Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Helicopters / July 2004

quote  (you are a modeller aren't you - i.e. you build things - or are you a
consumer - pay someone else type?)

Actually, I am pretty skilled at electronics (to degree level and beyond)
and could easily design and build a PIC based interface from first
principles.  However, I tend not to assume others share my skills - I have
found that in the past when I have assumed that modellers have the tools or
the ability to solder electronics components I have been usually wrong.

I'm aware of the serial port emulator that you can use on NT-based operating
systems because applications such as FMS, CSM simulator and CSM gyro tools
don't run in kernal mode.  I've experienced and heard mixed reactions - I
certainly couldn't get it to work on XP Pro with the CSM simulator that
comes with the Hoverfly.

I have been into RC modelling for the last 18 years - 17 of those on fixed
wing and the last 1 on helis.  Another observation that I have personally
made is that fixed wing types are more likely to build themselves whereas
heli type go out and buy consumer parts - just look at how many splash out
on commercial pitch guages and blade balancers when they are a piece of
piddle to make for virtually nothing - bet you made yours though.

In defence of heli fliers, I have observed that generally they are
comfortable and adept with new technologies such as programmable radios,
gyros, governors and computers in general, much more so than fixed wing
fliers - generalisation I know but holds pretty solid in my personal
experience.

Not sure which version of FMS I tried but it was over a year ago so I accept
that it could have improved - but the one I tried was dead easy compaired
with G2.

Cheers,

Nigel

Also, I didn't dismiss FMS.

I said that if you don't have a heli but you have a transmitter (fixed wing
flier for example) then it is worth using.

If you don't have either then you have to factor in the transmitter and lead
cost at which point you are on your way to Aerofly Pro costs.

The trouble with FMS for learning helis is that it doesn't simulate hovering
very well - but this is what you've got to learn first with your 'real'
model so this is a big minus for FMS IMHO.

Cheers,

Nigel

It's all about ANTICIPATING what's going to happen next and being
PROreactive not REactive. Keep at it, and yes a real model does feel the
same.

I agree completely with what Alan says about anticipation.  It's the heart
of  hovering a helicopter, model or full size, and it just takes practice.

The sim should teach you the base reflexes you need to fly the real thing.
However, I've found some models programmed up that were "way" more touchy
than a beginner should be trying to fly.  I've also seen them on the other
end of the scale where you get away with things that you'd "never" get away
with on a real model.  If you know someone in your area that flying
competently, ask them to check out the model you're flying.  If not, try
selecting a different model to see if it's a little more sedate.

After 2 weeks, I'd think you'd start to be getting the hang of things.  On
the other hand, some folks take a little longer than others.  Don't get
discouraged.  You're doing the right thing, sticking to the sim.  Think of
all the money you're saving every time you crash on the computer and not in
the real world.  I wish these things had been around when I learned to fly!
;-)

When you're ready, you'll find that the real world is no big deal.  Good
luck and keep at it!

Fly Safe,
Steve R.