Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / July 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Found a good RC RTF article

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rcrtf - 05 Jul 2009 22:42 GMT
Hi there. I found an article with tips about buying a RC RTF plane:
http://www.rcrtf.com/rc-rtf/rc-rtf
MJKolodziej - 06 Jul 2009 02:18 GMT
> Hi there. I found an article with tips about buying a RC RTF plane:

Ha!
I hope no one falls for that.
mk
A.T. - 06 Jul 2009 06:54 GMT
Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the same
as can be seen on the blog URL?
Regards
Alan T.
Alan's Hobby Model & RC FAQ Web Links
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~atong

> Hi there. I found an article with tips about buying a RC RTF plane:
> http://www.rcrtf.com/rc-rtf/rc-rtf
Ray Haddad - 07 Jul 2009 01:01 GMT
>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the same
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> Hi there. I found an article with tips about buying a RC RTF plane:
>> http://www.rcrtf.com/rc-rtf/rc-rtf 

So what if it is? The real issue is the relevance. Stop attacking
those who self promote on USENET. What's the difference between this
kind of post and someone who blabs on about their eBay sale?

Answer: Nothing.
--
Ray
MJKolodziej - 07 Jul 2009 02:18 GMT
>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> --
> Ray

Ray, you must have not followed the link.  This is totally different from
someone finding relevant, good info and passing it on.  At the least it
needed to be pointed out he is a faker. Read it and see if you agree about
this Cub.
If you agree with this guy then your post is spot on. I'm interested.
mk
Vance - 07 Jul 2009 04:39 GMT
>>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> agree about this Cub.
> If you agree with this guy then your post is spot on. I'm interested. mk

Definitely not the airplane I would recommend to anybody to learn to fly
on. They fly OK in no wind situations, but in wind, a beginner would be
having problems. There's one guy in our club that chose this plane to
learn to fly on. Despite what we have suggested, he's determined to learn
on this plane. All he's managed to do so far is crash a lot. So much for
anti-crash technology.

Signature

To reply by email: vhoward1122 at gmail dot com

Ray Haddad - 07 Jul 2009 07:12 GMT
>>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>If you agree with this guy then your post is spot on. I'm interested.
>mk

So what? He pretended to "discover" the page. It's a marketing ploy
and not at all illegal. Except by those who on one hand are too pure
to accept a pretense of discovering a page all the while complaining
about hobby shops closing while they search for the absolute cheapest
price (including shipping) for something they could have gotten
locally for $1.00. In other words, it may not be YOUR preferred means
of marketing but it is one that comes straight from the marketing
handbooks. Would you prefer that he signed on anonymously? At least he
was honest enough to not hide his identity.
--
Ray
David Hopper - 07 Jul 2009 02:24 GMT
>.... What's the difference between this
>kind of post and someone who blabs on about their eBay sale?
>
>Answer: Nothing.

You are correct. They are both annoying..

Signature

David

Ray Haddad - 07 Jul 2009 07:15 GMT
>>.... What's the difference between this
>>kind of post and someone who blabs on about their eBay sale?
>>
>>Answer: Nothing.
>
>You are correct. They are both annoying..

Toemaytoe, tumahtoe, eh?

One group I frequent asks that anyone selling an item use the
following formats in the subject line so all can filter as needed.

FA: For auction
FS: For Sale

The Colon should be included so the filtering will be accurate.
--
Ray
David Hopper - 07 Jul 2009 10:43 GMT
>One group I frequent asks that anyone selling an item use the
>following formats in the subject line so all can filter as needed.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>The Colon should be included so the filtering will be accurate.

The annoying part is that sellers must think that the people that read
this and other newsgroups are dummies that do not know how to use the
ebaY search function. I search ebaY every day with my bookmarked
searches which works just fine for me.

I read this newsgroup to pick up good tips and trick from
knowledgeable folks that have been in this hobby for awhile.  I go
elsewhere to purchase items. It seems the majority of the people that
come here to post their fs/fa stuff post nothing else. Kinda like your
neighbor's dog that comes in your front yard just to take a dump, then
leaves...

Signature

David

Ray Haddad - 07 Jul 2009 12:55 GMT
>>One group I frequent asks that anyone selling an item use the
>>following formats in the subject line so all can filter as needed.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>neighbor's dog that comes in your front yard just to take a dump, then
>leaves...

Shoot the dog. As to the newsgroups, there are a variety of reasons to
read them and the biggest among them is camaraderie. Where else can
you contact like minded people away from the hobby shop or the flying
field? The minor annoyances one has to deal with shouldn't diminish
the worth of the UESNET system.
--
Ray
MJKolodziej - 07 Jul 2009 14:12 GMT
>>>One group I frequent asks that anyone selling an item use the
>>>following formats in the subject line so all can filter as needed.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> --
> Ray

I must admit there are minor annoyances that diminish the group more than
non-contributing spammers.
mk
The OP is forgiven
Tim Wescott - 08 Jul 2009 16:00 GMT
>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Answer: Nothing.

Answer:  Lots.

Why?

He didn't say "Hey look at this RC RTF article I just wrote".  _That_
sort of self-promotion would be like someone posting a pointer to their
eBay site.

But this innocent "Oh look what I stumbled across" is just badly executed
fakery: it's dishonest and stupidly so.  How good of a site could it be
if the author of the post is the author of the site?

