Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

noob Q: does torque make aircraft bank more readily one way vs. another?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
walter - 28 Aug 2007 01:11 GMT
my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.

same plane. same radio.  same thumbs.  my right turns are really bad.
poorly coordinated, blah, blah, blah.

does the torque from the prop have anything to do with this?  or do i
just need to practice more right turns?

w
Ted Campanelli - 28 Aug 2007 03:06 GMT
Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these great (and sometimes not
so great) words of knowledge:
> my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> w

You need to practice more right turns.  The torque (or "P" factor) only
comes into play on take off.  Once you are flying any torque is not
noticeable.   This is presuming you have a single engine plane - twins
are another story altogether where the torque does factor in, especially
if the engines are not in sync or one engine dies.
The Natural Philosopher - 28 Aug 2007 12:17 GMT
> Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these great (and sometimes not
> so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> You need to practice more right turns.  The torque (or "P" factor) only
> comes into play on take off.

P factor is not torque. Its gyroscopic precession.

Torque maintains its effect throughout flight.

> Once you are flying any torque is not
> noticeable.  

It bloody well is if you slow down..

> This is presuming you have a single engine plane - twins
> are another story altogether where the torque does factor in, especially
> if the engines are not in sync or one engine dies.

"When the blind leads the blind, they both shall end up in the ditch."
Ralph Jones - 28 Aug 2007 19:04 GMT
>> Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these great (and sometimes not
>> so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>P factor is not torque. Its gyroscopic precession.

Ummm, no. P factor is an offset of the effective thrust line that
occurs at high angles of attack, when the descending prop blade is at
a higher AOA, and therefore develops more thrust, than the ascending
blade. It's why a taildragger wants to turn left early in the takeoff
roll.

Gyroscopic precession exists only when the orientation of the prop
axis is changing: i.e., when the airplane is rotating in pitch and/or
yaw. It occurs as you raise the tail, and ends when that pitch motion
stops. In light airplanes it's hardly noticeable because it starts
just as the P factor is going away -- if there were no gyro precession
and the P factor lasted just a bit longer, it would feel the same to
the pilot.

rj
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 29 Aug 2007 15:19 GMT
> > Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these great (and sometimes not
> > so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> "When the blind leads the blind, they both shall end up in the ditch."

         Four factors that pull an airplane to the left on takeoff:
1.Torque. The torque reaction of the prop rotates the fuselage the
other way, putting more weight on the left wheel and increasing its
drag.
2. Gyroscopic precession, notable when the tail is raised and in
turns.
3. P-factor, the assymetric thrust when the engine's axis is tilted
higher than the airplane's flight path so that the downgoing blade's
AOA is higher and the thrust is offset to that side. Noted in takeoff,
climb and slow flight.
4. The swirling prop blast that strikes the fin on the left side and
pushes the tail right. Noted at low speeds and higher power settings.
The air coming off the prop has an angular component to it, a result
of the drag of the prop blade.

         All from flight training textbooks.

           Dan
The Natural Philosopher - 30 Aug 2007 10:47 GMT
>>> Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these great (and sometimes not
>>> so great) words of knowledge:
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> The air coming off the prop has an angular component to it, a result
> of the drag of the prop blade.

1 and 4 are components of the same thing really.

the 'spirality' of the airstraam implies a torque moment. Any bits of
the aircraft that straighten the 'spirality' out introduce a reverse torque.

>           All from flight training textbooks.
>
>             Dan
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 28 Aug 2007 03:36 GMT
> my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> w

       Engine torque makes too little difference. It's the gyroscopic
precession generated by the propeller in the turn that makes the right
turn more difficult. In a left turn the precession helps keep the nose
up; in the right turn it pulls it down, and more back pressure is
needed. And if you are a bit clumsy with the rudder, the turn won't be
constant and neither will the precession forces, and you'll be all
over the sky.

         Dan
Ed Cregger - 28 Aug 2007 08:48 GMT
>> my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>           Dan

Dan nailed it perfectly.

During left turns, the nose rises (with a counter clockwise rotating
prop viewed from the front). With the same prop rotating in the same
direction, the nose will tend to drop during right turns, making the
pilot carry a bit more of "up" elevator in the right turn than in the
left turn.

Ed Cregger
The Natural Philosopher - 28 Aug 2007 12:18 GMT
>> my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>           Dan

Gyroscopic precession is not generally an effect you notice unless its a
VERY high powered machine.

