> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> time you are near the stall and I wondered what the original designers did to
> counteract that ?
The engine thrust is offset accordingly. I have a power pod that is
used for temporarily converting a 2M sailplane to electric power. (also
have a 1/2A glo engine one) Both are set up in a tractor configuration
with a positve engine thrust line. I.E., the engine points up in
relation to the fuselage center line. Here is a good read on it:
http://www.djaerotech.com/dj_askjd/dj_questions/upthrust2.html
Notice he points out that if the engine is placed on, or very nesr, the
CG the effect is not as pronounced.

Signature
Anyolmouse
Lee B. - 16 Feb 2009 18:40 GMT
Both the lateral and verticle CG location enters the question. Granted, the
engine can be located on the lateral CG -- it can not be located on the
verticle CG. The moment produced by the engine can not be reduced with down
thrust to a significant degree. A 10 degree down thrust -- which would be
VERY large -- would reduce engine moment by about (sine of 10 degrees) 17
percent. The result is that, during cruise flight the airplane. when trimed
for hands off flight must use down trim to counter the engine. When thrust
is reduced the moment produced by engine thrust must be replaced by down
elevator -- or be retrimed to lower the nose. For a pilot this is a natural
thing and not a big deal.