Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / December 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A good RTF elect. for a youth?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MJKolodziej - 16 Dec 2008 16:47 GMT
During Christmas friends always ask me what plane to buy their kids because
they know I fly.  I haven't been playing with or looking at RTF trainers
lately.  A guy wants something durable.  Apparently he's gotten something
that flies in the past that was a waste of money. I try to tell him to bring
him over and put him on a buddy box but they live 50 mi away.
   So, recap your favorite or clue me in on what's new this year.  I'm all
ears.
TIA,
mk
Tim Wescott - 16 Dec 2008 16:55 GMT
> During Christmas friends always ask me what plane to buy their kids
> because they know I fly.  I haven't been playing with or looking at RTF
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> TIA,
> mk

Tell him to go to his local field and get them to train the kid.

Barring that, buy something from someone who sells _all_ the spare parts
(it's been a long time since I looked, too, but I believe that Hobby
Lobby has a couple of trainers that you can just about build from
available spares).

Signature

Tim Wescott
Control systems and communications consulting
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Need to learn how to apply control theory in your embedded system?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" by Tim Wescott
Elsevier/Newnes, http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html

TTman - 16 Dec 2008 17:13 GMT
> During Christmas friends always ask me what plane to buy their kids
> because they know I fly.  I haven't been playing with or looking at RTF
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> TIA,
> mk

One of the multiples trainers- all foam. when it breaks ( and it will) it's
a simple matter to glue back together with cyano and a kicker.Not pretty,
but fast and practical.
DanKMTB - 16 Dec 2008 17:32 GMT
On Dec 16, 11:47 am, "MJKolodziej"
<mjmwcsREMOVEKILLERCH...@htcomp.net> wrote:
> During Christmas friends always ask me what plane to buy their kids because
> they know I fly.  I haven't been playing with or looking at RTF trainers
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> TIA,
> mk

IMO, easiest plane to fly is the Parkzone Micro Citabria.  It’s a
micro, as the name suggests, not sure if that’d be a deal breaker or
not.  Weighs under 1oz, so it doesn’t really carry enough momentum to
do damage when you crash it.  It’s still fun, and can do small stuff.
It’ll loop no problem, fly inverted for a bit, and generally kick
around enough to keep you entertained for a bit.  I know of 4 people,
myself included, who learned to fly on one of these things with no
training and no experience flying anything.  2 of the 4 managed to
break props by not cutting throttle on nose-ins.  ~$2 for a new prop,
2 minute fix with only a small set of needle nose, and you’re back in
the air.  I flew mine without a single repair until I got too cocky on
a windy day and lost it.  Speaking of, whatever they get make sure
they write their name & # on the plane.  These go for $120 new, and
can usually be had for around $80 in good condition on RCG, or a bit
more if they come with some extra batteries (not a bad idea!).  IMO
the biggest downfall to this plane is it’s lack of wind resistance –
being under 1 oz AUW it’s very susceptible to being tossed around by
the wind.  OTOH, if you learn when it’s calm and work your way up it’s
a good way to learn to deal with the wind, and teaches you things that
will translate to handling bigger 3 channel planes in higher winds
when you move up.

Another commonly recommended first plane is the Multiplex Easystar.
People like these because they’re fairly resistant and they’re
pushers.  To me, a big downside is if/when you do break one, they’re
not cheap to fix.  Expect to pay around $200 for a RTF.

My personal favorite is the Slow Stick.  It’s not ARF, but the build
is quick – 2 hours if you really take your time.  I can build one in
under an hour.  One of the best things about this plane for a beginner
is the entire slope glider kit is only $20, so it’s almost impossible
to do more than $20 in damage, and you can have a spare everything on
hand for an extra $20.  Also, all electronics can be moved over to the
next plane if/when you outgrow it.  Personally, I like mine enough
that when I build another plane I buy more electronics, and keep the
SS for lazy flying and AP.  They can be built for anywhere from $100-
$300, depending on the radio choice.  Mine’s probably about $300 all
told, but $180 of that is a DX6i Tx/Rx, which is Spektrum 2.4G and has
a 10 model memory – it’s all the Tx I’ll need for years to come.

IMO the easystar or the slow stick is going to suffer some damage
learning with no training.  It’s a shame you can’t get them to ride
the 50 miles and buddy boxy with you.  The slow stick will suffer more
broken props, even with a prop saver (highly recommended!), but it’s a
lot less expensive to fix when you do break it.  I can’t think of
anything offhand besides aero-ace style toys and the PZ Micro Citabria
that’s going to lend itself to out-of-the-box flying with no
experience without some breaking of things during the learning
curve.

