Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / December 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Westland Lysander

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Schiffner - 22 Dec 2008 21:17 GMT
Ed, do you think it might be a good plane for that Fox 36rx rc of
mine. I'm thinking that heavy motor would do well in a radial style
airframe and I like that one better than the Lockheed Vega.
--
Keith
Ed Cregger - 23 Dec 2008 14:35 GMT
> Ed, do you think it might be a good plane for that Fox 36rx rc of
> mine. I'm thinking that heavy motor would do well in a radial style
> airframe and I like that one better than the Lockheed Vega.
> --
> Keith

------------

It should work just fine. Don't forget about biplanes. They often need nose
weight.

I have a Global Ultimate Biplane ARF that I bought five or so years ago. It
is advertised as being a .40 size model, but the instructions recommend
using a Magnum .91 four-stroke. They say that it balances perfectly with
that engine. Can you imagine how much lead you would have to put in the nose
to get it to balance with a .40 two-stroke?

My Balsa USA Phaeton (original version) was powered by an ST .40K and needed
a 5 ounce bar of lead screwed to the firewall in order to balance. Shoulda
gone with a .60.

Ed Cregger
Schiffner - 23 Dec 2008 18:39 GMT
> > Ed, do you think it might be a good plane for that Fox 36rx rc of
> > mine. I'm thinking that heavy motor would do well in a radial style
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It should work just fine. Don't forget about biplanes. They often need nose
> weight.

I did, something about it just seems to want a monoplane.

> I have a Global Ultimate Biplane ARF that I bought five or so years ago. It
> is advertised as being a .40 size model, but the instructions recommend
> using a Magnum .91 four-stroke. They say that it balances perfectly with
> that engine. Can you imagine how much lead you would have to put in the nose
> to get it to balance with a .40 two-stroke?

I can and why I'd want that much extra weight doing nothing is beyond
me.

> My Balsa USA Phaeton (original version) was powered by an ST .40K and needed
> a 5 ounce bar of lead screwed to the firewall in order to balance. Shoulda
> gone with a .60.

A piped Rossi perchance? ;^)

This has been the only time I've had a motor that I didn't know what I
wanted it in.
--
Keith
Ed Cregger - 23 Dec 2008 20:17 GMT
On Dec 23, 7:35 am, "Ed Cregger" <ecreg...@bellsouff.net> wrote:
> "Schiffner" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> nose
> weight.

I did, something about it just seems to want a monoplane.

> I have a Global Ultimate Biplane ARF that I bought five or so years ago.
> It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> nose
> to get it to balance with a .40 two-stroke?

I can and why I'd want that much extra weight doing nothing is beyond
me.

> My Balsa USA Phaeton (original version) was powered by an ST .40K and
> needed
> a 5 ounce bar of lead screwed to the firewall in order to balance. Shoulda
> gone with a .60.

A piped Rossi perchance? ;^)

This has been the only time I've had a motor that I didn't know what I
wanted it in.
--
Keith

--------------

Believe it or not, even with the anemic Super Tigre .40 S (correction), at
WOT, the Phaeton used to hunt and seek a bit. I checked everything to make
sure that the wings and surfaces were not flexing and nothing was amiss.
Looking back on it, I wish I had tried an 11x5 prop. I don't remember seeing
any of those in 1982. It would certainly have gotten off the ground a bit
quicker, not that the takeoff roll was excessive with a 10x6. If I backed
off the throttle just one or two clicks, the model would settle down and
groove. The 11x5 might have slowed it down enough not to do its dance. It
was controllable and you really had to look for the little jig that it was
doing, but it was there.

If you get to where you absolutely can't decide what to do with that engine
and you want to get rid of it, keep me in mind.

Ed Cregger
Schiffner - 23 Dec 2008 20:22 GMT
SNIP

> If you get to where you absolutely can't decide what to do with that engine
> and you want to get rid of it, keep me in mind.

Nice try. I have some sort of sick addiction to this oddball (for
Fox). It's the one that sliced my hand length wise from between the
ring finger and teh fourth almost the FULL length of my palm and down
to the tendons. Grrr...it's going earn that blood, even if it kills
me.
--
Keith
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.