Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Helicopters / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Strange Servo Failure Mode, near end of travel (one direction only)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dan Asay - 23 Jun 2004 00:01 GMT
Can you please tell me if you have ever seen any servo exhibit this failure
mode (described below)?

What is happening within a servo to cause this?

I discovered a subtle but serious problem with the extreme left response
from my aileron servo. When I give a full left cyclic demand the servo goes
steady with no observable problems. However, when I add a little torque
resistance with my fingers, while slowly returning the cyclic stick just off
the extreme, the servo loses a significant amount of torque and starts to
shake the horn. This very strange behavior occurs only at left extreme and
not right extreme. Have you seen this failure mode in a servo before?

I swapped the original 9202 with another 9202 servo and the problem goes
away (strong steady torque at both extremes). I tried the original servo
again and problem returns (validated consistency by swapping 3 times each).

I disassembled the original servo and verified gears are in good shape and
no obvious signs of internal damage. However, after reassembling the servo,
the problem is gone! Strong and steady torque through both extremes!

Now I feel a little uneasy about whether the problem will return someday
(and cause another crash), because I still don't know what was happening
within the servo. This problem results in locked roll and loss of aileron
control. However, the servo seems to be performing consistent for now, after
several minutes of testing with torque resistance.

Dan
Beav - 23 Jun 2004 00:19 GMT
> Can you please tell me if you have ever seen any servo exhibit this failure
> mode (described below)?
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> (and cause another crash), because I still don't know what was happening
> within the servo.

If in doubt, bin the servo. A 60 quid servo isn't worth twatting the heli
for. Or some poor spectator.

This problem results in locked roll and loss of aileron
> control. However, the servo seems to be performing consistent for now, after
> several minutes of testing with torque resistance.

And it MAY peform faultlessy for the next 20 years, but on the other
hand......

Servos do fail occasionally even if the failure doesn't manifest itself as a
"dead in the water" deal. Don't put it back in the heli.

Signature

Beav

Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com"
(with the obvious changes)

Beavisland now lives at
www.beavisoriginal.co.uk

>
> Dan
Dan Asay - 23 Jun 2004 04:09 GMT
Thanks Beav,

I always value your advice.

If I cannot narrow the scope of possible causes to an acceptable risk, I
will be left with no choice but to "bin the servo".

Thanks again,

Dan

> > Can you please tell me if you have ever seen any servo exhibit this
> failure
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> > Dan
Beav - 23 Jun 2004 23:37 GMT
> Thanks Beav,
>
> I always value your advice.

Thanks for that Dan.

> If I cannot narrow the scope of possible causes to an acceptable risk, I
> will be left with no choice but to "bin the servo".

The problem with servos is they REALLY should be considered as consumables.
They don't last forever and if you get a couple of seasons flying from a
set, you're ahead of the game. After that, I don't consider them worth even
looking at if they show any signs of "offness"

Signature

Beav

Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com"
(with the obvious changes)

Beavisland now lives at
www.beavisoriginal.co.uk

S-Man - 24 Jun 2004 03:19 GMT
> The problem with servos is they REALLY should be considered as consumables.
> They don't last forever and if you get a couple of seasons flying from a
> set, you're ahead of the game. After that, I don't consider them worth even
> looking at if they show any signs of "offness"

Just *what* on a heli isn't a consumable?? I think I've replace all the
parts on mine... no wait.. I haven't smashed the receiver yet...  ;-)

.S.
Steve R. - 24 Jun 2004 05:32 GMT
> > The problem with servos is they REALLY should be considered as consumables.
> > They don't last forever and if you get a couple of seasons flying from a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> .S.

Uh-Oh, you just jinxed yourself on that one!  :-o  ;-)

Fly Safe,
Steve R.
S-Man - 24 Jun 2004 06:28 GMT
>>Just *what* on a heli isn't a consumable?? I think I've replace all the
>>parts on mine... no wait.. I haven't smashed the receiver yet...  ;-)
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Fly Safe,
> Steve R.

Damn!
C W - 24 Jun 2004 12:41 GMT
When servos were much more expensive in real terms in the 80's, I
regularly replaced feedback potentiometers.

However, Ripmax in the UK a couple of years ago started not to
want to sell `electronic' spares for servos - citing Health &
Safety issues. (and no doubt product liability creeps in as well)
-  unless of course they repaired the servo. Not sure what their
current position is. Comment from Ripmax - if they read this -
would be useful.

But I really don't like the `consumable' culture - and I hate
binnining an expensive servo for the sake of a feedback
potentiometer.

And the `'neutral' position of the servo is always where the
potentiometer track wears most ..... = the jitters around neutral.

CW

>> The problem with servos is they REALLY should be considered as consumables.
>> They don't last forever and if you get a couple of seasons flying from a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>.S.
Beav - 24 Jun 2004 16:52 GMT
> When servos were much more expensive in real terms in the 80's, I
> regularly replaced feedback potentiometers.

Same here. Changing pots was almost a weekly affair, particularly when the
servos began appearing with paper tracks.

> However, Ripmax in the UK a couple of years ago started not to
> want to sell `electronic' spares for servos - citing Health &
> Safety issues. (and no doubt product liability creeps in as well)
> -  unless of course they repaired the servo. Not sure what their
> current position is. Comment from Ripmax - if they read this -
> would be useful.

I wouldn't hold me breath:)

> But I really don't like the `consumable' culture - and I hate
> binnining an expensive servo for the sake of a feedback
> potentiometer.