Signature

http://www.wescottdesign.com

Ray Haddad - 08 Jul 2009 20:38 GMT
>>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>sort of self-promotion would be like someone posting a pointer to their
>eBay site.

Aw, too bad. He used a marketing ploy you don't like. As I said, it's
not illegal. Others do it all the time. Do you really think the
advertisers on radio and TV use the products they "discover" in the
aisles at the shopping center?

>But this innocent "Oh look what I stumbled across" is just badly executed
>fakery: it's dishonest and stupidly so.  

So is telling someone how to promote their ideas to everyone else.
Your concept of "do it my way or get out of here" is just plain wrong.
Let him be stupid. You have no obligation to show him that you can do
it better. Yet, here you are. Doing it better.

>How good of a site could it be
>if the author of the post is the author of the site?

It may be the best site ever but sadly, you will never see it. Unless.
No. It couldn't be. Did you go and look? Tell the truth.
--
Ray
Joe - 09 Jul 2009 09:07 GMT
> >>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
> >>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> --
> Ray

Good Lord, Ray, you come off as such an arrogant argumentative twit.  
MJK's remark:

"I must admit there are minor annoyances that diminish the group more than
non-contributing spammers.
mk
The OP is forgiven"

was humorous to me, and I agree with that remark.  Can you guess what
"minor annoyances...diminish the group more than non-contributing
spammers"?

:)

---  Joe
Ray Haddad - 09 Jul 2009 09:37 GMT
>> >>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>> >>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>mk
>The OP is forgiven"

That was MK, not Tim. But then you knew that.

>was humorous to me, and I agree with that remark.  Can you guess what
>"minor annoyances...diminish the group more than non-contributing
>spammers"?
>
>:)

Someone who continues a thread when it should die? Like Joe? Oh, never
mind. You would NEVER do that.
--
Ray
Joe - 09 Jul 2009 10:02 GMT
> >> >>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
> >> >>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> --
> Ray

No, Ray, it's someone like you that continues to chide respected
participants of this newsgroup with silly arguments.  

BTW, what in the heck was "That was MK, not Tim. But then you knew that."
supposed to mean?  Can't you read?  Or is it that you can't see straight
sometime?  I wrote "MJK's remark:" just before the quote.  Sheesh.  

Also BTW, speaking of beating a dead horse, you now have SIX posts on this
thread, and it appears that you cannot let the poor horse RIP.

---  Joe
Ray Haddad - 09 Jul 2009 22:22 GMT
>> >> >>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
>> >> >>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>
>---  Joe

I rest my case, Joe. Remember that you are, ironically, now a major
contributor to something you profess to dislike in others.
--
Ray
Joe - 09 Jul 2009 23:13 GMT
> >> >> >>>Why look if you cannot say outright that it is an advert for your own
> >> >> >>>blog,..or is it simply a co-incidence that the name on your post is the
[quoted text clipped - 79 lines]
> --
> Ray

RIP, Ray, along with that poor dead horse you keep beating.  And please
stop annoying people with your inane defense of spammer.

---  Joe
Vance - 10 Jul 2009 01:15 GMT
>> I rest my case, Joe. Remember that you are, ironically, now a major
>> contributor to something you profess to dislike in others. --
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ---  Joe

Sounds like neither one of you likes to not have the last word.

Signature

To reply by email: vhoward1122 at gmail dot com

Joe - 10 Jul 2009 02:40 GMT
> >> I rest my case, Joe. Remember that you are, ironically, now a major
> >> contributor to something you profess to dislike in others. --
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Sounds like neither one of you likes to not have the last word.

wore chester shyer sauce.  :)

---  Joe
Fubar of the HillPeople - 10 Jul 2009 23:20 GMT
So I guess just blocking the thread was a waste of time and I need to go to
the next step.
Bye, Joe...
Joe - 11 Jul 2009 04:20 GMT
> So I guess just blocking the thread was a waste of time and I need to go to
> the next step.
> Bye, Joe...

Such drama.  

I guess my reply would be the words spoken by Gable, as Rhett Butler, in
his last words to Scarlett O'Hara...  

---  Joe
MJKolodziej - 11 Jul 2009 19:59 GMT
>> So I guess just blocking the thread was a waste of time and I need to go
>> to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ---  Joe

I guess drama is better than nothing, this group was a gem once.
Is anyone flying??
Not me of late..........
mk
Skywise - 12 Jul 2009 01:17 GMT
> Is anyone flying??
> Not me of late..........

Delurking long enough to say "ME!". Although I burned up my
motor....again. I got halfway through my second battery though,
so I had _some_ fun.

Time to upgradt to brushless me thinks.

Brian
Signature

http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

MJKolodziej - 12 Jul 2009 07:56 GMT
>> Is anyone flying??
>> Not me of late..........
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Brian

Yeah, Zagi motor is gone here.
mk
Morgans - 10 Jul 2009 02:20 GMT
> Good Lord, Ray, you come off as such an arrogant argumentative twit.

You must be new, to not have known that already!

If you want to really hear some annoying drivel from him,  just mention
using MEK in a hobby like RC.

I loved it when someone proved that nitro-methane glow fuel is more
dangerous.
Signature

Jim in NC

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.