Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / December 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Small Models

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tim Wescott - 25 Dec 2009 20:11 GMT
As a result of a Parenting Saga* I now have a nifty Dumas kit for a Tiger
Moth, with a 17-1/2" wingspan.

The kit is intended for rubber power, so everything is light.  I haven't
decided whether I want to build it as a rubber powered free flight and be
happy with 45 second flights, if I want to put my old Telco CO2 motor in
it (assuming it still works) and be happy with a slightly underpowered
plane, or if I want to go mini-RC.

I'm assuming that if I go RC I want to use one of the actuator-based
radios, but I know from experience that the oh-so-disappointing "Piloto"
isn't going to be a good donor plane. for a system, so I'll actually have
to (horrors!) -- spend money.

I know that there are radios out there that'll work with this, but I
don't know what's the best combination to use.

So has anyone here done this?  What's the cool combination?  Does one go
with servos, or actuators, for this size plane?  Any gotchas that I
should know?  What weight should I be aiming for, when I'm converting a
17-1/2" wingspan rubber-powered biplane to RC?

Danke.

Signature

www.wescottdesign.com

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 25 Dec 2009 20:17 GMT
>As a result of a Parenting Saga* ...

I can't answer any of your technical questions.

But did you mean to tell the story with a footnote?
If so, you seem to have forgotten.

Inquiring minds want to know ...

                Marty
Signature

Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See <http://www.big-8.org> for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.

Tim Wescott - 25 Dec 2009 20:49 GMT
>>As a result of a Parenting Saga* ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>                 Marty

Yea, I forgot that part.

#2 son, 11, lives and breaths video games.  I don't.  Playing a video
game (or, for that matter, watching TV), generally makes me think of
things I could be building with the time that I'm wasting.  I can
generally stand playing one for a few minutes, then it gets to be less
enjoyable than digging ditches (lots less: when you dig a ditch, you can
look back and see progress; with video games...).

So two years ago the kid bought me a game for the Nintendo DS, which I
never touched.  This year I find out that he's headed for Game Crazy to
get me a gift.  He had already tried to get a pedometer accessory for the
DS for my wife, so I knew what was coming.  I headed that one off, and he
was reasonably cheerful about it in a "grownups are weird" sort of way.

I ask my wife to intervene (Please no video games.  Please no DS games.  
Please no DS-based gizmos.  Please no video game accessories, etc.)  She
has the discussion with him (how often does dad play video games?  
Compare and contrast this with how often dad is in his shop building
planes!  Note that Dad mentioned that he'd never bring himself to buy one
of these nifty laser-cut kits, but he drools over them regularly, etc.)

I don't know how high the general tone of the conversation was, but I do
know that I ended up with a model kit, and not some bit of electronic kit
that I'll never use.  And I made sure that knows that I like it.  So
hopefully he's one step closer to understanding that you don't get a gift
for someone so you can use it (which he was doing at 8), you don't get a
gift for someone because once you force them to use it they'll like it
(which is probably payback for all the broccoli), no, you get a gift for
someone because you've observed they're behavior and you know _they'll_
like it.

I suppose I should make a point to build it soon, come to think of it, so
he can see it done and I can thank him again.  Hmm.  There's a slot
coming up that was going to get filled with a Martian Invader from
Mechanix Illustrated, but I guess parenting comes first...

So, that's the story.  Not much amazement, just the homey avoidance of
getting a game that I'd chew glass to avoid playing.

#1 son got me a very nice set of slippers, which I'm known to like, as my
last set was just about disintegrating on my feet.  Not to say that at 11
he wouldn't have thought it perfectly reasonable to get me video games,
too, then insist that I play them.

Signature

www.wescottdesign.com

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 25 Dec 2009 21:46 GMT
> ... Yea, I forgot that part.

Thanks for filling in the blanks!

>#2 son, 11, lives and breaths video games.  I don't.  Playing a video
>game (or, for that matter, watching TV), generally makes me think of
>things I could be building with the time that I'm wasting.  ...

I've spent hours and hours this last week playing a Wii fishing
game with my best RC friend.

It's keeping him away from building.  Me, I keep myself
away from that by force of habit nowadays (one of my
New Year's wishes is to clean up my workshop and
reverse course on that score).

