Futaba FASST update
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Steve R - 01 Feb 2008 21:01 GMT I just looked at Futaba's web site here in the States and noted that they've updated their information on the effected 2.4 systems, namely the 6EX and 7C radios as well as the TM-7 module. They show potentially effected serial numbers as well as those that should be clean, and they have a list of hobby shops up that are capable of testing for effected units on site without having to send them off to Futaba and being without a radio for however long that will take. I'll be taking the two 6EX's I've got access to in on Monday for testing. It'll be interesting to see how it turns out and I'll let you know what they find.
Have you effected folks in other parts of the world gotten this far? I've not seen much more from the previous thread since whoever it was hijacked it to spread their religious beliefs. Just wondering! :-)
Best of luck to everyone on this! Steve R.
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 04 Feb 2008 17:04 GMT >I just looked at Futaba's web site here in the States and noted that they've >updated their information on the effected 2.4 systems, namely the 6EX and 7C [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >Best of luck to everyone on this! >Steve R. I got to fly a 14MZ with a FASST module in it this past Friday. Nice rig, but nice enough to drop over $1500 on it? I dunno. Didn't seem to do anything my X9303 couldn't. :)
Steve R - 05 Feb 2008 01:38 GMT >>I just looked at Futaba's web site here in the States and noted that >>they've [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > rig, but nice enough to drop over $1500 on it? I dunno. Didn't seem > to do anything my X9303 couldn't. :) I've got the 12Z and recently put a TM-14 FASST module in it. I love this radio and wouldn't trade it for anything. The 12Z is basically a 14MZ without all the bells and whistles, stuff like a color touch screen, the ability to play MP3 files through a head set, display a picture of your model on the screen, etc. The important part, the flight programming, is totally compatible as far as I've been able to tell with the exception that the 14MZ will allow model names up to 32 characters and the 12Z limits you to eight.
As for comparing the 14MZ, or the 12Z for that matter, to a radio like the X9303, there is no comparison "IF" you need and use the features offered. If course, if you don't, it makes little difference. All of the radio systems mentioned here are fine radios that will work well for everyone from beginner to hard core 3D flying. As for paying $1,500 for a 14MZ? If you can find one for that price, jump on it. By flying buddy has the 14 and I'm not totally sure but I think he paid around $1,500 for his but he's also a field rep for Futaba and got a break on the price. For us average Joe's like me, the best price I've ever found to date was more like $2,100, most are $2,200. I paid $1,300 for my synthesized 9Z back in 1995 and swallowed hard to do that. I'd pay $1,500 for the 14MZ in a heart beat today but over $2000 is just too much. I paid $1,300 for my 12Z and was quite happy with that especially since I found out the main differences between the 14 and the 12 is primarily glitz.
Back to the original topic of this post, I was just wondering how things were going for the rest of the world in weeding out the effected 6EX, 7C, and TM-7 modules. I took our two 6EX's into the local shop here in Houston that was setup to check for effected radios and am happy to report that we're clean. :-D It's a dirt simply test. All Futaba did was send them a 7ch FASST receiver that's programmed to the "00000000 etc." code. You power up the receiver, turn on your radio, and if you get a solid green light, you're toast and need to send your transmitter back to Futaba. If you get a flashing green light, like I did, you're safe and can go fly with no worries. Needless to say, I'm happy! Total time to test two radios? About 20 seconds! It's well worth the peace of mind.
Fly Safe, Steve R.
The OTHER Kevin in San Diego - 05 Feb 2008 19:49 GMT >As for comparing the 14MZ, or the 12Z for that matter, to a radio like the >X9303, there is no comparison "IF" you need and use the features offered. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >that especially since I found out the main differences between the 14 and >the 12 is primarily glitz. I have a buddy who has 2 14MZs and I've told him when he's ready to sell one of 'em, I want 1st crack at it. :)
>Back to the original topic of this post, I was just wondering how things >were going for the rest of the world in weeding out the effected 6EX, 7C, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >worries. Needless to say, I'm happy! Total time to test two radios? About >20 seconds! It's well worth the peace of mind. Glad Futaba is jumping all over this..