I don't think any of us LIKE the consumable idea, but most people wouldn't
tear a servo apart and it can cost as much to get someone else to do it as
it would to replace the whole servo.

> And the `'neutral' position of the servo is always where the
> potentiometer track wears most ..... = the jitters around neutral.

That can usually be treated with a good dollop of vaseline too, not that
many would try it these days. Back to the "CYA" world we live in nowadays.

Signature

Beav

Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com"
(with the obvious changes)

Beavisland now lives at
www.beavisoriginal.co.uk

Beav - 24 Jun 2004 16:49 GMT
> > The problem with servos is they REALLY should be considered as consumables.
> > They don't last forever and if you get a couple of seasons flying from a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Just *what* on a heli isn't a consumable?? I think I've replace all the
> parts on mine... no wait.. I haven't smashed the receiver yet...  ;-)

Just the flyer and some of them are too:-)

Signature

Beav

Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com"
(with the obvious changes)

Beavisland now lives at
www.beavisoriginal.co.uk

Dan Asay - 24 Jun 2004 04:31 GMT
Now that I'm paying more attention to these consumables, I noticed my
elevator servo starting to shake today just around center position.  I won't
be flying the rebuild until both cyclic servos are renewed.  However, I will
take the old ones to work and look at them thoroughly with a microscope to
see if I can learn anything or if I can find a cracked solder joint that
might allow me to restore servo performance.  If not, they're trash.

> > Thanks Beav,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> set, you're ahead of the game. After that, I don't consider them worth even
> looking at if they show any signs of "offness"
Beav - 24 Jun 2004 16:54 GMT
> Now that I'm paying more attention to these consumables, I noticed my
> elevator servo starting to shake today just around center position.  I won't
> be flying the rebuild until both cyclic servos are renewed.  However, I will
> take the old ones to work and look at them thoroughly with a microscope to
> see if I can learn anything or if I can find a cracked solder joint that
> might allow me to restore servo performance.  If not, they're trash.

You'll probably find the feedback pot track that the wipers run on to
give/take the signal is in need of cleaning and re-greasing (vaselining). If
that's all it takes to sort the servo, it's not a binnable item and this
sort of thing is WELL within the abilities of most modellers (or it WAS).

Signature

Beav

Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com"
(with the obvious changes)

Beavisland now lives at
www.beavisoriginal.co.uk

Dan Asay - 25 Jun 2004 02:12 GMT
I thought that was oil from exhaust fumes.  That was vaseline?

I placed several of my servos under a microscope today and learned a little.
I was about to post the results, but I'll edit the part about the oil and
then post it as a separate thread.

Thanks again.

Dan

> > Now that I'm paying more attention to these consumables, I noticed my
> > elevator servo starting to shake today just around center position.  I
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> that's all it takes to sort the servo, it's not a binnable item and this
> sort of thing is WELL within the abilities of most modellers (or it WAS).
Beav - 25 Jun 2004 21:14 GMT
> I thought that was oil from exhaust fumes.  That was vaseline?

It's VERY unlikely to be oil from the flying. More likely to be whatever the
manufacturer put in their when the servos were made. The tracks need
SOMETHING to lubricate them and vaseline has worked for years.

> I placed several of my servos under a microscope today and learned a little.
> I was about to post the results, but I'll edit the part about the oil and
> then post it as a separate thread.

I got it about a minute ago:-)

Signature

Beav

Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com"
(with the obvious changes)

Beavisland now lives at
www.beavisoriginal.co.uk

C W - 23 Jun 2004 01:55 GMT
Maybe one of the servo motor drive transistors/FETS is iffy? I
think they are normally in a bridge to the servo motor - maybe you
have intermittently lost half of the bridge? This has happened to
me - no appreciable torque in one direction of servo travel.

C W

>Can you please tell me if you have ever seen any servo exhibit this failure
>mode (described below)?
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Dan
Dan Asay - 23 Jun 2004 04:04 GMT
C W,

Thanks for the reply.  I believe I am observing slightly different behavior
than you describe.  Rather than less torque through an entire direction of
movement, I am observing strong torque in both directions.  However, at one
extreme (and only if some torque resistance is applied), the servo starts to
lose it only during the first small portion of the path back to center.
After crossing this shakey small area, the servo regains its strong control
through the remainder of its movement back to center.

Thanks again,

Dan

> Maybe one of the servo motor drive transistors/FETS is iffy? I
> think they are normally in a bridge to the servo motor - maybe you
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> >
> >Dan
C W - 23 Jun 2004 10:39 GMT
`shaky' areas and jitter are often associated with feedback
potentiometer track problems in a certain part of the travel - but
that does not explain why the problem is only there when torque is
applied. I used to build - and wreck - my own servos from kits
many years ago - but these digitals are a whole new game for me !

I have been playing with a JR8700G super tail servo - and that
causes all sorts of jitter on other servos when used with Futaba
PPM - it needs an opto isolator and separte battery to work with
PPM. (PCM filters the interference out from the 8700G - or masks
it !! - which is why I am not keen on PCM having had one lock out
crash)

So try the servo with a different Rx all on its own - and with PPM
and PCM.

CW

>C W,
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>> >
>> >Dan
Al - 23 Jun 2004 16:51 GMT
sounds like it could be a dodgy feedback pot to me.
Rgds Alan

> C W,
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> > >
> > >Dan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.