Super Tigre Carb Tuning
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ted - 30 Jun 2008 23:57 GMT I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the low end and high end before you get it just right. I recall reading somewhere that the position of the spray bar is very critical as well. Has anyone also heard of this? And what position would be ideal? Most engines like it pointed straight down but I seem to think the STs prefer a little upward thrust of the spray so if you are looking from the needle valve side it would be pointed around 4 o'clock. Any thoughts or experience on this? Many thanks.
Ted
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 01 Jul 2008 00:32 GMT >I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I >have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >the needle valve side it would be pointed around 4 o'clock. Any >thoughts or experience on this? Many thanks. I have no personal experience of tuning an ST.
Their web site (and many other people who have posted here since 1995) recommends that the hole in the spraybar be straight down:
http://www.supertigre.com/faq/product-faq.html
As often happens with tuning, people disagree about what works and what doesn't work. In my view, you should feel free to experiment and report your results here so that the peanut gallery can learn from your mistakes. :o)
Marty
 Signature Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.* See http://www.big-8.org for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.
Ed Cregger - 02 Jul 2008 12:31 GMT >>I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I >>have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Marty -------------
Many folks, because of previous exposure to OS "no break-in" engines, attempt to fine tune and fly a Super Tigre engine long before it is ready to be put into service. These are the folks that end up complaining about those miserable ST carburetors.
Marketing will not mention just how long an ST engine needs to be broken-in because of a possible loss of sales, so they let their customers bumble around making confetti of their models because of an improper break-in regime. All marketing cares about is profit. Not their customers' well being or enjoyment of their purchase.
Super Tigre engines are fine engines, but none of them come ready to fly right out of the box, like OS. Trying to break-in an ST engine in the air, unless it is ABC, is pretty much a waste of time and nearly a sure bet to destroy your model, unless you are very experienced and are accustomed to deadsticks and their requisite landings.
This does not make ST engines a bad buy. It simply means that one has to learn something new and employ a test stand for break-in. Once accomplished, an ST engine will last many decades of fairly rigorous use. Not done properly, the engine can be ruined in no time flat.
Once the engine is broken-in, the carb that comes with ST engines suddenly changes into a pussycat to adjust and operate. Surprise!
Ed Cregger
Bob Cowell - 02 Jul 2008 16:31 GMT >------------- > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >Once the engine is broken-in, the carb that comes with ST engines suddenly >changes into a pussycat to adjust and operate. Surprise!
>Ed Cregger Ed:
In your estimation, Does this apply equally to the new oriental ST engines as to the older ones Italian manufacture?
bob
MJKolodziej - 02 Jul 2008 18:59 GMT >>------------- >> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > bob I'm not Ed but I concur with what he said and I have a newer ST45 and it took some breaking in and now is much better. mk
Ed Cregger - 02 Jul 2008 20:28 GMT >>------------- >> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > bob ------------
Bob, I suspect that the Chinese are making the engines a little better, or they have switched to softer metals, because I have heard that the newer Chinese engines take a little less time to come in on the average. I have no scientific proof of this at all. But lots of folks are reporting, via the web, that the engines, while not as readily broken-in as OS, are better in this respect than they were back in "the old days".
I'm not knocking Italy's Super Tigre's efforts either. CNC machinery hasn't been around all that long, so the Italians may not have been set up as well in this regard as the current Chinese manufacturers.
These are simply my impressions and nothing more.
Ed Cregger
MJKolodziej - 02 Jul 2008 21:43 GMT >>>------------- >>> [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > Ed Cregger This last ST45 I bought woud NOT turn over by hand when I got it. I added oil and rotated it without a glow plug until it got better. It's one of the higher RPM ST45s at the club now.(we race 'em) mk
Lyman Slack - 02 Jul 2008 22:21 GMT ED --
Here in Florida we've been running the ST .40s in a Club 40 Pylon Race program, having switched over from the OS .40LA. Most of the racers are running the STs in for a few tankfulls before flying. Other than a few deadsticks, these new engines seem to be OK with an in-fight break-in. Most fly with a smaller prop than what they will race with, and certainly do not run the lean at any time. After a while, no one is having and problems. We supply 15% Cool Power fuel and most of the guys are happy with an OS #8 plug.
Cheers -- \_________Lyman Slack________/ \_______Flying Gators R/C___/ \_____AMA 6430 LM____ / \___Gainesville FL_____/ Visit my Web Site at www.LymanSlack.com
>>>Super Tigre engines are fine engines, but none of them come ready to fly >>>right out of the box, like OS. Trying to break-in an ST engine in the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >>>suddenly >>>changes into a pussycat to adjust and operate. Surprise!
