> I'm curious why are some people getting or recommending AR6100 receiver
> over AR7000 for DX7 and Trex 450 As far as technical specs go 7000 wins
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> difference in flight, even if only slightly? Is there something else I'm
> missing?
If the weight of the heavier Rx gets rid of the shitty tail heavyness of
most of the electric heli's on the market, then yes, 9.5g is a huge
improvement.
> Price could be one of the reasons but let's ignore that for a moment - if
> they were priced equally would you still get or recommend 61000 for Trex
> 450? If so why? Thanks.
To get the nose heavy enough to make the heli directionally stable.

Signature
Beav
VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 23 Feb 2007 00:02 GMT
>If the weight of the heavier Rx gets rid of the shitty tail heavyness of
>most of the electric heli's on the market, then yes, 9.5g is a huge
>improvement.
All of my 'leccy choppers balance right at the flybar.. Not a tail
heavy one of 'em in the bunch and except for my micro, all the Rxs are
in the rear.
Place your gear carefully and you can get the CG right where it needs
to be. Just keep the high voltage stuff (battery/ESC/Motor wiring)
away from the low voltage stuff when you're running wires and you're
good to go.
Nigel Heather - 23 Feb 2007 17:15 GMT
shitty tail heavyness
No doubt caused by the first piece advised given to anyone who buys a leccy
heli ....
"Get rid of that crappy but really light gyro and replace it with a really
heavy GY401"
Cheers,
Nigel
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 23 Feb 2007 17:50 GMT
>shitty tail heavyness
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>"Get rid of that crappy but really light gyro and replace it with a really
>heavy GY401"
Gy401 on my Trex 450.. S9650 servo too...
Got a 611/9256 on my Trex 600...