Steve R - 05 Feb 2008 23:49 GMT >>Back to the original topic of this post, I was just wondering how things >>were going for the rest of the world in weeding out the effected 6EX, 7C, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Glad Futaba is jumping all over this.. Me too! I'm very impressed with how Futaba is handling all of this. Too often is seems like all we get as comsumers is a bunch of excuses and/or attempts to blame "us" for "their" screw ups. Futaba is admitting their mistake and taking what certainly looks to me to be a healthy proactive response to correct the problem. It definitely justifies my loyalty toward them!
Fly Safe, Steve R.
terry - 07 Jun 2008 16:10 GMT > I just looked at Futaba's web site here in the States and noted that they've > updated their information on the effected 2.4 systems, namely the 6EX and 7C [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Best of luck to everyone on this! > Steve R. I have a futaba 6ex fasst and havent heard anything about faults mines fine Im in australia
just thort Id let u knoow
:-] Steve R. - 08 Jun 2008 04:48 GMT >> I just looked at Futaba's web site here in the States and noted that >> they've [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > :-] Thanks Terry! We've got a couple of 6EX's that were tested and passed with flying colors. My personal radio is a Futaba 12Z which I've converted to 2.4 and it's been great but the TM14 modules that I plugged into it weren't included in the list of effected systems. I haven't heard much on this subject for some time so I'd guess that Futaba's got most of it taken care of by now.
Fly Safe Down Under! :-) Steve R..
Doug McLaren - 12 Jun 2008 20:33 GMT | I have a futaba 6ex fasst and havent heard anything about faults mines | fine Im in australia That doesn't prove it's fine.
The problem is that under some conditions, the unique ID of the TX can be set to 0, making it no longer unique. If you bind your TX to it, it'll work fine, BUT if anybody else also has the same problem and also has unique ID 0, they'll interfere.
The problem is also that `some conditions' basically means turning it on, and then turning it off after the right (short) amount of time. So a TX that's good today might be bad tomorrow. The problem seems to be that as part of the initialization, the configuration is re-written, and if it loses power in the middle of this, things can be reset. This seemed to happen at the factory during testing mostly, but it could happen during normal usage too.
I don't know what they did to fix this. (It's easy enough to reset the unique ID, but I don't know what they did to prevent it from happening again.) In any event, if your RX works fine one day, but then stops working the next day until you rebind it, then that would be the sort of thing I'd expect to happen when this problem manifests.
 Signature Doug McLaren, dougmc@frenzied.us Two wrongs don't make a right. It usually takes three or four.
Steve R. - 13 Jun 2008 02:26 GMT > | I have a futaba 6ex fasst and havent heard anything about faults mines > | fine Im in australia > > That doesn't prove it's fine. True, the radio needs to be tested at a hobby shop or authorized repair center. The hobby center that tested ours was simply sent a receiver that was bound to the default ID codes. If it would respond to our transmitter, then our transmitter was bad. If not, it's OK! Fortunatly, neither one of ours was effected and both have been working without incident for almost a year now.
> The problem is that under some conditions, the unique ID of the TX can > be set to 0, making it no longer unique. If you bind your TX to it, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > then stops working the next day until you rebind it, then that would > be the sort of thing I'd expect to happen when this problem manifests. I've always had a problem with those who say they can "quickly and deliberately" cycle the power switch on and off multiple times and cause the transmitter ID codes to reset. Futaba's operations manuals "specifically" warns "against" doing that. If you operate the transmitter according to the directions, you won't have any problems. The time frame that Futaba recommends waiting before cycling the on/off switch in the opposite direction is no more than a couple of seconds at most. This shouldn't be a problem for anyone. Futaba's service bulletin, on their web site, also states that the receiver should not loose bind with the transmitter under normal usage. If this happens, don't rebind and fly the system. Send it in immediately to be repaired as it is NOT normal behavior.
Whether or not Futaba has made any changes in the systems to prevent an operator from inducing this issue deliberately, I don't know. I do personally believe that their response, overall, has been first class. I know there are people out there that don't agree with that but as they say, you can't please everyone, all the time! :-)
FWIW & Fly Safe, Steve R.
|
|
|