>>>Ed Cregger Ed Cregger - 03 Jul 2008 13:42 GMT > ED -- > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > problems. We supply 15% Cool Power fuel and most of the guys are happy > with an OS #8 plug. ------------------
Running a smaller prop would let the engine run cooler when wide open. That might be helping the situation a bit.
The GS-40 engines that I have seen rev up really well. Frankly, I didn't expect anything nearly as dramatic in power production. They are still one of the best buys in R/C.
Ed Cregger
Jim - 03 Jul 2008 22:41 GMT I have the best luck with "Tiger Fuel" which is lower in nitro and oil than the typical 15% coolpower, etc. fuel. But then I have been running bigger Tiger engines too!
> ED -- > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > >>>>Ed Cregger Ed Cregger - 04 Jul 2008 01:01 GMT >I have the best luck with "Tiger Fuel" which is lower in nitro and oil than >the typical 15% coolpower, etc. fuel. But then I have been running bigger >Tiger engines too! Just don't mistakenly burn it in the smaller engines and tune them the way that most folks do. Smoke city.
Ed Cregger
Jim - 03 Jul 2008 22:40 GMT Makes sense. The Chinese metallurgy ain't that great!
>>>------------- >>> [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > Ed Cregger Mark Eastman - 01 Jul 2008 13:24 GMT > I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I > have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Ted Start with the spray bar straight. It may take a tiny twist later but that is usually your last resort. The most important thing you can do, in particular with the ST51, is switch to an OS-8 glow plug. The ST plugs are basically junk. I fought with my ST51 for months before I came to that simple solution. It simply wouldn't mid-range well. Now it runs great, hardly ever needs adjustment, and starts easily.
Good luck, --Mark
Jim - 03 Jul 2008 22:39 GMT Like you, several years ago I went NUTS trying to get a ST to run right. Here is what I learned the hard way:
DON'T MESS WITH THE SPRAYBAR POSITION FRO THE FACTORY!
The secret to getting an ST to run right is as follows:
1.Start and adjust for high end mixture. Stop engine.
2. Connect a piece of fuel line to the carb that is long enough you can put the other end in your mouth to blow through.
3. CLOSE the idle mixture needle.
4. While blowing into the fuel line, open the idle needle until you can JUST hear air coming through.
5. reconnect fuel line and start engine. Adjust high end needle again.
You are done.
This will normally set up the carb nearly perfectly and allow transition from low to high throttle without the 'stumble'.
Good luck!
>> I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I >> have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Good luck, > --Mark MJKolodziej - 01 Jul 2008 14:59 GMT >I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I > have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Ted A couple of weekends ago we took apart a ST45 carb. Seems to me(<-that was a disclosure about accuracy), the spray bar was at 4 or 5 o;clock when viewing it from the needle end. It looked to be pointing right down the throat of the engine. I have one I could go take apart and look at if ya want? Use an OS #8 mk
M-M - 01 Jul 2008 16:20 GMT > I recall reading > > somewhere that the position of the spray bar is very critical as well. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > throat of the engine. I have one I could go take apart and look at if ya > want? Use an OS #8 ST carb spray bars like to be pointed straight back towards the cylinder head.
 Signature m-m
weedhopper - 01 Jul 2008 15:13 GMT >I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I > have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Ted The spray bar position is considered to be a tuning adjustment also. In my club we would swap the ST carb for an OS. Then they would run like a raped ape.
Morgans - 01 Jul 2008 17:17 GMT >I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I > have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the needle valve side it would be pointed around 4 o'clock. Any > thoughts or experience on this? Many thanks. Is it a true 2 needle carb, and not a high speed needle and air bleed valve?
If the spray bar changes do not do the trick, and it is a two needle carb, you might be able to take a trick from the older Fox engines.
The instructions told the user to modify the profile of the low speed needle to adjust the midrange.
The told you (and they were right) to chuck it into a drill, and turn it fast, and put some sandpaper to it, either on the tip to "dull it" or the "shoulder" where the angle met the full diameter of the shaft.
I think (it has been a while) if the midrange was lean, you sand a small radius on the shoulder. It does not take much, and if you go too far, be prepared to buy a new needle and try again. DAMHIKT! <g>
 Signature Jim in NC
3for3 - 03 Jul 2008 12:20 GMT Hi Ted, My experience with the 5 ST engines that I have owned/own has been varied. I have never experienced that moving the spray bar has made a difference in the performance of the Super Tigre engines. I have also tried placing a brass ferral in the carb throat to decrease the intake diameter with no positive effect. Today I have two G-51 that are three years old and they both misbehave on a regular basis. One is on a Seamaster and I have the low needle at 8 plus turns out to keep the low end and mid transition from going lean. The other G-51 is on a trainer and is always full of surprises. I don't know if these engines are sensitive to barometric pressure or the alignment of the planets. Some days they run very acceptable and other days they are threatening to stall during transitions. I have a G-45 and a 40 (Italian made) that run like clocks with no issues what so ever. I did own ( and now returned to Tower Hobbies with full refund) a 61 size engine that ate three planes.