Unless starting with the PZ Citabria, I’d suggest a bit of time with
RC cars or on a sim (normal game controller with 2 joysticks/keypads
and a freebie sim like FMS is fine) to get the hang of orientation
before flying for real.  Some people have trouble with the reversing
of controls when the plane is coming toward them.  I raced RC trucks
long before I got into planes so it was natural for me, and should be
for anyone with RC car/truck experience.

Good luck!

Dan
TTman - 16 Dec 2008 17:51 GMT
Snip
Another commonly recommended first plane is the Multiplex Easystar.
People like these because they’re fairly resistant and they’re
pushers.  To me, a big downside is if/when you do break one, they’re
not cheap to fix.  Expect to pay around $200 for a RTF.

snip
I disagree.... fixing is easy and cheap., as I said above. Maybe not if you
try and buy a spare wing or fuselage....
The mentor is a dream for a beginner. Ok in winds to 15mph looks nice, flies
nice.
DanKMTB - 16 Dec 2008 17:57 GMT
> Snip
> Another commonly recommended first plane is the Multiplex Easystar.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The mentor is a dream for a beginner. Ok in winds to 15mph looks nice, flies
> nice.

I've not had one, so I'll take your word for it.  I've read some
things on RCG about beginners being dissapointed because they managed
to destroy a wing or fuse, and replacements were so expensive.  It's
possible they lacked your repair skills, or crashed harder than
usual.  To rephrase:  If you break one bad enough to require spare
parts, they're not cheap to replace the broken parts.

I'd like to see a plane like the EZ* in all EPP.  It'd make a great
starter plane.
TTman - 16 Dec 2008 18:49 GMT
On Dec 16, 12:51 pm, "TTman" <someone...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Snip
> Another commonly recommended first plane is the Multiplex Easystar.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> flies
> nice.

I've not had one, so I'll take your word for it.  I've read some
things on RCG about beginners being dissapointed because they managed
to destroy a wing or fuse, and replacements were so expensive.  It's
possible they lacked your repair skills, or crashed harder than
usual.  To rephrase:  If you break one bad enough to require spare
parts, they're not cheap to replace the broken parts.

I'd like to see a plane like the EZ* in all EPP.  It'd make a great
starter plane.

Repair is relatively easy.... make sure u have the majority of the foam....
if it was a major ground hit, then it will be  a bin job whatever model you
have.... I split my fuselage in half just behind the U/C back edge. Couple
of bits missing, no big deal.... Make sure the 2 parts will fit back
together..... then cyano one half, kicker on the other half and get ready...
you got to get the 2 parts back in line and pressed together in one go.
there's NO second chance. You'll have a couple of seconds to get the final
fit...... the kicker and cyano will generate lots of heat and fuse the 2
parts together in a flash.
5 mins later, job done, back flying.
DanKMTB - 16 Dec 2008 19:08 GMT
<snip>

> Repair is relatively easy.... make sure u have the majority of the foam....
> if it was a major ground hit, then it will be  a bin job whatever model you
> have....

<snip>

I guess that's more what I was getting at.  I expect some major ground
hits from anyone learning to fly on their own with no experience, no
sim time, no coach and no buddy box - which is what the OP sounded
like he was dealing with.  In that case I think something like the PZ
Citabria is the best bet, since as long as you're at least 6' off the
ground when things go wrong you can just cut the throttle, let go of
the controls and watch the thing straighten itself out and float down
to a perfect landing.  If you want something bigger than that, I like
the Slow Stick not only because it's easy to fly, but because if
(when, given the above circumstances) you do hit the ground hard and
really break stuff, you're most likely looking @ $20 to replace
whatever you broke, with a nice stash of spare parts left over.  It
doesn't hurt that the thing can be built up, brushless & LiPo, for
well under $100 + radio (which can be as little as $20 used, or as
much as a couple hundred to buy one that'll do you for years and a
bunch of planes).  In fact, given the liberty to select an
inexpensive, used FM Tx/Rx I'd be willing to bet I could spec an
entire Brushless/LiPo SS for $100, plus charger (which is another
spend $10 or $150 thing).  I could probably even include a cheap lipo
charger and stay under $100.

This isn't to say the EZ* isn't a good plane, mind you.  It's a cult
classic with thousands of loyal followers, just like the SS.  There
are no doubt reasons for that, with both planes.  I am saying more
about the SS because I’m familiar with it.  If I knew more about the
EZ* I’d be saying more about that.

Your repair tutorial for the EZ* is quite clear, and sounds simple
enough.  I'm sure it'll come in handy for someone, maybe even the kid
the OP was asking for.
PCPhill - 16 Dec 2008 23:39 GMT
The Parkzone  Micro Citabria really is pretty good in calm winds.  I spent a
great 45 minutes yesterday flying with my 14 year old daughter.  She was
flying a PZ Citabria, and I had a Vapor.  With extra batteries being VERY
cheap, and the spare parts reasonable, it's a decent way to start.  After
many collisions with the ground, trees, etc,  the only damage to date is one
broken prop.

