Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rechargable batteries for coach lighting

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Byron Creek - 31 May 2004 01:26 GMT
The current issue of AMRM has an article about fitting batteries to power
tail lights on brake vans, rail cars etc. but does not go into using
rechargable batteries charged from the track power.

Has anyone done this? I can't imagine it would be too hard but I wonder how
power consumption would affect power available for the locomotive if I had
four or five cars with full interior lighting and charging batteries at the
same time.

The other option of course is to go DCC and just have carriage lights run
off the constant power to the track. Seems a lot of trouble to go to just
for carriage lights when I'm quite happy using the layout without DCC, but I
really want lit carriages to go with the street lighting and building
lighting I want to fit to the layout.

Any thoughts on all this much appreciated!

Byron Creek
http://www.byroncreek.com
fred - 31 May 2004 01:46 GMT
> The current issue of AMRM has an article about fitting batteries to power
> tail lights on brake vans, rail cars etc. but does not go into using
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Byron Creek
> http://www.byroncreek.com

Several articles in Electronics Australia in 1967/8 showed how to do
exactly this and much else. I recall they parked the coaches on a
special charging siding between running sessions.

apw
Terry Flynn - 31 May 2004 04:14 GMT
> The current issue of AMRM has an article about fitting batteries to power
> tail lights on brake vans, rail cars etc. but does not go into using
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Byron Creek
> http://www.byroncreek.com

Using rechargeable batteries is not going to be a problem with power
consumption from typical model railway controllers, however some sort of
circuitry would be required between the battery and track power. By the time
you have built all this installing DCC seems just as easy. The advantage of
using just  batteries is you do not need pick ups on your carriage wheels,
and you don't get the lights flickering. You can use alternatives to
batteries with DC. 1 simple solution is to use LEDs and a couple of diodes
as voltage droppers installed into each locomotive. Some locomotives with
'constant lighting' already have this. Then you can have about 2 volts on
the track before the trains move, but the lights are on. However this means
you don't get full speed of your models without increasing the maximum track
voltage to at least 14 volts. New models with DC /DCC decoders also don't
move until you have over 2 volts DC.
Try these sites for locomotive lighting circuits to do with diodes
http://www.mrollins.com/circuit.html
http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/xConstLight.html

And for a current regulator circuit for lighting in carriages see
http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/xCurrentReg.html
Steve Magee - 31 May 2004 12:06 GMT
> Any thoughts on all this much appreciated!
>
> Byron Creek
> http://www.byroncreek.com

Some time ago I played with a Bachmann Spectrum heavyweight car. Ex-factory,
this has lighting off track power. Because I use DCC, this meant that the
car had the equivalent of 20 PortaFloods inside. My passengers would have
been very cross. Now, I had been in DCC long enough for me to start
upgrading the decoders in my loco's - replacing old Lenz LE100 14-step
decoders with other decoders more appropriate for the loco, be it 28 step,
advanced consisting, sound, back EMF, silent drive etc etc etc. This left me
with a pile of old decoders.

Looked at old LE100 in one hand. Looked at Spectrum car in other. Thought -
"Hmmmm". Dismantled car and put red/black wires from decoder to track pick
up. Put orange/grey leads from decoder to lights (incandescents, BTW). Also
thought of running yellow/blue/white wires to marker lights via LED's/fibre
optics, but thought one heroic feat of intellectual genius was enough per
night. Might try that another day.

Anyway, put coach back on track and called up the decoder. Turned the lights
on via the motor control, and used the 14 step function to adjust the coach
lights for the ambient light condition (dim for night, etc). In comparison
with uncontrolled cars, it was much better. You can now buy function
decoders cheaply to put into your passenger fleet, but they do not have the
option to control light output. So I figure this is more fun than batteries
recharged off track power, but whatever floats your boat.