Torque is very noticeable particularly with large diameter propellors
(D>25% of span)
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 29 Aug 2007 15:14 GMT
> Dan_Thomas_nos...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Torque is very noticeable particularly with large diameter propellors
> (D>25% of span)

          Gyroscopic precession shows up in all full-scale airplanes,
even in those low-powered machines with wooden props turning rather
slowly. It's a factor in steep turns as well as any rapid pitch
changes. In a model with a light prop but with the much higher RPM it
WILL be a factor. Even the engine's rotating mass will have its
effect.

          Dan
The Natural Philosopher - 30 Aug 2007 10:44 GMT
>> Dan_Thomas_nos...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>> my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>            Dan

It has an effect, but not as much as the torque....although it depends
on the way the model is set up. I fly a lt of small electrics, and
mostly they are large diameter slow revving stuff. Those are
monumentally subject to torque..a full power on stall will always flip
the left wing down..

OTOH a smaller model with a huge brushed motor and loads of power into a
small prop showed none of that, but curiously in turbulent weather, it
would 'wag its tail' over the bumps. I eventually worked out that the
rapid pitch changes were introducing yaw due to precession..
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 30 Aug 2007 14:50 GMT
> Dan_Thomas_nos...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> Dan_Thomas_nos...@yahoo.com wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> monumentally subject to torque..a full power on stall will always flip
> the left wing down..

          There's another cause for that wing-drop. The air coming
off the prop is angled upward on the left, downward on the right, and
this changes the angle of attack at the wing roots. The left side has
a higher AOA than the right, and the stall starts sooner o that side.
Even full-scale, relatively underpowered airplanes will do that. It's
called a departure stall and gives new students the willies when we
demonstrate it.

         Dan
walter - 28 Aug 2007 15:49 GMT
bingo!  the nose drops when i turn right.  and, yes, i am all over the
sky!  ;-)

i'm getting better, though...practice, practice, practice.

w

On Aug 27, 10:36 pm, Dan_Thomas_nos...@yahoo.com wrote:
>         Engine torque makes too little difference. It's the gyroscopic
> precession generated by the propeller in the turn that makes the right
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> constant and neither will the precession forces, and you'll be all
> over the sky.
Bob Cowell - 28 Aug 2007 15:09 GMT
>my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>does the torque from the prop have anything to do with this?  or do i
>just need to practice more right turns?

I never worried about exactly "WHY" right hand turns are different than left
hand turns,  I know that there is a difference,  but trained my thumbs to
compensate for the difference without thinking about it.

Whatever you do,  do NOT think of right hand turns as being "harder" than left
hand turns,  different, yes,  but not harder.

My instructor when I learned to fly, taught me that the two were different,  and
I have never had a problem with the right hand turn.

Over the years, I have seen an amazing number of RC pilots who can not or will
not set up and land in a right hand pattern, They are intimidated by a right
hand turn on final, and will resort to doing a "fishhook" approach so the last
turn can be to the left,  I even saw a "hot-shot" who could hover his plane
ad-nauseam, but could NOT do a right hand turn to land.
He walked across the active runway, faced into the setting sun, and landed his
plane (from his left) all to avoid doing a right hand turn on final.
Six_O'Clock_High - 28 Aug 2007 20:13 GMT
>>my left turns are good.  smooth.  well coordinated.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> his
> plane (from his left) all to avoid doing a right hand turn on final.

UGH!

In most cases those fishhook turns wind up with the aircraft being behind
the flight line and *I* really really really hate that.

This is one reason I use the horizontal figure 8 in training.  Hard to do
with turns only one way...

Jim
AMA 1428
Bob Cowell - 29 Aug 2007 14:44 GMT
>UGH!
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>This is one reason I use the horizontal figure 8 in training.  Hard to do
>with turns only one way...

It makes me shudder just thinking about it.
I don't venture out into the airplanes space,  and I really don't like it when
the airplanes come into MY space either.

My instructor made me do left hand approaches, right hand approaches, figure 8
patterns,
AND
obstacle avoidance,
The field where I started had a TALL chain link fence topped with 3 strands of
barbed wire about 20 feet from the end of the runway,
as a bonus feature,  there was an old dragline type crane whose usual parking
space was about 50 feet on the other side of the fence and more or less in line
with the runway.
never bothered me,  because my instructor refused to let it bother him.

A good instructor is worth his weight in gold.
he will NOT let you slide by with poor performance,  he will make you learn to
fly.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.