Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Helicopters / November 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Aerial pictures

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Adrian Smith - 23 Nov 2005 18:13 GMT
I want to take aerial pictures from a couple of hundred or so feet up, in
public places. I think for the most part a model heli is not acceptable
because of liability etc.

I'm thinking of using a tethered helium ship with photographic and remote
cameras on board.

Any recommendations concerning equipment, ships and manufacturers of
wireless cameras would be appreciated.

Signature

Adrian Smith
www.YourStadium.com
Superb aerial pictures of UK football stadiums.

The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 24 Nov 2005 00:17 GMT
>I want to take aerial pictures from a couple of hundred or so feet up, in
>public places. I think for the most part a model heli is not acceptable
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Any recommendations concerning equipment, ships and manufacturers of
>wireless cameras would be appreciated.

Rent me a helicopter and I'll fly ya wherever you want to go.  :)
Adrian Smith - 24 Nov 2005 09:26 GMT
>>I want to take aerial pictures from a couple of hundred or so feet up, in
>>public places. I think for the most part a model heli is not acceptable
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Rent me a helicopter and I'll fly ya wherever you want to go.  :)

I used to have the same arrangement with a friend of mine. I paid for the
flight and he flew the plane for free. Got all the piccies I wanted.

These pictures need to be of a very high quality, better than you can get
from a real ship flying at a legal height over a populated area.

How much does it cost to rent a small heli for an hour?

Signature

Adrian Smith
www.YourStadium.com
Superb aerial pictures of UK football stadiums.

The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 24 Nov 2005 19:20 GMT
>I used to have the same arrangement with a friend of mine. I paid for the
>flight and he flew the plane for free. Got all the piccies I wanted.

Regfulation violation for a pilot with just a private license over
here.  Gotta have a commercial ticket to have someone else pay more
than their pro-rata share for the flight (i.e you can split costs
equally as a private pilot)  Still, a nice arrangement..

>These pictures need to be of a very high quality, better than you can get
>from a real ship flying at a legal height over a populated area.

That's the cool part about helicopters.  You can fly as low as you
want as long as you pose no undue rick to persons or property on the
ground.  (US regs anways)

>How much does it cost to rent a small heli for an hour?

The place I fly from rents the R22 for $185/hour.  Not sure what the
Hughes 300s are going for..  I'd guess $250/hour or so...
Steve R - 24 Nov 2005 23:25 GMT
>>I used to have the same arrangement with a friend of mine. I paid for the
>>flight and he flew the plane for free. Got all the piccies I wanted.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> than their pro-rata share for the flight (i.e you can split costs
> equally as a private pilot)  Still, a nice arrangement..

You sure on that?  Sounds like they tightened up the regs then.  I learned
in the late 70's & early 80's.  Back then, you had to have a commercial
ticket if you expected to be paid for services rendered as a pilot.  If my
friend wants to take some aerial photos, rents an airplane to do it in and
has me, as a private pilot, fly the bird, it's Ok as long as no money passes
to me for flying the airplane.  Who pays for the aircraft rental is, or at
least was, irrelevant.

Just wondering?

Fly Safe,
Steve R.
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 25 Nov 2005 06:41 GMT
>You sure on that?  Sounds like they tightened up the regs then.  I learned
>in the late 70's & early 80's.  Back then, you had to have a commercial
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>to me for flying the airplane.  Who pays for the aircraft rental is, or at
>least was, irrelevant.

Yep.   CFR 14 part 61.113 says basically a private pilot may not act
as PIC of an aircraft carrying passengers or property for compensation
or hire.

A private pilot may for compensation or hire act as PIC in connection
with any business or employemnt IF the flight in incidental to that
business or employment and the aircraft doesn't carry passengers for
compensation or hire.

A private pilot may not pay less than the pro-rata share of the
operating expenses of a flight with passengers provided those expenses
include only fuel, oil, airport fees and/or rental fees.

