Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / May 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Anyone know if the Russian K-7 SuperFortress was real (photos)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
T Lee Buyea Fla.News Service - 28 May 2009 19:16 GMT
Anyone know if the Russian K-7 SuperFortress was real (photos)

I have kept track of most aircraft that have ever been built then
yesterday I ran across this ?
I find it hard to believe it ever existed especially back in 1930

Please look at the photos below and tell me if you know if this is real
or faked and if real did it ever fly ?

I count between 18 and 20 engines on it (some are pushers)

Please send me an email at ranger116@webtv.net

With any information on this

Russian K-7 or Ka-7 SuperFortress ??
I have searched Russian K-7 Superfortress but found another Russian 6
engine bomber ?

http://www.aksturgeon.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/k7-1.jpg

Click here and scroll down to 5 more photos.
Address:http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.aksturgeon.com/wp-content/uplo
ads/2009/03/k7-1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.aksturgeon.com/2009/03/12/k-7-bomber/&
usg=__uPtb-Cc1mVsCTODraTWfG2CV8M0=&h=359&w=800&sz=21&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=Za1wHt
iSIRntOM:&tbnh=64&tbnw=143&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drussian%2Bk-7%2Bflying%2Bfortress%
26hl%3Den%26um%3D1%26ie%3DUTF-8&um=1

daytripper - 28 May 2009 21:02 GMT
>Anyone know if the Russian K-7 SuperFortress was real (photos)
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Click here and scroll down to 5 more photos.
>Address:http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.aksturgeon.com/wp-content/uplo
ads/2009/03/k7-1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.aksturgeon.com/2009/03/12/k-7-bomber/&
usg=__uPtb-Cc1mVsCTODraTWfG2CV8M0=&h=359&w=800&sz=21&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=Za1wHt
iSIRntOM:&tbnh=64&tbnw=143&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drussian%2Bk-7%2Bflying%2Bfortress%
26hl%3Den%26um%3D1%26ie%3DUTF-8&um=1

PhotoShop is a wonderful program...

http://www.loqu.com/cool-kalinin-k-7/blogs/azlansooty-3029

Check out the 7th and 8th pictures ;-)

otoh, there was a *real* Kalinin K-7 heavy aircraft, with a single prototype
completed, flown, and eventually crashed, in the 1930's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalinin_K-7

Google Kalinin K-7 images and you'll find quite a few of the real
aircraft...as well as the fantasy design :-)

Cheers

/daytripper
Ed Cregger - 28 May 2009 21:56 GMT
I love it!

Some of the real Russian bombers were a hoot. Especially the ones where some
of the crew could walk outside to take a smoke break, or to get away from
the smell and clatter of the busy airborne propaganda printing press.

Ed Cregger

> On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:16:46 -0400, ranger116@webtv.net (T Lee Buyea
> Fla.News
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> /daytripper
Fubar of the HillPeople - 29 May 2009 00:37 GMT
Oh, yeah, its real.
Big Foot is the pilot and Elvis is the gunner. Its made completely from
Unobtainium crafted together by the Keebler Elves who were on loan for the
Russian war effort by the Lord of Atlantis.
It had the awesome ability to land downhill in the Swiss Alps as indicated
by the tail gear that would only reach the ground if the plane was sitting
on a 45 degree down slope.
Apparently the Russians were ahead of us in luggage tech since one of the
women (civilian clothes yet) has a rolling suitcase.
The pilot and Elvis, the gunner, had to use 5 point harnesses to keep them
in their seats as every time they fired the main gun, the back blast would
cause the plane to back flip in midair hence the altitude activated safety
on the triggers which would only allow the gun to be fired above an altitude
of 1000 meters.
The tires are all filled with helium which gave it lift as the guns and main
gear caused wing loading of 75 tons per square inch. During take off the
crew was under orders to hold their breath so as to reduce the take off
weight.
This is the second prototype as the first was lost on takeoff when the
bartender burped and caused a tail heavy condition which coincidentally was
the only time the tail gear actually touched the ground however briefly it
was.
There was a third prototype but after mistakenly being painted with a new
experimental invisible paint it was lost forever in the hanger.

Dan
Fubar of The HillPeople
Seller of Bridges
Six_O'Clock_High - 29 May 2009 03:33 GMT
After you wipe the blood off your cheek where the hook, line, and sinker you
swallowed poked through; you can explain how the people in the obviously
1930's black and white picture are in color with out having been
photoshopped.  While you are at it, consider that the ramp seems to be a
different color from that under the aircraft in the background.

