> The Marx Brothers answer would be that it's a viaduct when it's not a
> chicken. :)
Damn - you stole my response... :-)
Steve
Roy Wilke - 20 Jun 2004 13:32 GMT
> > The Marx Brothers answer would be that it's a viaduct when it's not a
> > chicken. :)
> >
> Damn - you stole my response... :-)
>
> Steve
You could have said that my answer only applied when the viaduct was
attached to a small peninsula :-)
--
"
> > Last night at the club running night a question was asked by one of the
> > memeber what is the diffenece between a bridge and a viaduct?
> > Does a viaduct go over water?
> > Does a bridge go over land?
>
> A viaduct, in English usage, is a bridge with more than one span.
hmmm....I think I prefer the dictionary definition. By the definition above,
that large steel railway structure over the Hawkesbury R near near Brooklyn
is really a viaduct and not a bridge, as I've thought all these years!
My Australian Oxford Dictionary says a viaduct is a long, bridge-like
structure, usually with a series of arches, for carrying a road or railway
over a valley or dip in the ground.
Oxford says a bridge is a structure providing a way across a river, railway,
etc.
>.It comes
> from the Latin "viaduct", which is a variant on the word "aqueduct" (a
> conduit to carry water).
But often a viaduct would carry the aquaduct across a valley!
That railway structure which crosses an arm of the Melton weir...I think
that is generally called "The Melton Viaduct"....yes? But no arches.
I guess a viaduct can have a bridge as part of it, as you would see where a
railway is elevated across a flood plain, and there is a long trussed span
where it crosses the river proper. Numerous examples on NSW north coast
line, North Wagga...(fill in your own local example here)...
................Bill
Roy Wilke - 20 Jun 2004 15:00 GMT
> --
> "
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> line, North Wagga...(fill in your own local example here)...
> ................Bill
In short, a bridge is a viaduct and a viaduct is a bridge. An aqueduct is a
bridge that carries water.
Viaducts have even been known to carry chickens.
Terry Flynn - 24 Jun 2004 03:40 GMT
> > --
> > "
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> In short, a bridge is a viaduct and a viaduct is a bridge. An aqueduct is a
> bridge that carries water.
I would suggest from the above definitions a viaduct is a type of bridge, a
multi span arch in compression type. Not all bridges are viaducts.
> Viaducts have even been known to carry chickens.

Signature
Terry Flynn
For HO scale track standards go to
http://angelfire.com/clone/rail/index.html
also includes details of HO wagon weight and locomotive tractive effort
estimates
Robert Lee - 21 Jun 2004 04:20 GMT
Entirely a matter of terminology I think. There is a difference between a
culvert and a bridge or a viaduct, but that's about it
By the way, Melton is a curous case, because the bridge or viaduct was there
before the weir, meaning it was intially mostly over dry land and then the
lower parts of the piers were submerged.
> --
> "
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> line, North Wagga...(fill in your own local example here)...
> ................Bill