The other plus is you don't need a big field to fly in.

PCPhill
Ted Campanelli - 16 Dec 2008 19:57 GMT
Ted shuffled out of his cave and grunted these great (and sometimes not
so great) words of knowledge:
> During Christmas friends always ask me what plane to buy their kids because
> they know I fly.  I haven't been playing with or looking at RTF trainers
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> TIA,
> mk

I STRONGLY recommend having an instructor at a local flying field teach
the person.

If that is not possible, take a look at the Easy Star

http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXFXV0&P=ML

These are large enough to handle LIGHT winds, easier to see and see what
they are doing and will actually fly with the stock configuration
(UNLIKE MANY RTF - insuffiencient power).  There are spare parts for it
also.

They fly slow enough so they will not get ahead of newbie.
TTman - 16 Dec 2008 21:56 GMT
> I STRONGLY recommend having an instructor at a local flying field teach
> the person.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> They fly slow enough so they will not get ahead of newbie.

The BIG bonus there with the ES is no undercarriage.... That is where a lot
of damage gets done...
Morgans - 16 Dec 2008 23:04 GMT
"TTman" <someone.pc@ntlworld.com> wrote .

> The BIG bonus there with the ES is no undercarriage.... That is where a
> lot of damage gets done...

Yes, but if it has no gear, then there is no practicing touch and go's, or
landing or taking off.

If you are not able to do that, is the person really learning to fly?  There
are those who would say no, and I would have to say that I'm one of them.

To grab and hold interest, it must be easy enough to fly some before
crashing, and be able to do more than fly around in a circle to then flop
down in the grass.  IMHO, of course.
Signature

Jim in NC

The Natural Philosopher - 17 Dec 2008 07:50 GMT
> "TTman" <someone.pc@ntlworld.com> wrote .
>> The BIG bonus there with the ES is no undercarriage.... That is where a
>> lot of damage gets done...
>
> Yes, but if it has no gear, then there is no practicing touch and go's, or
> landing or taking off.

many whop have bounced an easy star off the field would disagree with
you here. ;-)

Besides, touch and goes is 'advanced training'. The easy star is slow
enough and tough enough that the inevitable crash following control
reversal dumb thumbs doesn't take more than a few minutes to fix.

once the basic up down left right stuff is keyed into the brain, then
its time to ditch the easy star and move on.

> If you are not able to do that, is the person really learning to fly?  There
> are those who would say no, and I would have to say that I'm one of them.

Who says that one expensive plane and formal instruction is the only way
to move from zero to a certificate?

I started with a ARF electric glider, moved on to planes with ailerons
land wheels much later.

MY club is miles  away and no one wants to instruct. But I had huge
amounts of fun tecahing myself on a field out the back. Sure it cost me
in planes, but it was cheaper than driving to the club. And finding no
one there.

crap plastic electrics are the best way into teh hobby for absolute
newbs, unless they have a really good club with nice helpful people close.

In which case they wouldn't be asking here.

> To grab and hold interest, it must be easy enough to fly some before
> crashing, and be able to do more than fly around in a circle to then flop
> down in the grass.  IMHO, of course.

Mate, when I were a lad flying single channel, what you describe was the
height of success, and was followed by at least half an hour of self
congratulation.

The firtst thing to do is get a model up and down in one piece: that n
itself is actually quite challenging.

The next thing is to fly it where you wnt it to fly. That is a second
major hurdle. Then to get it to land near your feet. Dead stick. Thats a
real achievement.

All that needs to achieve those three things is a crappy plastic easy
start or similar.

Takeoffs and landings on wheels are not a huge challenge beyond that,
but flying a plane with neutral stability and ailerons is: thats the
next challenge. Planes that you have to fly, rather then guide.

Thats where your basic plastic crap gives out. At that point you
probably want something else. For many its a foamie jet, others go for
scale models, some go glo, some dont. Some never go further - I fly a
lot of really slow vintage planes, because actually I just like building
them and watching em in the air!
icerinkdad@gmail.com - 24 Dec 2008 22:52 GMT
My two cents worth... understand that I am a 40 year modeler who still
flys CL and has flown both indoor and outdoor FF.   So I have trimming
skills that a raw beginner is missing.  I got impressive results out
of a $20 Estes toy after about a half hour of trimming... and I have
not flown any RC since the days of pulse rudder only.    It depends on
what you want (a toy or a more serious flying machine).    Now... if I
were planning on taking up RC Pattern as an event I would go to the
local RC field.   But for a lazy sunday afternoon with a kid that had
not already fallen in love with flying I would probably get one of the
under $100 toys out there.   And it helps if it looks like a FF
model... (high wing, or at least a good bit of dihedral).
Bob Furr
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.