr 2007 03:45 GMT
I'm down at SEFF this week and there are many DX7s, DX6s, and even a few of
the Xtreme Links systems in evidence.  I'm flying my DX7 with all three RX
models(Ar6000,6100,7000) with no problems, on everything from a Slow Stick,
Sr. Telemaster, and a LMR Electric Glider.  I've had the glider close to
specked out with no problems...

PCPhill

> Go for the AR6100 instead of the AR6000... It is DSM2 capable (the latest
> Spektrum), and it is nice and small. However, AR6000 works with both DX6
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>>>
>>>>    CR
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.