Mind you, ultimately, I'd love to see loco's with a 9v ni-cad battery as
their power source, radio controlled, with the "charging" tracks located in
the loco servicing area. Few hours of running, then a blinking LED in the
cab reminding you to "refuel" urgently, or you've a dead loco! Would maske
wiring the layout a whole lot easier, too.

Steve
Newcastle NSW
Byron Creek - 01 Jun 2004 00:18 GMT
> > Any thoughts on all this much appreciated!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> cab reminding you to "refuel" urgently, or you've a dead loco! Would maske
> wiring the layout a whole lot easier, too.

I've often thought about battery power for HO locos. It's been around for a
while in G scale and I think O too. Wiring the layout would be very easy as
you would not need to wire the track at all (unless you want to run track
powered locos as well). You could even have the track powered to a constant
level for lighting of coaches and tail lights.

One big problem I see with this is lack of space for batteries in most HO
locos. A tender steam loco would have more space for batteries than
something like the Austrains 442 or 80 diesels which are filled with mech
and weights. Most other diesels seem to be full of weights too.

All in all, it does seem DCC is the best way to go for independent loco
control in HO and other smaller scales. I'm beginning to think it's probably
the best way to get what I want too. By the time I fiddle around with
batteries and lights in every passenger car I could have wired up decoders
in most of my locos and installed simpler track powered lighting in the cars
too.

DCC does seem to be getting cheaper and better as time goes on. Just proves
it's always best to wait a while when new tech comes out before diving in!

More reasearch on my part needed!!

Byron Creek
http://www.byroncreek.com

> Steve
> Newcastle NSW
Steve Magee - 01 Jun 2004 06:29 GMT
> I've often thought about battery power for HO locos. It's been around for a
> while in G scale and I think O too. Wiring the layout would be very easy as
> you would not need to wire the track at all (unless you want to run track
> powered locos as well). You could even have the track powered to a constant
> level for lighting of coaches and tail lights.

Or, use the tracks for signalling just as the prototype does.

eries in most HO locos. A tender steam loco would have more space for
batteries than
> something like the Austrains 442 or 80 diesels which are filled with mech
> and weights. Most other diesels seem to be full of weights too.

Diesels - esp the full body types like the 80/81 or even 44's etc would
probably be even easier. Consider using a variation on the Black Beetle
truck under each end, with the empty internal space now availble for 9v
nicad (fairly small anyway), control circuitry - big unknown this one, esp
if you want sound, etc - with a weight designed to wrap around everything
like most modern loco's (model) do. I don't think you could use existing
manufacturers models - apart from the bodies -  as it would require a whole
new design. Or, a VERY dedicated and competent modeller!

By the time I fiddle around with
> batteries and lights in every passenger car I could have wired up decoders
> in most of my locos and installed simpler track powered lighting in the cars
> too.
>
> DCC does seem to be getting cheaper and better as time goes on. Just proves
> it's always best to wait a while when new tech comes out before diving in!

No no! Always better to dive in first when new stuff comes out! Much more
fun, you get to make all those mistakes by yourself, and you get to spend
more than you would any other way. (Sigh). The life of a trail blazer is
very tough... :-)

> More reasearch on my part needed!!
>
> Byron Creek
> http://www.byroncreek.com
mutley - 01 Jun 2004 12:43 GMT
>The current issue of AMRM has an article about fitting batteries to power
>tail lights on brake vans, rail cars etc. but does not go into using
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>four or five cars with full interior lighting and charging batteries at the
>same time.

In the UK, Harvey Godber of First Class Trains has produced something
along the line of what you are looking for.

http://www.ukmodelshops.co.uk/catalogues/fct/lighting.html

There's a diagram showing how it's done:

http://www.ukmodelshops.co.uk/catalogues/fct/fitting_ultra.html

Pete
Signature

http://www.ukrecmodelsrail.co.uk an unofficial website for the newsgroup
http://www.bristol-rail.co.uk an archive of photos from the Bristol area

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.