We had a lengthy discussion in CFI ground school about what you can
and cant do as a private pilot when money is involved.  Basically, you
can't do sh.t as a PP and as a commercial pilot, you still can't do
sh.t.  heheh

The FARs are so full of legalese, I'm amazed every pilot in the US
isn't in some kind of trouble.  My CFI ground school instructor told
us that we violate some part of the FARs each time we fly.  I don't
doubt it for a minute.
Steve R - 26 Nov 2005 03:33 GMT
>>You sure on that?  Sounds like they tightened up the regs then.  I learned
>>in the late 70's & early 80's.  Back then, you had to have a commercial
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> business or employment and the aircraft doesn't carry passengers for
> compensation or hire.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> A private pilot may not pay less than the pro-rata share of the
> operating expenses of a flight with passengers provided those expenses
> include only fuel, oil, airport fees and/or rental fees.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"THAT" is the part that didn't exist when I learned to fly!!  The paragraph
above it did, but not the one I just emphisized.  A private pilot could act
as PIC in connection with any business or employment "if" the flight was
"incidental" to that business or employment and the aircraft wasn't carrying
paying passengers.

The part about a private pilot may not "pay less than the pro-rata share of
the operating expenses of a flight" is brand new to me!  It also seems to
contradict the paragraph above it.  Typical feds BS, isn't it.  :-/

Makes me wonder how much else has changed.  Thanks for the clarification,
Kevin!

Fly Safe,
Steve R.
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 26 Nov 2005 22:50 GMT
>> A private pilot may for compensation or hire act as PIC in connection
>> with any business or employemnt IF the flight is incidental to that
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>"incidental" to that business or employment and the aircraft wasn't carrying
>paying passengers.

We took about 30 minutes one afternoon to define "incidental" and 8 of
us couldn't come to any sort of agreement on what it really meant.  We
decided we'd all be safe and not do anything for compensation until we
got our commercial tickets..

>The part about a private pilot may not "pay less than the pro-rata share of
>the operating expenses of a flight" is brand new to me!  It also seems to
>contradict the paragraph above it.  Typical feds BS, isn't it.  :-/

Equal shares all around.  I guess the PP is only paying for HIS
portion of the flight and everyone else is paying for THEIR portion.
Funny how that works, but the PIC takes all the responsibility and
blame if the sh.t hits the fan.

>Makes me wonder how much else has changed.  Thanks for the clarification,
>Kevin!

I've got to pick up my 2006 FAR and start reading to see what changes
have been made...  Just when I got my 2005 version all marked up and
tabbed too..  :)
Funfly3 - 24 Nov 2005 09:32 GMT
>>I want to take aerial pictures from a couple of hundred or so feet up, in
>>public places. I think for the most part a model heli is not acceptable
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Rent me a helicopter and I'll fly ya wherever you want to go.  :)

Heluim has a lift capacity of 0.064 lb/ft3 so to lift a a 1lb ship and
payload you will need a ship 2.5ft X 2.5ft X 2.5ft so you either need to
think small and light or you are going to need a seroius amount of helium
Adrian Smith - 24 Nov 2005 18:04 GMT
>>>I want to take aerial pictures from a couple of hundred or so feet up, in
>>>public places. I think for the most part a model heli is not acceptable
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> payload you will need a ship 2.5ft X 2.5ft X 2.5ft so you either need to
> think small and light or you are going to need a seroius amount of helium

That ties in with my calculation of 1KG of lift for 1m3 of Helium. We
currently estimate a required lift of approx 3-4 kg including the blimp. So
this means we need over 4m3 of Helium. Furtunately when purchased in large
bottles Helium is not that expensive.

Anyone know of any uk based blimp suplliers?

Signature

Adrian Smith
www.YourStadium.com
Superb aerial pictures of UK football stadiums.

Steve - 25 Nov 2005 22:20 GMT
Has anyone used one of the cameras available from www.blip.au?  For
about $100 they look pretty interesting.

Steve
Smeghead - 27 Nov 2005 04:23 GMT
that should be www.blip.com.au . I have just ordered one, should have it by
Monday. let you know how it goes.

> Has anyone used one of the cameras available from www.blip.au?  For
> about $100 they look pretty interesting.
>
> Steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.