Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / January 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

AMA EC votes for term limits

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Red Scholefield - 19 Jan 2009 16:21 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony
To: amadist5@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:11 AM
Subject: [AMA Dist V] TERM LIMITS

All:
I am very happy to report that the EC has passed a provision to have the AMA
Leader Members vote on Term Limits for AMA officers.  The Term Limits are 3
consecutive 3-year terms.  After that time, the Officer must step down for a
full term, at which time he or she will be able to run for that office for
another 3 consecutive 3-year terms.

This is something that has come up every year since I have been on the EC,
but has always failed.  I have voted in favor of it each time, but this is
the first time (because of the new blood on the council) that we have
actually been able to pass it.

The next step is for the Leader Members of AMA to vote and approve it.

In a few days, all AMA Leader Members will receive an E-mail from AMA HQ
about this issue.  I would hope that everyone will understand how difficult
it is to get a body of elected officers to vote to approve limiting their
terms!  Most want to protect their turf and are unwilling to step down as
they feel that “AMA can’t operate without me”.  This is one of the last
strongholds of the “good ‘ol boy” barrier that some EC members have been
trying to break down.  Well, that time may have finally come, with the help
of the Leader Members.

Please pass this info to all AMA clubs and especially to the Leader Members.
We need their support to make this  happen!

Tony Stillman, President

Radio South, Inc.

139 Altama Connector, Box 322

Brunswick, GA  31525

1-800-962-7802

www.radiosouthrc.com

.
Tim Wescott - 19 Jan 2009 17:46 GMT
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tony
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> limiting their terms!  Most want to protect their turf and are unwilling
> to step down as they feel that “AMA can’t operate without me”.  This
is
> one of the last strongholds of the “good ‘ol boy” barrier that some
EC
> members have been trying to break down.  Well, that time may have
> finally come, with the help of the Leader Members.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> .

In all the clubs I've ever been in, you selected the officers from a
small pool of candidates that had the word "sucker" tattooed on their
foreheads.  The challenge wasn't to limit terms, but rather to scrape up
enough folks to vote in an entire slate every year -- in fact, officers
were had the highest motivation to seek out new members, because those
would be the folks who hadn't yet realized the level of work vs. the
level of thanklessness involved in being involved.

But then, I've never been involved in anything as big as the AMA...

Signature

Tim Wescott
Control systems and communications consulting
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Need to learn how to apply control theory in your embedded system?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" by Tim Wescott
Elsevier/Newnes, http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html

Ed Cregger - 19 Jan 2009 19:21 GMT
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Tony
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> But then, I've never been involved in anything as big as the AMA...

------------

Term limits are favored by those that wish to circumvent the will of the
voting membership. The membership should have the ability to vote, or not
vote, for folks as many times as they wish, as far as I'm concerned.

Ed Cregger
notruthless - 20 Jan 2009 10:42 GMT
> Term limits are favored by those that wish to circumvent the will of the
> voting membership. The membership should have the ability to vote, or not
> vote, for folks as many times as they wish, as far as I'm concerned.

Occasions arise where the voting membership has dwindled to the point
that only a few even bother to vote anymore for whatever reason
(alienation, apathy, tired of dealing with single mindedness,
unwillingness to tolerate change, etc.) and those that do are able to
push their own agenda or those of their cronies. In Southern parlance,
the "good ol' boys" get to run the show for as long as they want.
Term limits, at the very least, offer the opportunity for some members
to think there might be changes in the future rather than a single
path to the same thing.

Chris
Red Scholefield - 20 Jan 2009 17:49 GMT
Consider this when thinking about term limits.  There has been ample
opportunity to dump the good old boys as evidenced by the number of time
setting members of the AMA EC have run unopposed.  Your excuses for not
voting (alienation, apathy, tired of dealing with single mindedness,
unwillingness to tolerate change, etc.) omitted one very important factor.
Negligence on the part of the electorate to become informed and then take
action!

Red Scholefield
AMA 951 Dist. V
Leader Member/CD
Bob Cowell - 20 Jan 2009 18:52 GMT
consider also that it is DAMN hard to vote someone OUT when they run unopposed.

the ballot needs a "none of the above" box

>Consider this when thinking about term limits.  There has been ample
>opportunity to dump the good old boys as evidenced by the number of time
>setting members of the AMA EC have run unopposed
Ed Cregger - 30 Jan 2009 09:32 GMT
> consider also that it is DAMN hard to vote someone OUT when they run
> unopposed.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>opportunity to dump the good old boys as evidenced by the number of time
>>setting members of the AMA EC have run unopposed

-----------

Obviously, there is no one perfect answer to suit all situations. I was for
term limits for a long period of time in my life and the "good old boys"
syndrome was the reason why.

I spoke with a much older and wiser club member who was against term limits.
He convinced me that it was the lesser evil of all of the alternatives. I
can't articulate exactly why I changed my mind, but I have.

A club that my wife belongs to, and which she has been president of three
times in the last five years, faced a the situation of having no one running
for president when my wife decided to back off and do other things. She
simply did not have the time to babysit everyone and think of new projects
for them to work on. The membership consists of very nice and talented
people, all of whom would have been a suitable president for one or two
terms. Finally, with a bit of a push from my wife, someone was talked into
running, but it very nearly didn't happen. The club would probably have
disbanded had not this one person come forward and volunteered to hold the
office of president. It's pretty sad, but this is what we get when religions
emphasize that one should lack pride (confidence) and should not be
competitive or assertive. Fortunately, the men down here do not seem to
suffer from the same malady.

Ed Cregger
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.