I see others peoples responses indicate that they need a lot of break-in. If more that three gallons of fuel does not qualify for break-in, then I need to sell these G51's to some unsuspecting person on Ebay and go buy some magnum XLS-46's. I have not replaced my temperamental ST G-51's because I am frugal and I like a dead stick challenge at least twice a week. If I were to purchase new engines I would not purchase a ST again. I own OS, GMS, Magnum, Jett and Weston engines and do not have the trouble that I have with the two G-51's.
On a side thought, maybe the issue with the G-51's are a quality issue with machined surface tolerances and are on the margin of acceptable dimensions. Does anybody know what happens when the crank intake area under the carb opening and the inside wall of the crank case get leaky?
Thanks for reading RCS
>I am having a bit of a problem getting my ST 51 to run smoothly. I > have had STs before so I know you have a delicate balance between the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Ted Ed Cregger - 03 Jul 2008 13:54 GMT > Hi Ted, > My experience with the 5 ST engines that I have owned/own has been varied. [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] >> >> Ted ------------
I'm going to treat this subject as though there are folks reading my response is brand new to the hobby - not you.
The first thing I would do is to compare the ST.51 engines' features to those of the engines you own that run well. Are they ringed? The ST.51 is a ringed engine. Are you using the same glow plugs in all of your good running engines and is this the same type of glow plug that you are using in your G.51 engines? Fuel? Prop sizes for equal and near displacements? Inverted engine installation?
Can you see where I'm going with this? I realize that you have probably already been through this routine, so forgive me for being simplistic, but many times the things that are causing us grief are simplistic.
If your other ST engines are running great and are nearly the same size, might not their carbs switch with your problematic .51 engines? Might be worth a try.
A ringed engine can have quirks in running that are caused by a defective ring, or a defective ring slot in the piston. Changing a ring and inspecting the ring slot/groove is an easy process and is one that might yield an answer to your problem. I can think of nothing about the ST.51 design that is problematic on a regular basis.
I am not telling you that I don't believe you or that you are hallucinating. I believe you. Let's get to the bottom of this. Now it is time for you to answer some of the above questions, if you please.
Ed Cregger
3for3 - 09 Jul 2008 00:39 GMT >> Hi Ted, >> My experience with the 5 ST engines that I have owned/own has been [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] > > Ed Cregger Mr Ed, Hopeflully this information will satisfy your curiosity. I have replaced the stock carb with a perry carb with no improvements. I did replace the ring in one of the two engines with no improvement. I buy plugs a dozen at a time and all of my 2 cycles have the same plug. All of my 2 cycles that I own use the same 15%N 20% synth/castor mix fuel.
I have an 10.5 x 6 on one engine and a 9.5 X6 on the second. These engines were purchased within 6 mos. of each other 3 to 3.5 years ago. I'm done with the one. If you would like, I'll ship it to you. If you fix it, let everyone know what I did not do to get the engine to run satisfactorly.
thanks, rcs
Ed Cregger - 10 Jul 2008 22:13 GMT >>> Hi Ted, >>> My experience with the 5 ST engines that I have owned/own has been [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > thanks, > rcs -------------
There have been a lot of posts through my mind since your original post, so pardon me if I get confused with the particulars of your situation.
All of the props you listed are small for an ST .51, so I assume that you are trying to go really fast with this engine. Frankly, picking a large displacement version of an engine that was built in a smaller engine's crankcase was not the best move. Notice how heavy the Rossi .45 engines are? That's because they carry more metal in their cases, metal that can be removed to form larger bypass passages. The larger bypass passage permits the Rossi to breathe better and produce more power. Usually at a very high rpm. If you read some reviews, you'll notice that folks are not generally as happy with the .53 sized Rossi either and for the same reason as the .51 Tigre. The larger displacement engines should be used to carry more prop and conventional rpm levels and not used for very high rpm engines.
My choice, had I wanted a Super Tigre to go fast in that size range, would have been for the .45 ABC. It would have been a better engine for high rpm operation than the .51.
Sorry if I'm completely disconnected from this thread. Thunderstorms in the area mess with this old man's noggin.
Thanks for the offer of sending it to me. That was nice of you, but I'm very busy with my recording studio (amateur), motorcycle and ham radio. Flying is being relegated to very small glow and electric models these days. Good luck on your next choice of engine.
Ed Cregger
|
|
|