>I have to admit that I snorted and guffawed when I first saw your suggestion
>of using a kite or helium balloon.
The gang who sent me to Fiji and New Zealand in 2003 to look
for the bones of a person who died on Gardner Island before
1940 used Kite Aerial Photography with some success on their
2007 expedition to Gardner (now Nikumaroro). I've seen
the results, but I can't find any photos on the group's
main site:
http://www.tighar.org
>However, now that I think of it, the
>balloon needs absolutely zero pilot skill to control and cannot be "shot
>down" via RF interference.
It sounded crazy to me, too--but then I googled it
and found a few hits. People do strange and wonderful
things. ;o)
>I don't care much for the kite idea because it depends on wind, blowing at a
>given speed and probably from a favorable position. It also requires some
>piloting skill.
Yes. There's no free lunch with any of these approaches.
>The helium balloon may be perfect for some situations. The camera module
>will need to be gyro stabilized, but that is doable, low tech and should be
>relatively inexpensive.
>You've proved your justification for your Doctorate, friend Marty.
Thanks for the vote of confidence, Ed!
Marty

Signature
Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See http://www.big-8.org for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.
> ----------------
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Ed Cregger
One thing with helium balloons; I used an 80" weather baloon (tethered) to
launch wire antennas for amateur radio events. It works well as long as
their's no wind. I tied a Sony Hi8 camcorder to a couple of balloons later
on. I needed more than one balloon to carry the load. Problem with the wind
was that I added balloons for the heavier load, and the multiple balloons
created more wind drag. It was still a fun project.

Signature
Smitty
Somerset, PA