To my understanding, OS made 2 versions of this engine. The Gemini and the
Gemini II, both now out of production. Can anyone explain the differences
between these two.
TIA
Seems to me the early version had a weak spot in the shaft/crankpin area????
I've only had the Gemini II, but it's still a sweet engine!
Cheers -- Lyman
"On so-called global warming or climate change, let us not scare ourselves
with catastrophic forecasts, or use them to defend and promote irrational
interventions in human lives."
> To my understanding, OS made 2 versions of this engine. The Gemini and the
> Gemini II, both now out of production. Can anyone explain the differences
> between these two.
> TIA
A.T. - 27 Jan 2008 09:29 GMT
Correct; the Gemini ll was a detuned 160 with big performance differences.
Hard to imagine any of the first FT-120 are still running as crankshafts
have been unavailable for past 5-6 years.
FWIW extract from my post to this n/group 03Aug99
OS Four stroke ratings =
FT-120 = .86kw or 1.2ps (difference between ps and hp is minute)
FT-120 11 = 1.32kw or 1.8ps ==significantly improved==
FT-160 = 1.47kw or 2.0ps
FT-240 = 2.87kw or 3.9ps
FS-120 111 = 2.1ps
FS-90 = .96 or 1.3ps
FS-91 = 1.6ps
Regards
Alan T.
Alan's Hobby Model & RC FAQ Web Links
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~atong
> Seems to me the early version had a weak spot in the shaft/crankpin
> area???? I've only had the Gemini II, but it's still a sweet engine!
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> differences between these two.
>> TIA