>You sure on that? Sounds like they tightened up the regs then. I learned
>in the late 70's & early 80's. Back then, you had to have a commercial
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>to me for flying the airplane. Who pays for the aircraft rental is, or at
>least was, irrelevant.
>>You sure on that? Sounds like they tightened up the regs then. I learned
>>in the late 70's & early 80's. Back then, you had to have a commercial
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> business or employment and the aircraft doesn't carry passengers for
> compensation or hire.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> A private pilot may not pay less than the pro-rata share of the
> operating expenses of a flight with passengers provided those expenses
> include only fuel, oil, airport fees and/or rental fees.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"THAT" is the part that didn't exist when I learned to fly!! The paragraph
above it did, but not the one I just emphisized. A private pilot could act
as PIC in connection with any business or employment "if" the flight was
"incidental" to that business or employment and the aircraft wasn't carrying
paying passengers.
The part about a private pilot may not "pay less than the pro-rata share of
the operating expenses of a flight" is brand new to me! It also seems to
contradict the paragraph above it. Typical feds BS, isn't it. :-/
Makes me wonder how much else has changed. Thanks for the clarification,
Kevin!
Fly Safe,
Steve R.
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 26 Nov 2005 22:50 GMT
>> A private pilot may for compensation or hire act as PIC in connection
>> with any business or employemnt IF the flight is incidental to that
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>"incidental" to that business or employment and the aircraft wasn't carrying
>paying passengers.
We took about 30 minutes one afternoon to define "incidental" and 8 of
us couldn't come to any sort of agreement on what it really meant. We
decided we'd all be safe and not do anything for compensation until we
got our commercial tickets..
>The part about a private pilot may not "pay less than the pro-rata share of
>the operating expenses of a flight" is brand new to me! It also seems to
>contradict the paragraph above it. Typical feds BS, isn't it. :-/
Equal shares all around. I guess the PP is only paying for HIS
portion of the flight and everyone else is paying for THEIR portion.
Funny how that works, but the PIC takes all the responsibility and
blame if the sh.t hits the fan.
>Makes me wonder how much else has changed. Thanks for the clarification,
>Kevin!
I've got to pick up my 2006 FAR and start reading to see what changes
have been made... Just when I got my 2005 version all marked up and
tabbed too.. :)