LOL

The Internet and made up facts, gotta love it.

I really get a big laugh out of those retards quoting wikipedia as their
source.  A little critical thought should share the laughs.  .   .

> Anyone know if the Russian K-7 SuperFortress was real (photos)
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Click here and scroll down to 5 more photos.
> Address:http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.aksturgeon.com/wp-content/uplo
ads/2009/03/k7-1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.aksturgeon.com/2009/03/12/k-7-bomber/&
usg=__uPtb-Cc1mVsCTODraTWfG2CV8M0=&h=359&w=800&sz=21&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=Za1wHt
iSIRntOM:&tbnh=64&tbnw=143&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drussian%2Bk-7%2Bflying%2Bfortress%
26hl%3Den%26um%3D1%26ie%3DUTF-8&um=1
Andrey Tarasevich - 29 May 2009 19:00 GMT
> The Internet and made up facts, gotta love it.
>
> I really get a big laugh out of those retards quoting wikipedia as their
> source.  A little critical thought should share the laughs.  .   .

Huh? Is there really a Wikipedia entry for the aircraft in those made-up
pictures? Or is it just that you can't tell a Wikipedia entry from a
hole in the ground?
Six_O'Clock_High - 29 May 2009 21:09 GMT
>> The Internet and made up facts, gotta love it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> pictures? Or is it just that you can't tell a Wikipedia entry from a hole
> in the ground?

OOPS!  Sorry for the fast pitch.

My comment about Wikipedia was a relative comparison for a commonly accepted
source of what frequently turn out to be non facts, posts on the Internet.
Just like the thought process the artist used in trying to start a hoax on
the Internet.  The same folks who would quote wiki (with its made up facts)
would also post his artwork and swear it was the original stuff never
thinking that they had been had.  That slow enough for you?

LOL

I stand by my original remarks.  Have a great weekend flying, I will.
Vance Howard - 29 May 2009 23:11 GMT
>>> The Internet and made up facts, gotta love it.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> I stand by my original remarks.  Have a great weekend flying, I will.

And you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the aircraft referenced in
the Wiki article never existed? Care to share your source of knowledge?

Signature

To reply by email: vhoward1122 at gmail dot com

Six_O'Clock_High - 30 May 2009 14:02 GMT
>>>> The Internet and made up facts, gotta love it.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> And you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the aircraft referenced in
> the Wiki article never existed? Care to share your source of knowledge?

Two different subjects Vance.

One is airplanes and the other is Wiki.  Never the twain should meet.

In general I have a total dislike for Wikipedia because it is written by
anyone willing to create an account and do the work.  What that has meant is
that in a very great number of citations facts are really unknown and often
made up.  If you bothered to read from the top you may note that I only
took/take issue with folks that quote Wiki as their SOURCE not those who use
it as a tool to share information, as was the case in this situation.  The
Kalinin K-7 can be found through other sources, which is not always true of
wikipedia citations.

Once again, I stand by my original remarks and continue my disdain for folks
quoting Wiki as their SOURCE.
Opie's Dad - 30 May 2009 14:19 GMT
>>>>> The Internet and made up facts, gotta love it.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>Once again, I stand by my original remarks and continue my disdain for folks
>quoting Wiki as their SOURCE.

ahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
As if anyone gives a rat's a.s what you think.
Andrey Tarasevich - 29 May 2009 18:56 GMT
> Anyone know if the Russian K-7 SuperFortress was real (photos)

What you have in your photos is _not_ real. It is 3D rendering project
made by one of the 3D enthusiasts. It was never presented as real. The
pictures were originally posted as just a 3D rendering. I don't remember
whether they were intended as an entry for a 3D contest, or just for fun.

Then someone took the pictures and started posting them around with an
obvious purpose of starting an internet hoax.

However, the author of these rendered images took his inspiration from a
real experimental aircraft - Kalinin K-7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalinin_K-7

It is not the same as what you see in the rendered pictures, but the
similarities are quite obvious.
MJKolodziej - 29 May 2009 19:10 GMT
>> Anyone know if the Russian K-7 SuperFortress was real (photos)
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> It is not the same as what you see in the rendered pictures, but the
> similarities are quite obvious.

Apparently a death trap.  Cool though.
mk
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.