Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hobico Superstar EP Servo Torque requirement ??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mjohn@twmi.rr.com - 23 Aug 2007 13:58 GMT
Hello
I just purchased the Hobico Superstar EP  kit, 48 " wing with Ailerons
less Radio & Servos
I have Hitec servos HS-80 servos with 36 oz. in torque per specs.
From the data on RTF Model , it appears to have Fatuba servos S-3003
with  44 oz. in. torque.
Will my servos provide adequate torque ?

Thanks
The Natural Philosopher - 23 Aug 2007 14:06 GMT
> Hello
> I just purchased the Hobico Superstar EP  kit, 48 " wing with Ailerons
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Thanks
they will be fine.

Ive used micro servos in 48" stuff.
Mark Miller - 24 Aug 2007 01:26 GMT
mjohn@twmi.rr.com wrote in news:5p0rc35cql8927vn6udvqm5snpgjl7f3m8@
4ax.com:

> Hello
> I just purchased the Hobico Superstar EP  kit, 48 " wing with Ailerons
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Thanks

Without going through the math (and sometimes I actually do go through
the math), 36 oz-in should be plenty.  Generally, "standard" servos (like
the S3003) are considered appropriate for .46-sized planes, which usually
weigh 5+ lb with ~1.5 hp.  

For the Superstar EP, it's a 3 lb airplane that's probably underpowered
with the stock motor (compared to a standard .46 trainer).  That would
suggest that 25 oz-in would be sufficient.

Of course, it's better to have a too much servo than to have too little.

Now that I've said all that - standard servos are cheap ($9 at Tower for
Hitec or Cirrus), and the socket in the wing is probably sized for one,
so it may be easier to just go that route.

Beyond all *that* - Might wanna wade through the discussion on RCGroups.  
Here's one of them:  http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=
311392

I didn't read through it to see if anyone talks about servo sizing, but
someone probably did.  

Since the thread is a few years old, the brushless motors weren't so
widely available and Li batteries were much more expensive.  Don't know
if you're planning to use the stock power system or not, but . . .

Signature

"Whatever will have been, will have been."

- Douglas Adams, "Life, The Universe, and Everything"

Milt - 24 Aug 2007 18:09 GMT
>mjohn@twmi.rr.com wrote in news:5p0rc35cql8927vn6udvqm5snpgjl7f3m8@
>4ax.com:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>widely available and Li batteries were much more expensive.  Don't know
>if you're planning to use the stock power system or not, but . . .

Mark

Thanks for detailed info.
The  http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=  pages look
good.
From your knowledge, is it a good cite, relative free of spam ?

Thanks ,again ,for input.

If the plane handles OK, as is, with no quirks,  i will probably
upgrade power.
With all the free bees etc., I got it cheap enough- only paid $79 & I
am happy with quality of what I see.

Milt
Mark Miller - 24 Aug 2007 21:43 GMT
> Mark
>
> Thanks for detailed info.
> The  http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=  pages look
> good.
> From your knowledge, is it a good cite, relative free of spam ?

I've certainly found a lot of useful info on RCGroups & RCUniverse; in
some forums, there are manufacturers posting information, but AFAIK, the
manufacturers always identify themselves.  If you're new to the hobby,
then bear in mind that the people who post to those forums (fora?  
whatever the plural is) aren't gods; some know what they're talking about
and some don't.  But it's always interesting to see what problems they
had when working on the same plane, and what hardware choices they made,
what mods they tried, etc.  

> Thanks ,again ,for input.
>
> If the plane handles OK, as is, with no quirks,  i will probably
> upgrade power.

That sounds reasonable.  

Signature

"Whatever will have been, will have been."

- Douglas Adams, "Life, The Universe, and Everything"

lipston@west.tt.com - 25 Aug 2007 00:57 GMT
>mjohn@twmi.rr.com wrote in news:5p0rc35cql8927vn6udvqm5snpgjl7f3m8@
>4ax.com:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>widely available and Li batteries were much more expensive.  Don't know
>if you're planning to use the stock power system or not, but . . .

Thanks for detailed info.
The  RCGroups looks good.
From your knowledge is it a reliable cite relative free of spam ?

Thanks ,again ,for input.
If the plane handles OK, as is, with no quirks,  i will probably
upgrade power.
With all the free bees etc., I got it cheap enough- only paid $79 & I
am happy with quality of what I see.
Joe
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.