But I hope to go "fishing" over at Dan's tomorrow anyway.  :-O

> ... I don't know how high the general tone of the conversation was, but I do
>know that I ended up with a model kit, and not some bit of electronic kit
>that I'll never use.  And I made sure that he knows that I like it.

Great!

> ... So, that's the story.  Not much amazement, just the homey avoidance of
>getting a game that I'd chew glass to avoid playing.

Merry Christmas!

                    Marty
Signature

Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See <http://www.big-8.org> for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.

ecregger - 25 Dec 2009 20:44 GMT
> As a result of a Parenting Saga* I now have a nifty Dumas kit for a Tiger
> Moth, with a 17-1/2" wingspan.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Danke.

Geez, I haven't heard of anyone contemplating the use of actuators in many a
year.

I would think that with all of the super micro R/C servos in abundance, that
that would be the logical way to go. I'm not up to date on electric
propulsion and micro servos, but I could swear that I saw Hobby King selling
some 3 gram servos for about $3.00 a piece on their site just this week. Try
www.hobbyking.com. They should be right there on the front page.

The problem with a model that small is its susceptibility to the wind, I
would imagine.

Ed Cregger

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
Vance Howard - 25 Dec 2009 21:19 GMT
> As a result of a Parenting Saga* I now have a nifty Dumas kit for a
> Tiger Moth, with a 17-1/2" wingspan.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Danke.

http://www.microflight.com/  Is the plantraco equipment too small?

Signature

To reply by email: vhoward1122 at gmail dot com

MJKolodziej - 27 Dec 2009 05:06 GMT
>> As a result of a Parenting Saga* I now have a nifty Dumas kit for a
>> Tiger Moth, with a 17-1/2" wingspan.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> http://www.microflight.com/  Is the plantraco equipment too small?

I was considering this for a similar project.  I have a boston pup(PP) that
may take it.

They do have teeninetsy motors too.
mk
PCPhill - 27 Dec 2009 13:06 GMT
That's WAY bigger than anything that uses actuators. (I'm sure there are
exceptions, but they're mostly used for micro RC these days, under 10"
profile planes)  Considering both wings, you'll have a decent total wing
area. You'll probably want something in the range of 5-7G servos and a
10-15G brushless outrunner, or an equivalent geared  inrunner.  Do a search
on the RCGroups forums.  Most of the Dumas kits have been converted to RC

PCPhill

>>> So has anyone here done this?  What's the cool combination?  Does one go
>>> with servos, or actuators, for this size plane?  Any gotchas that I
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> They do have teeninetsy motors too.
> mk
Tim Wescott - 27 Dec 2009 19:01 GMT
>>>> So has anyone here done this?  What's the cool combination?  Does one
>>>> go with servos, or actuators, for this size plane?  Any gotchas that
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> PCPhill

Thanks -- the actuator-based stuff did look too small.

I'm still trying to decide if I want to put RC in it at all -- I'd have
an easier time of it except that my one CO2 motor is a bit small for the
plane.

Signature

www.wescottdesign.com

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 28 Dec 2009 00:19 GMT
>I'm still trying to decide if I want to put RC in it at all -- I'd have
>an easier time of it except that my one CO2 motor is a bit small for the
>plane.

I vote for RC.

Of course, you may have to fly it indoors or in super-calm
conditions ...  ;o)

                Marty
Signature

Big-8 newsgroups: humanities.*, misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, talk.*
See <http://www.big-8.org> for info on how to add or remove newsgroups.

ecregger - 28 Dec 2009 11:39 GMT
>>I'm still trying to decide if I want to put RC in it at all -- I'd have
>>an easier time of it except that my one CO2 motor is a bit small for the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Marty

Yep, be sure the HVAC system is off that day. It can generate some devasting
wind shear.

Ed Cregger

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
ecregger - 28 Dec 2009 11:38 GMT
> That's WAY bigger than anything that uses actuators. (I'm sure there are
> exceptions, but they're mostly used for micro RC these days, under 10"
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> They do have teeninetsy motors too.
>> mk

It is funny how the meaning of common words drift over time. Anyone remember
the Ace Hobbies pulse proportional actuators? That's what I was talking
about.

Ed Cregger

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.